Facebook Instagram Twitter Youtube
    Latest

    Metaverse

    Home Metaverse Page 32

    Anthropic Releases Claude Code Security: An AI Tool For Scanning Codebases And Delivering Targeted Vulnerability Fixes

    By
    Metaverse Fashion Week Online
    -
    0
    Anthropic Releases Claude Code Security: An AI Tool For Scanning Codebases And Delivering Targeted Vulnerability Fixes


    by
    Alisa Davidson

    Published: February 23, 2026 at 2:02 am Updated: February 23, 2026 at 2:02 am

    by Ana

    Edited and fact-checked:
    February 23, 2026 at 2:02 am

    In Brief

    Anthropic has introduced Claude Code Security, an AI‑driven system that identifies complex software vulnerabilities and recommends human‑reviewed fixes to strengthen defensive cybersecurity.

    Anthropic Releases Claude Code Security: An AI Tool For Scanning Codebases And Delivering Targeted Vulnerability Fixes

    AI safety and research company Anthropic announced that it has released Claude Code Security, a new capability built into Claude Code on the web, now available in a limited research preview. The tool is designed to scan software codebases for security vulnerabilities and propose targeted patches for human review, aiming to help teams identify issues that traditional methods often overlook.

    Security teams continue to face a widening gap between the volume of software vulnerabilities and the number of specialists available to address them. Conventional static analysis tools typically rely on rule‑based pattern matching, which can detect common problems but often fails to surface complex, context‑dependent flaws. These weaknesses frequently require expert human researchers, who are already contending with growing backlogs.

    Anthropic reports that recent internal testing has shown Claude capable of identifying novel, high‑severity vulnerabilities. The company acknowledges that such capabilities could be used by both defenders and attackers, and says Claude Code Security is intended to ensure these tools are deployed in support of defensive efforts. The preview is being offered to Enterprise and Team customers, with accelerated access for open‑source maintainers.

    Claude Code Security Uses Behavioral Reasoning To Uncover Complex Software Vulnerabilities

    Claude Code Security analyzes code by reasoning about program behavior rather than searching for predefined patterns. It examines how components interact, traces data flows, and highlights vulnerabilities that rule‑based tools may miss. Each finding undergoes a multi‑stage verification process in which Claude attempts to confirm or refute its own assessment, reducing false positives. Results are assigned severity ratings and delivered through a dashboard where analysts can review findings, inspect suggested patches, and approve fixes. The system provides confidence ratings for each issue, and no changes are applied without human authorization.

    The new capability builds on more than a year of research into Claude’s cybersecurity performance. Anthropic’s Frontier Red Team has tested the model in competitive Capture‑the‑Flag environments, collaborated with Pacific Northwest National Laboratory on AI‑assisted defense of critical infrastructure, and refined Claude’s ability to detect and patch real‑world vulnerabilities. Using Claude Opus 4.6, released earlier this month, the team identified more than 500 vulnerabilities in production open‑source codebases, including issues that had gone unnoticed for decades. Anthropic says it is currently working with maintainers on triage and responsible disclosure.

    The company describes this period as a pivotal moment for cybersecurity, anticipating that a large share of global code will soon be scanned by AI systems. While attackers are expected to use AI to accelerate vulnerability discovery, Anthropic argues that defenders who adopt similar tools can identify and patch weaknesses before they are exploited. Claude Code Security is positioned as part of a broader effort to raise security standards across the industry.

    Disclaimer

    In line with the Trust Project guidelines, please note that the information provided on this page is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as legal, tax, investment, financial, or any other form of advice. It is important to only invest what you can afford to lose and to seek independent financial advice if you have any doubts. For further information, we suggest referring to the terms and conditions as well as the help and support pages provided by the issuer or advertiser. MetaversePost is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice.

    About The Author

    Alisa, a dedicated journalist at the MPost, specializes in cryptocurrency, zero-knowledge proofs, investments, and the expansive realm of Web3. With a keen eye for emerging trends and technologies, she delivers comprehensive coverage to inform and engage readers in the ever-evolving landscape of digital finance.

    More articles

    Alisa, a dedicated journalist at the MPost, specializes in cryptocurrency, zero-knowledge proofs, investments, and the expansive realm of Web3. With a keen eye for emerging trends and technologies, she delivers comprehensive coverage to inform and engage readers in the ever-evolving landscape of digital finance.

    More articles





    Source link

    Vitalik Buterin Explains Why Crypto Security Can Never Be Perfect

    By
    Metaverse Fashion Week Online
    -
    0
    Vitalik Buterin Explains Why Crypto Security Can Never Be Perfect


    Key Highlights

    Vitalik Buterin emphasizes the importance of aligning crypto systems with user intent.

    Redundancy and multiple verification layers reduce risk in transactions and smart contracts.

    Tools like LLMs and transaction simulations can help approximate intent, but perfect security is impossible.

    Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin recently shared his thoughts on X about how security and user intent are connected in digital systems. He explained that security is not a separate feature but part of the broader goal of making the system behave according to what the user actually intends.

    Security and User Experience are Closely Linked

    Buterin said that both security and user experience can be seen as ways to make the system reflect the user’s intentions. Security, though, is especially concerned with rare situations where mistakes can have serious consequences, often caused by malicious actions.

    “Perfect security is impossible,” Buterin wrote, explaining that the difficulty isn’t because machines or people are flawed, but because user intent is complicated, and even users don’t fully understand or express it clearly.

    He illustrated this with a simple Ethereum transaction: a user may intend to “send 1 ETH to Bob,” but defining “Bob” mathematically—using a public key—does not guarantee it actually represents the intended recipient. Other factors, such as contentious chain forks, further complicate matters. In reality, the user relies on a sense of “common sense,” which cannot be fully captured by code.

    Complex Goals Make Security Harder

    Buterin explained that more intricate objectives, like preserving privacy, make security even harder. Encrypting messages protects content, but metadata such as communication patterns and timing can still leak sensitive information. 

    He pointed out that what constitutes a trivial versus catastrophic privacy loss is not always clear and depends on context.

    He compared this challenge to early AI safety discussions, where defining goals precisely has always been one of the most difficult problems.

    Redundancy: A Core Principle of Security

    According to Buterin, the foundation of strong security is redundancy. Users specify what they want in several overlapping ways, and the system only moves forward when all of these checks are consistent.

    He offered several examples to illustrate this:

    Type systems in programming make sure that code runs as expected and that data is structured correctly, catching mistakes before the program executes.

    Formal verification checks the code against mathematical rules to confirm it behaves correctly.

    Transaction simulations allow users to see what will happen before they approve an action.

    Multisignature wallets and social recovery require multiple keys to approve important operations.

    Spending limits and new-address confirmations make users review actions that are unusual or carry a higher risk.

    In all these cases, the aim isn’t perfection. It’s about reducing risk by checking the user’s intent from multiple angles.

    Large Language Models and Security

    Buterin also discussed the potential role of large language models (LLMs) in security. He described LLMs as a “simulation of intent.” A general-purpose model mirrors broad human common sense, while a model fine-tuned to an individual user can approximate that person’s judgment more closely.

    He also warned that LLMs should never be the only way to determine what a user intends. They should be used as an extra layer, alongside traditional methods, to help confirm user intent.

    Balancing Risk and Convenience

    Buterin pointed out that good security doesn’t mean making users go through endless steps for every action. Routine, low-risk tasks should be easy—or even automated—while actions that carry more risk should require extra checks and confirmation. “Getting this balance right is the challenge,” he wrote.

    Trader Question Sparks Discussion

    A trader responded, highlighting a limitation of redundancy: “Redundancy only protects against mechanical error, not mistaken intent. A user can confirm, re-confirm, multisig… and still be wrong about what they’re doing. So is better security about modeling intent more accurately, or about strictly bounding downside regardless of intent?”

    Buterin replied: “Strictly bounding downside regardless of intent is not possible. That implies freezing your money forever, which itself is the ultimate downside.”

    Conclusion

    Vitalik Buterin’s points show that crypto security isn’t only about avoiding technical mistakes. It’s about building systems that can understand what users really want in several different ways, so risks are reduced without making the system hard to use. Using methods like redundancy, running transaction previews, or tools such as LLMs can help the system understand what a user is trying to do. Still, none of these can make it perfect. 

    At the end of the day, security is about balancing letting people act freely with keeping them safe. Freezing someone’s money forever would be the worst-case scenario.

    Also Read: Vitalik Buterin Explains How AI Could Revolutionize Governance

    Disclaimer: The information researched and reported by The Crypto Times is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional financial advice. Investing in crypto assets involves significant risk due to market volatility. Always Do Your Own Research (DYOR) and consult with a qualified Financial Advisor before making any investment decisions.



    Source link

    Dangerous Prints: What You Should Never 3D Print at Home | Metaverse Planet

    By
    Metaverse Fashion Week Online
    -
    0
    Dangerous Prints: What You Should Never 3D Print at Home | Metaverse Planet


    I’ll be the first to admit it: the first time I got my hands on a 3D printer, I felt like a god. Being able to hit “print” and watch a physical object manifest out of thin air is a geek’s ultimate dream. I started printing everything—cable organizers, tiny Grogu figures, even a replacement knob for my washing machine. But as I went deeper down the rabbit hole of filament types and layer heights, I realized something chilling.

    Just because we can print something doesn’t mean we should.

    I’ve seen a lot of “life hacks” on social media lately showing off 3D-printed kitchenware or even DIY safety gear. As someone who loves this tech, I have to step in and be the voice of reason here. Some of these projects aren’t just cool DIYs; they are legitimate safety hazards. Let’s talk about the “dark side” of 3D printing and the things I would never let near my body or my home.

    The Bacteria Hotel: Why Your 3D Printed Mug is a Biohazard

    I get the appeal. You want a custom mug with your favorite logo on it. But here’s the reality I discovered: 3D prints are inherently porous. Even if you’re using the highest quality FDM (Fused Deposition Modeling) printer, the way these objects are built—layer by layer—creates microscopic ridges and valleys. To our eyes, it looks solid. To a colony of bacteria, it’s a five-star luxury resort with infinite hiding spots.

    The Problem with “Food Safe” Filaments

    The Micro-Canyons: No matter how much you scrub or put that printed spoon in the dishwasher, you cannot reach the bacteria trapped between the layers.Chemical Leaching: Most filaments like standard PLA or ABS contain dyes, flame retardants, and other additives that were never meant to be ingested. When these plastics meet hot coffee or acidic orange juice, they can leak toxic chemicals directly into your drink.The Lead Factor: I often forget that most 3D printer nozzles are made of brass, which frequently contains small amounts of lead. As the filament passes through the hot nozzle, it can pick up trace amounts of heavy metals.

    I’ve seen people try to “seal” their prints with food-grade epoxy. While that’s a step in the right direction, if the coating chips—which it eventually will—you’re back to square one, but now with added epoxy flakes in your soup. My advice? Print the cool mug, put it on your shelf, and keep using your ceramic one for coffee.

    The “Safety” Illusion: Why Your Printed Helmet Won’t Save You

    This one actually scares me. I’ve seen people online sharing files for 3D-printed bike helmets, shin guards, or even tactical gear. I understand the “Iron Man” fantasy, but using home-printed gear for actual protection is a recipe for disaster.

    In the engineering world, we talk about anisotropy. Standard manufactured plastics (like injection-molded helmets) have the same strength in every direction. 3D prints do not. A 3D-printed object is only as strong as the bond between its layers.

    Why It Fails Under Pressure:

    Sheer Force: If you hit the ground while wearing a 3D-printed helmet, the impact doesn’t get absorbed. Instead, the layers “delaminate.” The helmet effectively shatters along the print lines.Shrapnel Risk: Unlike professional safety foam that compresses, hard 3D-printed plastic (like PETG or ABS) can break into sharp, jagged shards. Imagine falling to protect your head, only to have a plastic spike from your DIY helmet driven into your temple.Heat Deformation: I once left a printed part in my car on a summer day, and it turned into a puddle of goo. Do you really want to trust your life to a material that loses its structural integrity just because the sun came out?

    If it’s meant to protect your brain, your eyes, or your limbs, buy it from a company that has a multi-million dollar testing lab. Your Ender 3 is great, but it’s not a safety certifications lab.

    Structural Integrity: When 3D Printed Furniture Fails

    I love the “minimalist” aesthetic of 3D-printed furniture. A sleek, geometric stool or a wall-mounted shelf looks amazing in a tech-heavy setup. But here’s something I learned the hard way: plastics under constant load behave strangely.

    There is a phenomenon called “Creep.” Over time, a plastic part under constant stress will slowly deform. You might print a shelf that holds your books perfectly today, but six months from now, you’ll notice it sagging. One day, the internal stress becomes too much, and boom—your expensive collectibles are all over the floor.

    The Risks of Load-Bearing Prints:

    Infill Deception: A print might look solid, but it’s usually mostly air (infill). If the internal structure isn’t designed with complex stress-path mathematics, it will collapse when you least expect it.Temperature Sensitivity: If you print a chair out of PLA and sit on it in a warm room, the plastic becomes slightly more “pliant.” That’s when the joints snap.

    I stick to printing decorative items. If you want to print a shelf, use it for your 3D-printed figures, not your heavy encyclopedias. And for the love of all things tech, don’t print a baby crib or a ladder.

    The Legal and Ethical Red Lines

    I can’t talk about the “dark side” without mentioning the two biggest “No-Go” zones: Medical Devices and Firearms.

    Medical DIY is Dangerous

    I’ve seen stories of people printing their own dental aligners or finger splints. While it sounds like a way to stick it to expensive healthcare costs, it’s incredibly risky.

    Skin Toxicity: Prolonged contact with certain filaments can cause severe allergic reactions or chemical burns.Non-Sterile: You can’t properly sterilize a home print. If you’re using a DIY splint on an open wound, you’re basically inviting an infection to dinner.

    The “Ghost Gun” Problem

    Then there’s the issue of firearms. Not only is this a massive legal nightmare in almost every country, but it’s also a physical danger to the user. Home-grade plastics are not designed to handle the explosive pressure of a bullet firing. I’ve seen enough “test fire” videos where the 3D-printed frame explodes in the user’s hand to know that this is a hobby with no winners. Plus, as a tech brand, we stay away from anything that skirts the law. It’s just not worth it.

    My Honest Takeaway

    I’m not trying to be a “Negative Nancy” here. I love my 3D printers. They are the closest thing we have to Star Trek replicators. But being a part of the Metaverse Planet community means being a smart, responsible creator.

    Use your printer to innovate, to decorate, and to solve small problems. Fix that broken plastic clip on your dishwasher (the non-food contact part!), make a custom stand for your VR headset, or build a complex mechanical clock. Those are the projects where this technology shines.

    But when it comes to things you eat off of, things that protect your body, or things that carry heavy loads—stick to the pros. Your health is worth more than the $20 you’d save on a DIY version.

    You Might Also Like;



    Source link

    Space Travel Rewires Your Skull: How Zero-G Physically Moves Your Brain | Metaverse Planet

    By
    Metaverse Fashion Week Online
    -
    0
    Space Travel Rewires Your Skull: How Zero-G Physically Moves Your Brain | Metaverse Planet


    I have always looked up at the stars and dreamed of being an astronaut. The idea of floating in the International Space Station (ISS), looking down at our blue marble, is the ultimate fantasy for tech lovers like us.

    But lately, the more I read about the physiological effects of leaving Earth, the more I realize that space is actively trying to rewrite our biology.

    We already knew about muscle atrophy and bone density loss. We knew about the radiation risks. But a new study I’ve been diving into has revealed something even more startling: Space travel literally pushes your brain upward and backward inside your skull.

    And the longer you stay up there, the more drastic the shift becomes. Let’s break down what is happening to our anatomy when gravity decides to take a vacation.

    The “Puffy Face” and the Floating Brain

    If you follow space missions, you’ve probably noticed that astronauts often look a bit different when they are in orbit. Their faces look rounder, almost swollen. NASA calls this the “fluid shift,” but astronauts jokingly call it the “Charlie Brown phase.”

    Here on Earth, gravity is our constant anchor. It pulls our blood, water, and organs toward our feet. Your heart has to work against gravity to pump blood up to your head.

    In Microgravity, that anchor is gone.

    Without gravity pulling fluids down, they rush toward the head. This causes the facial puffiness, but it also increases pressure inside the skull.

    On Earth: Your brain sits comfortably on a cushion of cerebrospinal fluid.In Space: That cushion changes. The brain is no longer “sitting”; it is floating freely, and the fluids are pushing it around.

    The New Discovery: It’s Not Just Fluids

    Previous studies hinted that the brain changes position, but they treated the brain as one big, solid block. A new research paper, however, took a much more granular approach.

    Researchers analyzed the MRI scans of 26 astronauts. They compared scans taken before they launched with scans taken immediately after they returned to Earth. Instead of looking at the brain as a whole, they divided it into 100 different regions to track specific movements.

    Here is what they found: The brain doesn’t just swell; it physically migrates.

    The Upward Shift: The brain pushes up against the top of the skull.The Backward Shift: It slides toward the rear of the skull.The Squeeze: This movement compresses the veins and cerebrospinal fluid pathways at the top of the head.

    The 2 Millimeter Warning

    You might be thinking, “Ugu, how much can a brain really move?”

    The study found shifts of roughly 2 millimeters. In the context of driving a car, 2mm is nothing. But inside the tight, bony enclosure of your skull? 2 millimeters is massive.

    Think of your skull as a perfectly packed suitcase. If you suddenly shove the contents 2mm in one direction, something is going to get squished. The research showed that the areas most affected were those responsible for motor control and sensory input.

    This might explain why astronauts often feel clumsy or disoriented when they first return to gravity. Their brain has literally been in the wrong place.

    Duration Matters: The Mars Problem

    Here is the part that concerns me regarding our future ambitions for Mars. The study found a direct correlation between the length of the mission and the severity of the shift.

    Short missions (a few weeks): Minimal shifting.Long missions (6 months to 1 year): Significant upward and backward movement.The Mars Mission (3 years): Unknown territory.

    If the brain continues to shift and compress over a three-year journey to the Red Planet, we don’t yet know what the neurological consequences could be. Will astronauts arrive on Mars with impaired motor functions right when they need to be their sharpest?

    The Recovery: The “Backward” Shift Lingers

    The most fascinating part of this research is what happens after the astronauts come home. The researchers followed up with scans six months after the return.

    The Good News: The “upward” shift mostly corrects itself. Gravity does its job, pulling the brain back down to its original seat.

    The Bad News: The “backward” shift is stubborn. Even after six months on Earth, the brain hadn’t fully returned to its forward position.

    Why? Think about physics. Gravity pulls things down, not forward. While Earth’s gravity helps pull the brain away from the top of the skull, there is no natural force pushing the brain back toward the forehead. This suggests that space travel leaves a lasting “fingerprint” on the brain’s anatomy that might take years to fully reverse—or it might be permanent.

    My Perspective: Is It Dangerous?

    I don’t want to be an alarmist. The researchers explicitly stated that, right now, these shifts do not seem to cause severe brain damage or cognitive decline. The human body is miraculously adaptable (neuroplasticity is a beautiful thing).

    However, this changes the game for space tourism and professional exploration.

    For Tourists: If you are just going up for a sub-orbital hop or a week-long stay at a space hotel, you are probably fine.For Career Astronauts: This is a new occupational hazard that needs to be monitored.

    As we push the boundaries of where humans can go, we are learning that our bodies are strictly “Earth-designed” machines. Overcoming gravity is an engineering challenge; overcoming our own biology might be the harder test.

    I’m curious—knowing that your brain physically moves and changes shape, would you still volunteer for a one-way trip to Mars, or does this kind of physiological risk make you want to stay firmly on Earth?

    Let’s discuss in the comments below!

    You Might Also Like;



    Source link

    Pakistan Moves Toward Crypto Regulation With New Sandbox

    By
    Metaverse Fashion Week Online
    -
    0
    Pakistan Moves Toward Crypto Regulation With New Sandbox


    Key Highlights

    The sandbox is designed to allow firms to test products in real-world conditions while remaining under regulatory oversight.

    It lets regulators evaluate consumer protections, operational procedures, and compliance.

    Pakistan has taken another step toward managing digital assets by launching a regulatory sandbox that will allow companies to test crypto-related products under supervision.

    The Pakistan Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (PVARA) introduced the framework on February 20, 2026. The sandbox aims to provide a controlled setting where companies can trial virtual asset services before seeking full regulatory approval.

    Regulated testing for crypto services

    The sandbox is designed to allow firms to test products in real-world conditions while remaining under regulatory oversight. Authorities say the approach will help identify operational and compliance risks before wider deployment.

    According to PVARA, the program will prioritize several areas:

    Tokenization of real-world assets

    Stablecoin issuance and payment systems

    Cross-border remittance services

    Fiat-to-crypto and crypto-to-fiat infrastructure

    Regulators say the supervised model is intended to balance experimentation with risk monitoring, allowing authorities to observe how new services operate in practice.

    What a regulatory sandbox means

    According to the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP), a regulatory sandbox provides a controlled setting where innovative financial products and services can be tested for a limited period.

    Such programs allow regulators to evaluate whether new technologies can operate safely and whether existing rules need to be adjusted. The approach is often used to assess risks before allowing full-scale deployment.

    Growing expansion

    Meanwhile, Pakistan has previously explored partnerships for stablecoin-based payment systems. The country made a deal with an affiliate of World Liberty Financial (WLFI). The collaboration was aimed at allowing WLFI’s stablecoin USD1 to interact with the country’s digital currency ecosystem.

    Shift toward formal rules

    The sandbox is part of a larger effort by Pakistani authorities to create rules for digital assets. Instead of prohibiting crypto activity completely, policymakers have shown increasing support for a regulated framework.

    Officials say the aim is to improve oversight while allowing some innovation within defined boundaries. The sandbox model lets regulators evaluate consumer protections, operational procedures, and compliance before giving full approval.

    Why it matters

    The sandbox marks a change in how Pakistan regulates digital assets. Instead of just restricting crypto activities, authorities are now aiming to create a framework that includes oversight and some experimentation.

    Officials believe the testing phase would help refine future rules by identifying operational challenges and highlighting the need for consumer protection.

    Also Read: Antier Launches VARA-Compliant Crypto Exchange Platform in the UAE

    Disclaimer: The information researched and reported by The Crypto Times is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional financial advice. Investing in crypto assets involves significant risk due to market volatility. Always Do Your Own Research (DYOR) and consult with a qualified Financial Advisor before making any investment decisions.



    Source link

    PayPal Shares Down 30% Since Launch of PYUSD Stablecoin

    By
    Metaverse Fashion Week Online
    -
    0
    PayPal Shares Down 30% Since Launch of PYUSD Stablecoin


    Key Highlights

    PayPal launched PYUSD in August 2023, but the stock has remained weak even as the stablecoin expanded its use cases.

    PYPL closed near $41.65 on Feb. 20, with shares down sharply over the past year and nearly 29% YTD, per market data.

    Investors are still pricing in broader PayPal turnaround risks, including weak outlook concerns and management turbulence.

    PayPal Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: PYPL) shares remained under pressure for over a year, with PYPL trading around $41.65 on Feb. 20, 2026, according to market data. The weakness stands out because it comes during PayPal’s biggest crypto product push in years.

    At that time, PYPL was trading at $60, making a 30% drop since the company launched its stablecoin.

    At the time of writing, the stock was down 46.35% from its 52-week high and 28.66% year-to-date, while PayPal’s investor relations data reflected the stock trading in the low-$40 range in recent sessions.

    PYUSD launch and expansion 

    PayPal introduced PayPal USD (PYUSD) in August 2023 as a U.S. dollar-backed stablecoin designed for payments and transfers, issued by Paxos and backed by dollar deposits, short-term U.S. Treasuries, and similar cash equivalents.

    The launch was widely seen as a major step for crypto adoption in mainstream fintech, with PayPal becoming one of the first large payment firms to issue its own stablecoin.

    Since then, PayPal has continued to expand the product rather than treat it as a one-time announcement. The company later rolled out PYUSD support on Arbitrum to improve speed and lower costs, and it also announced plans to bring PYUSD to Stellar, subject to regulatory approval. 

    These moves gave PYUSD a clearer multi-chain payments narrative and strengthened PayPal’s long-term crypto positioning.

    Why investors still haven’t re-rated PYPL

    Despite these developments, the stock market has largely treated that progress as secondary.

    Instead of re-rating PayPal on its crypto strategy, investors have stayed focused on the company’s core business performance, particularly checkout growth, margins, and execution. In recent months, PYPL has continued to trade well below levels seen before and around the PYUSD launch period, reinforcing the view that product innovation alone is not enough to shift sentiment.

    This disconnect became even more visible after PayPal’s recent results and forward guidance disappointed markets. The selloff following weak outlook commentary and leadership changes added to pressure on the stock. It also highlighted the main issue for investors: PayPal’s crypto push may be strategically important, but Wall Street still wants stronger evidence of core-business momentum.

    A social media post circulating this week captured that gap by tying PayPal’s past “shock the world” messaging to the stock’s decline during the PYUSD era. While the post is commentary, the broader takeaway reflects current market sentiment. PayPal’s stablecoin strategy has advanced, but the stock remains tied to execution in its main payments business.

    Why it matters

    PayPal’s PYUSD rollout remains one of the clearest examples of a mainstream fintech adopting stablecoin infrastructure at scale. But the company’s share-price performance shows a key market lesson: crypto product expansion can strengthen long-term positioning without immediately improving the stock narrative.

    For investors, the question is no longer whether PayPal can build in crypto. It is whether those products can eventually drive revenue growth, user activity, and profitability in a way that changes how the market values PYPL.

    Also Read: Strategy Shares Surge 26% as Bitcoin Rebounds to $70K

    Disclaimer: The information researched and reported by The Crypto Times is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional financial advice. Investing in crypto assets involves significant risk due to market volatility. Always Do Your Own Research (DYOR) and consult with a qualified Financial Advisor before making any investment decisions.





    Source link

    Is the Future of Public Transit Tiny Pods? Atlanta Says Yes | Metaverse Planet

    By
    Metaverse Fashion Week Online
    -
    0
    Is the Future of Public Transit Tiny Pods? Atlanta Says Yes | Metaverse Planet


    I have always been fascinated by the gap between the sci-fi future we were promised and the traffic-jammed reality we live in. We were supposed to have teleportation devices or flying cars by now; instead, we have slightly better electric scooters. But reading about what’s happening in Atlanta right now gave me a genuine pause. We might finally be seeing a shift in how we move through cities, and it doesn’t involve flying—it involves shrinking.

    Atlanta is officially breaking ground on a futuristic, autonomous public transit system that uses small “pods” instead of massive trains or buses. It’s called an Automated Transit Network (ATN), and honestly, it looks like something straight out of a concept art book for a solarpunk city.

    Here is why I think this pilot project by Glydways matters more than just another tech headline.

    The Pilot: Small Steps for a Giant Leap

    Let’s get the specs out of the way first. I know, “800 meters” sounds incredibly short. It’s basically a long walk. But in the world of infrastructure, this is how revolutions start—quietly and in controlled environments.

    The project is launching in South Metro Atlanta, connecting the ATL SkyTrain to the Gateway Center Arena. The plan is to have this up and running as a free public service by December 2026.

    Why this specific spot? It’s smart engineering.

    Controlled Environment: It connects a transit hub, an arena entrance, and a parking lot.Predictable Demand: They know exactly when people need rides (game days, flight arrivals).Low Risk: If it glitches, it doesn’t paralyze the whole city center.

    Not Just a Fancy Bus

    When I first looked at the Glydways concept, I asked myself, “Why not just use an autonomous shuttle bus?” But the engineering logic here is actually quite brilliant.

    The system uses dedicated guideways that are only about 2 meters wide. Think about that for a second. A standard train track or bus lane eats up a massive amount of real estate. These pods can squeeze into narrow corridors, bike-lane-sized gaps, or elevated paths that wouldn’t support a heavy rail line.

    Here is what makes it different from a subway:

    On-Demand: You don’t wait for the 5:15 PM train. You summon a pod, it arrives, and you go.Non-Stop: Since it’s a dedicated network, the pod doesn’t stop at every station to let people off. It takes you directly to your destination.24/7 Operation: Powered by AI, these electric pods don’t need sleep or shift changes.

    The “Magic” Numbers: Capacity and Cost

    This is the part that made me raise an eyebrow—in a good way. Usually, “Personal Rapid Transit” (PRT) is criticized for having low capacity. You can’t move a million people in 4-seater cars, right?

    Glydways claims their system, when scaled up, can move 10,000 passengers per hour. That puts it in the same weight class as light rail systems, which is staggering if true.

    The Economic Argument: I’ve written enough about failed transit projects to know that money kills innovation faster than physics does. Glydways is claiming they can build this with:

    Lower Infrastructure Costs: No heavy rails, no massive tunnels.Zero Subsidies: They believe the operational costs (thanks to electric drive and AI) are so low that ticket prices can match bus fares without the government needing to bail them out every year.

    If they can actually pull off a “profitable public transit system” without charging luxury prices, that is the real disruption here.

    A Global Movement

    While Atlanta is the testing ground, this isn’t an isolated experiment. While researching this, I noticed Glydways isn’t just talking to Georgia.

    Abu Dhabi & Dubai: They have signed agreements with the Roads and Transport Authority and investment offices in the UAE. (And we know the UAE loves being first with transport tech).USA & Beyond: Discussions are happening with San Jose, New York, and Tokyo.

    This tells me that city planners around the world are realizing that building more 10-lane highways or digging billion-dollar subway tunnels isn’t sustainable anymore. We need something lighter, faster, and smarter.

    My Take: The End of the “Last Mile” Problem?

    I view this Atlanta pilot as the ultimate test for the “Last Mile” problem. We have great trains that get you near your house, but not to your house. If systems like this can act as the veins connecting to the arteries of heavy rail, we might finally ditch our cars.

    However, the skepticism remains. Will the AI handle a sudden surge of 15,000 angry sports fans leaving an arena simultaneously without creating a “pod traffic jam”? That is what the MARTA-led feasibility study will have to prove.

    But for now, I’m optimistic. It’s refreshing to see a transit solution that respects the passenger’s time (on-demand) and the city’s space (narrow lanes).

    I’d love to know what you think: Would you feel comfortable riding in a small, windowless autonomous pod alone, or do you prefer the safety in numbers of a traditional bus or train?

    You Might Also Like;



    Source link

    Coinbase Faces Solana Transaction Delays Amid Technical Issues

    By
    Metaverse Fashion Week Online
    -
    0
    Coinbase Faces Solana Transaction Delays Amid Technical Issues


    Key Highlights

    Some Coinbase users are experiencing delays sending or receiving Solana transactions.

    Other services like buying, selling, and fiat deposits/withdrawals are not affected.

    Similar delays happened in January 2026 after Trump and Melania launched memecoins.

    Coinbase, a U.S.-based crypto exchange, reported technical issues on Friday that caused delays in sending and receiving SOL and SPL tokens on the Solana network.

    The issue was first identified at 10:37 PST. However, a quick fix was immediately implemented by 11:17 PST, but the team confirmed that they are monitoring the system to ensure full recovery.

    Coinbase’s update on the delay | Source: Coinbase

    “We are aware that some users may be experiencing delayed sends and receives on the Solana network. Buys, Sells, and Fiat withdrawals/deposits remain unaffected. We are working on this issue and will provide updates as the situation changes. Rest assured your funds are safe,” the team said. However, the exchange did not disclose the cause of the issue.

    Recent transaction delay on the platform

    This is one of many recent technical issues that have happened lately. On February 13, Coinbase reported a separate issue that briefly disrupted customers trying to buy, sell, or trade assets on the platform. 

    That incident lasted roughly 40 minutes, and Coinbase also confirmed that all users’ funds were protected. According to a previous report, the issue occurred on the night of February 12-13, which prompted the exchange to look into it immediately.

    The delay was first reported at 11:14 PM, when the team posted on X saying, “Our team is investigating this issue and will provide an update. Your funds are safe.” By 12:19 AM on February 13, Coinbase announced that it had deployed a fix and that the situation was being monitored.

    Similar Solana delays in the past

    A more significant event happened in January 2025, following the launch of the TRUMP memecoin on January 18 and the MELANIA memecoin on January 19. The surge of activity caused a long wait for transactions on the platform, with some users reporting delays of up to 15 hours.

    At the time, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong stated on X, “Lot of Solana activity last few days, we were not anticipating the level of surge.”

    Some delays during the spike were independent of Solana’s blockchain, as Coinbase’s settlement time lagged the network by hours. Despite the spike, the Solana blockchain reported 100% uptime in the 90 days before February 6, 2025.

    Broader context

    Coinbase’s repeated delays show the ongoing technical issues faced by crypto platforms. These delays tend to happen because the exchanges’ system is slower than the Solana network, even though the blockchain itself has full uptime. 

    Still, a short disruption can slow trading action and affect users who depend on a fast response to their transactions. However, Coinbase has acted quickly to fix these problems each time. 

    Also Read: U.S. Supreme Court Blocks Trump Tariffs, Bitcoin Hovers Near $67,000

    Disclaimer: The information researched and reported by The Crypto Times is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional financial advice. Investing in crypto assets involves significant risk due to market volatility. Always Do Your Own Research (DYOR) and consult with a qualified Financial Advisor before making any investment decisions.

    mobile only image



    Source link

    Sonic Labs Unveils Spawn: An AI‑Driven Platform For Fast Natural‑Language Web3 App Development

    By
    Metaverse Fashion Week Online
    -
    0
    Sonic Labs Unveils Spawn: An AI‑Driven Platform For Fast Natural‑Language Web3 App Development


    by
    Alisa Davidson

    Published: February 20, 2026 at 9:30 am Updated: February 20, 2026 at 8:45 am

    by Ana

    Edited and fact-checked:
    February 20, 2026 at 9:30 am

    In Brief

    Spawn’s debut positions Sonic Labs’ new AI system as a tool that can generate full‑stack Web3 applications from natural‑language prompts, dramatically reducing development complexity and showcasing the Sonic blockchain’s high‑speed infrastructure.

    Sonic Labs Unveils Spawn: An AI‑Driven Platform For Fast Natural‑Language Web3 App Development

    Sonic Labs, the team behind the high‑performance Sonic blockchain, unveiled Spawn, described as the first AI‑driven platform designed specifically to generate full‑stack Web3 applications from natural‑language instructions. A preview of the system debuted at ETHDenver 2026, with a wider rollout planned after the event. 

    The launch positions Spawn as a response to the broader vibecoding trend, which has made no‑code and agent‑based development common in traditional software but has not previously produced an equivalent tool tailored to decentralized applications.

    The platform is built to address the complexity of Web3 development, where creating even simple decentralized applications typically requires expertise in Solidity, security auditing, compilation pipelines, deployment processes, wallet integration, and frontend engineering. 

    Spawn aims to remove these barriers by allowing users to describe an application in plain language, after which the system generates the smart contracts, compiles and deploys them to the Sonic testnet, and produces a complete frontend with wallet connectivity. 

    Through Spawny, an integrated conversational AI agent, users can refine logic, adjust interfaces, or add features through iterative natural‑language prompts, reducing development time from weeks to minutes.

    Spawn Demonstration Highlights The Chain’s High‑Speed Infrastructure

    At ETHDenver, Sonic Labs demonstrated the platform by generating a fully playable Snake game with an on‑chain leaderboard from a single prompt. The game is currently accessible at snake.soniclabs.com, and attendees were invited to compete for top leaderboard positions and event merchandise. 

    The company emphasized that Spawn is built to take advantage of the Sonic blockchain’s high throughput, EVM compatibility, near‑instant finality, and low transaction costs, making it suitable for interactive applications such as games, NFT collections, DeFi tools, DAOs, and payment systems.

    A preview version of Spawn is already live, with a closed beta scheduled to begin shortly and a broader public release to follow

    Disclaimer

    In line with the Trust Project guidelines, please note that the information provided on this page is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as legal, tax, investment, financial, or any other form of advice. It is important to only invest what you can afford to lose and to seek independent financial advice if you have any doubts. For further information, we suggest referring to the terms and conditions as well as the help and support pages provided by the issuer or advertiser. MetaversePost is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice.

    About The Author

    Alisa, a dedicated journalist at the MPost, specializes in cryptocurrency, zero-knowledge proofs, investments, and the expansive realm of Web3. With a keen eye for emerging trends and technologies, she delivers comprehensive coverage to inform and engage readers in the ever-evolving landscape of digital finance.

    More articles

    Alisa, a dedicated journalist at the MPost, specializes in cryptocurrency, zero-knowledge proofs, investments, and the expansive realm of Web3. With a keen eye for emerging trends and technologies, she delivers comprehensive coverage to inform and engage readers in the ever-evolving landscape of digital finance.

    More articles



    Source link

    When Should We Expect The Next ‘Greed’ Zone? Crypto Sentiment And Timing In 2026

    By
    Metaverse Fashion Week Online
    -
    0
    When Should We Expect The Next ‘Greed’ Zone? Crypto Sentiment And Timing In 2026


    by
    Alisa Davidson

    Published: February 20, 2026 at 8:40 am Updated: February 20, 2026 at 7:42 am

    In Brief

    Crypto sentiment entering 2026 sits in deep Extreme Fear, with markets showing sustained risk aversion and no clear shift toward a Greed phase until broader macro, liquidity, and confidence conditions materially improve.

    When Should We Expect The Next ‘Greed’ Zone? Crypto Sentiment And Timing In 2026

    Cryptocurrency markets started 2026 in an extremely pessimistic mode. The sentiment measures were down to the Extreme Fear category, which indicates market bottoms and not a manic run-up. The next question now for analysts, traders, and long-term investors is when the next zone of Greed may come, indicating a high bullishness and overall confidence in the market. To view this timeline, it is necessary to take a look at not only up-to-date sentiment data but also the history of crypto cycles.

    By February 18, 2026, the Crypto Fear & Greed Index, one of the most common indicators of the state of market psychology, is only at 9 out of 100, which is evidently in the realm of Extreme Fear. Such a low reading suggests that traders and investors, as well as even institutional traders, are suffering widespread risk aversion and extreme caution. A score below 20 has traditionally been associated with protracted sell-offs, volatile trading, and the wave of capitulation.

    Prior to markets being in a Greed zone, which is generally characterized by a reading of above 60, various factors about price momentum, investor confidence, macroeconomic stability, and liquidity will have to change considerably. Nevertheless, researching the evidence of sentiment indices, technical indicators, and crypto-cycle patterns, scholars and market commentators are starting to map when a movement to the greed sentiment may plausibly happen.

    Current Crypto Sentiment: Under the Shadow of Extreme Fear

    The mood image is not positive at the moment. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index has recorded several times in the single-digit figures, even a record low of 5 in early February 2026, indicating the deepest reluctance in the market.

    To measure the overall investor mood, the measurement consolidates statistics from various sources, such as price volatility, market momentum, social media activity, volume of trade, the dominance of bitcoins in the market, and Google search results. A score under 20 is usually an Extreme Fear, which means that a significant portion of the market members are abandoning the risk and minimizing the exposure to digital assets.

    This fear has been the order of the day and has accompanied significant price contractions. An example is the case of Bitcoin that retested the support at the levels of $60,000–$70,000. 

    When Should We Expect The Next ‘Greed’ Zone? Crypto Sentiment And Timing In 2026

    This level has been used as a psychological aspect over the last several months. These extended periods of bearishness are usually indicators of either an extension of the negative price movement or a time during which the markets absorb weak holders and then major, sustained upturns.

    This is because some commentators believe that long durations of intense fear, especially where sentiment measures are below historic levels, may lead to a change of heart in the market psychology. In mid-2022, another trough in sentiment led to one of the largest bull runs in late 2023 into 2024. 

    Nonetheless, the interval between the greatest fear and the start of the greedy interval fluctuated significantly throughout the cycles, indicating that although a bad mood can be a precursor to a subsequent recovery, the process relies on numerous macro market forces.

    Historical Patterns and What They Suggest

    The Fear and Greed Index has no predictive nature, and history portrays that periods of Extreme Fear last months before they change into a neutral or greedy mood. As an example, in the 2021 2022 bear market, sentiment fell to fear deep for long periods before recovering with the revival of the price momentum in 2023. 

    Another paper by scholars that studies sentiment regimes in cryptocurrency markets points to the extreme sentiment, either fear or greed, as connected to increased volatility and a potential transition phase in the future when the selling pressure is drained, and the liquidity level stabilizes. Although this kind of research does not identify any specific date, it suggests that the results of such escalations to the extreme fear territory and then to the territory of greed indicate structural changes that go beyond the short-term price changes.

    Further, other technical analysis frameworks indicate that deep sentiment lows along with oversold signs, like those of the Relative Strength Index (RSI) measurements, may represent a sustainable bottom period, out of which markets can develop an upward momentum. Such conditions have been observed in recent research and study reports where capitulation is seen to be almost complete before reversal sets in at the beginning of the year 2026.

    However, when the sentiment is Greed, signified by an overall reading greater than 60 on the Fear & Greed Index, prolonged rallies in the price, participation of more participants (retail and institutional flows), and high levels of social involvement will be associated. All these are present, and sentiment is still in a very fearful land.

    Macro Forces, Market Dynamics, and the Path to Greed

    The interaction between the macroeconomic situation in the world and the crypto sentiment is one of the primary causes of the long-term fear situation in the crypto markets. In the late 2025 and early 2026, the digital assets have been burdened by the growing interest rate issues, regulatory uncertainty, and classic market volatility. 

    Although the price of crossovers indicated its strength in retaining its major support levels, the mood was still pessimistic due to the growing inclination of investors to consider cryptocurrencies as risky assets that are more susceptible to macroeconomic changes.

    Nevertheless, investors following cycle bottoms and sentiment extremes now have possible indications of where the market is likely to go. The Matrixport sentiment index, which extends the Fear and Greed Index by capturing positioning and volatility, recorded readings of fear of below-zero, and this is a rarity, something the market has occasionally accompanied with a significant movement of the major trend. Such oversold sentiment is similar to past market bottoms before the trend switches.

    Similar to this, long-term sentiment readings have recently reached their lowest level in four years, which implies that selling pressure amongst the large holders could be fading. Analysts at Matrixport view the change in their internal sentiment indicators as the selling pressure starting to ease, which is an indicator of the possible formation of a bottoming phase. This does not serve as a direct indicator of a Greed phase, but it does confirm the notion that market psychology might be at a point where it is no longer in a state of pure panic, but rather stabilization, which will be followed by a considerable amount of rebound.

    The other significant possible trigger of sentiment improvement is renewed institutional adoption or optimistic regulatory changes. Earlier rallies, including 2020-2021 and 2023-2024, were boosted as institutional interest revived, coupled with better legal frameworks of crypto products such as Bitcoin ETFs. Should the same happen in 2026, they would offer the lever that is required to change the perception to optimism and ultimately greed.

    When Might Greed Return?

    Combining the existing sentiment data and historical cycles, technical indicators, and macro forces, most market analysts opine that short-term relief rallies can be experienced, but it will not likely be in an extended state of greed before more structural enhancements can be realized.

    Technical analysts believe that in the short term (1-3 months), there is an indication of relief rallies whereby Bitcoin and major altcoins may experience moderately bouncing jumps. 

    When Should We Expect The Next ‘Greed’ Zone? Crypto Sentiment And Timing In 2026

    This may elevate sentiment to a neutral level, although not to the extent of attracting a full Greed reading. Such rebounds can be driven by oversold situations and panic exhaustion as the traders make opportunistic positions.

    Disclaimer

    In line with the Trust Project guidelines, please note that the information provided on this page is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as legal, tax, investment, financial, or any other form of advice. It is important to only invest what you can afford to lose and to seek independent financial advice if you have any doubts. For further information, we suggest referring to the terms and conditions as well as the help and support pages provided by the issuer or advertiser. MetaversePost is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice.

    About The Author

    Alisa, a dedicated journalist at the MPost, specializes in cryptocurrency, zero-knowledge proofs, investments, and the expansive realm of Web3. With a keen eye for emerging trends and technologies, she delivers comprehensive coverage to inform and engage readers in the ever-evolving landscape of digital finance.

    More articles

    Alisa, a dedicated journalist at the MPost, specializes in cryptocurrency, zero-knowledge proofs, investments, and the expansive realm of Web3. With a keen eye for emerging trends and technologies, she delivers comprehensive coverage to inform and engage readers in the ever-evolving landscape of digital finance.

    More articles



    Source link

    1...313233...254Page 32 of 254

    Popular Posts

    My Favorites

    Popular Categories

    © Newsmag WordPress Theme by TagDiv