Arts

Home Arts

Proof of Play Shuts Down Despite a16z Backing – NFT Plazas

0
Proof of Play Shuts Down Despite a16z Backing – NFT Plazas


Proof of Play, the Andreessen Horowitz (a16z)-backed Web3 gaming studio behind the fully on-chain RPG Pirate Nation, is shutting down after concluding it could not build a scalable and sustainable blockchain gaming business, marking another high-profile setback for the Web3 gaming industry.

The company announced on Aug. 4 that it will cease operations after failing to validate its vision of fully on-chain games as a commercially viable business. While Proof of Play did not disclose its remaining financial position, employee impact, or a final shutdown date, it acknowledged that its core thesis had ultimately fallen short despite years of development and strong venture backing.

Proof of Play Shuts Down Despite a16z Backing (Source: X)

Proof of Play Shuts Down Despite a16z Backing (Source: X)

A bold vision backed by top investors

Proof of Play emerged as one of blockchain gaming’s most ambitious startups after raising a $33 million seed round in 2023 led by a16z and Greenoaks. The company set out to prove that blockchain technology could fundamentally change how games are built by placing game logic, assets, and player ownership directly on-chain.

Its flagship title, Pirate Nation, became the centerpiece of that vision. Rather than simply incorporating NFTs or crypto rewards, the role-playing game served as a demonstration of fully on-chain infrastructure, where players could retain ownership of in-game assets while developers could build persistent gaming worlds that survived beyond the life of a single studio.

Despite attracting attention across the crypto industry, Proof of Play admitted that the concept failed to evolve into a sustainable business.

We couldn’t build a product and sustainable business that proved out this thesis at scale,” the company said in its shutdown announcement, confirming that commercial viability—not technical capability—ultimately drove the decision.

The company did not release player statistics, revenue figures, or operating costs explaining the closure.

Pirate Nation will live on through open source

Rather than allowing years of development work to disappear, Proof of Play is making much of Pirate Nation publicly available.

The studio has released four public repositories covering the game’s Unity client, smart contracts, artwork, and its internal AI development tool, PopBot.

The Unity client has been published under the MIT license, although it serves primarily as an archival release. Several commercial Unity assets, backend services, software development kits, and authentication systems have been removed, meaning developers cannot simply relaunch the game without rebuilding critical infrastructure.

Likewise, the smart contract repository is intended as a reference rather than production-ready software.

Perhaps the most notable release is the game’s artwork. Pirate Nation assets—including Founder Pirate NFT artwork, logos, combat cards, and voxel assets—have been licensed under Creative Commons CC0, allowing unrestricted public reuse, modification, and distribution without traditional copyright restrictions.

Proof of Play also open-sourced PopBot, its internal system designed to coordinate multiple AI coding agents during game development, making another piece of its engineering stack available to developers.

PIRATE token survives under independent foundation

Although the studio is shutting down, the PIRATE token ecosystem will continue operating under the independent Pirate Nation Foundation.

Proof of Play confirmed that the foundation remains active and will continue supporting the PIRATE token after the company’s closure. However, it emphasized that its internal reward points will not be redeemable for tokens, products, or any other compensation, urging users not to treat them as claims against either the foundation or the company.

Investors reacted negatively to the news.

Following the announcement, the PIRATE token dropped nearly 14% over 24 hours, trading near $0.00112 with a market capitalization of roughly $803,000. Daily trading volume stood at approximately $209,000, meaning relatively small trades were capable of triggering sharp price swings.

Meanwhile, Proof of Play confirmed that its mobile title Shiba Story Go has been acquired by an undisclosed third party and will continue operating independently. The company did not identify the buyer or disclose financial terms of the transaction.

Pirate Nation (PIRATE) Price Performance (Source: CoinMarketCap)Pirate Nation (PIRATE) Price Performance (Source: CoinMarketCap)

Pirate Nation (PIRATE) Price Performance (Source: CoinMarketCap)

Another reality check for Web3 gaming

Proof of Play’s closure reflects broader challenges across blockchain gaming, where many studios have struggled to convert technological innovation into profitable businesses.

During the 2021-2022 crypto boom, numerous projects launched with business models centered on token incentives, NFT trading, and speculative demand. As market conditions normalized, however, maintaining active player communities became significantly harder once financial incentives declined.

At the same time, operating proprietary blockchain networks, maintaining token ecosystems, and continuously funding live-service games proved considerably more expensive than many developers anticipated.

Supporters continue to argue that blockchain offers meaningful benefits through digital ownership, interoperability, and decentralized infrastructure. Critics, however, contend that most players prioritize engaging gameplay over tokenization, limiting mainstream demand for crypto-native games.

Proof of Play’s decision underscores that even one of the industry’s best-funded and most technically ambitious projects could not overcome those commercial realities.

Still, the company’s legacy may extend beyond its closure. By releasing Pirate Nation‘s codebase, artwork, smart contracts, and AI development tools as open-source resources, Proof of Play has ensured that its technical innovations remain accessible to the broader development community.

While the company itself is coming to an end, its technology—and the lessons learned from one of Web3 gaming’s most ambitious experiments—may continue shaping the next generation of blockchain-powered games.



Source link

XRP Ledger upgrade brings back features once pulled over critical bugs

0
XRP Ledger upgrade brings back features once pulled over critical bugs


XRP Ledger is preparing for the XRPLD 3.3.0 release, which Jazzi Cooper, Head of Product at RippleX, announced on July 31, 2026, with an expected target release in the following week. This release will introduce 5 new amendments to the voting schedule, including Confidential MPT, Batch, Permission Delegation, Sponsored Fees and Reserves, and Dynamic MPT. The goal is to expand XRPL’s support for tokenized assets, ranging from private transactions and batch settlement to transaction delegation, fee sponsorship, and post-issuance token configuration updates.

Notably, two of these features, Batch and Permission Delegation, were previously removed from the mainnet roadmap after critical bugs were discovered during the voting phase or in non-production environments.

A Cleanup Upgrade With Security Baggage

XRPLD 3.3.0 continues a series of maintenance upgrades that XRPL executed throughout 2026. Before this, v3.1.1, released on February 23, disabled Batch and fixBatchInnerSigs after a critical bug was discovered.

On May 14, the company released V3.1.3, introducing fixCleanup3_1_3 to address bugs in NFTs, Permissioned Domains, Vaults, Lending Protocol, and MPTs. By v3.2.0 on June 15, XRPL renamed the core server from rippled to XRPLD and added fixCleanup3_2_0 for vaults, lending, permissioned DEX, MPTs, and permissioned domains.

These steps reflect efforts to re-establish the network’s security discipline before re-launching major features.

The Features Coming Back Into Focus

Confidential MPT adds a privacy layer to Multi-Purpose Tokens, enabling the hiding of balances and transfer amounts on the public ledger while maintaining mechanisms for designated issuers or auditors to view transaction data. This is the aspect RippleX emphasizes for financial institutions that require transaction privacy while maintaining auditability.

Batch allows grouping up to 8 transactions into a single ledger. Transactions can be processed under various execution modes, such as all-or-nothing (all succeed), single success, execution until an error occurs, or independent execution. This paves the way for workflows like delivery-versus-payment, atomic settlement, or multi-step transactions that must be bundled together.

Permission Delegation allows an account to delegate a narrow scope of permissions to another account to execute transactions on its behalf. For financial institutions, this is a familiar model: one party holds custody, while another operates transactions, but permissions are restricted by action type.

Sponsored Fees and Reserves allow a sponsor—such as a bank, issuer, or platform—to pay transaction fees and account reserves on behalf of another user. Dynamic MPT allows certain properties of an MPT to be updated post-issuance, rather than fixing the token completely from day one.

The Bug That Forced A Reset

According to a vulnerability disclosure from XRPL Labs, on February 19, 2026, Pranamya Keshkamat and Cantina AI’s security tool, Apex, discovered a logic flaw in the signature check mechanism of the Batch amendment.

In the Batch design, inner transactions do not carry their own signatures. Delegation is handled at the outer transaction level via a list of batch signers. The bug resided in a signer check loop: when encountering an account that did not yet exist on the ledger but possessed a signing key matching that account, the system could conclude successfully prematurely and skip the remaining signers.

If Batch had been activated before the bug was discovered, an attacker could have executed a Payment from a victim’s account without requiring their private key. The XRPL Labs disclosure also highlighted the potential for unauthorized execution of AccountSet, TrustSet, or even AccountDelete. The bug was discovered during the voting phase before becoming active on the mainnet, meaning no user funds were ever at real risk.

Permission Delegation also had its own history. A disclosure from September 2025 indicated that a bug in this feature could cause an account to have transaction fees unauthorizedly deducted under certain conditions. This feature was also not active on the mainnet when the bug was found, and validators were advised to vote No. A corrected version was later included in a replacement roadmap.

Validators Face The Real Deadline

The amendments in XRPL 3.3.0 will not automatically activate simply because the software is released. On XRPL, changes impacting transaction processing must pass through the amendment process. An amendment requires maintaining over 80% support from trusted validators for two weeks to be permanently activated.

This point is crucial as Jazzi Cooper also emphasized that amendments only activate after approval by validator voting. For validators, early upgrading provides them with the code to understand the new rules if the amendments pass. For node operators, exchanges, API providers, or applications building on XRPL, lagging behind on updates could lead to an “amendment-blocked” state when the network transitions to the new rule set.

According to data on xrpscan, the XRP Ledger has 546 running nodes. Among them, 334 nodes run rippled-3.2.1 (approximately 61%), 113 nodes run rippled-3.2.0 (nearly 21%), and 58 nodes remain on rippled-3.1.3 (nearly 11%).

Distribution of Node versions on the XRP Ledger

Distribution of Node versions on the XRP Ledger. Source: XRPScan

A Test For XRPL’s DeFi Ambitions

If put to a vote and sequentially activated, this group of 5 amendments will complete a critical technical piece for the real-world asset (RWA) tokenization puzzle on XRPL: ensuring both privacy and enterprise-grade permissioning, while optimizing onboarding costs for end users.

However, the greatest value of the 3.3.0 upgrade lies in serving as a “litmus test” for network discipline. Batch and Permission Delegation are not entirely new features, but tools once suspended due to critical bugs that are now returning after rigorous auditing.

For everyday XRP holders, the update does not alter tokenomics or require any wallet actions. But for builders and issuers, this serves as a practical yardstick for whether XRPL can safely scale into the DeFi/Institutional Finance space without sacrificing execution speed.



Source link

FBI Agent Charged With Stealing $1 Million in Cryptocurrency From Suspect’s Wallets – NFT Plazas

0
FBI Agent Charged With Stealing  Million in Cryptocurrency From Suspect’s Wallets – NFT Plazas


A former FBI supervisory special agent has been charged with stealing nearly $1 million in cryptocurrency from digital wallets tied to an active counterintelligence investigation, in a case that underscores the risks of insider abuse as law enforcement agencies increasingly rely on digital assets in national security probes.

Patrick Steven Yaroch, who previously held a top-secret security clearance and served in the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division, allegedly exploited his privileged access to internal systems to transfer cryptocurrency from wallets under FBI monitoring into accounts he personally controlled. Authorities arrested Yaroch on July 31 after he allegedly confessed, with court documents unsealed on August 1 detailing the scheme.

FBI Agent Charged With Stealing $1 Million in Cryptocurrency From Suspect's Wallets

FBI Agent Charged With Stealing $1 Million in Cryptocurrency From Suspect’s Wallets

Prosecutors allege agent abused privileged access

According to the criminal complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Yaroch worked on investigations involving an unnamed “adversarial nation” and had access to sensitive intelligence concerning cryptocurrency wallets linked to a foreign target.

Rather than immediately seizing those assets, the FBI was monitoring the wallets as part of an ongoing intelligence operation. Court filings state that Yaroch became frustrated with what he viewed as government inaction over the continued use of the crypto accounts.

Prosecutors allege he used his authorized access to obtain the wallets’ recovery seed phrases before creating personal wallets and transferring the cryptocurrency into accounts under his own control. Investigators say he carried out roughly 10 unauthorized transfers over more than a year while serving in the bureau.

The stolen assets were initially valued at more than $900,000 but later appreciated to roughly $1 million, according to statements Yaroch allegedly made to investigators.

Federal prosecutors have charged him with interstate transportation of stolen property and receipt of stolen property.

The criminal complaintThe criminal complaint

The criminal complaint

Emotional confession led to arrest

The investigation reached a turning point on July 28, when Yaroch allegedly contacted a Department of Justice employee through the encrypted messaging app Signal requesting a private meeting.

According to prosecutors, he met with the official at FBI headquarters, where he became emotional and admitted stealing the cryptocurrency. When agents later interviewed him at his Virginia home, the affidavit states Yaroch acknowledged his actions, telling investigators, “I f—ed up.

Searches of his residence uncovered a Trezor hardware wallet, handwritten cryptocurrency seed phrases, and digital assets stored on a Kraken exchange account.

Court filings state the account contained approximately $188,570 in assets, including around $166,000 in cash, nearly $18,000 in USDC, and smaller holdings of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

The FBI suspended Yaroch before terminating his employment and arresting him days later.

As soon as the FBI became aware of these allegations, we immediately took action, began an investigation, and ultimately executed an arrest warrant,” an FBI spokesperson said in a statement. The bureau added that it holds employees to the highest ethical standards and does not tolerate misconduct.

ChatGPT searches become evidence

One of the most unusual aspects of the case is prosecutors’ use of Yaroch’s conversations with ChatGPT as part of the evidence.

After examining his phone, investigators recovered several prompts related to managing wealth and relocating overseas.

According to the affidavit, Yaroch first asked ChatGPT how someone with around $1 million could invest the money to maximize returns. Days later, he asked: “If you had a bucket of money (around $1 million) and you wanted to leave the USA and become a resident or citizen of an EU country, what would you do?

The affidavit says ChatGPT responded with recommendations tailored to his age, family circumstances, and interest in moving to regions of Portugal or southern Italy.

Investigators also discovered searches concerning travel through Turkey, moving to Greece, and drafting emails related to overseas employment opportunities.

Authorities further recovered travel plans for Yaroch and his family to visit Portugal in September 2026, documents related to Portugal, and records of several foreign trips that prosecutors say had not been reported internally as required under FBI rules.

Broader implications for crypto investigations

The case highlights the growing importance of cryptocurrency in national security and financial crime investigations. Federal agencies routinely monitor digital wallets linked to ransomware groups, sanctioned entities, cybercriminals, and foreign intelligence operations.

In many investigations, authorities intentionally leave wallets active instead of immediately seizing assets so investigators can continue tracking transactions, identify networks, and gather intelligence. Decisions on whether and when to seize digital assets are typically made on a case-by-case basis.

According to prosecutors, Yaroch exploited that access by obtaining confidential wallet credentials that were available only through FBI systems.

The case also illustrates how AI-generated conversations are increasingly appearing in criminal investigations. Alongside blockchain transaction records, prosecutors relied on data recovered from Yaroch’s phone, cryptocurrency wallets, exchange accounts, handwritten seed phrases, travel documents, and his alleged confession to build their case.

Yaroch remains in federal custody in Virginia while the criminal proceedings continue. As with all criminal defendants, he is presumed innocent unless proven guilty in court. If convicted, the case would represent one of the most significant insider theft cases involving cryptocurrency handled by the FBI and one of the first major U.S. prosecutions in which ChatGPT conversations play a notable role in the government’s evidence.



Source link

CLARITY Act Faces Critical 72-Hour Window as Senate Leaves Bill Off Monday Agenda – NFT Plazas

0
CLARITY Act Faces Critical 72-Hour Window as Senate Leaves Bill Off Monday Agenda – NFT Plazas


The U.S. Senate has entered a crucial week for cryptocurrency legislation after the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act was absent from Monday’s official floor schedule, leaving lawmakers with just days to begin advancing the bill before Congress starts its August recess.

With senators set to leave Washington on August 10, leadership now has roughly 72 hours to initiate the procedural process if it hopes to move the landmark crypto market structure bill before the break. Missing that window would likely delay consideration until mid-September, extending regulatory uncertainty for the U.S. digital asset industry.

CLARITY Act Absent from Monday’s Senate Schedule

CLARITY Act Absent from Monday’s Senate Schedule

Senate Calendar Tightens the Timeline

When the Senate reconvened on August 3, its published agenda listed only a procedural vote on H.R. 6500, a federal spending bill. The CLARITY Act (H.R. 3633) was nowhere on the schedule, and Senate records updated through July 31 showed no cloture petition had been filed for the legislation.

Under normal Senate rules, leadership must file a cloture petition by August 5 to hold a procedural vote as early as August 7. That vote would simply determine whether the Senate can begin debating the bill—not whether it passes.

Even after clearing that hurdle, the legislation would still face debate, amendments, and a final vote, making the remaining legislative days before recess especially important.

If lawmakers fail to begin consideration before August 10, the bill will likely remain on hold until the Senate returns in mid-September. A longer delay could prove even more costly: if the CLARITY Act is not approved before the 119th Congress ends in late 2026, lawmakers would have to restart the legislative process in the next congressional session.

The CLARITY Act’s Timeline (Source: CryptoSlate)The CLARITY Act’s Timeline (Source: CryptoSlate)

The CLARITY Act’s Timeline (Source: CryptoSlate)

Leadership Still Has Fast-Track Options

Although time is running short, Senate leaders still have procedural tools that could speed up consideration.

One option is a bipartisan cloture petition, which shortens the timeline for bringing the bill to the floor. Another is unanimous consent, allowing senators to bypass several procedural requirements entirely. However, unanimous consent can be blocked by a single senator, making it difficult to achieve.

So far, Senate leadership has not indicated which path, if any, it intends to take.

Political Hurdles Remain

Procedure is only part of the challenge. The bill must also secure enough bipartisan support to advance.

Seven Democratic senators—Catherine Cortez Masto, Angela Alsobrooks, Cory Booker, Ruben Gallego, John Hickenlooper, Mark Warner, and Raphael Warnock—have said the revised draft still does not fully address their concerns, although negotiations are continuing. Senator Elizabeth Warren also remains firmly opposed to the legislation.

Meanwhile, Senate Majority Leader John Thune has suggested the bill is unlikely to reach the floor before recess without sufficient Democratic backing, leaving its near-term prospects uncertain.

Ethics Debate Continues

One of the main sticking points has been ethics provisions governing cryptocurrency activities by public officials.

To address those concerns, President Donald Trump reportedly agreed to support language that would prohibit the president, vice president, members of Congress, senior federal officials, and their spouses from issuing or sponsoring digital assets for personal financial gain. The proposed restrictions would remain in place until January 20, 2029.

Supporters hope the revisions will help attract additional bipartisan support, though it remains unclear whether they will be enough to secure the votes needed for passage.

Industry Pressure Builds

Outside Congress, calls for action continue to grow.

Former U.S. Defense Secretary Mark Esper recently described the CLARITY Act as a national security priority, arguing that clear digital asset rules would strengthen the United States’ competitive position.

Crypto companies and industry groups have likewise urged senators to move quickly, saying the absence of a comprehensive regulatory framework continues to discourage investment and innovation. The legislation would establish a clearer division of authority between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), replacing years of overlapping oversight with a more defined regulatory structure.

At the same time, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins has indicated the agency is prepared to develop its own crypto regulatory framework if Congress cannot pass the CLARITY Act, highlighting the growing pressure for regulatory reform.

Mark Esper’s Status on X (Source: X)Mark Esper’s Status on X (Source: X)

Mark Esper’s Status on X (Source: X)

A Pivotal Week Ahead

The CLARITY Act’s absence from Monday’s Senate schedule does not mean the legislation has stalled permanently, but it has left lawmakers with virtually no room for delay.

Over the next several days, Senate leaders must decide whether to launch the procedural process through a standard cloture filing or pursue a faster legislative route before lawmakers leave for the August recess.

For the crypto industry, the outcome of this week could determine whether long-awaited market structure reforms finally begin moving through the Senate—or remain in limbo for at least another month, prolonging uncertainty for exchanges, issuers, investors, and regulators alike.



Source link

POAP Is Winding Down After Five Years of Turning Moments Into Onchain Memories | NFT CULTURE | NFT News | Web3 Culture | NFTs & Crypto Art

0
POAP Is Winding Down After Five Years of Turning Moments Into Onchain Memories | NFT CULTURE | NFT News | Web3 Culture | NFTs & Crypto Art


One of Web3’s most recognizable digital-collectible platforms is coming to an end—leaving behind millions of tokens, hundreds of communities, and an important lesson about building sustainable products without sacrificing their soul.

POAP, the platform that transformed attendance and participation into collectible digital memories, is winding down after more than five years.

The announcement was shared by POAP general manager and co-founder Isabel Gonzalez, who reflected on the platform’s accomplishments, its sustainability challenges, and the lessons its team learned while building through one of the most volatile eras in crypto.

During its run, POAP minted millions of digital collectibles across hundreds of communities. It also worked with major organizations including Coinbase, American Express, Warner Music Group, and Bayer, alongside countless crypto-native projects and events.

But POAP’s significance cannot be measured by mint totals or corporate partnerships alone.

For many people, POAP became a visual history of their journey through Web3—a wallet-sized scrapbook recording conferences attended, communities discovered, classes completed, hackathons survived, and friendships formed.

From Proof of Attendance to Proof of Experience

POAP stands for “Proof of Attendance Protocol.” The concept was elegantly simple: give someone a blockchain-based collectible proving they participated in a particular experience.

The earliest POAPs appeared at ETHDenver in 2019. The platform later moved to the xDai network, now known as Gnosis Chain, allowing organizers to distribute large numbers of collectibles without burdening participants with Ethereum mainnet gas fees.

That combination of simplicity, affordability, and emotional resonance helped POAP spread rapidly across Web3.

Communities used POAPs to recognize contributors. DAOs issued them during governance calls. Artists distributed them at exhibitions. Educators used them to commemorate completed courses, while conferences turned them into digital souvenirs.

POAP also gave mainstream organizations an accessible entry point into NFTs. Warner Music Group, for example, partnered with POAP in 2022 to help artists create digital mementos connected to concerts and album experiences. At the time, WMG described the technology as a bridge between digital identity and physical experience. Warner Music Group

At one major Devcon activation, POAP reportedly minted more than 8,000 collectibles during a single week. Its Airport Rally later expanded the idea beyond scheduled events, letting collectors claim location-based POAPs while traveling through more than 100 airports worldwide.

POAP had found something that many NFT projects missed: the collectible did not need a speculative price to have value. Its value came from the memory attached to it.

Why POAP Is Winding Down

According to Gonzalez, the decision reflects the difficulty of creating a sustainable crypto company without compromising the qualities that made its product meaningful.

Crypto’s boom-and-bust funding cycles frequently reward rapid expansion, aggressive monetization, and speculative activity. POAP, however, was built around low-cost or free collectibles whose primary purpose was commemoration rather than financial trading.

That created a fundamental business-model challenge. How do you monetize participation without making every interaction transactional? How do you charge communities without excluding the grassroots organizers responsible for the product’s growth? And how do you introduce commercial incentives without turning sentimental collectibles into another speculative asset?

POAP had already entered maintenance mode earlier in 2026, ending active development and stopping the onboarding of new issuers while continuing to support existing collections, integrations, and collector tools. The team said it wanted to explore more open infrastructure for digital collectibles. The Defiant

The latest announcement goes further, describing the company as winding down. It does not yet provide a detailed closure schedule or explain the long-term status of every application, API, and service.

Previously minted collectibles do not automatically disappear when the company behind an interface winds down. Their underlying blockchain records remain onchain. However, the tools people use to display, organize, issue, and interact with those assets may depend on infrastructure that requires ongoing maintenance.

That distinction is one of the defining promises—and persistent complications—of digital ownership.

Community Is More Valuable Than Most Companies Realize

One of Gonzalez’s biggest lessons from POAP is that customer communities remain among the most undervalued assets a company can build.

POAP grew because people cared enough to carry it into new spaces. Organizers created drops for small meetups, developers integrated POAP into applications, collectors shared their badges, and community members invented uses the original team could never have centrally planned.

This is what authentic distribution looks like.

The strongest communities do not merely consume a product. They interpret it, adapt it, teach others how to use it, and turn it into part of their identities.

POAP had brand ambassadors everywhere precisely because the product represented participation rather than promotion. Receiving a badge often felt less like entering a marketing funnel and more like being recognized for showing up.

That distinction matters—not only for Web3 companies, but for every brand trying to manufacture “community” through loyalty points, Discord servers, or engagement campaigns.

Community cannot simply be added as a growth channel. It must be earned through shared meaning.

Connection Was Always the Product

Crypto conversations have a habit of becoming trapped in technical architecture, token prices, and whichever narrative is driving the current cycle.

POAP was a reminder that the technology was never supposed to be the entire point.

The point was connection.

People collected POAPs because they represented moments: attending an early DAO meeting, meeting online friends in person, completing a hackathon, watching an artist perform, or joining a community before it became widely known.

The blockchain provided provenance and persistence, but the emotional value came from the human experience behind the token.

This remains one of the strongest long-term arguments for NFTs. The technology can create durable, interoperable records of culture, identity, participation, and belonging. Those applications may ultimately prove more important than purely speculative collectibles.

POAP did not need to promise financial returns. It gave people a way to say: I was there.

Brand Equity and Longevity Are the New Moats

POAP’s final lesson may be the most relevant in the age of artificial intelligence.

Software is becoming dramatically easier to build. AI-assisted development can compress months of product work into weeks—or even days. Distribution is also becoming increasingly automated, optimized, and engineered.

When features can be replicated quickly, technical functionality becomes a weaker competitive moat.

Trust becomes the differentiator.

Customers want confidence that the products, platforms, and digital assets they adopt will continue to exist. They want brands that can evolve with changing technology without abruptly abandoning the values that attracted their communities in the first place.

This is especially important in Web3, where users are often asked to invest more than money. They invest identity, reputation, creative work, community relationships, and years of participation.

Longevity cannot be guaranteed, but it can be cultivated through transparent governance, open standards, portable data, sustainable economics, and infrastructure that does not depend entirely on one company’s survival.

POAP’s Closure Is Not a Rejection of the Idea

It would be easy to interpret POAP’s wind-down as another failure from the NFT era. That reading would miss what the platform actually accomplished.

POAP proved that millions of people were willing to collect blockchain-based objects without requiring promises of profit. It showed that an NFT could function as a memory, credential, community signal, and cultural artifact. It helped normalize digital ownership for people who might never have purchased a traditional NFT.

The company struggled to convert that cultural utility into a sustainable business. That is a significant failure of the model—but it is not evidence that the underlying behavior was meaningless.

The next generation of builders can learn from both sides of the story.

Digital collectibles need open, durable infrastructure. They need business models aligned with their communities. They need portable experiences that can survive individual applications. Most importantly, they need to preserve the human connection that makes a digital object worth keeping.

POAP may be winding down as a company, but the millions of memories it helped record—and the product category it helped establish—will remain part of Web3’s history.

Sometimes the most important proof of attendance is proof that an idea mattered.

TL;DR

POAP is winding down after more than five years of creating blockchain-based memories for events, communities, brands, classrooms, and hackathons. The platform minted millions of collectibles and worked with organizations including Coinbase, American Express, Warner Music Group, and Bayer. Its closure highlights the difficulty of building a sustainable crypto business without compromising a community-first ethos. POAP’s enduring legacy is the demonstration that NFTs can hold emotional and cultural value without depending on speculation—and that community, connection, trust, and longevity remain the strongest moats in an increasingly automated world.





Source link

Coldcard Warns Users After Entropy Flaw Linked to Suspected $88.6M Bitcoin Sweep

0
Coldcard Warns Users After Entropy Flaw Linked to Suspected .6M Bitcoin Sweep


A suspected attack targeting Bitcoin addresses created using 1,367.05 BTC drained 1,367.05 BTC, worth approximately $88.6 million, from 4,585 addresses, according to Galaxy Research. This development came after Coinkite announced an entropy flaw in older firmware versions used to generate seed phrases and urged affected users to move their assets quickly.

The flaw lies in how certain Coldcard firmware versions generated seed phrases with lower-than-required randomness, allowing an attacker to narrow the wallet brute-force search space significantly. Coinkite stated that new firmware versions have fixed the bug for future seed generation processes, but cannot “fix” weak seeds that were created previously.

Galaxy Flags Suspected Attack Waves

Galaxy Research stated that it detected three suspected attack waves targeting addresses believed to have been generated using Coldcard devices. The company emphasized that this analysis is based on blockchain data, so it cannot independently prove that every address drained was created from a weak-entropy seed. However, the timing of the transactions, the wallet scanning pattern, and the way funds were consolidated mean the incident is no longer just a technical warning from the manufacturer, but has become an ongoing security incident for hardware wallet users.

According to data published by Galaxy Research, the three suspected waves include:

Wave 1: Took place from 01:10 to 01:51 UTC on July 30, draining 1,082.6532 BTC from 1,195 addresses.Wave 2: Took place from 04:54 to 08:36 UTC on July 31, draining 76.1616 BTC from 1,478 addresses.Wave 3: Spanned from July 31 to August 1, affecting 1,912 addresses and taking 208.2377 BTC.

Three suspected Coldcard attack waves

Three suspected Coldcard attack waves. Source: Galaxy Research

In total, these three waves involved 4,585 addresses and 1,367.05 BTC. Galaxy stated that the first two waves had fairly similar transaction patterns and could have been executed by the same party, although this has not been confirmed. The third wave showed more differences, which might reflect an adjusted tool or a different attacker targeting the same group of vulnerable wallets.

Alex Thorn, head of research at Galaxy, said the attacks appear to still be ongoing and urged affected users to move their assets as soon as possible if they have not yet migrated. According to him, the BTC taken in the three main waves remained in addresses controlled by the attacker and had not been moved at the time of the analysis. Galaxy also noted that the drained coins had been dormant for an average of 3.18 years, with a median of 3.55 years, indicating that many victims may be long-term holders.

Coinkite Explains the Entropy Flaw

Coinkite, the company behind Coldcard, stated that the flaw lies in how certain firmware versions generated wallet seed phrases. In its technical backgrounder, the company explained that the issue originated from a 2021 code migration, when the seed generation process was transitioned to a new random-number call route but inadvertently relied on a software pseudo-random number generator fallback instead of the intended hardware-backed source of randomness.

As a result, some seed phrases could be generated with lower entropy than expected. In crypto wallets, entropy represents how unpredictable a seed phrase is: lower entropy means a smaller brute-force search space, giving attackers a higher chance of discovering the seed under certain conditions.

For Mk2/Mk3, the affected group consists of devices that generated seeds using firmware 4.0.1–4.1.9; Coinkite estimates the effective search space for these seeds could be only around 40 bits under current attack conditions. For Mk4, Mk5, and Q, devices had additional entropy from secure elements, but affected seeds could still reach only about 72 bits, below the 128-bit threshold commonly considered a safe baseline.

Coinkite said the flaw has been fixed in newer firmware versions, including Mk2/Mk3 4.2.0+, Mk4/Mk5 standard 5.6.0+, Q standard 1.5.0Q+, Mk4/Mk5 Edge 6.6.0X+, and Q Edge 6.6.0QX+. The company also stated that TAPSIGNER, OPENDIME, and SATSCARD are not affected.

Who Is at Risk

The group at highest risk includes users who created seed phrases using affected Coldcard firmware versions and subsequently stored Bitcoin on addresses generated from those seeds. For Mk2/Mk3, the most notable group involves devices that created seeds using firmware 4.0.1–4.1.9, especially if users did not manually add sufficient entropy via dice rolls or use a strong BIP-39 passphrase.

According to Coinkite, users may have significantly reduced their risk if, during seed creation, they added at least 50 independent and private dice rolls. The company stated that 50–98 rolls can bring a seed to a minimum of 128 bits of entropy, while 99 or more rolls provide approximately 256 bits of dice entropy. Conversely, those who relied solely on the device’s flawed seed generation route may lack this protective layer.

The incident drew further attention when several victims claimed their assets were held in cold storage. Jonathan Goodman, a Canadian author and verified X account, stated that 18.25245043 BTC, worth over 1.6 million CAD, was drained from wallets associated with a Coldcard device kept in a safety deposit box and never connected to the internet. While this claim has not been fully independently verified, it illustrates why this incident is particularly sensitive for hardware wallet users.

Why Updating Firmware Is Not Enough

The most critical point in Coinkite’s warning is that new firmware only fixes future seed generation. It cannot add entropy to an already generated seed phrase. If the original seed was weak, addresses derived from that seed remain at risk.

This makes the incident different from many standard security patches. A user can update their device to safer firmware but remain unprotected if their Bitcoin currently resides on addresses created from an old seed. In its technical backgrounder, Coinkite also emphasized that hashing or deriving addresses from a weak seed does not introduce new randomness; cryptographic functions merely process input data and cannot compensate for entropy that was missing from the start.

This is why Galaxy’s on-chain findings add urgency to the situation. The suspected sweep waves appear to target old addresses that had been dormant for years, rapidly consolidating funds into collector addresses. If this analysis is accurate, the attacker does not need physical access to the victim’s device.

What Users Should Do Now

Coinkite recommends that users first check whether their current seed was created on an affected Coldcard firmware version. For Mk2/Mk3, the group needing the most attention includes those who generated seeds using firmware 4.0.1–4.1.9, particularly if dice rolls were not added during setup.

Following Coinkite’s guidance, affected users should update their devices to patched firmware and then generate a completely new seed. The company also recommends adding personal entropy via dice rolls during creation, with a minimum of 50 rolls to protect against this type of flaw and 99+ rolls for a larger safety margin.

After generating a new seed, users must transfer their assets away from addresses derived from the old seed. This process should be executed carefully, including a small test transaction before moving the entire balance. Old backups should also be retained until users confirm that all assets have arrived safely in the new wallet.

The urgency is even higher for wallets that still hold BTC on addresses that may have been generated from an affected seed. Galaxy’s analysis suggests the attacker may have scanned the vulnerable key space and swept funds immediately upon finding an address with a balance. For self-custody users, the core takeaway of this warning is that new firmware only protects seeds generated moving forward; assets residing on old seeds must still be migrated if that seed falls into the risk group.





Source link

Tether Posts $1.5 Billion Q2 Operating Profit as Treasury Holdings Drive Earnings – NFT Plazas

0
Tether Posts .5 Billion Q2 Operating Profit as Treasury Holdings Drive Earnings – NFT Plazas


Tether, the issuer of the world’s largest stablecoin USDT, reported $1.5 billion in net operating profit for the second quarter of 2026, as returns from its U.S. Treasury portfolio continued to power earnings despite declines in the value of its Bitcoin and gold holdings.

According to the company’s latest quarterly attestation, verified by BDO, Tether held $187.75 billion in total assets against $183.64 billion in liabilities as of June 30, leaving $4.11 billion in excess reserves backing USDT. However, that reserve cushion fell sharply from more than $8.23 billion reported three months earlier, marking a decline of over $4 billion.

Tether earns $1.5B in Q2 2026

Tether earns $1.5B in Q2 2026

Treasury Income Remains Key Profit Driver

Tether said its earnings were primarily generated from income on U.S. Treasury bills and repurchase agreements (repos), which remain the foundation of its reserve strategy. The company has become one of the world’s largest holders of U.S. government debt among private firms, benefiting from elevated short-term interest rates that continue to generate strong recurring income.

Chief Executive Officer Paolo Ardoino said the second quarter tested Tether’s reserve strategy under difficult market conditions.

He acknowledged that some reserve assets were negatively affected during the quarter but stressed that USDT remained fully backed with more than $4 billion in excess reserves. Ardoino also highlighted Tether’s continued purchases of U.S. Treasuries, a reduction in secured lending exposure to $2.38 billion, and an increase in the company’s gold holdings.

New Profit Metric Sparks Discussion

One notable change in the Q2 report was Tether’s decision to report “net operating profit” instead of the “net profit” figure used in previous quarters.

The distinction is significant because operating profit excludes unrealized gains and losses from assets owned by the company, including Bitcoin and gold. Both assets lost value during the second quarter, meaning the reported operating profit does not capture the impact of those market declines.

The shift has drawn attention from industry observers, with some arguing it provides a clearer picture of Tether’s core business performance, while others believe it makes comparisons with previous quarterly reports less straightforward.

Gold and Bitcoin Holdings Grow

Tether continued expanding its reserve assets during the quarter despite falling market prices.

The company increased its physical gold holdings by approximately 14 metric tons, bringing total reserves to around 146.2 metric tons, up from 132.2 metric tons in the previous quarter. However, the value of those holdings declined to $18.84 billion from $19.84 billion as gold prices fell roughly 15% during the reporting period.

Tether also added approximately 1,796 BTC, increasing its Bitcoin holdings to 98,933 BTC. Even so, the reported value of its Bitcoin reserves fell to $5.80 billion, down from $6.62 billion, because the valuation price used in the report dropped to about $58,600 per BTC from $68,200 in Q1.

The lower valuations reflected market prices rather than asset sales, with Tether continuing to accumulate both assets during the quarter.

Tether's Q2 2026 (left) and Q1 2026 (right) reserve asset reports.Tether's Q2 2026 (left) and Q1 2026 (right) reserve asset reports.

Tether’s Q2 2026 (left) and Q1 2026 (right) reserve asset reports.

USDT Supply Continues to Expand

Despite softer conditions across the broader crypto market, demand for USDT remained resilient.

Tether reported that the circulating supply of USDT increased by approximately $446 million during the quarter to $184.6 billion, allowing the company to maintain its position as the world’s largest stablecoin issuer with more than 60% of the global stablecoin market.

The steady growth highlights continued demand for dollar-backed digital assets across cryptocurrency trading, payments, and decentralized finance.

Reserve Buffer Shrinks

While Tether remained highly profitable, the most closely watched figure in the report was the sharp decline in excess reserves.

The company’s reserve surplus fell from more than $8.2 billion at the end of the first quarter to $4.1 billion by June 30. Tether did not explain the reason for the reduction, prompting questions about how capital was deployed during the quarter.

Tether's Q2 2026 (left) and Q1 2026 (right) financial reports.Tether's Q2 2026 (left) and Q1 2026 (right) financial reports.

Tether’s Q2 2026 (left) and Q1 2026 (right) financial reports.

The lower reserve cushion also coincided with declines in the value of Bitcoin and gold, both of which fell by more than 10% during the period. Because Tether reported operating profit rather than net profit, those unrealized losses were excluded from its headline earnings.

Even so, the company emphasized that its assets continue to exceed liabilities by billions of dollars, ensuring that every USDT in circulation remains fully backed.

The latest results reinforce the strength of Tether’s Treasury-focused business model, which continues to generate significant income even during periods of crypto market weakness. At the same time, the shrinking reserve surplus and the company’s shift in reporting methodology are likely to remain key areas of scrutiny as investors and regulators continue to monitor the financial health of the world’s largest stablecoin issuer.



Source link

Aave Plans to Shut Down Six Blockchain Deployments in Strategic Network Cleanup – NFT Plazas

0
Aave Plans to Shut Down Six Blockchain Deployments in Strategic Network Cleanup – NFT Plazas


Aave, the world’s largest decentralized lending protocol, is preparing to streamline its multi-chain footprint by retiring six blockchain deployments and dozens of underutilized asset markets. The proposal, currently under governance review, is part of a broader effort to cut operating costs, reduce risk, and focus resources on networks with stronger user activity.

If approved by the Aave DAO, Aave would phase out deployments on Sonic, Scroll, zkSync, Metis, Soneium, and Aptos, while removing dozens of low-adoption reserves and matured Pendle Principal Tokens (PTs). The proposal affects nearly $98 million in supplied assets, though users would be given time to unwind their positions through a phased migration rather than facing immediate liquidations.

A Cost-Driven Strategic Shift

The proposal, developed by LlamaRisk alongside Aave’s risk providers, is part of the protocol’s updated Risk Framework and Technical Asset Listing Framework.

Maintaining each blockchain deployment requires dedicated infrastructure, including oracle price feeds, liquidation systems, monitoring, and ongoing risk management. While those costs remain largely fixed, several smaller deployments no longer generate enough revenue to justify their upkeep.

Each of the six targeted networks now produces less than $5,000 in quarterly revenue, while Metis, Soneium, and Aptos each generate under $1,000. In contrast, Ethereum remains Aave’s primary revenue driver, generating more than $142 million annually, while the Base deployment contributes roughly $4.7 million per year. The widening gap highlights how economically inefficient several smaller markets have become.

The proposal signals a shift away from expanding across every emerging blockchain toward concentrating liquidity and development on deployments with sustainable demand.

Aave To Shut Down Six Chain Deployments

Aave To Shut Down Six Chain Deployments

User Activity Has Fallen Sharply

The recommendation follows a sustained decline in liquidity across the six affected networks.

Over the past six months, Sonic deposits have dropped 74% to around $7.6 million, while Scroll has fallen 86% to roughly $2.2 million. zkSync has declined 88% to approximately $844,000, Metis has dropped 79% to around $297,000, and Soneium has recorded the steepest decline, plunging 95% to roughly $173,000. On Aptos, available liquidity has contracted 94%, leaving about $1.7 million supplied.

Combined, the six deployments now account for only about $13 million in deposits—well below 1% of Aave’s roughly $14 billion in total value locked across 23 blockchain networks.

More Than Chain Closures

The proposal extends beyond retiring blockchain deployments. Aave also plans to remove:

50 low-adoption asset reserves21 matured Pendle Principal Tokens25 reserves tied to the six affected blockchains

Many of these assets have attracted little borrowing activity despite maintaining deposits, while others have become redundant following the launch of native alternatives. For example, bridged versions of USDC would be phased out where native USDC is already available. MaticX is also slated for removal after Stader Labs announced plans to discontinue support for the liquid staking token.

According to the proposal, eliminating inactive or redundant assets simplifies protocol management while reducing the operational burden on governance and risk providers.

Existing Users Will Have Time to Exit

The proposal does not call for immediate shutdowns. Instead, Aave plans a phased transition designed to encourage users to close positions gradually.

Initially, affected markets would be frozen to new deposits, borrowing, and collateral usage, while existing lending and borrowing positions remain active. Supply and borrowing caps would then be reduced to a single token, preventing new activity while allowing markets to unwind naturally.

For deployments scheduled for retirement, Aave also proposes raising the reserve factor to 99%, directing nearly all borrower interest to the protocol treasury while sharply reducing depositor yields. A 5% base borrowing rate would further encourage borrowers to repay loans and withdraw liquidity.

If necessary, borrowing rates and liquidation parameters could be adjusted further until markets are largely inactive, after which live oracle feeds would be replaced with fixed-price oracles before each deployment is permanently retired.

Part of Aave’s Broader Evolution

The proposal reflects Aave’s broader strategic direction rather than a response to a single event.

In recent months, the protocol has placed greater emphasis on operational efficiency, disciplined expansion, and stronger governance. Earlier governance discussions had already questioned whether several newer blockchain deployments had achieved meaningful product-market fit, with community members proposing minimum revenue thresholds for future expansions.

At the same time, Aave continues investing in initiatives such as Aave V4, institutional DeFi products, and infrastructure upgrades focused on larger, more active markets. Founder Stani Kulechov has described the initiative as primarily a risk-reduction measure aimed at simplifying operations and allocating resources more efficiently.

Founder Stani Kulechov on X (Source: X)Founder Stani Kulechov on X (Source: X)

Founder Stani Kulechov on X (Source: X)

Governance Vote Still Pending

The proposal remains in the Aave Request for Comment (ARFC) stage and must still pass community discussion, an off-chain Snapshot vote, and a final on-chain Aave Improvement Proposal before implementation.

Until then, users are not required to take immediate action.

If approved, the plan would mark one of Aave’s most significant operational consolidations, underscoring a strategic shift from broad multi-chain expansion toward a leaner deployment strategy centered on efficiency, sustainable growth, and long-term resilience.



Source link

Strategy Posts $8.2 Billion Q2 Net Loss as Bitcoin Slump Cuts Holdings Value – NFT Plazas

0
Strategy Posts .2 Billion Q2 Net Loss as Bitcoin Slump Cuts Holdings Value – NFT Plazas


Strategy (NASDAQ: MSTR) reported an $8.22 billion net loss for the second quarter of 2026 after a decline in Bitcoin prices sharply reduced the reported value of its digital asset holdings under fair-value accounting rules. The results highlight how closely the company’s financial performance is now tied to cryptocurrency market movements, even as management continues expanding the world’s largest corporate Bitcoin treasury.

The quarterly loss stemmed almost entirely from an $8.32 billion fair-value markdown on Strategy’s Bitcoin portfolio rather than deterioration in its software business. While the headline figure represents one of the largest losses in the company’s history, executives emphasized that it primarily reflects accounting treatment rather than realized losses from selling Bitcoin.

Bitcoin Price Decline Hits Earnings

Strategy adopted FASB’s ASU 2023-08 accounting standard, which requires companies to report digital assets at fair value each quarter. Under the new rules, unrealized gains and losses on Bitcoin are recognized directly in net income, causing reported earnings to fluctuate alongside market prices.

As Bitcoin weakened during the second quarter, Strategy recorded an $8.32 billion markdown on its holdings, resulting in a net loss of $24.45 per diluted share. The figure marked a dramatic reversal from the prior-year quarter, when stronger cryptocurrency prices helped the company report a multibillion-dollar profit.

The accounting loss does not indicate that Strategy liquidated most of its Bitcoin holdings. Instead, it reflects the market value of assets the company continues to hold on its balance sheet.

Strategy Posts $8.2 Billion Q2 Net Loss as Bitcoin Slump Cuts Holdings Value

Strategy Posts $8.2 Billion Q2 Net Loss as Bitcoin Slump Cuts Holdings Value

Bitcoin Treasury Continues to Expand

Despite the quarterly loss, Strategy continued increasing its Bitcoin exposure.

As of July 26, the company owned 843,775 BTC, up 25% since the beginning of 2026. Bitcoin was acquired for approximately $63.7 billion, representing an average purchase price of about $75,500 per coin.

At recent market prices, the holdings were valued at roughly $54.8 billion, leaving the company with an unrealized shortfall of approximately $9 billion compared with its acquisition cost.

The latest figures reinforce Strategy’s position as the largest publicly traded corporate holder of Bitcoin.

Strategy's Bitcoin Holdings as of July 31, 2026. (Source: Saylor Tracker)Strategy's Bitcoin Holdings as of July 31, 2026. (Source: Saylor Tracker)

Strategy’s Bitcoin Holdings as of July 31, 2026. (Source: Saylor Tracker)

Strengthening Liquidity

Alongside its earnings report, Strategy highlighted several balance sheet initiatives designed to support its long-term Bitcoin strategy.

The company raised $17.06 billion through at-the-market equity offerings this year and repurchased $1.5 billion of convertible notes at an 8% discount, reducing outstanding debt.

Chief Financial Officer Andrew Kang said Strategy’s U.S. dollar reserve increased to $3.75 billion, enough to cover existing preferred dividend payments and interest obligations for more than 2.1 years.

Management said the stronger liquidity position provides flexibility to navigate market volatility while continuing to invest in Bitcoin.

Company Sells Bitcoin Under New Monetization Program

One of the quarter’s biggest developments was Strategy’s decision to sell a portion of its Bitcoin holdings.

The company disclosed that it sold approximately 3,588 BTC for around $218.4 million under its newly launched Bitcoin Monetization Program. The proceeds were used to strengthen cash reserves and help fund preferred stock dividend payments.

Although the sale represented less than 0.5% of Strategy’s total Bitcoin holdings, it marked a significant departure from the company’s long-standing practice of accumulating Bitcoin without selling.

Executive Chairman Michael Saylor said Strategy remains committed to expanding what it calls its Digital Credit business despite weaker Bitcoin sentiment. Rather than signaling a change in the company’s long-term conviction, management described the sales as part of a broader capital management strategy designed to support financial obligations while maintaining substantial Bitcoin exposure.

The company also authorized a $1 billion share repurchase program for its common stock, although no shares have yet been repurchased. Separately, Strategy bought back approximately $25 million of its STRC preferred shares while they traded below par value.

Investors Focus on Capital Structure

Beyond quarterly earnings, investors continue to watch Strategy’s increasingly sophisticated capital structure.

The company finances Bitcoin purchases through a combination of common equity, preferred stock, convertible debt, and cash reserves. While that approach has enabled continued Bitcoin accumulation, it also creates ongoing obligations through preferred dividends and interest payments.

Management argues its liquidity position provides sufficient flexibility to support those commitments while continuing to execute its Bitcoin strategy. However, analysts remain focused on whether the company can maintain that balance if cryptocurrency prices remain under pressure for an extended period.

At the same time, Strategy’s software business continues to generate steady revenue, although it now represents a relatively small portion of the company’s overall valuation compared with its Bitcoin holdings.

Outlook

Strategy’s latest earnings illustrate how dramatically fair-value accounting has changed the company’s financial reporting. Quarterly profits and losses are now largely driven by Bitcoin price movements rather than operating performance, making earnings considerably more volatile.

Even so, Strategy continues to increase its Bitcoin holdings and strengthen its balance sheet through new financing initiatives. While the introduction of its Bitcoin Monetization Program marks a more flexible treasury strategy than in previous years, management maintains that Bitcoin remains the cornerstone of the company’s long-term business model.

Future quarters will largely depend on cryptocurrency market performance. A sustained recovery in Bitcoin prices could reverse much of the current accounting loss under fair-value reporting, while continued weakness would likely keep earnings under pressure despite relatively stable operations. For investors, Strategy remains one of the market’s clearest publicly traded proxies for long-term Bitcoin exposure, with its financial results increasingly reflecting the cryptocurrency’s price cycle.



Source link

Axis Robotics Raises $12M to Crowdsource Robot Training Data

0
Axis Robotics Raises M to Crowdsource Robot Training Data


Axis Robotics, a startup developing data infrastructure for Physical AI, has raised $12 million in a seed round led by Hack VC, with participation from Nomad Capital, Pi Network Ventures, 10K Ventures, and several angel investors. Announced on July 27, the investment comes amid growing demand for robot training data as robotics companies expand deployments beyond testing environments.

Axis stated it will use the capital to expand its data engine for robot training, aiming to build a pipeline for continuous data generation and improvement for Physical AI systems.

A $12M Bet on Physical AI Data

The seed round places Axis among the startups building data infrastructure for Physical AI, rather than developing robots or foundation models. Led by Hack VC with participation from Nomad Capital, Pi Network Ventures, and 10K Ventures, the deal reflects a trend of investors beginning to view robot training data as an infrastructure layer capable of scaling alongside the robotics market.

This thesis stems from a common industry challenge: Physical AI systems cannot rely solely on datasets collected just once. As robots are deployed in real-world environments, models must continuously ingest additional data from new scenarios, detect errors, and update policies to improve performance over time.

Instead of competing on hardware or foundation models, Axis aims to build the infrastructure to generate, validate, and update data for the robot training process, targeting Physical AI development teams in need of data sources that can scale with their deployments.

Inside Axis’s Data Engine

Axis’s core product is a closed-loop data engine for robot training, combining large-scale simulation, real-world egocentric data, and a human-in-the-loop post-training process.

Axis’s data engine combines three layers of data. The first is large-scale simulation to generate robot trajectories across various environments, tasks, and robot embodiments. Next is egocentric data collected from the robot’s perspective in real-world environments. Finally, the company utilizes a human-in-the-loop process to review, correct errors, and improve policies during the post-training phase.

In its year-end roadmap, Axis plans to deploy human-gated DAgger — a variant of the imitation learning method that only requires human intervention when the robot makes incorrect decisions or needs correction. The company expects this approach to help reduce the cost of generating post-training data while maintaining the quality of data for training.

According to Axis, the company’s system has processed over 200,000 verified trajectories. Previous campaigns also recorded 10,000+ valid trajectories in 3 days and 100,000 trajectories in 5 days.

The Bottleneck Holding Back Robots

Unlike language foundation models, which are trained on massive amounts of internet data, Physical AI must learn from real-world interactions — where every action is tied to objects, spaces, physical forces, and various environmental conditions.

This makes robot training data significantly harder to scale. Data is often fragmented by robot type, task, hardware, and deployment environment, while a policy that works well on one robot may not necessarily transfer to another. The gap between simulation and real-world operating conditions also continues to be a major barrier to commercial-scale robot deployment.

Consequently, many robotics companies are shifting their attention to platforms capable of continuously generating and updating data, rather than merely scaling models or hardware.

What’s Next for Axis

Following the seed round, Axis will focus on expanding both its product capabilities and operational scale. In the coming months, the company expects to deploy an egocentric data pipeline in September, expand simulation to more robot embodiments and atomic capabilities in October, and launch a large-scale post-training dataset based on human-gated DAgger by the end of the year. According to Axis, the company has collected “tens of thousands of hours” of egocentric data and is co-developing product requirements with several frontier labs.

Alongside product expansion, Axis also aims to scale its contributor network. The company stated it currently has over 100,000 contributors and aims to expand into Latin America and Eastern Europe, while increasing daily active users to 10,000. Operationally, Axis aims to generate over 500 hours of egocentric data and 50 hours of simulation data daily, while also developing the capacity to generate corrective post-training data.

On the commercial front, Axis aims to complete two to three paid pilots before the end of the year and become a preferred vendor for foundation model development companies in Q1 of next year. In the long term, the company wants to integrate its data engine directly into the training and deployment workflows of robot developers, AI model developers, and industrial operators.

Although the roadmap is fairly well-defined, Axis still needs to prove that data generated from crowdsourcing combined with simulation can improve performance during real-world robot deployment, rather than just scaling the dataset. This outcome will determine whether the company’s data infrastructure model can become a critical infrastructure layer for Physical AI as the industry transitions from initial experiments to commercial-scale deployment.





Source link

Popular Posts

My Favorites