Charles Schwab opened up access to Schwab Crypto accounts this week, allowing users to trade Bitcoin and Ethereum.
The firm previously only offered exposure to crypto via ETFs and crypto-related equities.
Shares of SCHW are up around 1% on Wednesday.
Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.
Susanna Reid left fans with their jaws on the floor after rocking a skintight leather skirt on GMB.
The beloved presenter is no stranger to sending fans wild thanks to her stunning on-screen looks. And on Wednesday (May 13) Susanna was back at it when she returned to front the programme alongside Ed Balls.
And it was her daring ensemble that got plenty of viewers feeling hot under the collar…
On Wednesday (May 13) GMB was back on screens with Susanna and Ed at the helm.
For the latest instalment, Susanna looked sensational in a sheer blouse adorned with polka dots. Underneath she rocked a tight brown vest.
As for her bottoms, Susanna slipped into a skintight leather skirt that showed off every inch of her fabulous figure.
Finishing off the look, Susanna wore a pair of nude heels. As for hair and makeup, she went for a full face of glam and had her lush locks in curls that bounced around her face.
As expected, fans went wild over Susanna’s daring look, with one person writing on X: “SUSANNA fabulous sheer blouse and leather skirt/trousers. A second penned: “Susanna showing a good bit of cleavage this morning.”
The compliments came pouring in over on Instagram too after Susanna uploaded a photo of her posing up a storm in the GMB studio. In the comments section, another fan gushed: “Nobody does it better Susanna.”
Someone else quipped: “You are so hot, gorgeous and sexy what a milf.”
Echoing their thoughts, a third chimed in: “Broke the internet. Elite level!”
Gorgeous Susanna previously offered an insight into her diet and fitness, explaining that she “barely” does any exercise.
She told Woman & Home: “I barely do any exercise. It’s the one casualty of my current work-life balance. Like everyone, I can spend an hour on the sofa doom-scrolling, and if I got myself into gear, I could go to the gym for that hour. I just physically find it impossible. I don’t have the energy.”
In 2024 she also reflected on the changes in her weight and health since giving up alcohol.
“I prefer life alcohol-free. It’s tiring and the hangxiety got to me. I don’t feel like I can plough on after pints of Guinness the night before.
“It turned out that I was at the upper end of my BMI and, I have to admit, I’d been feeling a little heavy for a while. I’ve lost a stone and a half since then and I feel fantastic.”
Read more: Concerns for Katie Price after Susanna Reid’s baffling comments about her appearance on GMB today
What do you think of this story? You can leave us a comment on our Facebook page @EntertainmentDailyFix and let us know
Published: May 13, 2026 at 9:10 am Updated: May 13, 2026 at 5:23 am
MEXC, a pioneer in 0-fee digital asset trading, has officially launched Spot Grid Trading, further elevating the user experience within the spot trading ecosystem. The Spot Grid Trading bot empowers users to execute disciplined, systematic investment strategies, enabling them to capture market opportunities 24/7 without manual intervention.
MEXC Spot Grid Trading drives trading efficiency for investors through the following core advantages:
Market Adaptability: The grid bot is well-suited for volatile markets. By executing a continuous “buy low, sell high” strategy, the bot helps users accumulate grid profits during these market cycles.
Risk Control: Operating strictly within the spot market, the grid bot eliminates leverage-related risks and forced liquidation. Combined with customizable Take-Profit and Stop-Loss triggers, users maintain full control over their principal.
Capital Liquidity: Users can withdraw grid profits at any time during strategy operation, ensuring flexible capital management. Upon termination, the principal and all accrued profits are automatically transferred back to the user’s spot account.
The launch of Spot Grid Trading marks a significant milestone in MEXC’s commitment to building a user-centric trading ecosystem. As the gateway to infinite opportunities, MEXC empowers users to navigate market volatility with greater confidence and control. Moving forward, MEXC remains dedicated to strengthening its trading infrastructure, ensuring every user has access to the liquidity and execution speed required to effectively capture opportunities in the digital asset landscape.
About MEXC
MEXC is the world’s fastest-growing cryptocurrency exchange, trusted by more than 40 million users across 170+ markets. Built on a user-first philosophy, MEXC offers industry-leading 0-fee trading and access to over 3,000 digital assets. As the Gateway to Infinite Opportunities, MEXC provides a single platform where users can easily trade cryptocurrencies alongside tokenized assets, including stocks, ETFs, commodities, and precious metals.
MEXC Official Website｜ X ｜ Telegram ｜How to Sign Up on MEXC
For media inquiries, please contact MEXC PR team: [email protected]
Risk Disclaimer:
This content does not constitute investment advice. Given the highly volatile nature of the cryptocurrency market, investors are encouraged to carefully assess market fluctuations, project fundamentals, and potential financial risks before making any trading decisions.
Source
In line with the Trust Project guidelines, please note that the information provided on this page is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as legal, tax, investment, financial, or any other form of advice. It is important to only invest what you can afford to lose and to seek independent financial advice if you have any doubts. For further information, we suggest referring to the terms and conditions as well as the help and support pages provided by the issuer or advertiser. MetaversePost is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice.
Gregory, a digital nomad hailing from Poland, is not only a financial analyst but also a valuable contributor to various online magazines. With a wealth of experience in the financial industry, his insights and expertise have earned him recognition in numerous publications. Utilising his spare time effectively, Gregory is currently dedicated to writing a book about cryptocurrency and blockchain.
More articles
Gregory, a digital nomad hailing from Poland, is not only a financial analyst but also a valuable contributor to various online magazines. With a wealth of experience in the financial industry, his insights and expertise have earned him recognition in numerous publications. Utilising his spare time effectively, Gregory is currently dedicated to writing a book about cryptocurrency and blockchain.
The U.S. crypto ETF landscape reached another milestone on Tuesday when the first-ever spot Hyperliquid ETF began trading, adding a prominent DeFi-native token to the growing roster of digital assets accessible through conventional brokerage accounts. The debut was measured but encouraging — and it may only be the opening act.
Crypto asset manager 21Shares announced the launch of the 21Shares Hyperliquid ETF (Nasdaq: THYP) on May 12, offering U.S. investors direct spot exposure to HYPE — the native token of Hyperliquid — alongside integrated staking rewards. The firm simultaneously introduced a leveraged companion product, the 21Shares 2x Long HYPE ETF (Nasdaq: TXXH), for investors seeking amplified price exposure.
Bloomberg ETF analyst James Seyffart weighed in on the debut, calling it a promising start. “THYP finished the day at $1.8 million in trading. Very, very solid day and better than your average ETF launch for sure but nothing too crazy,” Seyffart posted to X. He also noted that Bitwise’s competing Hyperliquid ETF should be next to launch.
Alongside the trading volume, 21Shares reported approximately $1.2 million in net inflows on day one, giving investors an early datapoint on how quickly demand formed after the open.
For context, not all crypto ETF launches are created equal. The XRP ETF that debuted last November pulled in $58 million on its first day — a dramatically higher figure. THYP’s $1.8 million is considerably more modest, but analysts note that Hyperliquid is a newer, less broadly recognized name than XRP among retail investors, making the debut relatively respectable for the asset class.
21Shares announced the launch of the 21Shares Hyperliquid ETF
THYP is structured as a grantor trust — not a 1940 Act fund — which allows the sponsor to stake held HYPE for yield while maintaining passive price exposure. Custody sits with Anchorage Digital Bank and BitGo Bank & Trust, both using cold storage backed by up to $350 million in joint theft and fraud insurance.
The issuer listed a 0.3% annual management fee, the lowest among Hyperliquid ETF products as of May 12. Distribution dates show expected quarterly staking payments beginning June 30, with additional payable dates on September 30 and December 30.
However, investors should be aware of the fund’s structural limitations. THYP’s 33-Act ETP structure does not provide the same investor protections as registered funds. The staking mechanism also introduces risks tied to lock-up periods, unbonding intervals, and possible slashing penalties if a validator fails to perform. Staking rewards accrue to the trust but are not guaranteed, and THYP shares may trade at prices that deviate from the underlying token’s net asset value.
The leveraged companion product, TXXH, carries its own distinct risk profile. It is structured as a 40-Act ETF registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and carries a separate 1.89% management fee. TXXH is intended for sophisticated investors who understand the effects of daily compounding. That daily leverage reset means losses can compound quickly during sustained downturns — a critical consideration for anyone treating it as a long-term hold rather than a short-term tactical position.
What THYP Actually Offers Investors
The underlying protocol behind THYP is not a household name outside of DeFi circles, but its on-chain metrics are striking. Hyperliquid now accounts for more than 50% of decentralized perpetual futures open interest and processes roughly $8 billion in daily trading volume.
The protocol has accumulated over $4 trillion in cumulative trading volume since inception. It generates over $56 million in monthly trading fees, with more than 95% directed toward daily open-market HYPE buybacks — a deflationary mechanism designed to support token value over time. More than 76% of HYPE tokens are allocated to the community, while team tokens remain locked until 2028.
Andres Valencia, EVP of Investment Management at 21Shares, described Hyperliquid as a category-defining platform: “Having pioneered the first Hyperliquid exchange-traded product in Europe, we have seen the protocol evolve into a de facto global liquidity hub for decentralized derivatives.”
Hyperliquid (HYPE) 24H Price Chart on 13/5/2026 (Source: CoinMarketcap)
21Shares may have gotten to market first, but it won’t be alone for long. Bitwise filed its BHYP product as far back as September 2025, Grayscale followed with GHYP in March 2026, and 21Shares filed its second THYP amendment on April 14, 2026.
Bitwise’s updated S-1 for BHYP lists NYSE Arca as the intended exchange with a 0.67% annual management fee. The trust plans to stake a substantial portion of its HYPE holdings, with approximately 85% of staking rewards flowing back to NAV after fees — giving investors both price exposure and yield inside a regulated brokerage account.
Grayscale’s GHYP, if approved, would trade on Nasdaq with Anchorage Digital serving as custodian. The March filing notably included a “Staking Condition” allowing staking rewards to be incorporated at a later date, though staking is currently prohibited under the initial structure.
The broader expectation is that these competing products stand to benefit from the current regulatory environment, with a now pro-crypto SEC led by Paul Atkins.
The debut wasn’t untouched by broader market turbulence. HYPE was trading around the $40 level at the time of writing, under pressure alongside a broader crypto market pullback. The token carries significant volatility — the prospectus itself warns that HYPE’s annualized volatility exceeds 126%, and that THYP is unsuitable for investors who cannot afford a total loss.
Still, the bigger picture is hard to ignore. The arrival of THYP marks a meaningful expansion of what’s available to U.S. retail and institutional investors through standard brokerage accounts — and with Bitwise and Grayscale both in the queue, the question isn’t whether more HYPE ETFs are coming. It’s simply a matter of timing.
Exes Emma Roberts and Evan Peters made a rare joint appearance nearly seven years after their breakup.
Roberts, 35, and Peters, 39, were spotted sharing the stage at the Disney upfront presentation on Tuesday, May 13, per social media, where they promoted the upcoming 13th season of American Horror Story.
Both actors are staples across AHS seasons, even sharing the screen in multiple iterations of the horror anthology. In real life, Roberts and Peters dated on and off from 2012 to 2019.
One year into their relationship, Roberts was arrested for alleged domestic violence after an altercation with Peters.
“It was an unfortunate incident and misunderstanding,” a rep for Roberts and Peters told Us Weekly in a joint statement. “Ms. Roberts was released after questioning and the couple are working together to move past it.”
Roberts was eventually released before the charges were dropped. She and Peters continued to date, getting engaged in 2014. The duo, however, called it quits for good in 2019.
“Emma and Evan were heading for a split and now are just friends,” a source exclusively told Us at the time. “Evan has moved out. It wasn’t a bad breakup.”
Roberts subsequently moved on with actor Garrett Hedlund, welcoming son Rhodes in 2020. The pair broke up in 2022.
“I’m at a place where I can say, ‘I may not have got everything right, but I like who I am more than I ever have,’” the actress told Tatler later in 2022. “My life has changed more in the past two years than it did in the 28 years beforehand and I love where I’m standing now at the age of 30.”
Emma Roberts and Cody John have been packing on the PDA since their first social media post as a couple. “Sweet sweet,” John captioned an August 2022 Instagram post of him kissing the Holidate star on a boat. The intimate snap came less than a year after Us Weekly confirmed Roberts’ split from Garrett Hedlund […]
According to Roberts, she was focused on raising Rhodes to be an “utmost gentleman.”
“I want him to be respectful and intelligent at school but also in life,” the Belletrist founder stated. “What it means to be a man is being rewritten right now and I hope my contribution to the world can be raising an amazing boy who turns into an amazing man. I want him to feel that there’s nothing he couldn’t ask or tell me.”
Roberts eventually found love again with Cody John, and they got engaged in 2024.
“Putting this here before my mom tells everyone ❤️,” Roberts joked via Instagram in June 2024, sharing a photo of her diamond ring.
As for Peters, he has been linked to the likes of Halsey and Natalie Engel after his split from Roberts.
If you or someone you know is experiencing domestic violence, please call the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-7233 for confidential support.
Recently a few readers have asked about my dislike of quarter-zip (and half-zip) sweaters. This is probably, at least in part, because they’ve become so popular – both as a finance-office staple and as fashion.
In the same way as navy chinos, my objection to quarter zips is narrower than people often remember. The issue is also partly a result of that popularity (again like navy chinos). Men think they’re the answer to everything because they go with everything; but they’re not, because they don’t. Just with some things.
The idea is that a quarter zip is great because it can be worn with a shirt, but also with a T-shirt. Thus you can wear the same thing at work and at the weekend, and not have to think about it.
Unfortunately, most of the time a quarter zip doesn’t look great with a shirt. The sharp collar of the shirt points downwards, diagonally towards the arms, and the soft collar of the knit points upwards, diagonally towards the ears. The two are always going to butt against each other, and not sit together effectively or elegantly.
The quarter-zip sweater was originally a piece of sportswear, and it works best today over something like a T-shirt, with free rein to be zipped or unzipped. In that position it is both functional and flattering – framing the face nicely when it is open, and having an effect akin to a roll neck when zipped up under an overcoat.
A collared shirt has other knitwear that’s designed to work with it – a crewneck or a V-neck – and generally they sit much better with the collar.
The only issue with a crewneck or V-neck is that it’s harder to wear with a T-shirt – a topic it’s probably worth doing a separate article on at some point. And, a little depressingly, sometimes people say they’re too much fuss.
This came up recently in another article, where a reader was saying a crewneck is too hard to take on and off in the office, and so he wears a gilet.
Now, I get that some people are working very hard, are very tired, and clothing is nowhere near the top of their priority list. But it seems a little odd to take the time to read a niche blog about menswear, yet feel that taking off a crewneck is too much of a faff.
There’s perhaps another article here at some point – taking the time to enjoy, experience and maintain good clothing, in proportion to the time shopping for it. It’s something I’m certainly guilty of – I should spend more time having my clothes altered and cleaned, and in fact polishing my shoes, and less time browsing the internet in search of something new.
But I digress. I was saying, quarter zips can be great but they should be thought of primarily as sportswear. Now here come the caveats.
First, some shirt collars work better than others. A soft button-down oxford will roll outwards more with the neck of a quarter zip, and be a better partner than a stiff dress shirt. But still, I usually prefer a crewneck or a V-neck.
Second, sometimes the point of wearing a quarter zip with tailoring is the contrast with a sports wear. This is common in Ivy clothing. But, the point is that clash of ideas. If a clash is not what you’re going for, don’t wear it.
Third, wearing a quarter zip with a tie is in some ways better, because the shirt collar is tied down and flatter. It’s how they were worn originally, as ski wear and then for sports like golf. But still, these are different times and I’d prefer a V-neck.
Modern office uniforms are a little trickier than the suits and ties we had in the past, but not that hard.
Wear a soft-collared shirt, a nice crewneck sweater, a pair of chinos or tailored trousers, and a loafer/boot/derby. Just like a suit and tie, focus on good quality and a small number of pieces that go together. Top it off with a lightweight coat or jacket, and a heavier one. Sprinkle with accessories for interest.
A quarter zip is a great thing for the weekend, over a T-shirt, even if I personally wear collared knits like the Cashmere Rugby. And indeed prefer half zips to quarters – the latter can seem a little like V-necks that have all become too shallow, at least the shorter ones.
Lastly, there’s a current trend for extra-tall zipped collars, which fold down over the shoulders. I’ve tried this (above), and eventually found it too annoying that it doesn’t actually zip up, at least comfortably. There’s lots we can take from women’s fashions when it comes to half zips (see Chanel, below) but I don’t think that’s one of them.
The U.S. Senate Banking Committee will debate the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act on May 14, 2026, with over 100 amendments filed.
Senator Elizabeth Warren’s amendments aim to restrict the Federal Reserve’s ability to grant master accounts to crypto companies, shaping the bill’s future.
The bill’s outcome will significantly impact the crypto industry, as a proposed amendment by Senator Jack Reed seeks to ban cryptocurrencies as legal tender in the US.
It is May 13, 2026. In less than 24 hours, the U.S. Senate Banking Committee will open what is shaping up to be the most contested crypto hearing in American legislative history. At 10:30 AM Eastern Time on Thursday, May 14, 2026, committee members will convene in Room 538 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building in Washington, D.C. to begin debating, amending, and voting on the 309-page Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act.
What was supposed to be a straightforward committee markup has now turned into a full-scale legislative battle. According to Politico, committee members have filed more than 100 amendments to the bill.
Crypto journalist Eleanor Terrett disclosed on X that Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) alone submitted over 40 of those amendments, including one that would block the Federal Reserve from granting master accounts to crypto companies.
Senator Jack Reed (D-R.I.) went even further, proposing an amendment that would explicitly ban cryptocurrencies from ever being recognized as legal tender in the United States. This also includes a prohibition on using crypto to pay taxes at any level of government.
The amendment flood is arriving on top of an already brutal political environment for the bill. Five of the country’s largest labor unions came out against the CLARITY Act this week. The banking lobby rejected the stablecoin yield compromise on May 9. And the ethics standoff between Democrats and Republicans remains completely unresolved, with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer personally stepping in to push for progress, and a bipartisan meeting on Tuesday producing nothing concrete.
The bill was officially released on May 12 by Chairman Tim Scott (R-S.C.), Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), and Senator Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) through the Senate Banking Committee’s official page. Thefull 309-page draft, a section-by-section breakdown, and a Myth vs. Fact sheet were all published alongside the text. The House-passed version of the bill is publicly available on Congress.gov under H.R.3633.
Senator Warren’s amendment count is the highest from any individual committee member, and her package extends well beyond the ethics provisions she has been pushing for in recent weeks. The most aggressive proposal in her filing would prevent the Federal Reserve from granting master accounts to crypto companies.
A Fed master account provides direct access to the central bank’s payment rails, including real-time settlement through Fedwire and participation in the Automated Clearing House (ACH) network. Blocking crypto firms from this access would cut them off from one of the most critical on-ramps into the traditional financial system that several companies in the industry have been actively pursuing.
During the January 2026 markup attempt, which was cancelled after Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong pulled the company’s support, Warren had filed more than 20 amendments targeting stablecoin yield and crypto-friendly guidance issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
She has now more than doubled that number to over 40, signaling a deliberate strategy to either reshape the bill from within or force difficult votes on the record that slow down its path to the Senate floor.
In a statement released via the Senate Banking Committee’s minority press page, Warren described the current version of the bill as one that puts “investors, our national security, and our entire financial system at risk.” She pointed to what she estimated is $1.4 billion in crypto-related gains by President Donald Trump and his family and called the total absence of ethics provisions from the 309-page bill “stunning.”
As The Crypto Times reported on Tuesday, Warren urged that no committee member should support legislation that fails to address what she called “the massive conflict of interests posed by Donald Trump and his family’s crypto ventures.”
Senator Jack Reed’s amendment draws a completely different kind of line. His proposal would explicitly prohibit cryptocurrencies from ever being recognized as legal tender in the United States. It does not stop at the conceptual level.
The amendment would ban the use of crypto to pay taxes at the federal, state, and local levels, drawing a hard statutory line against any future scenario where digital currencies could be used to settle government obligations.
Reed has been one of the most consistent crypto skeptics on the committee. He and Warren have previously collaborated on the Digital Asset Sanctions Compliance Enhancement Act and have jointly pressed the Department of Justice and Treasury on national security risks tied to Trump-affiliated crypto ventures.
Galaxy Digital’s research team has flagged Reed as one of the Democratic members most likely to oppose the CLARITY Act, regardless of any compromise that is reached.
His legal tender amendment fits within a broader pattern of Democratic senators using the markup process to push maximalist proposals that test the limits of what the Republican majority will accept.
In what may be the most politically significant development heading into Thursday, five of the country’s largest labor unions have formally come out against the CLARITY Act. As The Crypto Times reported on May 12, the AFL-CIO, the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), the National Education Association (NEA), and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) all sent letters to the Senate Banking Committee warning that the bill could jeopardize retirement accounts for millions of American workers.
The AFL-CIO, which represents over 12.5 million members and is the largest labor federation in the country, warned in its letter that the CLARITY Act “will prompt a flood of digital assets into pension plans, retirement accounts, and our broader financial system under an ineffective regulatory system.”
The federation argued that while the bill would make “a small number of wealthy people even wealthier,” it would put working people at risk. The AFL-CIO urged the committee to oppose the bill outright.
The unions’ opposition is directly tied to President Trump’s February 2026 executive order that cleared the way for pension funds and retirement accounts to hold cryptocurrency assets. Labor leaders argue that combining that executive order with the CLARITY Act’s regulatory framework would create a direct pipeline for volatile digital assets to flow into workers’ retirement savings without the protections that currently exist for traditional financial instruments.
This is politically significant because organized labor carries enormous weight with Democratic senators, the exact group of lawmakers the CLARITY Act needs to reach its 60-vote threshold on the Senate floor. The AFL-CIO’s opposition makes it even harder for the handful of Democratic Banking Committee members who might have considered crossing the aisle to support the bill.
The labor opposition arrives on top of the banking industry’s own sustained campaign against the bill. On May 9, the three largest U.S. banking trade groups, the American Bankers Association (ABA), the Bank Policy Institute, and the Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA), formally rejected the Tillis-Alsobrooks stablecoin yield compromise that was brokered on May 1 to break the months-long stalemate.
The ABA’s CEO, Rob Nichols, reportedly told bank executives to call their senators over the weekend, arguing that the activity-based rewards carve-out in the bill still functions too much like interest-bearing deposit accounts and could trigger a migration of capital from the traditional banking system into stablecoin wallets.
The banking groups warned that every dollar moving from a checking account to a stablecoin balance is a dollar of cheap funding that banks lose, threatening their ability to issue mortgages, small-business loans, and agricultural credit.
The banking lobby and organized labor almost never align on financial regulation. Their convergence against the CLARITY Act, with banks opposing the competitive threat to deposits and unions warning about pension risk, creates a two-pronged political squeeze on committee Democrats who might otherwise have considered supporting the bill.
The ethics provision remains the single biggest obstacle to bipartisan support. The 309-page bill contains zero restrictions on senior government officials profiting from the crypto industry while shaping its regulation. Democrats have made this a non-negotiable condition for their votes, and the issue has now drawn in the highest levels of Democratic leadership.
Crypto journalist Eleanor Terrett reported on May 12 that Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer personally attended a Democratic member meeting where he appeared “engaged and eager for members to get to a yes on the Clarity Act” but stressed that ethics negotiations need to be further along before Thursday’s markup.
The Majority Leader’s personal involvement signals that Democratic leadership views the ethics fight not as a side issue but as the central obstacle to delivering a bill both parties can support on the Senate floor.
His insistence on more progress before Thursday also suggests that a party-line markup without Democratic buy-in is something the leadership wants to avoid, not just for the CLARITY Act itself, but for the broader political optics of regulating an industry in which the sitting President holds direct financial interests.
As The Crypto Times reported in its detailed analysis, a bipartisan meeting held Tuesday morning, where ethics issues were discussed, produced no concrete agreement. GOP and Democratic staff were set to reconvene Tuesday evening to review the filed amendments, but the gap between the two sides remained wide.
Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), who is named on Title I of the bill, told the audience at Consensus 2026 in Miami that the CLARITY Act will not go forward without an ethics provision. She did not leave room for interpretation: “This provision will be part of this bill, or it will not go forward. Because we cannot let greed and corruption in Washington tear this industry down, and without that provision, that’s exactly what will happen.”
Her office backed the position by citing a CoinDesk-commissioned poll showing 73% of registered U.S. voters support restricting officials from profiting off crypto while regulating it.
Senator Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) is reportedly pushing for even stronger provisions specifically targeting the Trump family’s crypto ventures, including World Liberty Financial and the TRUMP memecoin.
The White House has drawn its own line on the other side. Crypto adviser Patrick Witt said the administration supports ethics rules applied uniformly across all government positions but will reject any provision that singles out a specific officeholder or family. Witt has confirmed the administration’s July 4 target for signing the CLARITY Act into law.
That puts the White House and Senate Democrats on a direct collision course. Democrats want provisions that address the Trump family’s expanding crypto portfolio. The White House says it will reject any language targeting a specific person.
The gap between “uniform rules” and “targeted restrictions” is exactly the fault line where the CLARITY Act could fracture, and Tuesday’s bipartisan meeting produced no concrete direction, suggesting that fault line has not narrowed.
The sheer volume of amendments creates a logistical and political challenge that goes beyond the ethics debate. Over 100 amendments mean Thursday’s session could stretch well beyond a single day. Each amendment must be formally introduced, debated, and voted on.
If Democrats choose to force roll-call votes on a significant portion of their filings, the markup could turn into a multi-day marathon that eats directly into the narrow window before the May 21 Memorial Day recess.
Senate Republicans mounted a preemptive defense of the bill on May 12, releasing aMyth vs. Fact sheet that pushed back on claims that the CLARITY Act would weaken securities law, create loopholes, or ignore illicit finance risks.
The committee’s Republican majority argued that the bill instead assigns clear regulatory authority between the SEC and CFTC, requires disclosures, and adds anti-fraud protections across digital asset markets.
Chairman Scott has publicly framed the legislation as the product of “serious, good-faith work across the committee” and said it “puts consumers first, combats illicit finance, cracks down on criminals and foreign adversaries and keeps the future of finance here in the United States.”
Scott can technically pass the bill out of committee on a party-line vote. The Senate Banking Committee has 13 Republicans and 11 Democrats. But the committee vote is not the real test.
On the full Senate floor, 60 votes are required for passage. The GENIUS Act cleared the Senate 68-30 last year with strong bipartisan support. Without ethics language, Democrats are organizing against the CLARITY Act rather than toward it, making that kind of margin nearly impossible to replicate. At least seven Democrats would need to cross the aisle.
Even the committee vote is not guaranteed. According to Punchbowl News, Senator John Kennedy (R-La.) has not committed to voting yes, and his hesitation reportedly has nothing to do with crypto policy. If even one Republican defects, Scott would need a Democratic crossover to pass the bill out of committee.
Senator Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), who ran on a moderate platform with crypto industry support, is considered the most likely Democratic swing vote but has not committed publicly. Galaxy Digital’s Head of Research, Alex Thorn, has said that while the bill can still advance out of committee on a partisan vote, “the odds of ultimate Senate passage are certainly diminished if no Democrats vote in favor during committee markup on Thursday.”
Senator Cynthia Lummis has warned repeatedly that if the bill does not clear the committee before the May 21 Memorial Day recess, it could effectively be pushed to 2030. Senator Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio) has echoed the same warning.
On the other side of the fight, the crypto industry has rallied behind the bill and is urging lawmakers to move forward. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong backed the CLARITY Act after reversing his January opposition following the Tillis-Alsobrooks stablecoin yield compromise on May 1.
The Blockchain Association called the legislation “a step in the right direction.”Michael Saylor praised the bill’s digital yield provisions as a potential game-changer for institutional adoption.
The DeFi Education Fund said it was “encouraged by the direction of recent negotiations” and pointed to the bill’s protections for developers and infrastructure providers under the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act and Exchange Act provisions.
Coinbase, Robinhood, the Digital Chamber, the Blockchain Association, and the Solana Policy Institute have all publicly urged passage, framing the bill as a bipartisan, voter-backed priority. A HarrisX poll released last week found that 52% of registered voters support the CLARITY Act, with 70% of Americans saying Congress should have already passed crypto legislation.
On Polymarket, the odds of the CLARITY Act becoming law in 2026 currently sit at roughly 75%.
But that number gets stress-tested tomorrow morning.
In less than 24 hours, Room 538 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building becomes the center of the crypto world.
Thursday, May 14, 2026 10:30 AM Eastern Time | 8:00 PM Indian Standard Time
Three outcomes are possible.
The bill passes committee cleanly, potentially with one or two Democratic crossovers, and heads to reconciliation with the Senate Agriculture Committee’s version before a full Senate floor vote targeted for June. That would keep the White House’s July 4 signing timeline alive and send a strong bipartisan signal to the market.
The bill passes on a strict 13-11 party-line vote. It still advances, but the signal is that 60 votes on the Senate floor will be extremely difficult to reach without meaningful concessions on ethics. The realistic signing timeline slips to October or later.
The bill stalls or fails. If Kennedy defects, or if procedural delays from 100-plus amendments push the session past the May 21 Memorial Day recess without a completed vote, the CLARITY Act effectively dies for 2026 and potentially for the rest of the decade.
Warren’s 40-plus amendments. Reed’s legal tender ban. The AFL-CIO’s pension warning. The banking lobby’s stablecoin rejection. Schumer’s personal intervention. The unresolved ethics standoff. Over 100 proposed changes to a 309-page bill. It has all converged on the same 24-hour window.
The CLARITY Act has survived every obstacle thrown at it over the past 10 months. Tomorrow, it faces all of them at once.
Also Read: CLARITY Act’s May 14 Senate Test: What Happens Next?
Disclaimer: The information researched and reported by The Crypto Times is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional financial advice. Investing in crypto assets involves significant risk due to market volatility. Always Do Your Own Research (DYOR) and consult with a qualified Financial Advisor before making any investment decisions.
May 13, 2026
If you’ve been looking at winter shoe trends recently, you probably saw the big and modern look of Moon Boot. Easy to spot for their thick shape and space-themed style, Moon Boots have turned into a fashion sign and an important winter need. But before buying a pair, lots of buyers want a clear and true Moon Boot review to see if they are worth the fuss.
First thought of from the 1969 trip to the moon, Moon Boots have changed into a group loved by style fans and winter adventurers. They are often spotted at ski places, snowy spots and even in city fashion scenes. But, their special shape brings up big questions about ease, comfort, usability and sizing.
Are they really cozy enough for tough winter weather? Do they prove their cost? And most importantly, are they useful for daily wear or just a style fad?
In this in-depth review of moon boots we will go over all you should know from looks and ease to fit, good points and bad points and if they are the right pick for your winter outfits.
Moon Boot is a cold weather shoe name known for its famous, big snow shoes inspired by space gear. Made to give warmth and safety in chilly weather, these shoes mix use with a striking, stylish look.
Moon Boots are usually made of water-proof outside stuff, soft inside padding and a rubber bottom for holding on snowy ground. Their tall style helps to keep feet cozy by holding in warmth while the soft inside adds ease.
Unlike old winter shoes, Moon Boots focus on both ͏how well they work and how they look. They come in many colors, styles, and types making them good for outside use or dressing up.
One of the largest reasons for the fame of Moon Boots is their unique look. The big, fluffy shape quickly makes them different from regular winter shoes.
The shoes often have a tied-up front, a round toe, and a heavy bottom, all of which add to their modern look. This style not only makes a strong fashion point but also does a useful job by giving warmth and help.
Moon Boots are found in many styles, from plain black and white to shiny looks and bright shades. This choice gives people a chance to pick a pair that fits their own style.
When it is about comfort, Moon Boot is unique for its soft, cushy inside and light weight feel making it great for casual winter wear. The boots are made with thick foam stuffing that wraps around the foot creating a comfy almost slipper like feeling. This makes them very cozy in cold weather as they not only keep your feet warm but also lessen pressure during quick walks or daily errands.
One special thing about Moon Boots is their different fit shape. Unlike regular shoes, lots of styles don’t have a clear left or right form at first. Instead, the soft lining slowly changes to your foot as you wear them more, making it feel more like yours. This might seem odd in the beginning but gets comfier after a couple wears.
Choosing the right size can be a bit hard. Moon Boots often come in two sizes, so they might feel a little loose or not quite right like normal shoes. If you are in between sizes, it is usually best to pick a bigger size for more comfort, especially if you want to wear warm winter socks.
In all, Moon Boots focus on heat and padding more than strong support, which makes them comfy for relaxing times but not so great for long strolls or active wear.
When it is about cold weather use, Moon Boot works really well for warmth and cover. This makes it a great pick for winter trips and snowy places. These boots are made with thick foam or man-made fiber that keeps body heat inside well and keeps feet warm even when it’s super cold. Their tall style also helps keep in heat and stops the cold air and snow from getting into the boot.
In real life, Moon Boots work better on cold, dry snow than on wet or sloppy places. The outside material is usually water-proof which means it can deal with light snow and wetness but it ain’t fully waterproof.
This makes them great for easy winter use, ski trips, and outside walks, instead of thick rain or deep mud. For grip, the rubber bottom gives enough hold on snow-covered grounds but it may not work as good on icy areas. Also, though the boots are light and comfy, they aren’t made for big activities like hiking or long walks.
Moon Boots do a great job of keeping your feet warm and comfy, but they work better in easy winter places than tough outdoor weather.
Unique and stylish designExcellent warmth and insulationLightweight and comfortableAvailable in various colors and styles
Bulky appearance may not suit everyoneLimited sizing precisionNot ideal for heavy outdoor activitiesPremium pricing
If you’re curious if they meet the buzz, this moon boots check says that Moon Boot can really be worth the money- based on your needs and way of life.
One of the main reasons folks pick Moon Boots is their special mix of style and use. Unlike usual winter shoes, they show off a strong look while still giving nice heat and ease. The big stuffing and soft inside make them great for chilly times, especially when traveling, skiing, or just having fun in winter.
One more plus is their light build. Even with their big look, they are simple to walk in for little to medium times, which makes them handy for daily wear in cold places. Their unique style also brings a cool, stylish touch to winter clothes that attracts fashion-minded shoppers.
But, they might not be the best pick for all. If you want boots for hard outside work, long steps, or harsh weather, some other types could fit better. All in all, Moon Boots are good if you care more about style, heat, and ease over top-level performance.
In this Moon Boots look, it’s clear that Moon Boot mixes bold style with good winter comfort. These boots stand out for their heat, light feel, and nice look, making them a popular pick for both travel and casual winter use. While they may not be best for tough outdoor tasks or deep snow times, they work well for daily use in cold places. If you’re wanting stylish comfy shoes that bring a statement to your winter clothes, are Moon Boots really worth thinking about as a stylish and useful choice?
Yes, they are good for s͏oft snow and chilly weather.
They use dual sizing, so fit may vary slightly.
They are water-resistant but not fully waterproof.
Yes, especially in cold climates.
Yes, if you prioritize style and warmth.
May 13, 2026
When buying designer shoes, one of the biggest questions buyers ask is: are Karl Lagerfeld shoes true to size? Fit is a main piece of both ease and look and even the fanciest pair of shoes can be a bummer if the size isn’t right. Karl Lagerfeld, known for his new Paris style and bright but simple-to-wear designs, has become a favorite choice for fashion lovers seeking bold shoes at an easier price.
Karl Lagerfeld shoes are popular for their nice forms, strong looks and flexible styles. From sneakers and slip-on to boots and high heels, the brand has a big variety of types that fit many fashion preferences. But, like many fancy brands, size can sometimes change based on the style, fabric and make of the shoe.
Knowing if the Karl Lagerfeld shoes fit just right is very key for people who buy online and can’t try them on first. Things like foot shape, how wide they are and what kind of shoe it is all change how a pair fits. Some designs may feel tight at first but others can be more easy to wear.
In this full buying guide we’ll look at all you need to know about Karl Lagerfeld shoes, like size truth fit in different styles tips for picking the right size and what to look for in comfort and fit. Whether you are getting your first pair or adding to your set this guide will help you make a sure and smart ch͏oice.
The query if Karl Lagerfeld shoes fit well is one that many shoppers ask before purchasing. Usually, the Karl Lagerfeld shoes are accurate to size, especially when compared with normal European sizes. Most people see that their normal size fits well, mainly in sneakers, casual shoes and boots.
But, it’s key to see that size can change a bit based on the kind and stuff of the shoe. For instance, leather shoes might feel a bit tight at first but usually grow softer and fit your feet better as time goes by. On the flip side, types made from fake materials may not stretch much which can mess with the fit.
High shoes and sharp-toe shapes are the place where size gaps are most clear. These styles can at times seem tight, notably for people with broad feet. In those situations, going up by half a size might give a nicer fit. Likewise, boots with a firm shape may feel snugger around the ankle or leg area based on how they are cut.
One more thing to think about is foot form. Karl Lagerfeld shoes are mainly made for a normal foot width, but folks with wider or thinner feet may feel different comfort levels. That’s why it is nice to check out product reviews when they’re available; they often offer advice on how a certain style fits.
In general, Karl Lagerfeld shoes are mostly right in size but small changes might be needed based on the style. If you’re not sure, it’s best to stay with your normal size, making little tweaks for the certain design and how you like them to fit.
When figuring out if Karl Lagerfeld shoes fit your size it’s important to check how they fit in different groups. Karl Lagerfeld has a lot of types of shoes and each style may feel a little different based on how they are made and what stuff is used. Here is a simple guide to help you choose the right size for the shoe type.
Karl Lagerfeld shoes are some of the best when it comes to fit. Most designs stay true to size and are made for daily ease. They usually have soft soles, airy tops, and bendy make, which makes them good for wearing for a long time. If you like a tight feel your usual size should do fine. But if you want a bit more space or plan to wear thick socks going up half a size can make it comfier. All in all, shoes are the best choice for new buyers.
Boots from Karl Lagerfeld usually go with normal sizes but the fit can change with type. Ankle boots often feel very nice and are easy to wear with lots of clothes. But, knee-high or tight boots can feel tighter around a calf or ankle mostly if they are made of stiff material. If you have broad calves or wish to wear them with bulkier clothes, think about getting a bigger size. Also, leather boots might feel tight at first but usually get looser as you wear them.
Heels are where size can seem a little strange. Many Karl Lagerfeld heels, especially pointy styles, often feel a bit tight. If you have average feet, your normal size should be fine but people with wider feet might find them snug. In those cases, it’s good to go up half a size. The height of the heel also matters for comfort— taller heels can press more on the front of the foot making fit much more important. Picking the correct size helps with good balance and lasting use.
Slip-ons and shoes often give a good size fit, but they can feel snug at first, especially if it’s made of leather. This is normal because leather tends to stretch and mold itself to your feet as time goes on. If you find yourself between sizes it’s usually better to choose the larger size for more comfort.These types are good for daily use and bring together style with usefulness.
Karl Lagerfeld flip flops usually fit as expected, but they can change based on where the straps are and how they͏ are made. Straps that you can change give a better fit, while ones that don’t may seem tight or loose depending on how wide your foot is. If you have broad feet, search for types with bendy straps or think about getting a little bigger size.
All in all, while many Karl Lagerfeld shoes fit as they should, a few changes based on shoe kind and how comfy you feel can make big changes.
When finding out if Karl Lagerfeld shoes fit r͏ight size, it’s important to know that lots of things can change how a pair feels on your feet. Although Karl Lagerfeld mostly sticks to normal European sizes, the last fit can change based on a mix of style, stuff, and personal foot traits.
One of the biggest things is stuff. Shoes made of real skin feel a little snug at first, but then they ease up and match your feet more as you use them. This makes them nicer to wear in the long run. On the other hand, fake materials or covered cloth often have less give and do not change much, which means the first fit will probably stay like that.
Another key thing is the form and build of the shoe. Pointed-toe kinds, slim forms, and hard boots often feel tighter than rounded-toe or easy styles. Also, shoes with little bend or stiff build might need a better fit from the start. Height of heel can too change how weight is spread on foot – changing comfort overall.
Foot form and width matter a lot. Karl Lagerfeld shoes are often made for normal foot widths, so people with wider or thinner feet might feel changes in how they fit. Persons with wide feet may find some styles a little snug mainly in slim designs and could benefit from getting a bigger size.
Finally, use and time worn should be thought about. Shoes made for long times of wear should have some more room for comfort, because feet can get a bit bigger during the day. By thinking about these things you can make good choices and find the right fit.
Picking the right size is important when you are choosing if Karl Lagerfeld shoes are true to size, mainly if you’re buying online. While Karl Lagerfeld usually sticks with normal European sizes, some useful tips can help make sure you get a good fit each time.
Begin by finding your true foot measurements. Measure the length and width of your feet, then check them with the brand’s size chart. As European sizes can change a bit from UK or US sizes, trusting in measurements instead of guesses is always a better way.
Next, think about what type of shoe you are getting. Sneakers and flats often fit well, but heels or pointy shoes might feel tight. If you’re buying a hard or narrow style, trying one half size bigger can help with comfort – especially for wide feet.
One more handy tip is to look at buyer thoughts for a certain item. Thoughts often show if a certain kind is small, big, or just right. This real-life feedback can be super helpful, especially when sizes change a bit in different styles.
Think about when and how you will wear the shoes. Feet often get a little larger at the end of day, so choosing a size that fits this can stop pain. If you want to wear cozy socks with boots or shoes, leave some more room.
Also pay attention to stuff and bendability. Leather shoes can widen over time, so a tight fit at first is fine. But, man-made stu͏ff does not widen much, so you should seek a cozy fit from the start. By joining these hints, you can surely pick the best fit and make sure of both ease and style in your Karl Lagerfeld shoes.
When looking at comfort, Karl Lagerfeld shoes usually hit a nice mix of style and daily wear. Though the name is mostly known for its stylish look, many of its shoe styles are made with cozy parts that make them fine for regular wear.
One big reason Karl Lagerfeld’s shoes are thought to be cozy is the use of nice stuff and soft shape. Many sneakers and laid-back types have fluffy insoles, bendy bottoms and airy fabrics, which help lessen foot tiredness during long times of wearing. For instance, styles like Karl Lagerfeld Ikon NFT Kapri Sneakers and Karl Lagerfeld Men’s Everyday Essential Leather Sneaker are known for mixing a nice look with steady soles and light build – making them great for everyday tasks.
Based on product info and brand talks, Ka͏rl Lagerfeld shoes are often made with stuff like leather, soft fabric, rubber and plastic. This helps in both strength and ease. These items not only improve the touch of the shoe but also give bendability and help for different foot actions.
Yet, ease can change based on the kind of shoe. Sneakers and flats are usually the coziest choices, giving padding and simple motion. In contrast, heels and hard boots might need a little time to fit in well; this is especially true if they have a stiff shape or sharp tip.
Another thing to consider is fit. Since many Karl Lagerfeld shoes are the right size, choosing the correct size is very key for comfort. A nice fit offers more support and lessens the chance of trouble when used for a long time.
To sum up, Karl Lagerfeld’s shoes are mostly comfy for daily wear, mainly in easy styles. Although some designs may care more about looks than comfort, choosing the right style and size makes sure of a good wearing time.
When picking if to put money in Karl Lagerfeld shoes, knowing the pros and cons can help you make better choices.
Stylish and distinctive designs: Karl Lagerfeld shoes are famous for their fresh, bold look often showing brand names and special designs that lift any outfit.Good quality materials: The brand uses stuff like hide, soft fabric, and rubber which help with lastingness and a nice touch.Comfort-focused construction: Lots of types, like shoes, have soft bottoms and bendy outside parts. This makes them good for daily use. Versatile options: From chill shoes to nice high shoes and boots, the brand gives many kinds of styles for all sorts of times.Generally true to size: Many users think the size is right which makes shopping online simple.
Some styles run narrow: Sharp-toed shoes and strong shapes can seem snug, mostly for big feet.Break-in period required: Leather shoes may feel hard at first but will change to fit your foot shape. Premium pricing: Though not super fancy, the brand still fits into a more expensive group than regular shoes.Limited stretch in synthetic materials: No-leather styles might not change a lot over time; it can hurt comfort.
In general, Karl Lagerfeld’s shoes give a good blend of style and use but picking the right kind and fit is important for getting the most comfort.
To answer the question, if Karl Lagerfeld shoes are true to size, the main opinion is mostly good. Karl Lagerfeld shoes usually stick to normal European sizes, making it a trusted choice for many buyers. Whether you are getting sneakers, boots , heels or casual flats sticking with your regular size is often a safe beginning point. But like any brand, small differences can happen based on the type material and shape of the shoe.
One main point from this guide is that fit isn’t only about size— it’s about knowing the design. Sneakers and daily styles usually give the best and most comfy fit, while heels and sharp designs might need more careful size choice, especially for people with wider feet. The materials also matter, as leather changes over time and man-made choices keep their first shape.
Ease is another big part of Karl Lagerfeld’s shoes. The brand does a good job of mixing trendy looks with useful parts like soft soles and tough build. While some types might need a little time to get used to, the whole feeling is usually pleasing when you pick the right size.
For folks who shop online, it’s good to check your feet size, look at size charts, and think about how you will use the shoes to make a big change. Those little steps help make sure of better fit and lessen chances of returns or hurt.
To wrap up, Karl Lagerfeld shoes are a good pick for folks wanting stylish, new shoes with consistent fit. By knowing your needs and the facts of each style you can surely find a pair that offers both ͏comfort and style.
Many styles fit right, but a few slim ones might seem a bit tight.
If you have big feet or like more ease, picking one half size bigger is suggested.
Yes, they are made for daily use with soft bottoms.
Leather types can bend a bit, but ͏fake stuff mostly does not.
Yes, as long as you check size charts and think about style tips for fit.
I’ve been testing wearable tech for years, and let’s be honest: our wrists and fingers are getting a little crowded. Between the bulky smartwatches that disrupt our sleep and the smart rings that inevitably get scratched on the keyboard, I’ve been waiting for the next logical step in bio-tracking. When you’re pulling 14 or 15-hour workdays—juggling office hours at the bank and then immediately switching to the editing desk until dawn to get these articles out to you—monitoring stress, recovery, and sleep isn’t just a fun hobby; it’s absolute survival.
That’s why when I saw what just happened on Kickstarter, I was genuinely shocked. We are witnessing a massive shift in how we interact with health data, and it’s moving straight from the wrist to the earlobe.
Let’s talk about the Lumia 2. This isn’t just another flashing gadget; it’s a piece of premium jewelry that might just make your smartwatch obsolete.
Normally, I look at crowdfunding campaigns with a healthy dose of skepticism. A lot of promises are made, and very few are kept. But the Lumia 2 campaign wasn’t just successful; it was an absolute flex.
Funded in Minutes: The project hit its initial financial goal in exactly three minutes.Massive Backing: It quickly amassed around $1.5 million in support from early adopters.
This tells me something crucial about where our relationship with technology is heading. We are tired of screens flashing on our wrists during meetings or buzzing while we try to relax. We want the biometric data, but we want the hardware to be completely invisible. The incredible demand for the Lumia 2 proves that the market is starving for highly functional, discreet aesthetics.
You might be wondering, “Why earrings?” It sounds like a futuristic fashion gimmick at first, but when you dig into the human anatomy, it actually makes terrifyingly good sense.
Think about your smartwatch. Every time you type, flex your wrist, wash your hands, or toss and turn in bed, the sensor shifts slightly on your skin. That movement creates “noise” and inaccuracies in the data. Smart rings solved some of this, but finger space is limited, and our fingers naturally swell throughout the day.
The earlobe, however, is prime real estate for biometric sensors for two major reasons:
Shallow Veins: The blood vessels behind the ear are incredibly close to the surface of the skin. This allows optical sensors to get a much clearer, stronger, and more accurate reading of your blood flow.Ultimate Stability: Your earlobe doesn’t flex or bend like a wrist joint. The sensor stays flush and stable against the skin, providing uninterrupted data flow even when you are walking, running, or sleeping.
By utilizing this incredibly stable biological environment, the Lumia 2 tracks over 20 different health parameters, including continuous heart rate, blood flow, and deep sleep metrics. Previous companies, like Incora Health, toyed with this idea, but Lumia 2 seems to be the first to truly perfect the execution.
What really caught my attention while researching this device is the “set it and forget it” philosophy behind its design. The goal is zero friction in your daily routine.
Here is what makes the daily experience with these smart earrings stand out:
Aesthetic Materials: These aren’t clunky plastic clip-ons that scream “tech nerd.” They are crafted from premium materials like gold, silver, and titanium. They look exactly like high-end jewelry, completely masking the advanced micro-sensors inside.Marathon Battery Life: One single charge gives you a full week of continuous use. No more taking your watch off every night to charge it.Advanced HRV Tracking: Heart Rate Variability (HRV) is the gold standard for measuring your body’s stress levels and nervous system recovery. The Lumia 2 quietly logs this throughout the day, sending a comprehensive map of your stress straight to your phone.
You can even customize how often the device pings for data, allowing you to build a highly personalized, granular health profile over time. Honestly, wearing a heavy watch to bed has always bothered me. Something as light as a titanium earring that tracks my sleep cycles without me even noticing its existence? That’s a game-changer for anyone trying to optimize their rest without compromising their comfort.
With a device this intimate, collecting your most personal biological data 24/7, privacy is the massive elephant in the room.
Daniel Lee, the founder of Lumia Health, recently addressed this, noting that his motivation for the project was highly personal and that the company claims a strict stance on data security. Your biometric information is heavily encrypted, and you have the option to keep your profile completely anonymous. According to the brand, the data is only shared with secure, highly regulated servers strictly for storage purposes.
Now, let’s talk about the investment.
Hardware Cost: The Lumia 2 is slated to hit retail shelves in December 2026 with an initial price tag of $249.The Subscription Catch: To unlock the full power of the mobile app and deep analytics, there is an ongoing $20 monthly subscription fee.
This subscription model is quickly becoming the frustrating standard in wearable tech, but it’s definitely something you need to factor into the long-term cost before taking the plunge.
We are moving into a fascinating era where technology doesn’t look like technology anymore. The line between high fashion and bio-hacking is rapidly blurring, and the Lumia 2 is leading the charge. It represents a subtle shift toward a practical transhumanism—where our bodies are continuously monitored and optimized by powerful devices that seamlessly blend into our personal style.
I’m seriously considering ditching my smartwatch for a pair of these when they finally drop. The idea of getting hyper-accurate health data without feeling like I’m wearing a miniature smartphone on my arm appeals to me deeply.
But I want to turn this over to you, Spartans. Are we truly ready to move our tech from our wrists to our ears? Would you pay a monthly subscription for a piece of jewelry that tracks your every heartbeat, or does a device that intimate feel a little too invasive for your daily routine? Let me know what you think down in the comments!
