Home Blog

‘Riverdale’ Star Reportedly Cuts Off Dad After He Married Her Ex-BFF

    0
    ‘Riverdale’ Star Reportedly Cuts Off Dad After He Married Her Ex-BFF


    A reported family fallout is making headlines for “Riverdale” actress Hayley Law, and the details are turning heads. According to new reports, the actress is allegedly at odds with her father after he married someone much younger, who also happens to be Hayley’s former best friend and one-time co-star. The alleged feud has reportedly left deep fractures within the family, with insiders claiming the “Riverdale” actress has distanced herself from both her father and the woman she once considered a close friend.

    River / MEGA

    Hayley is best known for playing Valerie Brown on “Riverdale,” but off-screen, sources claim she has been navigating painful family drama. According to the Daily Mail, Hayley’s father, casting director Blair Law, recently married actress Caitlin Mitchell-Markovitch, who is not only significantly younger than him, but also reportedly once shared a close friendship with Hayley.

    Caitlin appeared on “Riverdale” in a minor role as Ginger Lopez and reportedly attended school with Hayley years earlier. Last month, Caitlin shared photos from her bridal shower on Instagram, though Hayley was noticeably absent from the celebration.

    Insider Claims Hayley Felt ‘Ultimate Betrayal’

    Hayley Law at Los Angeles Premiere Of Amazon Prime Video's 'Something From Tiffany's'
    Xavier Collin/Image Press Agency/MEGA

    According to an insider, Hayley and Caitlin were once extremely close. The source claimed the pair “were very close” and had previously been photographed together in multiple family social media posts.

    However, Blair’s reported relationship with Hayley’s former friend allegedly caused a major rift. “This felt like the ultimate betrayal from both of them,” the insider claimed. “They’ve been together for a while now.”

    According to the source, Hayley “cannot get behind this union or the relationship” and “hasn’t spoken to her dad in quite some time.” The insider also alleged that Blair is in his sixties and is a well-known casting director in Vancouver.

    Hayley Law at Los Angeles Premiere Of Apple TV+'s Original Series 'See' Season 3
    Xavier Collin/Image Press Agency/MEGA

    Fans also reportedly noticed signs of tension online. According to reports, Hayley has unfollowed both her father and Caitlin on social media. Meanwhile, her sister Brittany, who reportedly attended the wedding, still follows both.

    Blair has also reportedly continued sharing photos celebrating Hayley’s career achievements online, though there are allegedly no photos of him featured on Hayley’s Instagram page. In contrast, insiders say Hayley has remained especially close with her mother following her parents’ separation years ago.

    Hayley Law Has Reportedly Stayed Close With Her Mother

    Hayley Law at Apple TV+s ''Number One on the Call Sheet'' LA Premiere
    ZUMAPRESS.com / MEGA

    The source also claimed Hayley’s bond with her mother remained strong throughout childhood. “Hayley was always very close with her mom growing up,” the insider alleged. “She was always present, and she basically raised her kids as a single mom. Blair wasn’t a consistent presence and wasn’t as involved in their lives as she was.”

    The insider further claimed Hayley’s mother played a major role in encouraging her acting ambitions. “Their mom really loved being a stage mom almost. She really wanted Hayley, especially, to get into acting,” they said. “The split from their mom was quite messy.”

    Blair Law And Caitlin Mitchell-Markovitch Went Public In 2025

    Blair Law And Caitlin Mitchell-Markovitch
    Instagram | Caitlin Law

    Blair and Caitlin officially debuted their relationship publicly in October 2025 when they announced their engagement on Instagram. “Hard launch!” the caption read alongside a diamond ring emoji. The couple later celebrated their engagement in Las Vegas before Caitlin shared bridal shower photos in April.

    According to old social media posts, Caitlin and Hayley once appeared especially close, with Blair previously sharing photos of the pair celebrating birthdays and spending time together, including a Disneyland trip in 2020.

    Now, insiders claim what was once a tight-knit friendship has reportedly become a painful family divide.

    Who Is Hayley Law?

    Hayley Law at World Premiere Of Apple TV+'S ''Pluribus''
    ZUMAPRESS.com / MEGA

    While Hayley is now making headlines for reported family drama, many fans first came to know the actress through her breakout role on “Riverdale.” The Canadian actress starred as Valerie Brown on the hit CW series, appearing in the show’s first season as a member of Josie and the Pussycats alongside Ashleigh Murray and Asha Bromfield.

    Outside of Riverdale, Hayley has continued building her acting and music career. She appeared in Netflix’s “Altered Carbon,” Freeform’s “The New Romantic,” and the horror film “Mark, Mary & Some Other People.” She also landed a lead role in the supernatural drama “The Good Doctor” spinoff-adjacent series “Moonshine” and appeared in several independent film projects in recent years.

    Beyond acting, Hayley has pursued music under the name “Hayleau,” releasing multiple tracks and leaning into an R&B-inspired sound.



    Source link

    Firefox’s Big Redesign Gives You a Button to Kill All the AI – Decrypt

    Firefox’s Big Redesign Gives You a Button to Kill All the AI – Decrypt


    In brief

    Mozilla’s Project Nova redesign adds a single Settings control to disable all AI features in Firefox.
    Brave launched Brave Origin in April, a $60 one-time purchase (free on Linux) that compiles out AI, Wallet, Rewards, and telemetry entirely.
    Chrome recently removed its disclosure promising to keep Gemini Nano data off Google’s servers, adding fuel to the AI-in-browsers backlash.

    The browser wars just got a twist: Instead of cramming more AI down your throat, Firefox is adding a switch to turn it all off.

    Mozilla unveiled Project Nova on May 21—a full visual overhaul of Firefox rolling out later this year. The redesign is cleaner, warmer, and faster, featuring rounded tabs, a refreshed color palette inspired by fire, and compact mode finally making a comeback. But the headline feature for a growing slice of users isn’t the aesthetics.

    It’s an anti-AI switch.

    Mozilla is redesigning its settings with plain-language controls that make privacy choices easier to act on—including, per the official announcement, “controls for turning off AI features entirely.” No buried menus. No dark patterns. Just an off button.

    It also comes with a graphic update, meant to make the new generation of Firefox browsers look a lot better.

    Image: Mozilla

    The timing couldn’t be better. Chrome has been quietly installing an undeletable 4GB Gemini Nano model on its users’ PCs. Meanwhile, browsers like Dia, Opera Neon, and Comet have been racing to build AI-first experiences that automate browsing and chat with your tabs.

    Turns out not everyone wants that.

    Brave noticed the same backlash. In April, the company launched Brave Origin—a paid browser build (one-time $60, free on Linux) that strips out everything: Leo (its AI assistant), Rewards, Wallet, VPN, Tor windows, and telemetry. Gone. The browser uses Privacy Pass blind token technology so the $60 purchase isn’t even tied to your device identity.

    The idea came from real demand: tutorials on manually “debloating” Brave had been going viral for years. Brave just packaged the process and charged for it.

    

    The fact that “no AI, no bloat” is now a paid product category says something.

    Firefox’s approach is subtler. Mozilla isn’t abandoning AI features—its free built-in VPN and summarization tools remain options. Project Nova simply bets that giving users visible, honest control is a differentiator in 2026. “Firefox is still the only browser built for people, not platforms,” Mozilla said in its announcement.

    That might read to some as a calculated jab at Chrome, which holds roughly 66% of global browser market share while running AI models in the background—with or without explicit consent from users. Firefox has been losing market share for years, sitting at around 4.44% as far back as 2020 with no major reversal since.

    Making “off by default” a feature might be a gamble—but it also might be the most honest pitch in the browser market.

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



    Source link

    The U.S. Bitcoin Reserve Just Got a 20-Year Lockup Twist – NFT Plazas

    The U.S. Bitcoin Reserve Just Got a 20-Year Lockup Twist – NFT Plazas


    Washington is making its most serious move yet to turn seized cryptocurrency into a generational financial asset — and it comes with an unprecedented catch.

    A bipartisan push on Capitol Hill is breathing new life into one of the boldest financial proposals in recent American history: a federally managed Strategic Bitcoin Reserve that the government would be legally prohibited from touching for two decades. The legislation, known as the American Reserve Modernization Act of 2026 — or ARMA — represents the most detailed statutory attempt yet to transform the United States from an accidental Bitcoin holder into a deliberate, long-term sovereign accumulator of the world’s largest cryptocurrency.

    The bill was introduced by Rep. Nick Begich alongside co-lead Rep. Jared Golden, a notably bipartisan pairing that signals the proposal is more than a fringe idea. At its core, ARMA would create a Treasury-managed Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, establish a separate Digital Asset Stockpile for non-Bitcoin assets held by the federal government, and — most strikingly — require that any Bitcoin placed in the reserve stay there for a minimum of 20 years, unless liquidated specifically to reduce national debt.

    What the Bill Actually Proposes

    The 20-year lockup is the headline, but the full architecture of ARMA is worth unpacking. The legislation would mandate quarterly proof-of-reserve reports, third-party audits, and congressional oversight of federal digital asset holdings — a level of transparency that current government crypto management conspicuously lacks.

    It would also direct a formal study into “budget-neutral” acquisition methods, a phrase that carries significant weight in Washington. Budget-neutral language is political shorthand for: no new taxes, no new deficit spending, no new national debt. Instead, the government would explore mechanisms like asset reallocations, proceeds from criminal forfeitures, and other offsets to build its Bitcoin holdings — essentially recycling assets the federal government already possesses.

    Rep. Golden made the rationale plain: the U.S. already holds Bitcoin but has no coherent policy for managing it. “Digital currencies are not the fringe phenomenon they once were,” he said, adding that Congress has yet to set federal rules governing what the government should actually do with the digital assets it accumulates. Rep. Begich framed the bill as a matter of financial sovereignty and taxpayer protection, arguing it would extend private property rights into the digital space and prevent hasty, politically-motivated sales of strategically valuable assets.

    The ARMA Bill Introduction

    The ARMA Bill Introduction

    Building on an Executive Foundation

    ARMA doesn’t arrive in a vacuum. It builds directly on a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve framework established by executive order in March 2025, which directed Treasury officials to manage government Bitcoin obtained through forfeiture and other lawful proceedings. That order also created a separate stockpile for other seized digital assets.

    The problem with an executive order, however, is that it can be reversed by the next administration with a stroke of a pen. ARMA’s purpose is to codify the reserve in statute — to make it far harder for a future president or Congress to simply liquidate holdings under political pressure. The 20-year minimum holding rule is the legislative mechanism for that durability.

    Patrick Witt, from the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, has reportedly indicated that officials are actively working through the legal structure needed to manage government-held Bitcoin — a signal that the executive branch is aligned with the reserve concept, even as the statutory details are still being hammered out.

    The Scale of the Ambition

    The numbers being discussed are significant. Fox Business reported that Rep. Begich envisions the U.S. ultimately holding approximately 1 million Bitcoin — equal to roughly 5% of Bitcoin’s fixed total supply of 21 million coins. The bill builds on earlier BITCOIN Act language that proposed acquiring up to 200,000 BTC per year over a five-year period, which would put the government on track toward that long-term target.

    To put the ambition in context: at current market valuations, 1 million Bitcoin would represent a reserve worth well over $100 billion, comparable in scale to significant portions of the U.S. gold reserve. The fixed supply ceiling of Bitcoin is central to the bull case — unlike gold or fiat currency, no government or central bank can create more of it.

    ARMA builds on Trump's 2025 Bitcoin Reserve Executive Order, adding new provisions.ARMA builds on Trump's 2025 Bitcoin Reserve Executive Order, adding new provisions.

    ARMA builds on Trump’s 2025 Bitcoin Reserve Executive Order, adding new provisions.

    Why Markets Are Paying Attention

    The near-term market impact of ARMA may be less about immediate demand and more about what the legislation signals. A U.S. statutory Bitcoin reserve would be an institutional endorsement at the highest possible level — one that carries weight far beyond American borders.

    The 20-year holding requirement sends a particular message to other sovereign wealth funds, central banks, and large institutional allocators: the United States views Bitcoin not as a speculative trading position to be flipped for short-term gain, but as a long-duration reserve asset analogous to gold. That framing, if it gains traction, could fundamentally shift how markets price structural supply risk in Bitcoin. When the world’s largest economy commits to holding 5% of total supply off the market for a generation, the calculus around scarcity changes.

    Why Markets Are Paying AttentionWhy Markets Are Paying Attention

    Why Markets Are Paying Attention

    The Road Ahead

    For all its ambition, ARMA remains a bill, not law. The path from introduction to passage is long and uncertain. The proposal will need committee action, House floor support, Senate alignment, and some reconciliation with the broader, still-unsettled landscape of U.S. crypto regulation — including ongoing fights over custody rules, stablecoin frameworks, and the limits of executive authority over digital assets.

    Skeptics will question whether a 20-year lockup is politically realistic, whether budget-neutral acquisition is sufficient to build meaningful reserves, and whether Bitcoin belongs in the same category as gold or foreign currency reserves at all.

    But the significance of ARMA is less about its immediate prospects and more about the direction it represents. Washington is no longer debating whether Bitcoin is real. It is now debating how much to buy, how long to hold it, and who gets to decide. That, by any measure, is a remarkable shift — one with consequences that could echo for decades.



    Source link

    Gogglebox fume as they brand last night’s episode the ‘Sophie and Pete Show’: ‘It’s every week!’

      0
      Gogglebox fume as they brand last night’s episode the ‘Sophie and Pete Show’: ‘It’s every week!’


      Gogglebox viewers were left divided during last night’s episode after Pete and Sophie Sandiford appeared heavily throughout the show.

      The brother-and-sister duo have become firm fan favourites since joining the Channel 4 series back in 2017. However, some viewers admitted they were growing tired of seeing so much of the pair during Friday night’s instalment (May 22).

      Pete and Sophie came under fire (Credit: Channel 4)

      What happened on Gogglebox last night?

      Friday’s episode saw the cast reacting to some of the week’s biggest TV moments and headlines.

      Among the programmes featured were the Eurovision Song Contest, which aired last weekend and saw Bulgaria crowned winner while the UK finished in last place with just one point.

      The Gogglebox stars also tuned into Jamie Oliver’s Ultimate BBQ, Apple TV’s Widow’s Bay, Dogs Behaving Badly and Police Interceptors, before catching up with the news.

      The episode ended with the finale of Race Across the World and an airing of Trading Places on Channel 5.

      Pete and Sophie on GoggleboxFans took issue with how much they were on the show (Credit: Channel 4)

      Gogglebox viewers issue plea

      Despite the range of shows featured during the episode, some viewers were more focused on how often Pete and Sophie appeared on screen.

      A number of fans took to social media during the broadcast to complain about the amount of airtime the pair were getting compared to other cast members.

      “Am I the only one that’s sick to death of Sophie and Pete show. She laughs for no reason, and most of the show is of them. Plenty of other cast to show. Start using others in September for god sake!” one viewer fumed.

      “They seem to be on a lot tonight,” another agreed.

      “It’s every week. Drives me mad when others hardly get any airtime. Thankfully done until September now,” another wrote online.

      Pete and Sophie on Gogglebox
      Fans took to social media to complain (Credit: Channel 4)

      Pete and Sophie slammed

      Elsewhere, some viewers suggested the pair should take a step back from the series altogether.

      “I agree, I think their time is up. They seem to think they are funny, but they are not,” one viewer claimed.

      “I have gone on about that pair for ages, they always get loads of airtime. They feature on or after the ad breaks plus at the very end,” another added.

      “The Pete and Sophie show is really wearing now -I’ve had enough of them…..,” another viewer said.

      Pete and Sophie first joined Gogglebox almost a decade ago and have remained among the programme’s best-known stars ever since.

      Read more: Channel 4 to air tribute as Gogglebox star Ken Harwood dies aged 77: ‘May he rest in peace’

      Gogglebox continues on Friday, May 29 from 9pm on Channel 4. 

      What do you think of this story? Leave us a comment on our Facebook page.

       



      Source link

      One Of The Mandalorian And Grogu’s Biggest Characters Was Barely In The Trailers – SlashFilm

        0
        One Of The Mandalorian And Grogu’s Biggest Characters Was Barely In The Trailers – SlashFilm






        Mild spoilers for “The Mandalorian and Grogu” to follow.

        Jon Favreau’s “The Mandalorian and Grogu,” a continuation of the live-action TV series “The Mandalorian,” takes place in the New Republic era of the “Star Wars” timeline, after the events of “Return of the Jedi” but years before “The Force Awakens.” It’s an insidious period where the remnants of the Galactic Empire are regathering in secret, trying to rebuild their evil in the shadows. Meanwhile, the New Republic is wary of the political fragility of the galaxy following the Galactic Civil War. During all this, those residing in the galaxy’s Outer Rim must scrounge to survive, giving rise to a thriving criminal syndicate.

        The plot of “The Mandalorian and Grogu” follows the titular bounty hunter, Din Djarin (Pedro Pascal), and his miniature, super-powered adopted toddler son to the Outer Rim to retrieve Rotta the Hutt (Jeremy Allen White) and return him to his aunt and uncle, the leaders of a crime syndicate of their own. Din is only retrieving Rotta in exchange for information, though, as the Hutt family knows the location of a particularly dangerous former Empire general.

        When he finds Rotta, however, the narrative shifts. Rotta is the son of the dead crime lord Jabba the Hutt, and he’s grown tired of living in his father’s shadow. He is currently enslaved by an underground pit-fighting organization, forced to battle space monsters in a gladiatorial arena. Rotta admits that he would rather keep fighting and win his freedom organically than return to a crime family that would probably kill him.

        Eventually, Rotta becomes a major part of the movie, joining forces with Din and Grogu and engaging in several action scenes and chases. This is a surprise, given how little Rotta was in the “Mandalorian and Grogu” trailers.

        Rotta the Hutt plays a surprisingly large role in The Mandalorian and Grogu

        “The Mandalorian and Grogu” is episodic in its structure, and Rotta the Hutt is essentially the guest star of one of the film’s “episodes.” He gets to speak at length about how he hates his father’s legacy and how fighting allows him to stand on his own two legs … er, make that his big long slug tail. Lest we delve too far into spoiler territory, let’s just say that Rotta ultimately ends up in the arena with Din, and the pair are forced to battle a gaggle of opponents as a team. And that’s far from the end of Rotta and Din’s adventures together in the film.

        No mere throw-away character, Rotta has a fully-realized personality and a fair amount to do in “The Mandalorian and Grogu.” For that matter, he gets more to do than Zeb (Steve Blum), a Lasat pilot and former Rebel who’s become one of Din’s key allies. Zeb, for those who are less familiar with him, was introduced in the animated series “Star Wars Rebels” before making his live-action debut via a cameo on “The Mandalorian.” Don’t worry about him too much; he’s barely in the movie.

        Rotta, meanwhile, has moments of tenderness in the movie, mostly with Grogu, whom he adores like his own child. It’s a credit to “The Mandalorian and Grogu” that it takes the time to develop Rotta as a character rather than treating him like a glorified visual effect. He even has abs, making him the first buff Hutt ever featured in a “Star Wars” flick.

        We’ve also met Rotta before, namely as an infant in the 2008 animated feature film “Star Wars: The Clone Wars.”

        Rotta the Hutt appeared in the Clone Wars movie prior to The Mandalorian and Grogu

        The plot of “Star Wars: The Clone Wars” is a little complex, but basically the Separatist Alliance’s leader, the former Jedi Count Dooku (Christopher Lee), kidnaps the infant Rotta in an attempt to strong-arm a deal with his father, Jabba. In order to stop this, the Jedi Obi-Wan Kenobi (James Arnold Taylor) promised Jabba that he’ll rescue little Rotta from Dooku’s clutches. As a result, a significant chunk of the movie involves Obi-Wan’s former student turned Jedi Anakin Skywalker (Matt Lanter) and his own young student or Padawan, Ahsoka Tano (Ashley Eckstein), returning Rotta to his father.

        “The Mandalorian and Grogu” marks Rotta’s first major appearance since then. He’s also but one of many “Star Wars” characters that we’ve now seen at drastically different ages in separate projects, much like Anakin and Obi-Wan before him. In fact, when interviewed by Empire, Jon Favreau compared Rotta’s journey from the “Clone Wars” movie to “The Mandalorian and Grogu” to that of Adonis Creed (Michael B. Jordan), the son of Apollo Creed (Carl Weathers), in the “Rocky” legacy sequel “Creed.” (Notably, the late Weathers also portrayed Din’s associate Greef Karga in “The Mandalorian.”) As Favreau put it:

        “When you’re trying to establish yourself and your name is famous, when you’re Jabba The Hutt’s kid, what does that do? How has that affected his trajectory? I get a kick out of that.”

        That means Rotta the Hutt is but the latest “Star Wars” character to have grown up and faced the challenges that come with that before our very eyes.

        “The Mandalorian and Grogu” is now playing in theaters.




        Source link

        Layer 2 Shakeout: Zero Network, Everclear, and Syndicate Labs Wind Down – NFT Plazas Layer 2 Shakeout: Zero Network, Everclear, and Syndicate Labs Wind Down

        Layer 2 Shakeout: Zero Network, Everclear, and Syndicate Labs Wind Down – NFT Plazas Layer 2 Shakeout: Zero Network, Everclear, and Syndicate Labs Wind Down


        On May 21, 2026, Zero Network, Everclear, and Syndicate Labs all announced wind-downs or closures of their core sectors, marking a notable week for the crypto market as Ethereum Layer 2s and rollup infrastructure face a shakeout. The commonality does not lie in an isolated incident but rather in operational pressures: infrastructure projects must demonstrate sufficient users, liquidity, and revenue to sustain a dedicated network or service layer.

        What Happened

        Zero Network, an Ethereum Layer 2 developed by Zerion with a “gasless rollup” positioning, announced it will wind down after about a year and a half of operation. The network began operations in November 2024, designed to help users send assets, mint NFTs, swap, and bridge within the Zerion environment without having to directly handle gas fees. According to the latest update on X, Zerion will shift its resources toward its API and wallet instead of continuing to maintain an independent blockchain.

        three project's wind down announcement

        Assets on Zero are reported to remain safe, but users need to bridge NFTs, ETH, and tokens out of the network before the end of July 2026. Currently, Zero has halted inbound bridging and only leaves outbound bridging open for users to withdraw assets before the network shuts down.

        Everclear, formerly Connext, also announced the wind-down of its Foundation/Labs and the cessation of product development. The team stated that the protocol has been sunsetted, and the UI and chain are no longer operational; no funds are stuck, and the remaining TVL has been withdrawn by users and partners. Everclear said it once reached $500 million in monthly volume, but failed to convert that volume into meaningful enough revenue. The DAO will continue to operate, while the protocol may be open-sourced for the community to take over.

        Syndicate Labs also announced it will wind down after 5 years of building on-chain developer infrastructure, because the rollup market has “fundamentally shifted.” According to the announcement, with every new rollup launched, many others are quietly closing down; the market has also shifted away from Syndicate’s technology, making waiting for better conditions no longer feasible. 

        The Demand Test for L2 Infrastructure

        These wind-down events show that the problem lies not in a lack of infrastructure, but in the demand to sustain it. Zero Network has around $1.3-1.4 million in total value secured on L2Beat and belongs to the Stage 0 group. With that scale, Zerion has a reason to consolidate resources back into its API and wallet, rather than continuing to operate a chain that has not generated enough demand. 

        Everclear demonstrates a similar dilemma at the liquidity layer. DefiLlama currently records the protocol with only about $6,891 in TVL, $5,539 in fees over 30 days, and $0 in fees over 24 hours, even though the team said Everclear once achieved $500 million in monthly volume. For Syndicate Labs, the pressure lies on the tooling side: if the demand to launch standard EVM rollups shrinks, the thesis of a broad market for rollup infrastructure contracts accordingly. 

        The L2 Market Is Consolidating

        Ethereum L2 is not failing. But the market is concentrating on a few major networks, while many smaller L2s and surrounding infrastructure projects no longer have enough demand to continue operating.

        Top 5 Layer 2 networks by Total Value Secured (TVS)Top 5 Layer 2 networks by Total Value Secured (TVS)

        Top 5 Layer 2 networks by Total Value Secured (TVS). Source: L2Beat

        L2Beat data shows that secured value remains heavily concentrated at the top. Arbitrum One and Base are currently the two largest rollups by total value secured, together accounting for about two-thirds of the value within the rollups group. Against this backdrop, smaller networks must compete in a market where user, liquidity, and developer attention have swung heavily toward major ecosystems.

        Following Dencun and improvements in data availability, transaction costs have dropped significantly across many L2s. As cheap fees become the default, competition shifts to liquidity, app ecosystems, wallet/exchange integrations, incentives, and the ability to generate revenue. A rollup with few users must still maintain infrastructure; a bridge with low volume must still ensure security and liquidity; a tooling provider with few clients must still support developers, audits, docs, and upgrades.

        Beyond Market Conditions

        These wind-down decisions take place in a context where crypto capital no longer flows evenly into every infrastructure narrative. Capital is still finding its way to sectors with clearer usage, such as stablecoins, trading apps, prediction markets, or networks with strong distribution. For L2 and rollup infrastructure, the question is no longer just whether the technology works, but whether there are enough users, fees, and revenue to sustain it in the long run.

        Zero Network, Everclear, and Syndicate Labs all launched to solve real problems: on-chain UX remains complex, cross-chain liquidity is fragmented, and developers need tools to deploy rollups more easily. But choosing the right problem does not equate to the market being large enough to sustain a dedicated project. In the infrastructure sector, being technically correct can still be insufficient to survive economically.

        What Comes Next

        The next phase for L2s could be more rigorous for smaller projects. The promise of cheap fees or a quick rollup launch toolkit will hardly be persuasive enough if a project lacks a channel to draw users, stable liquidity, and a clear fee model. For chains that do not have their own distribution, the question “why not build on Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, or a larger stack?” will arise much sooner.

        Previously, many L2s competed on launch speed. Now, the advantage will lean toward networks that demonstrate real usage, recurring revenue, and a reason to exist that is clear enough not to be replaced by a larger ecosystem.



        Source link

        CoinSwitch Just Walked Into India’s Living Room, and Nobody Saw It Coming

        CoinSwitch Just Walked Into India’s Living Room, and Nobody Saw It Coming


        Key Highlights

        CoinSwitch became the first Indian crypto exchange to integrate with, bringing crypto into mainstream family television through Episode 4721.

        The company’s Gujarat-focused strategy, including campaigns with Malhar Thakar and community events across major cities, reveals a deeper push toward culturally driven crypto adoption.

        In an exclusive conversation with The Crypto Times, Ashish Singhal said CoinSwitch is prioritizing long-term trust, compliance, and financial awareness over short-term crypto sign-ups.

        There is something almost poetic about the fact that a cryptocurrency exchange, an entity still viewed with suspicion by a large chunk of India’s population, just secured a brand integration with Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah (TMKOC), the country’s longest-running family sitcom. 

        On May 17, 2026, CoinSwitch went on-air during a TMKOC episode on Sony SAB, and with that single move, it did something no crypto platform in India has ever attempted before. It placed itself inside the one space Indian families guard most fiercely: their evening television routine.

        This was not a banner ad during an IPL match. It was not a fleeting influencer endorsement on Instagram. CoinSwitch put its name inside Gokuldham Society, the fictional Gujarati housing complex that has been making Indians laugh since July 2008, across over 4,700 episodes and nearly two decades of uninterrupted broadcasting. 

        For a crypto exchange operating in a country where the word “crypto” still makes dinner table conversations go quiet, this was a bold and unconventional call.

        And it did not come out of nowhere. If you trace the breadcrumbs, CoinSwitch has been building towards this moment for months, and the trail leads squarely to one state: Gujarat.

        The Gujarat blueprint: Why one state keeps showing up in CoinSwitch’s playbook

        To understand this move, it helps to first look at what CoinSwitch has been doing in Gujarat over the past year. The platform has made no secret of the fact that Gujarat is its most important regional market. 

        Ashish Singhal, Co-Founder of CoinSwitch, told The Crypto Times in an exclusive conversation that the reasoning is straightforward.

        “Gujarat stands out because the culture of investing and entrepreneurship there is genuinely different. Financially active retail investors, strong awareness of markets, and real curiosity around newer asset classes. That combination does not exist in every state at the same level.”

        The data is worth looking at. CoinSwitch’s own 2025 year-end report, India’s Crypto Portfolio: How India Invests, shared at the company’s Partner Conclave in Ahmedabad in February 2026, showed that Gujarat’s crypto investors are moving beyond speculative trading into more structured portfolio approaches. 

        Layer-1 assets dominate preferences with a 38.42% allocation; Bitcoin remains the most actively traded asset, and women now account for 30.7% of crypto investors in the state. Portfolio allocations reflect balanced risk-taking, with large-caps leading at 34.5%, followed by small-caps at 27.2%, mid-caps at 21.9%, and blue-chip assets at 16.4%.

        Those numbers, at minimum, suggest a level of engagement that goes beyond casual speculation.

        What makes the Gujarat story even more striking is that it does not stop at the obvious cities. In December 2024, CoinSwitch’s “How India Invests in Crypto” report revealed that Botad, a small city in the Saurashtra region of Gujarat with a population just above 13 lakh, had ranked 10th among India’s top crypto investor cities nationally. 

        Notably, major Gujarat cities like Ahmedabad, Surat, Rajkot, and Vadodara did not feature in that top-10 list at all. Botad did. The Crypto Times had reported on this in detail at the time, doing a ground-level check on the city and finding a quiet but genuine crypto culture taking root among its largely young, first-time investors.

        That a district primarily known for agriculture and small trade had organically produced an estimated 3.8 lakh crypto investors said something about the depth of interest across Gujarat that goes well beyond its financial capitals.

        And CoinSwitch has been paying attention. The company has been running community-led engagements through its Traders Connect initiative across Ahmedabad, Surat, Rajkot, and Vadodara, as well as national stops in Bangalore, Delhi, Lucknow, Mumbai, Guwahati, Indore, Kochi, and Ludhiana.

        “The entire Gujarat market is crucial for us,” Singhal said plainly. “We are equally active in Surat, Rajkot and Vadodara too.”

        But community meetups alone do not capture a state’s imagination. For that, CoinSwitch needed a face that Gujarat already trusted. And that is exactly what it went out and got.

        Enter Malhar Thakar: The face Gujarat did not expect on a crypto campaign

        In January 2026, CoinSwitch announced a partnership with Malhar Thakar, one of the biggest names in Gujarati cinema. For anyone outside Gujarat, the name might not register immediately. But within the state, Thakar is a well-recognized cultural figure. 

        His debut film, Chhello Divas (2015), became a phenomenon in Gujarati cinema. Love Ni Bhavai (2017) ran for over 100 days in theatres. He has starred in over 20 Gujarati films, launched his own production house, Ticket Window Entertainment, and carries a rare kind of credibility that spans both the youth demographic and family audiences. 

        He also holds a personal connection with TMKOC, having appeared in an episode of the show back in 2013, long before his film career took off.

        The campaign CoinSwitch built around him was titled “Navi Peedhi Ni Navi Reet,” which translates roughly to “the new generation’s new way.” It was directed by Viral Shah, a well-known Gujarati writer, director, and voice artist, and its central message was straightforward: investment habits evolve across generations, but the intent to build wealth stays the same.

        CoinSwitch’s Vice President, Balaji Srihari, explained the thinking at the time of the announcement: “Gujarat is a key growth region for us. Malhar’s credibility and deep cultural resonance make him an ideal partner. With his support, we aim to engage millions of Gujaratis and help them adopt smart and easy investment habits.”

        When The Crypto Times asked Singhal about the rationale behind choosing a regional face over a national celebrity, his answer revealed a philosophy that runs deeper than most marketing playbooks.

        “Malhar was a very deliberate call. Gujarat is a market that engages seriously with financial products and when the goal is to reach that audience in a meaningful way, cultural fit matters far more than reach numbers. A face the community genuinely trusts lands very differently from a national name with no real local connection.”

        He added: “We have never believed in a one-size-fits-all approach. Building genuine depth in key markets is what actually works, and Gujarat is absolutely one of them.”

        That depth-first philosophy explains everything that came next.

        From Malhar Thakar to Jethalal: The TMKOC bet

        If the Malhar Thakar campaign was CoinSwitch testing cultural integration in Gujarat, the Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah partnership was a far bigger play.

        With over 4,700 episodes since 2008, the show remains one of India’s most recognized family entertainment properties, deeply rooted in Gujarati culture and household viewing habits. Characters like Jethalal have become cultural icons across generations.

        CoinSwitch announced the integration on May 18, shortly after the branded segment aired in Episode 4721 on May 17. The move capped months of groundwork in Gujarat through the Malhar Thakar campaign, Ahmedabad partner events, and Traders Connect meetups — taking CoinSwitch’s messaging from community events and digital ads straight into India’s primetime family living rooms.

        Why this partnership is being watched closely

        Let us be honest about the state of crypto marketing in India. Most exchanges run performance ads on social media, sponsor a few podcasts, maybe put up a billboard near a tech park in Bangalore. The bolder ones sign a Bollywood celebrity for a quick brand film. None of it moves the needle with the audience that actually matters for long-term adoption: the Indian middle-class household.

        The reason is simple. Crypto in India still carries the weight of distrust. There is no comprehensive regulatory framework. The 30% tax on crypto gains and the 1% Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) on transactions above the threshold, introduced in 2022, gave the industry a taxation identity but not a regulatory one. 

        The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has historically been skeptical. The government’s position has oscillated between cautious interest and outright wariness. For the average Indian family, crypto remains something their children talk about, but they themselves do not fully understand or trust.

        This partnership appears to be an attempt to sidestep that distrust entirely, not by explaining blockchain technology or showing price charts, but by simply being present in a space that Indian families already watch out of habit. 

        It is a fundamentally different approach from what the Indian crypto industry has tried before. Whether it works is another question entirely, but the ambition behind it is hard to miss. It is also worth noting that no other exchange, domestic or international, has attempted anything remotely comparable in India so far.

        The Gujarat thread that connects everything

        There is a connecting thread running through all of CoinSwitch’s recent moves, and it is impossible to ignore. Malhar Thakar is Gujarati. TMKOC is set in a Gujarati society. The show was originally based on Tarak Mehta’s Gujarati column “Duniya Ne Undha Chashmah.” 

        CoinSwitch’s Partner Conclave kicked off in Ahmedabad. The Traders Connect events have covered Ahmedabad, Surat, Rajkot, and Vadodara. Malhar Thakar himself appeared in one of the episodes years ago.

        When The Crypto Times asked Singhal about this evident lean towards Gujarat, he did not sidestep the question.

        “In a country as diverse as India, regional outreach is not just a distribution strategy. Financial communication lands very differently when it feels locally relevant and culturally familiar. That principle applies in Gujarat and it applies everywhere else too.”

        But the deeper answer lies in the numbers. Gujarat, as a state, has one of the highest concentrations of retail investors in the country. Its population is financially active, familiar with market instruments, and demonstrably curious about newer asset classes. 

        The state’s entrepreneurial culture, which has produced everything from the textile powerhouses of Surat to the diamond trading networks of Ahmedabad, means there is an existing familiarity with risk and new financial instruments. CoinSwitch is not just marketing to Gujarat. It is building in Gujarat because the state’s investor profile overlaps significantly with the kind of audience a crypto platform would want to reach.

        And the integration takes that logic and scales it nationally. Because while TMKOC is culturally Gujarati, its audience is pan-Indian. The show is watched in Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, and every other Hindi-speaking state. By entering the show, CoinSwitch effectively used Gujarat as a cultural gateway to reach the entire Hindi-belt middle class.

        Ashish Singhal on the state of crypto awareness in India

        In The Crypto Times’ exclusive conversation with Ashish Singhal, the CoinSwitch co-founder was candid about where India stands on crypto adoption and what still needs to change.

        On the question of encouraging everyday Indians to invest in crypto despite the regulatory ambiguity, Singhal drew a parallel to earlier technology cycles. “During the Web 2.0 phase, many people underestimated the internet in its early days and later realized how big a shift it actually was. Crypto is now entering a similar phase with Web 3.0, where financial systems and ownership models are getting redefined.”

        He pointed to shifting institutional sentiment as part of his argument. “Morgan Stanley in 2017 declared the value of BTC to be zero, but today, it has launched services in crypto, including major public banks, that shows the demand and adoption scale.”

        On the compliance side, Singhal said CoinSwitch follows a compliance-first approach. The platform is registered as a reporting entity with FIU-IND, has mandatory KYC and due diligence for all users, and has partnered with tax filing platforms to help users file crypto taxes. The platform has listed around 450 tokens, each vetted through internal checks across multiple risk filters, as opposed to some platforms that list significantly more.

        “Unlike platforms that list thousands of coins, we have listed handpicked around 450 tokens. Each listing goes through internal checks based on multiple risk filters before being added. There are no hidden charges on our platforms, everything and anything is informed to the user.”

        A recent CoinSwitch survey found that nearly 88% of its users were already aware of India’s crypto tax framework, a number Singhal cites as evidence of a maturing market. “Reflecting a market that is becoming progressively more informed and compliance-conscious as the ecosystem matures.”

        Of course, a survey of existing CoinSwitch users is not representative of the broader Indian population, but it does indicate growing awareness within the platform’s own user base.

        Addressing the elephant in the room: Scams, safety, and skepticism

        No conversation about crypto in India is complete without addressing scams. Singhal was direct about where the real risks lie.

        “Most of them do not happen on exchanges. They happen through fake Telegram groups, phishing links, screen-sharing scams, and unofficial apps. Which means platform security alone is not enough.”

        CoinSwitch, he said, reinvests roughly 8 to 12% of its annual revenue back into security, compliance, and infrastructure. The platform claims to have been the first in India to launch proof of reserves, a transparency measure designed to show that customer assets are fully backed and verifiable. 

        The company holds ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification and operates with cold wallet storage, transaction monitoring, and fraud detection systems.

        But Singhal’s most interesting point was about the industry’s structural gap. “Currently, security standards across crypto exchanges are largely self-driven. Some platforms have the ability to invest deeply in security infrastructure, while others may not. That’s why the industry needs stronger baseline standards and frameworks that every platform should follow to better safeguard users.”

        That acknowledgment, that the industry itself needs to do better on security standardization, is a notable statement from the head of one of India’s largest crypto exchanges.

        The question nobody wants to ask: Is this really about education, or is it about sign-ups?

        When The Crypto Times put this question to Singhal directly, he did not duck it.

        “It is a fair question, and one we take seriously. In a sector like crypto, campaigns should absolutely be evaluated on whether they are encouraging informed participation rather than just driving sign-ups.”

        He insisted that this partnership, like the Malhar Thakar campaign before it, is designed around education and awareness first. 

        “The objective is to simplify conversations around crypto, answer user questions, and make the ecosystem easier to understand for everyday investors. Once people understand an asset class better, participation naturally follows, but direct onboarding has never been the core message of our campaigns.”

        Whether that claim holds up over time will depend on how CoinSwitch executes the integration going forward. But the structural choice to enter through TMKOC rather than, say, a high-intensity performance marketing blitz during a bull run does suggest a longer-term play. A brand integration with India’s longest-running sitcom is not a decision driven by a quarterly sign-up target.

        “In a volatile and evolving asset class like crypto, long-term trust matters far more than short-term acquisition.”

        What this means for the Indian crypto industry

        CoinSwitch’s TMKOC integration is, in isolation, a marketing decision. But in context, it represents something more significant for the Indian crypto ecosystem.

        For years, the industry has struggled with a perception problem. Crypto exchanges in India have largely spoken to an audience that already understands crypto: young, male, tech-literate, and concentrated in metros. 

        The rest of the country, the vast middle-class population that drives most financial product adoption in India, has been left out of the conversation. Not because they are uninterested, but because nobody has spoken to them in a language and format they recognize.

        CoinSwitch has made that attempt. By placing itself inside a show that 50-year-old fathers and 15-year-old sons watch together, it is trying to reach an audience that the crypto industry has largely failed to engage with so far. Whether it succeeds remains to be seen. 

        The real question now is whether the rest of the industry follows suit, not in copying this playbook specifically, but in recognizing that mainstream adoption requires mainstream communication.

        Singhal left us with a thought that captures the stakes rather well: “Every new asset class has gone through this journey, equities and mutual funds included, before becoming mainstream in India.”

        He may be right. And if the journey of equities and mutual funds is any guide, the platform that wins the trust of the Indian household, not just the Indian trader, will have a significant advantage in the long run. 

        CoinSwitch, for now, appears to be the one making the most deliberate attempt at it. Whether that attempt translates into genuine trust, or is remembered as just another marketing campaign, only time will tell.

        Also Read: Binance Says India Has No Law Restricting Crypto Withdrawals


        Disclaimer: The information researched and reported by The Crypto Times is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional financial advice. Investing in crypto assets involves significant risk due to market volatility. Always Do Your Own Research (DYOR) and consult with a qualified Financial Advisor before making any investment decisions.







        Source link

        The Terrifying Reality of Flying Nuclear Bombers | Metaverse Planet

        The Terrifying Reality of Flying Nuclear Bombers | Metaverse Planet


        Imagine looking up into the clear blue sky, watching a massive aircraft glide through the clouds. Now, imagine that same aircraft isn’t running on jet fuel, but carries a live, fully operational nuclear reactor right above your head.

        Yes, they actually tried this.

        When I was diving deep into the history of aviation and Cold War tech for this piece, my mind was absolutely blown. I always thought I knew the limits of mid-century engineering, but the idea of slapping a nuclear power plant into a bomber took my understanding of “extreme tech” to a whole new level. We are talking about sky monsters with infinite range, machines designed to stay airborne for weeks, or even years, without ever touching the tarmac.

        Let me take you through one of the most insane, brilliant, and ultimately terrifying engineering projects in human history.

        The Paranoia of the 1950s: Chasing the Infinite Range

        To understand why anyone would think a flying nuclear reactor was a good idea, I had to put myself in the shoes of military strategists in the 1950s. The Cold War was freezing over, and the biggest logistical nightmare for the United States was range.

        Jet engines of that era were notorious fuel guzzlers. If a conflict broke out, keeping a fleet of heavy bombers airborne near enemy borders required an impossibly complex ballet of mid-air refueling and forward airbases.

        The military wanted a silver bullet. They wanted an aircraft that could take off from the US, loiter over the oceans for days or weeks, and strike anywhere on the globe at a moment’s notice. The solution they landed on? Nuclear propulsion. A single pound of uranium packs the energy equivalent of roughly 1.7 million pounds of jet fuel. On paper, it was the ultimate engineering hack.

        Meet the Beast: The Convair NB-36H

        They didn’t just draw this up on a chalkboard; they actually built it. The aircraft chosen for this colossal experiment was the B-36 Peacemaker, an absolute behemoth of a plane that originally featured six propeller engines and four jet engines.

        The modified version, dubbed the NB-36H “Crusader”, was a marvel of terrifying engineering. Here is how they made the impossible happen:

        The Reactor: They installed a 1-megawatt Aircraft Shield Test Reactor (ASTR) right in the bomb bay of the plane.The Shielding: Radiation was obviously the biggest hurdle. Instead of shielding the entire massive reactor, engineers decided to shield the crew. They built a customized, 11-ton cockpit lined with lead and specialized rubber to keep the pilots from being cooked alive by gamma and neutron radiation.The Payload: The reactor was designed to be easily winched out of the aircraft upon landing and stored in a specialized underground pit, surrounded by thick concrete.

        Between 1955 and 1957, this nuclear beast completed 47 test flights over Texas and New Mexico. And from a purely technical standpoint, it was a massive success. The reactor went critical in the air, the shielding worked, and the crew survived without radiation poisoning.

        The “Flying Chernobyl” Scenario

        But this is where my fascination turned into sheer horror. While reading through declassified documents, I hit the exact same realization that the engineers of the era did: What happens when things go wrong?

        The Crash Risk: Airplanes crash. It’s an undeniable fact of aviation. If a conventional bomber goes down, you have a tragic fireball. If a nuclear-powered bomber goes down in a populated area, you literally have a flying Chernobyl disaster. It would scatter highly radioactive debris and contamination across miles of civilian territory.Combat Vulnerability: These planes were designed for war. What if an enemy anti-aircraft missile struck the reactor mid-flight? The skies would be poisoned.Maintenance Nightmares: Even on the ground, handling a radioactive aircraft required terrifying logistics. If an engine part broke, mechanics couldn’t just walk up with a wrench. They would need robotic arms, heavy shielding, and incredibly hazardous protocols.

        The risks were astronomically high. No amount of infinite range could justify the threat of accidentally nuking your own countryside during a routine test flight.

        Sanity Prevails: The Project is Grounded

        Thankfully, humanity dodged a massive radioactive bullet. The project was heavily scrutinized and eventually bled dry of funding.

        The final nail in the coffin wasn’t just the safety risk; it was the rapid evolution of other technologies. Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs) and nuclear-powered submarines entered the chat. Submarines could hide underwater for months using nuclear power without the risk of dropping out of the sky, and ICBMs could strike a target halfway across the world in 30 minutes without needing a human pilot.

        In 1961, President John F. Kennedy officially canceled the nuclear aircraft program. The dream of the infinite bomber was dead.

        Could the Sky Monsters Return?

        When I look at today’s technological landscape, I can’t help but wonder if we really left this idea in the past. We are currently seeing a massive resurgence in nuclear innovation.

        Compact Reactors: Startups are developing micro-reactors that are safer, smaller, and more efficient than anything the 1950s engineers could have dreamed of.Space Exploration: NASA and DARPA are actively developing nuclear thermal propulsion for spacecraft (like the DRACO project) to get us to Mars faster.Unmanned Systems: While a crewed nuclear bomber is highly unlikely, what about autonomous drones? Could a military superpower be tempted to build a nuclear-powered, high-altitude surveillance drone that flies for a decade without landing?

        Personally, while I am a huge advocate for next-generation nuclear energy on the ground and in deep space, keeping reactors strictly out of our atmosphere feels like the most basic form of common sense. The margins for error in the sky are just too thin.

        But human ambition has a funny way of ignoring common sense when ultimate power is on the table.

        What about you? Knowing the advancements in modern fail-safes and materials, do you think humanity will ever take this colossal risk again and bring nuclear-powered aircraft back to our skies? Let me know your thoughts down below!

        You Might Also Like;



        Source link

        Kash Patel-Linked Apparel Store Goes Dark After Pushing Crypto-Stealing Malware – Decrypt

        Kash Patel-Linked Apparel Store Goes Dark After Pushing Crypto-Stealing Malware – Decrypt



        In brief

        Based Apparel, linked to FBI Director Kash Patel, went dark after being flagged for pushing “ClickFix” wallet-draining malware.
        The infostealer targeted macOS users, tricking them into running terminal commands to steal session tokens and crypto.
        The incident marks the second time Patel has faced crypto-related shenanigans, following a previous data leak.

        An apparel store linked to FBI Director Kash Patel appeared to go offline on Friday after onlookers warned that Based Apparel’s website pushed wallet-draining malware.

        Until the website apparently went dark, macOS visitors were being prompted to install “ClickFix” malware by copying and pasting a command into their system’s terminal—which put session tokens, browser data, and crypto wallets at risk via an infostealer—a user said on X.

        The website was flagged as “potentially deceptive” for MetaMask users, who, when trying to visit the website, received a warning pop-up from the self-custodial wallet that identified “malicious transactions resulting in stolen assets” as among the potential risks.

        The attack was reproduced by PCMag; however, Decrypt was unable to do that because Based Apparel plainly says now that “the store will be back online shortly—bolder than ever.”

        

        Infostealer malware is designed to silently and secretly extract sensitive data from users’ devices, with precursors dating back as early as 2006. Two months ago, the FBI said it was investigating several PC games on the Steam platform that installed the malicious software.

        It’s unclear whether Based Apparel’s apparent compromise sparked significant losses. The website typically receives an estimated 33,600 visits monthly, according to ahrefs. One of its top pages showcases a camouflage hoodie.

        The venture is owned by Patel and Andrew Ollis, who serves on the board of the Kash Foundation as CEO, per The Guardian. Kash Foundation visitors, through one of the nonprofit’s primary menus, are directed to Based Apparel.

        Although the nonprofit was founded by Patel, he is no longer affiliated in any capacity, according to the organization’s website. A disclosure also makes clear that the Kash Foundation isn’t associated with government agencies, including the FBI.

        The FBI director, who has highlighted the bureau’s growing use of artificial intelligence to thwart bad actors, has been the subject of crypto shenanigans before. After Iranian hackers leaked his personal email and burner username, a bevy of Patel-themed meme coins followed.

        Daily Debrief Newsletter

        Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



        Source link

        GloomKeep – Procedurally generated roguelike for the C64 by j5-2026

        GloomKeep – Procedurally generated roguelike for the C64 by j5-2026


        The Commodore 64 gets another dose of dark, procedural dungeon crawling with the release of GloomKeep by j5-2026. This punishing new roguelike not only features 10 procedurally generated floors, but it also includes 100 hand-drawn monster glyphs themed by depth, stair guardians with themed taunts, hidden traps, healing wards, holy water, EXP bonuses, an original multi-track SID engine with mood themes, PCM digi-samples, and torch light that can run out, causing you to crawl blind through the dark. So if this sounds like your sort of game, make sure to check out the gameplay video provided by the developer below.

        Players begin their journey stranded atop a mysterious pentagram seal. Armed with nothing but a dim torch and basic leather armour, you must navigate a massive, shifting labyrinth. To survive, you must descend through ten dangerous levels, defeat the monstrous gatekeeper guarding each exit, steal the Idol of Orcus, and escape with your life.

        TECHNICAL

        ◆ Commodore 64 (NTSC/PAL), single-file .PRG (~50 KB)◆ Pure 6502 assembly · custom chargen · hi-res title bitmap◆ Multi-track SID music engine + PCM digi-samples◆ Tested on VICE and real hardware◆ Best on 6581 SID (required for full PCM playback); 8580 will run but the digi-samples will be quieter



        Source link

        Popular Posts

        My Favorites