Arts

Home Arts Page 5

Sony Bank Gains U.S. Approval for Stablecoin Trust Bank – NFT Plazas

0
Sony Bank Gains U.S. Approval for Stablecoin Trust Bank – NFT Plazas


Sony’s online banking arm has secured conditional approval from the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to establish a national trust bank subsidiary, positioning the Japanese entertainment and technology giant to issue and manage a dollar-denominated stablecoin in the United States.

The new entity, Connectia Trust, National Association, will be based in New York and capitalized with $40 million. Sony Bank, part of Sony Financial Group, will own the subsidiary outright. The board of Sony Financial Group Inc. ratified the plan on July 6, and the company disclosed the OCC’s conditional approval the following day.

Formation of Connectia Trust is expected this month, but the subsidiary is not slated to begin commercial stablecoin operations until 2027. As a national trust bank, Connectia will be permitted to hold customer assets and manage stablecoin reserves, but it cannot accept cash deposits or extend loans — restrictions typical of this class of OCC-chartered institution. Final approval still hinges on additional OCC review and sign-off from Japanese regulators before any token can be issued.

Sony Financial Group described the trust as intended to build a “medium- to long-term business foundation” for its digital asset ambitions. The framing suggests the stablecoin is meant less as a general-purpose payment rail competing head-on with market leaders, and more as an in-house settlement tool tied to Sony’s entertainment ecosystem. The company has previously indicated that U.S. customers could eventually use the token to pay for video games, anime content, and subscriptions across its PlayStation and entertainment platforms — a way to reduce reliance on credit-card processing fees.

Sony Bank Gains U.S. Approval for Stablecoin Trust Bank

Sony Bank Gains U.S. Approval for Stablecoin Trust Bank

A Crowded Field

Sony’s move lands in an increasingly competitive corner of the crypto industry. Stablecoin transaction volume hit a record $1.79 trillion in June, more than doubling year-over-year, according to Visa’s onchain dashboard. Dollar-pegged tokens account for over 99% of the roughly $311 billion stablecoin market, per DeFiLlama data, with Tether’s USDT and Circle’s USDC alone representing close to $250 billion of that total.

Stablecoin Market Cap (Source: DefilLama)Stablecoin Market Cap (Source: DefilLama)

Stablecoin Market Cap (Source: DefilLama)

That dominance hasn’t stopped a wave of new entrants from pursuing federal trust charters. The OCC has granted similar conditional approvals to Circle, Ripple, Paxos, BitGo, Fidelity Digital Assets, and Stripe-owned Bridge, among others. Large traditional banks, including Morgan Stanley, have also pursued charters of their own. The rush has drawn scrutiny in Washington — Sen. Elizabeth Warren has questioned whether the OCC is extending national trust charters to companies that don’t meet the standards set out in the National Bank Act.

Sony filed its original OCC application in October 2025. Under a December 2025 agreement, Bastion Platforms is expected to handle issuance and custody infrastructure for the eventual stablecoin, according to reporting on the filing.

Regulatory Backdrop

The approval comes as U.S. stablecoin oversight solidifies under the GENIUS Act, which established the first comprehensive federal framework for payment stablecoins. That legal clarity has been a driving factor behind the recent surge of trust-bank applications, as companies look to operate under a single federal regulator rather than a patchwork of state money-transmitter licenses.

A national trust charter also keeps issuers outside the deposit-insurance and prudential capital requirements that apply to full-service banks, while still subjecting them to OCC supervision — a middle ground that has proven attractive to both crypto-native firms and traditional financial institutions entering the space.

Sony’s Broader Position

The stablecoin push is one of several notable moves for Sony this year. The company also announced plans to end production of physical PlayStation game discs starting in 2028, part of a broader shift toward digital distribution — a decision that has drawn some backlash from collectors and longtime PlayStation users.

On the market side, Sony Group Corporation (NYSE: SONY) closed at $21.15 on July 8, 2026, down from a 52-week high of $30.34 and trading closer to its 52-week low of $19.32. The stock’s decline this year comes despite a mixed fiscal Q4 report in May, which showed record annual operating income alongside a net income dip tied to the absence of prior-year tax benefits. Analysts covering the stock currently rate it a consensus “Buy,” with price targets ranging up to $34.

Whether Connectia Trust becomes a meaningful new player in the stablecoin market — or remains a niche settlement tool for Sony’s own ecosystem — will depend on how quickly the company can clear its remaining regulatory hurdles and whether it can carve out demand in a market still dominated by two established incumbents.



Source link

Zapper’s Seven-Year Run in DeFi Comes to a Close – NFT Plazas

0
Zapper’s Seven-Year Run in DeFi Comes to a Close – NFT Plazas


Zapper, one of decentralized finance’s earliest and most recognizable portfolio dashboards, is shutting down for good. Co-founder and CEO Seb Audet announced on X that the platform will wind down completely on August 3, closing its website, mobile apps, and API services after nearly seven years in the market.

An Orderly Exit After Years of Building

Audet said the team weighed several paths forward before settling on a controlled shutdown rather than a last-minute scramble. “After close to 7 years building Zapper, I regret to announce that Zapper will be winding down. We evaluated a number of different options, pursued some to the fullest extent possible, and came to the realization that an orderly wind down is the best course of action,” Audet wrote.

He didn’t offer a detailed breakdown of the internal factors behind the decision, but in a follow-up reply to a user, he pointed to softening demand as the underlying driver, stating simply that “at the end of the day, the market decides.”

Audet also used the announcement to advocate for his team, describing the group as one that had scaled a serious product with deep technical expertise. “This is a team that scaled a product to millions of users and $13B in transaction volume, with deep onchain engineering expertise alongside ops people who know how to build and run things at scale,” he said, effectively opening the door for other companies to recruit Zapper’s engineers and operations staff.

Zapper CEO Announces Orderly Wind Down After 7-Years

Zapper CEO Announces Orderly Wind Down After 7-Years

From Hackathon Win to DeFi Summer Staple

Zapper’s origin traces back to 2019, when the project built early momentum by winning a DeFi hackathon hosted by Kyber, a result that helped it raise a $1.5 million seed round shortly after. The platform was formally founded in 2020 by Seb Audet and Suhail Gangji, built as a remote-first startup during the COVID-19 pandemic — timing that placed it right at the center of the 2020 “DeFi Summer” boom, when users needed a simpler way to track fast-moving positions across multiple protocols.

That momentum carried into 2021, when Zapper closed a $15 million Series A led by Framework Ventures, with backing from Mark Cuban, Coinbase Ventures, and Ashton Kutcher’s Sound Ventures. Across its funding history, CryptoRank data cited in earlier reporting put Zapper’s total raise at roughly $16.5 million, while more recent figures place the total closer to $16.6 million across six funding rounds.

At its high point, the platform was genuinely significant infrastructure rather than a niche tool: Audet said Zapper served more than 2 million monthly active users and processed over $13 billion in cumulative transaction volume, offering features like token tracking, liquidity pool and yield farm monitoring, and airdrop discovery.

Not Without Setbacks

Zapper’s run wasn’t without turbulence. In April 2025, the platform suffered a social engineering attack in which attackers temporarily hijacked its domain and redirected users to a malicious page containing phishing traps. The company also tried to broaden its scope over time — Zapper V2 repositioned the product as a wider Web3 exploration tool covering NFTs, DAOs, and cross-chain activity, and in 2024 the team floated Zapper Protocol alongside a planned ZAP utility token, an initiative that never reached launch before the shutdown decision was made.

What Happens Next for Users

Because Zapper functioned primarily as a read-only interface rather than a custodian, the shutdown carries limited direct financial risk — the company never held user funds. The practical impact is operational: anyone relying on Zapper for wallet history, portfolio views, tax-related records, or API integrations will need to export their data and migrate to another tool before August 3. Existing API customers are expected to receive transition guidance by email ahead of the cutoff.

Part of a Broader Industry Retreat

Zapper’s closure lands amid a wider contraction across crypto infrastructure. Ctrl Wallet, a multi-chain self-custody wallet, is set to shut down on the same August 3 date, and Moonbeam is entering a wind-down transition period after July 31. Other recent casualties include Cardano analytics provider TapTools, Bitcoin-focused DeFi platform Botanix, Ordinals platform Ord.io, and NFT marketplaces including Nifty Gateway and Rodeo.

The pattern points to a structural issue for consumer-facing DeFi tools: platforms built during a venture-funded growth cycle now need durable revenue models, something that’s difficult for products historically offered for free. Notably, overall crypto venture capital actually rose 57.6% year-over-year to $4.21 billion in the second quarter, but that capital is increasingly concentrated among fewer companies, with deal counts falling in nine of the last ten quarters, according to RootData figures cited in industry reporting.

For now, Zapper’s exit closes the book on one of DeFi’s original consumer-facing success stories — a reminder that even platforms with real usage and blue-chip backing aren’t guaranteed to outlast a prolonged market downturn.



Source link

Vanguard Seeks Digital Assets Chief After Years of Crypto Caution – NFT Plazas

Vanguard Seeks Digital Assets Chief After Years of Crypto Caution – NFT Plazas


Vanguard has opened its first-ever search for a Head of Digital Assets, a senior hire that would put a single executive in charge of the roughly $12 trillion asset manager’s strategy for cryptocurrencies and blockchain-based finance. The move signals a gradual but notable shift in Vanguard’s stance on digital assets, following its recent decision to allow trading of crypto ETFs and mutual funds while still declining to launch its own crypto products.

What the role covers

According to the job posting, the firm is seeking a Head of Digital Assets in the United States to lead “digital assets strategy, roadmap, and enterprise execution” across Vanguard Personal Wealth. The successful candidate is expected to serve as Vanguard’s senior subject matter expert for digital assets across that division, tasked with building a multi-year roadmap and defining how the firm implements digital asset capabilities, products, and operating models. The posting, based in Dallas, calls for the executive to lead execution across product, technology, operations, legal and compliance teams, while also advising senior leadership on shifts in digital asset markets and representing Vanguard with regulators and industry groups.

Vanguard says the person in the role will determine how the firm participates in digital assets, covering everything from product evaluation and tokenization initiatives to custody models, blockchain settlement considerations, and the operating infrastructure needed to support such efforts. Rather than pointing toward a specific fund launch, the mandate spans much of the digital-asset stack — tokenization, stablecoins, wallets and custody, blockchain-enabled settlement, and broader operating models — with the new executive expected to weigh whether Vanguard should build these capabilities internally, partner with outside firms, or hold off entirely.

Vanguard Seeks Digital Assets Chief After Years of Crypto Caution

Vanguard Seeks Digital Assets Chief After Years of Crypto Caution

Years of public resistance

The hire stands out because of how firmly Vanguard has historically opposed crypto exposure. The firm has described Bitcoin as an “immature asset class” ill-suited to long-term investors, and it was one of the only major asset managers to decline offering a spot Bitcoin ETF after the products won U.S. approval in 2024, even as BlackRock, Fidelity and Franklin Templeton built large crypto ETF businesses. In 2024, Vanguard stated it had “no plans to offer Vanguard Bitcoin ETFs or other crypto-related products,” explaining that “cryptocurrencies’ high volatility runs counter to our goal of helping investors generate positive real returns over the long term.”

CEO Salim Ramji, who joined Vanguard from BlackRock in mid-2024 after running the iShares business behind the industry-leading iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT), reinforced that stance before formally taking over, telling Barron’s that Vanguard’s decision not to offer its own bitcoin ETF was “entirely consistent” with its investment philosophy and that consistency in a firm’s product lineup mattered.

That posture began softening in December 2025, when Vanguard announced it would allow trading of mutual funds and ETFs that primarily invest in crypto on its brokerage platform, with the firm’s head of brokerage and investments, Andrew Kadjeski, noting that “cryptocurrency ETFs and mutual funds have been tested through periods of market volatility, performing as designed while maintaining liquidity.” 

The contrast wasn’t lost on industry watchers. ETF analyst Nate Geraci noted on X that Vanguard had once blocked clients from buying spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs on its brokerage platform, adding simply, “Life moves pretty fast.”

Crypto ETF Net Flow (Source: Coinglass)Crypto ETF Net Flow (Source: Coinglass)

Crypto ETF Net Flow (Source: Coinglass)

A broader industry pattern

Vanguard’s move follows similar hiring by its largest rival. In December 2025, BlackRock opened a search for seven digital asset positions — six based in the U.S. and one in Singapore — as it continues deepening its footprint in crypto, with its own IBIT fund now holding roughly $46.7 billion in net assets.

The tokenization push extends well beyond the two giants. Franklin Templeton and Ondo Finance have launched tokenized ETFs built for round-the-clock trading through crypto wallets outside the U.S., Franklin Templeton has expanded its BENJI tokenized money market fund with new distribution through MoonPay Trade, and State Street has introduced a stablecoin reserve money market fund alongside a tokenized liquidity product for on-chain cash management.

Market data underscores why asset managers are paying attention. Figures from RWA.xyz put the tokenized real-world asset market at roughly $30.87 billion in distributed value, including about $14.86 billion in tokenized U.S. Treasuries — a segment where BlackRock, Franklin Templeton, WisdomTree, Ondo Finance and Fidelity-linked products are already competing.

Demand for crypto ETFs themselves has also proven resilient. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs held $74.37 billion in net assets as of July 2, and inflows returned with $221.72 million after a 10-day outflow streak, pushing total net assets to roughly $77.32 billion. Competition among issuers has separately pushed some Bitcoin ETF expense ratios as low as 0.14%.

No product commitment — yet

Despite the scope of the new role, Vanguard has not said it plans to launch its own crypto ETF or tokenized fund. Instead, the posting suggests the firm wants a senior executive to methodically study product design, risk controls, custody arrangements, servicing, pricing and client education before committing to any specific offering. For a firm long defined by caution toward speculative assets, the creation of a leadership role dedicated to digital assets — rather than another narrow ETF-distribution decision — is itself the headline: institutions of Vanguard’s scale generally don’t build out senior strategy functions for categories they intend to keep ignoring.



Source link

Binance Sees $3.3B Monthly Outflows as ETH Withdrawals Hit 3-Year High

Binance Sees .3B Monthly Outflows as ETH Withdrawals Hit 3-Year High


Binance recorded over $3.3 billion in net outflows over the past month, according to DefiLlama data, while the number of ETH withdrawal transactions from Binance surged to over 166,000 in a single day, a multi-year high of over three years, according to CryptoQuant. This development occurred as ETH traded around $1,790, highlighting a trend of asset migration away from centralized exchanges, even as Binance maintains its massive asset scale and liquidity.

Binance Records $3.3B in Monthly Net Outflows

Data from DefiLlama shows that Binance recorded approximately $3.304 billion in net outflows over the most recent month, the highest among the centralized exchange group tracked on the CEX Transparency dashboard. On the same data dashboard, Binance remains the exchange with the largest asset scale, holding approximately $136.607 billion in assets and $116.384 billion in clean assets.

Short-term capital flows have become less strained compared to the monthly timeframe. Over the past 7 days, Binance recorded approximately $553.34 million in net outflows, while capital flows over the last 24 hours turned positive with approximately $121.33 million in inflows. This variance indicates that while asset withdrawal pressure remains apparent on the monthly timeframe, it has cooled down over shorter periods.

Binance 30-day netflow

Binance 30-day netflow. Source: DefiLlama

A negative netflow indicates that the volume of assets leaving Binance’s identified wallets was larger than the volume of assets entering during the same measurement period. At $3.304 billion, the outflows over the past month are equivalent to roughly 2.4% of the total assets tracked on the exchange by DefiLlama.

ETH Withdrawals Surge to Multi-Year High

In tandem with the negative capital flows on the monthly timeframe, the number of ETH withdrawal transactions from Binance also spiked sharply. According to CryptoQuant, Binance recorded over 166,000 ETH withdrawal transactions in a single day, the highest level in more than three years.

Ethereum Withdrawing Transactions on BinanceEthereum Withdrawing Transactions on Binance

Ethereum Withdrawing Transactions on Binance. Source: CryptoQuant

This surge indicates a sudden spike in activities moving ETH off Binance during a period when the market is closely monitoring capital flows across centralized exchanges. The withdrawal transactions indicator does not directly reflect the USD value of the ETH volume leaving the exchange, but it shows that the frequency of users or related wallets executing ETH withdrawal transactions has increased sharply.

ETH is currently trading around $1,790, with a market capitalization of over $215 billion and a 24-hour trading volume exceeding $14 billion, according to the latest market data. Given the massive trading scale of ETH on exchanges, this sudden spike in withdrawal transactions serves as an additional signal for the asset migration trend away from Binance over the past month.

Why Traders May Be Moving ETH Off Exchanges

Activities withdrawing ETH from exchanges usually increase when investors want to reduce the volume of assets readily available on trading venues. For ETH, popular destinations may include self-custody wallets, staking, custody services, or DeFi protocols, where assets are used as collateral to provide liquidity or to generate yield.

Staking is a notable factor because ETH can generate yield directly on the Ethereum network or through liquid staking products. If the withdrawal transactions are connected to staking wallets or institutional custody wallets, this signal would lean more toward long-term holding rather than preparation for selling on exchanges.

However, an increase in withdrawal transactions does not automatically imply bullish pressure. A portion of the activity could stem from market makers, trading desks, or wallet rebalancing processes across platforms. DefiLlama data also shows that Binance’s 24-hour capital flow has turned positive, indicating that asset flows on the exchange remain volatile in two directions rather than being a one-way exit.

Binance Liquidity Remains Large Despite Outflows

Despite monthly outflows exceeding $3.3 billion, Binance still maintains a massive asset scale and liquidity compared to the rest of the market. DefiLlama records that the exchange holds approximately $136.607 billion in assets and $116.384 billion in clean assets. Binance’s spot volume stands at around $8.012 billion, while its 24h open interest reaches approximately $23.244 billion.

The outflow level of $3.304 billion is equivalent to roughly 2.4% of total assets and about 2.8% of clean assets tracked on Binance by DefiLlama. This ratio indicates that while the negative capital flow during the month is notable, it remains within the context of the exchange’s massive asset scale.

Binance also maintains a Proof of Reserves system to publish user asset data, while independent tracking dashboards like DefiLlama continue to record capital flow fluctuations across exchange wallets. The divergence between outflows on the monthly timeframe and positive inflows over the last 24 hours shows that capital flow pressure has not occurred uniformly across all timeframes.

What to Watch Next

In the coming days, the market will monitor whether short-term capital flows on Binance continue to improve after 24h inflows turned positive by about $121.33 million and 7-day outflows narrowed to around $553.34 million. If this trend persists, the monthly outflow level of over $3.3 billion could begin to decrease in subsequent updates.

For ETH, the key metrics are withdrawal transactions, ETH netflow, and exchange reserve on Binance. CryptoQuant data shows that the number of ETH withdrawal transactions climbed to over 166,000 in a single day, but the next direction of asset flows will depend on whether ETH continues to leave the exchange or returns to trading wallets in the upcoming sessions.



Source link

Azuki TCG: Can a Web3 Anime Brand Win Over the Local Card Shop? | NFT CULTURE | NFT News | Web3 Culture | NFTs & Crypto Art

Azuki TCG: Can a Web3 Anime Brand Win Over the Local Card Shop? | NFT CULTURE | NFT News | Web3 Culture | NFTs & Crypto Art


Azuki has always been more than a profile picture project. At its best, it has been a thesis about what happens when crypto-native communities, anime aesthetics, collectibles, gaming, and entertainment IP start to collapse into one another.

Now that thesis is being tested in one of the most unforgiving arenas in fandom: the physical trading card game market.

With the launch of Azuki TCG: Gates Awakened (AZK-01), Azuki is attempting something far more ambitious than a merchandise drop. It is trying to move from digital collectibility into analog play. From wallet flex to tabletop strategy. From Web3-native hype to the local game store ecosystem.

And that matters.

Because if Azuki TCG works, it could become one of the clearest examples yet of an NFT-born brand crossing the bridge into mainstream entertainment without requiring the audience to care about wallets, tokens, or crypto mechanics at all. Featured on CardCore.xyz the leading news source for all things collectible cards.

From The Garden to the Game Table

Azuki began as one of the most recognizable anime-inspired NFT projects in Web3. Created by Chiru Labs, the collection quickly built a passionate collector base around its distinct visual identity, lore, and “Garden” mythology.

It also came with baggage. In 2022, founder Zagabond faced significant criticism after revealing involvement with earlier NFT projects that many collectors felt had been abandoned. That history remains part of the Azuki story, and it is one reason some traditional TCG players may approach the new card game with skepticism.

But the move into physical cards is not a small pivot. It is a serious attempt to build Azuki as an entertainment franchise, not just a blockchain collection.

The official Azuki TCG site now lists Gates Awakened (AZK-01) as “out now,” with players choosing between Lightning, Water, Earth, and Fire starter decks and battling across the game’s two major zones: the Garden and the Alley. The site also emphasizes that every card is hand drawn by artists, with featured cards illustrated by creators including Arnold Tsang, also known as Steamboy33.

That detail matters because Azuki’s strongest asset has always been taste. The brand’s visual identity is polished, collectible, and immediately legible. In a TCG market where art direction can be just as important as mechanics, Azuki is entering with a real advantage.

The Art Direction Is the Hook

The first thing players and collectors will notice is the art.

Azuki TCG leans hard into a cel-shaded anime aesthetic, with premium card treatments designed to make the physical product feel like more than a simple licensing extension. For an NFT-native brand, this is a smart move. Azuki’s community was built around visual identity, scarcity, and collectibility. A physical trading card game lets the project translate those same instincts into cardboard.

That translation is important. NFTs taught a generation of collectors to care about editions, traits, provenance, metadata, rarity, and social signaling. TCGs already had many of those behaviors decades before NFTs existed. Chase foils, alt arts, serialized cards, graded slabs, tournament promos, and sealed product speculation all live in the same psychological neighborhood.

Azuki TCG sits directly at that intersection.

The question is whether the cards are merely collectible, or whether the game underneath is strong enough to sustain repeat play.

How Azuki TCG Plays

Azuki TCG is a two-player card game built around 50-card decks, Leaders, Gates, Entities, Spells, Weapons, and a separate resource system.

The most important design choice is the IKZ resource deck. Instead of relying on traditional in-deck mana or energy cards, players use a separate 10-card IKZ resource deck. That helps reduce one of the most frustrating parts of many TCGs: losing because you simply did not draw the resources needed to play your cards.

That puts Azuki closer to modern card game design trends seen in games like Hearthstone, One Piece Card Game, and other systems that try to make resource development more predictable.

The battlefield is split into two horizontal areas:

The Alley is the protected back row, where players can stage Entities and prepare future plays.

The Garden is the active front row, where combat and direct pressure happen.

The game’s signature idea is the Gate mechanic. Once per turn, a player can use their Gate to “portal” an Entity from the Alley into the Garden. When that happens, the Entity’s Gate Power can trigger, creating a tactical push-and-pull between developing your back row and committing threats to the front line.

That is where Azuki TCG gets interesting. The game is not just asking, “Can you pay for the card?” It is asking, “When do you reveal your plan?” and “How long can you afford to set up before your opponent pressures you?”

That kind of spatial tension gives the game its own identity.

Gates Awakened: The First Set

The inaugural set, Gates Awakened (AZK-01), introduces the Azuki universe through a 148-card booster set. According to ICv2’s June 2026 preview, the product launched with booster display boxes priced at $119.99 MSRP and starter decks priced at $12.99 MSRP. Booster boxes include 24 packs, with 12 cards per pack.

The four starter decks are built around Azuki’s elemental leaders:

Raizan represents Lightning.

Shao represents Water.

Bobu represents Earth.

Zero represents Fire.

The starter decks are especially important because TCGs need a low-friction entry point. A collector might buy a booster box because the art is beautiful. A player needs a deck they can open, sleeve, and learn with immediately.

Azuki appears to understand that distinction.

Organized Play Is the Real Test

A trading card game does not live on aesthetics alone.

Beautiful cards can create a launch spike. Organized play creates a community. Weekly locals, regional events, tournament coverage, prize support, judge infrastructure, and deck-building content are what turn a new TCG from a novelty into a habit.

Azuki is clearly aware of this. In March 2026, Azuki announced a $100,000 prize pool commitment for its inaugural competitive season and named CoreTCG as its official tournament organizer. CoreTCG is known for supporting large-scale TCG events, including Yu-Gi-Oh! YCS events, Bandai Nationals, and Bandai Card Fests.

That is not a casual signal. That is Azuki telling the market it wants the game to be taken seriously by competitive players, not just NFT collectors.

The official Azuki TCG site also highlights local card shop partners, store locator functionality, competitive play, event updates, and an app ecosystem around the game.

This is the part that may determine whether Azuki TCG has staying power. The game needs more than collectors ripping packs. It needs people showing up on a Tuesday night to test decks, argue matchups, trade cards, and build local metagames.

Why This Matters for NFTs

For NFTCulture, the most interesting part of Azuki TCG is not simply that an NFT project made a card game. It is that Azuki is testing a broader path for Web3 IP.

For years, NFT projects promised future games, shows, comics, toys, memberships, token-gated worlds, and entertainment ecosystems. Some delivered. Many did not. The gap between roadmap language and actual consumer products became one of the defining credibility problems of the NFT market.

Azuki TCG is different because it does not ask the mainstream player to understand Web3 first.

You do not need an NFT to play.

You do not need a crypto wallet.

You do not need to mint anything.

You can walk into a card shop, buy a starter deck or booster pack, and play a game with another person.

That is powerful because it flips the usual adoption funnel. Instead of asking mainstream consumers to enter Web3, Azuki is pushing a Web3-born brand into a format consumers already understand.

That may be the future of NFT IP: not forcing everything on-chain, but using blockchain-native communities as the launchpad for brands that can move across physical, digital, and experiential formats.

The Skepticism Is Fair

Azuki TCG will still have to earn trust.

Traditional TCG players are not easy to impress. They have seen plenty of games launch with beautiful art, big promises, and early hype, only to disappear once organized play slows down or product support becomes inconsistent.

The NFT connection cuts both ways. For Web3 collectors, it creates instant cultural relevance. For some tabletop players, it may create hesitation.

That is why Azuki’s decision to make the game fully playable as a physical TCG is so important. The product cannot rely on tokenomics. It has to stand on gameplay, art, distribution, community, and support.

That is a healthier test.

The Verdict

Azuki TCG is one of the more compelling experiments in NFT-to-mainstream IP we have seen.

It does not feel like a simple merch extension. It feels like an attempt to build a durable entertainment product around a crypto-native brand. The art is strong. The mechanics appear modern and accessible. The organized play commitment is meaningful. And the retail strategy gives Azuki a shot at reaching players far outside its original holder base.

The challenge now is consistency.

Can Azuki support the game beyond the launch window? Can it keep local stores engaged? Can it create a competitive scene that players care about? Can it convert skeptics who have no interest in NFTs but love great card games?

If the answer is yes, Azuki TCG could become a case study in how Web3 brands evolve beyond speculation and into culture.

Not by abandoning their origins.

But by building something people can actually play.

TL;DR

Azuki TCG: Gates Awakened is a major test for NFT-born intellectual property. Built around premium anime-inspired art, modern resource mechanics, spatial gameplay across the Garden and Alley, and a serious organized play push, Azuki is trying to prove that a Web3-native brand can compete in the physical trading card game market. The NFT history brings skepticism, but the game’s fiat-friendly, no-wallet-required retail approach may be exactly what Web3 IP needs to reach mainstream audiences.

 



Source link

BONK DAO Loses $20 Million After Attacker Buys Governance Vote to Drain Treasury – NFT Plazas

BONK DAO Loses  Million After Attacker Buys Governance Vote to Drain Treasury – NFT Plazas


A governance exploit has cost the BonkDAO treasury an estimated $20 million, after an attacker spent roughly $4.4 million acquiring enough BONK tokens to push through a malicious proposal that automatically transferred the funds to a wallet under their control.

The incident, which unfolded over the course of a week and culminated early Monday, has reignited debate over whether onchain governance — long pitched as a transparent, community-driven alternative to centralized control — is fundamentally vulnerable to anyone willing to pay for a temporary majority.

How the Attack Unfolded

The scheme began on June 30, when an anonymous wallet submitted a proposal titled “BIP #76 – Sowellian BonkDAO” to the project’s onchain governance platform. On its surface, the proposal read like a reform pitch, promising to “rebuild from the ashes, monetize holdings, stop the bleeding,” and install new governance members. Buried within it, however, was a single operative instruction: transfer roughly 4.426 trillion BONK tokens — the entire contents of the treasury — to a wallet ending in “JHvQ.”

To pass, the proposal needed “yes” votes equal to at least 1% of BONK’s total supply, the quorum threshold set by the DAO’s rules. Over July 4 and 5, a separate wallet methodically acquired exactly that amount, spending about $4.4 million buying BONK on the exchanges Bybit and Binance, with some reports indicating additional tokens were borrowed through DeFi lending platforms, according to onchain analytics firm Lookonchain.

When the vote closed, only seven wallets had participated — against more than 18,000 total DAO members — a turnout of just 2.9%. The proposal cleared quorum by a razor-thin margin: 882.38 billion BONK in favor against an 879.95 billion threshold, almost exactly matching the stake the attacker had spent days assembling. Effectively, the “99.9% yes” result represented a single actor voting in agreement with itself.

How the Attack Unfolded

How the Attack Unfolded

The Drain and the Aftermath

Once the proposal passed, the transfer executed automatically, moving roughly $20 million worth of BONK out of the treasury and into the attacker’s wallet. According to blockchain intelligence firm Chainalysis, about $188,000 was sent to a centralized exchange within hours, likely an attempt to begin cashing out, while the remaining roughly $19 million was moved to a multisignature wallet requiring multiple approvals to access.

Just over an hour after the drain, the attacker began selling off the BONK tokens originally purchased to manipulate the vote, offloading about $5.3 million worth — while retaining the stolen treasury holdings.

BonkDAO confirmed the attack publicly, describing it as a malicious governance proposal and stating it had identified the exchange wallets used to accumulate voting power ahead of the proposal. “During the investigation, BonkDAO identified the exchange wallets used to purchase BONK ahead of the proposal,” the project posted on X, adding that law enforcement had been notified and that it continues working with exchanges, bridges, and the Solana Foundation to trace and potentially recover funds.

BonkDAO confirmed the attack publiclyBonkDAO confirmed the attack publicly

BonkDAO confirmed the attack publicly

In response, South Korean exchange Upbit and U.S.-based Kraken both suspended deposits and withdrawals of BONK, with Upbit citing “user protection measures following the circumstances of a security incident.”

Market Impact

BONK, once a top-100 token by market capitalization, fell roughly 7% in the 24 hours following disclosure of the attack, trading around $0.0000043 — a level roughly 93% below its all-time high of $0.000058. Some reporting places the decline closer to 10%, reflecting differences in the exact measurement window as the story developed throughout the day.

BONK Price Performance on 07/7/2026 (Source: CoinMarketCap)BONK Price Performance on 07/7/2026 (Source: CoinMarketCap)

BONK Price Performance on 07/7/2026 (Source: CoinMarketCap)

A Legitimate Attack

What sets the BonkDAO incident apart from typical DeFi exploits is that no code was broken and no private keys were stolen. Every action — the token purchases, the proposal submission, the vote, and the payout — was a valid, rule-following transaction on Solana. That has fueled a familiar argument within crypto circles over whether the episode constitutes theft or simply a ruthless but technically permitted use of a DAO’s own governance mechanics.

BonkDAO and blockchain analytics firms have characterized the episode as an attack, a framing reinforced by the involvement of law enforcement. Critics within the community have also pointed to a broader governance failure: the proposal sat visible on BonkDAO’s platform for nearly six days with minimal scrutiny before the vote concluded and the transfer executed as programmed.

The underlying lesson, analysts note, is structural. Any treasury governed by a system where voting power can simply be purchased is only as secure as the cost of assembling a controlling stake — and in this case, that cost was a fraction of the treasury’s value. With $4.4 million in capital, the attacker walked away having netted roughly $20 million, minus whatever portion is eventually recovered or frozen by exchanges and investigators.

BonkDAO has not yet detailed a formal remediation plan for preventing similar governance capture in the future, though its coordination with the Solana Foundation and multiple exchanges suggests recovery efforts remain active as of this writing.



Source link

Vitalik Buterin Outlines Lean Ethereum Path for Lighter Consensus, Validator Privacy

Vitalik Buterin Outlines Lean Ethereum Path for Lighter Consensus, Validator Privacy


On July 6, 2026, Vitalik Buterin published further details on the “Lean Ethereum” direction in a new series of updates to the Ethereum community, following recent discussions between researchers and client teams. The proposal focuses on making the consensus layer lighter, easier to upgrade, and more aligned with long-term goals such as privacy and post-quantum security. Although it is not yet a finalized hard fork, this content indicates that Ethereum is expanding its L1 roadmap to reduce protocol complexity over the coming years.

What Happened

On July 6, 2026, Buterin shared an updated strawmap of Ethereum L1, stating that this document follows recent discussions among Ethereum researchers in Berlin and client teams in Svalbard. The strawmap places Lean Ethereum on a multi-year trajectory, with long-term goals including a fast L1, a post-quantum L1, and a private L1.

In a follow-up update, Buterin dove deeper into the consensus branch of the roadmap, questioning how Lean Ethereum could become “aggressively more lean” while adding stronger validator privacy. The document titled “The Extremely Lean Chain” subsequently presented design directions for a lighter consensus chain, where Ethereum reduces the amount of data that must be maintained directly within the protocol and relies more heavily on cryptographic proofs.

Nevertheless, this remains a research proposal, not an announcement of a finalized hard fork deployment or protocol changes. This series of updates indicates that Lean Ethereum is being concretized from a long-term vision of a leaner, more private, and quantum-resistant L1 into technical directions that can be discussed, verified, and later introduced into the standardization process by the Ethereum community.

Inside The Proposal

Buterin targets a core part of the beacon chain: the amount of data the protocol must maintain for each validator. Currently, each validator in the consensus state is attached to multiple data fields, ranging from a 48-byte public key, 32-byte withdrawal credentials, and an 8-byte active balance to slashed status and epoch milestones related to activation, exit, and withdrawal. As the validator count grows, this state makes epoch processing heavier, especially if Ethereum wants to move toward few-slot or single-slot finality.

The “extremely lean” design proposes reducing the per-validator state to a 1-byte effective balance and a 5-byte pubkey index. The remaining data would be handled using proofs: validators monitor their own necessary data, prove whether they participated or did not participate in an attestation, calculate their new balance, and then submit that proof to the protocol.

In the initial description, Buterin used a one-day cycle for the balance update proof. Validators submitting proofs late would not be instantly slashed or excluded, but they cannot continue to attest until the update is complete. He also suggested that a one-hour cycle is the lower bound in terms of cost, while one day is a more conservative choice.

At a scale of 1 million validators, Buterin estimates the bitfield to be only around 128 kB, and the effective-balance tree around 1 MB. According to him, these structures can be proven using STARKs, but the proofs still need to be aggregated to avoid creating too much overhead for the protocol.

Privacy And Post-Quantum Angle

In addition to state reduction, Buterin’s proposal integrates validator privacy into the core design. In the next phase, the active validator registry could become a separate structure on a day-by-day basis. Validators would use a fresh pubkey every day, causing identities to be periodically re-anonymized rather than being tracked long-term through a fixed public key.

This design also aims to use ZK-STARKs so validators can prove their connection to a previous state without exposing their entire history. According to Buterin, this model could allow a validator identity to “re-randomize each day,” where only the validator itself knows the link between the old and new identity.

This proposal aligns with the post-quantum direction of Lean Ethereum. In an Ethereum Foundation blog post from July 2025, Justin Drake described Lean Ethereum as a 10-year vision that places hash-based cryptography at the center. The new strawmap also includes “post-quantum L1” and “private L1” among the long-term goals for Ethereum L1.

Roadmap Context

The strawmap on strawmap.org is maintained by EF Architecture and is described as a “strawman L1 roadmap,” not an official roadmap adopted by the entire Ethereum ecosystem. This document serves as a coordination tool for researchers, client developers, and governance participants, with a vision extending to the end of the decade.

Ethereum L1 strawmap

Ethereum L1 strawmap. Source: Vitalik Buterin

According to ethereum.org, the closest upcoming upgrades, Glamsterdam and Hegotá, are both in the development phase, expected in H2 2026. Glamsterdam is currently tied to goals such as enshrined proposer-builder separation and block-level access lists. In the strawmap, longer-term upgrade directions are divided into three layers: consensus layer, data layer, and execution layer.

Lean Ethereum is therefore not a single upgrade, but a cluster of technical directions for L1. Lean consensus focuses on finality and a lighter beacon chain; lean data relates to data availability and blobs, while lean execution aims for an execution environment that is more friendly to proving while maintaining continuity with the EVM ecosystem.

What Comes Next

Buterin’s proposals will need to be researched, critiqued, and refined by the Ethereum community before they can enter the standardization process. Open questions include the actual proof costs for small validators, the ability to aggregate proofs at scale, the impact of validator anonymity on measuring decentralization, and how to handle slashing in a model where pubkeys change daily.

If The Merge in 2022 transitioned Ethereum from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake, Lean Ethereum focuses on a different layer of change: making L1 lighter, easier to verify, more private, and readier for post-quantum cryptography. The next steps will likely unfold through research discussions, EIPs, client implementations, testnets, and, finally, a hard fork.





Source link

Aave V3.7 Launches on Monad as Network TVL Nears $450M

Aave V3.7 Launches on Monad as Network TVL Nears 0M


Aave has officially deployed Aave Protocol v3.7 on Monad on July 2, opening an additional lending and borrowing market on this EVM-compatible Layer 1 after receiving approval from Aave governance. The launch comes as Monad’s DeFi Total Value Locked (TVL) approaches $450 million, according to DeFiLlama data, while Aave’s Monad market quickly surpassed $100 million in total market size following its initial deployment phase.

Aave V3.7 Launches on Monad

Aave went live on Monad with Aave Protocol version v3.7 after securing approval through Aave governance, according to an announcement from the Monad Foundation on July 2. The deployment opens an additional lending and borrowing market for Monad users, supporting 12 assets from day one.

The list of supported assets includes USDT0, USDC, GHO, USDe, mUSD, AUSD, WETH, cbBTC, wstETH, weETH, syrupUSDC, and sUSDe. This selection covers stablecoins, ETH liquid staking assets, BTC wrappers, and yield-bearing collateral, establishing a foundation for both asset supply and borrowing activities on Aave.

The arrival of Aave adds a major lending protocol to the Monad ecosystem, where borrowing and lending markets have begun to form alongside the growth of on-chain liquidity.

Monad Market Tops $117M

Aave’s Monad market has reached a total market size of $117.56 million, according to data from the Aave app. Within this, available liquidity is $69.08 million, while total borrowings are $48.47 million.

This momentum follows the $75 million deposit milestone within the first 24 hours post-launch, announced by Aave on X on July 3. In the same update, Aave stated that deposits on Monad had neared $80 million.

Aave V3 on Monad.

Aave V3 on Monad. Source: Aave

Total market size reflects the amount of assets supplied to Aave on Monad, while borrows show the portion of liquidity that users have borrowed. With $48.47 million in total borrowings, the amount of borrowed assets currently equates to over 40% of the total market size, indicating that the market experienced early two-way activity after launch. For a newly deployed lending protocol on a new chain, the noteworthy point is not only the volume of supplied assets but also the speed at which liquidity began to be utilized by borrowers.

Monad TVL Nears $450M

Monad recorded approximately $449.84 million in DeFi TVL according to DeFiLlama data, placing the network among the chains with significant on-chain liquidity during its early mainnet phase.

Monad’s Total Value Locked.Monad’s Total Value Locked.

Monad’s Total Value Locked. Source: DeFiLlama

Aave joins Monad at a time when the lending market on this network already sees the presence of multiple other protocols. According to data from DeFiLlama, Euler V2, Morpho Blue, and Curvance are all among the major lending markets on Monad by TVL.

This competition makes Aave’s deployment not just an addition of a major lending venue to Monad, but also a test of Aave’s ability to attract liquidity within an ecosystem that already offers multiple borrowing and lending options.

Stablecoin Borrowing Leads Early Activity

Borrowing activity on Aave’s Monad Market is predominantly concentrated in the stablecoin sector. According to Aave app and DeFiLlama data, USDT0 recorded approximately $20.2 million borrowed, USDC around $16.0 million, AUSD around $5.0 million, and mUSD around $4.1 million. WETH also saw over $3 million borrowed, but stablecoins still account for the majority of borrowing activity in the early phase.

syrupUSDC is currently the asset with the largest supply in the market, at approximately $46.85 million. This structure indicates that Aave’s initial liquidity on Monad tilts toward stablecoins and yield-bearing collateral, rather than being evenly distributed across all 12 supported assets.

The Monad Foundation stated that subsequent phases could add Pendle PT assets and Fastlane’s LST. Expanding the asset list could help Aave move beyond the initial stablecoin borrowing demand, especially if demand for yield assets and liquid staking collateral continues to rise on Monad.



Source link

Aave V4 Deposits Exceed $250M, Monad Market Surpasses $100M in 48 Hours – NFT Plazas

Aave V4 Deposits Exceed 0M, Monad Market Surpasses 0M in 48 Hours – NFT Plazas


Aave, the largest decentralized lending protocol by total value locked, has notched two significant milestones within the same week. The protocol’s V4 deployment on Ethereum surpassed $250 million in deposits, while its newly launched lending market on the Monad blockchain crossed $100 million in deposits just 48 hours after going live on July 2. The dual achievement highlights both the protocol’s continued growth on its home chain and the strength of its multichain expansion strategy.

Monad Market Gains Traction Fast

According to data from on-chain analytics firm TokenLogic, Aave’s Monad market attracted more than $75 million in deposits within its first 24 hours, then crossed the $100 million mark roughly two days after launch. The deployment runs Aave Protocol V3.7 and supports 12 assets, including USDT0, USDC, GHO, WETH, Coinbase’s cbBTC, wstETH, weETH, USDe, mUSD, AUSD, syrupUSDC, and sUSDe.

The rapid inflow is notable given the size of Monad’s broader ecosystem. According to a LlamaRisk assessment posted to Aave’s governance forum, Monad’s entire DeFi sector held about $359.5 million in total value locked as of June 8. That means Aave’s new market alone accounted for more than a quarter of that figure within two days of launching.

Monad, an EVM-compatible Layer 1 network built by former Jump Trading engineers, launched its mainnet and MON token in November 2025. The chain is designed for high throughput, targeting 10,000 transactions per second with roughly 800-millisecond transaction finality — specs aimed at DeFi applications where speed and low latency matter.

Monad Market Surpasses $100M in 48 Hours

Monad Market Surpasses $100M in 48 Hours

Governance Process and Incentive Structure

Aave‘s deployment on Monad followed a multi-month governance process that began with a Temp Check proposal on February 24, 2026. The proposal, authored by TokenLogic, received strong community backing and cleared final approval in late June before the market launched on July 2.

To help bootstrap liquidity, the Monad Foundation committed $15 million in incentives over the deployment’s first year and agreed to acquire and hold 10 million GHO tokens for more than six months. The Aave DAO separately allocated 500,000 GHO to support stablecoin adoption within the Monad ecosystem. Analysts have noted that a portion of the early deposit surge is likely incentive-driven, and that sustained borrowing activity and utilization rates in the coming weeks will be a better test of whether the liquidity is durable once rewards taper off.

Early borrowing data suggests genuine two-way market activity rather than one-sided deposits. Total borrowings on the Monad market have reached roughly $48 million against a total market size north of $117 million, according to Aave app data, with borrowing concentrated in stablecoins such as USDT0 and USDC.

V4 Reaches New Milestone on Ethereum

Separately, Aave’s V4 version — which launched on Ethereum mainnet in late March using a new “hub-and-spoke” architecture — crossed $250 million in deposits, marking an all-time high for that version of the protocol. Aave Labs founder and CEO Stani Kulechov called it “a remarkable milestone for Aave” and said he expects the protocol to grow toward $1 billion in deposits “with more crypto-backed loans and expanding to securities-backed lending.”

AAVE’s TVL on 06/7/2026 (Source: DefilLama)AAVE’s TVL on 06/7/2026 (Source: DefilLama)

AAVE’s TVL on 06/7/2026 (Source: DefilLama)

Kulechov has previously described V4’s rollout as deliberately gradual, following the same controlled approach used with earlier versions of the protocol. Aave’s governance proposal for the Monad deployment leaves it up to the Monad Foundation to decide whether and when to eventually migrate that market to V4.

GHO’s Multichain Expansion Continues

The Monad launch also marks a notable expansion for GHO, Aave’s native stablecoin, which had previously been available on Base and Arbitrum. Monad represents GHO’s first deployment on a standalone, high-performance Layer 1 outside the Ethereum Layer 2 ecosystem. The integration uses Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) to facilitate transfers, and marks the first time Aave has used Chainlink’s Smart Value Recapture (SVR) technology from launch, a mechanism designed to return a portion of liquidation and MEV-related revenue to the protocol.

Keone Hon, co-founder and general manager of the Monad Foundation, said the deployment brings “Ethereum’s core liquidity infrastructure onto a faster chain,” framing Aave’s presence as validation of Monad’s ability to attract established DeFi protocols. Monad Foundation has indicated that future phases could add Pendle PT assets and Fastlane’s shMON liquid staking token to the market’s asset roster.



Source link

VALR Taps Hyperliquid to Launch 200+ Perps Markets

VALR Taps Hyperliquid to Launch 200+ Perps Markets


VALR, the Johannesburg-based cryptocurrency exchange, is set to launch its new perpetuals product on its web platform on July 6, 2026, through a direct integration with Hyperliquid. The “Perps” product adds over 200 cross-asset markets to VALR, enabling users to open and manage positions directly within the exchange’s platform as demand for derivatives trading continues to grow in the crypto market.

VALR Adds 200+ Perps Markets

The new product allows VALR users to open leveraged long or short positions on the newly added markets. This is not the exchange’s first time rolling out perpetuals: VALR stated it launched its initial perpetuals offering back in 2023. The novelty of this expansion lies in the scale of the product, as Perps brings a wide array of cross-asset markets into VALR’s existing trading interface.

The new contracts span crypto, equities, indices, commodities, precious metals, and foreign exchange. Some of the markets mentioned by VALR include Nvidia, Tesla, Apple, the S&P 500, Brent crude, gold, silver, and major forex pairs such as EUR/USD, GBP/USD, and USD/JPY.

This scale makes Perps a cross-asset derivatives offering, rather than just an extension of crypto futures. For VALR users, the new product offers additional ways to trade volatility across multiple markets in a single account.

Hyperliquid Powers Liquidity and Execution

The new Perps product is deployed via an integration with Hyperliquid, a prominent decentralized Layer-1 blockchain in the perpetuals and spot trading sector. VALR stated that users can open and manage positions directly on VALR, while liquidity and trade execution are powered by Hyperliquid’s infrastructure.

Hyperliquid also confirmed on X that VALR is utilizing its network as an on-chain infrastructure layer to bring perpetuals to users. According to Hyperliquid, this marks the first time a centralized exchange has directly integrated Hyperliquid, allowing users to access deep liquidity and on-chain data without leaving the VALR platform.

Despite expanding to over 200 new derivatives markets, VALR retains the trading experience within its own ecosystem instead of redirecting users to an external platform. For Hyperliquid, the agreement expands the network’s role from an independent trading venue to an infrastructure layer for other financial applications.

Perps Move Beyond Crypto

VALR’s addition of contracts tied to equities, indices, commodities, precious metals, and forex demonstrates that perpetuals are moving beyond the realm of pure crypto. Instead of only serving pairs like Bitcoin or Ethereum, the new product brings multiple global assets into a single trading interface on VALR.

Gianluca Sacco, Chief Operating Officer of VALR, stated that this launch will bring over 200 perpetual markets directly into the VALR app, providing 24/7 access to crypto, commodities, currencies, listed equities, and pre-IPO shares. “Perpetual futures have become one of the most popular ways for crypto traders to express views on price,” Sacco said, while suggesting that this product type could expand to even more asset markets.

For VALR, Perps is positioned as a cross-asset derivatives product, rather than just an addition to crypto futures. Users can trade volatility across multiple asset classes within the same account, ranging from crypto and tech stocks to energy commodities, precious metals, and major currency pairs.

Why It Matters for VALR and Hyperliquid

VALR currently serves over 1.9 million registered users and 1,900 corporate and institutional clients globally. Founded in 2018 and headquartered in Johannesburg, the exchange is licensed by the South African Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA), holds a provisional license from the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority, and is backed by Pantera Capital, Coinbase Ventures, and Fidelity’s F-Prime Capital.

Hyperliquid’s Total Value Locked

Hyperliquid’s Total Value Locked. Source: DefiLlama

For VALR, the product injects on-chain liquidity into a platform that serves both retail traders and institutional clients. For Hyperliquid, this marks an expansion from a direct trading venue to an infrastructure layer for other financial applications. According to DefiLlama, Hyperliquid recorded approximately $5.85 billion in TVL and $237.7 billion in 30-day perp volume as of early July 2026.

Regulatory and Risk Notes

VALR stated that futures trading is provided by VALR DAM Pty Ltd, a licensed Financial Services Provider in South Africa under FSP #54897 and an Over-the-Counter Derivatives Provider. The company also clarified that components such as order management, order execution, liquidations, margin requirements, position management, mark price, and funding rates for VALR Perps are managed and provided through one or more third-party liquidity providers.

According to VALR, the exchange acts as an intermediary, enabling account holders to access the liquidity provider’s services. As a result, risks regarding pricing, liquidity, order execution, system availability, and operations remain factors that users must consider before trading. Perpetuals can also amplify losses due to leverage, funding payments, and automatic liquidation mechanisms. Perps on VALR is scheduled to go live on the web on July 6, 2026, with a mobile version rolling out at a later date.



Source link

Popular Posts

My Favorites

Days of our Lives Early Spoilers May 11-15: EJ Issues Threats...

Days of Our Lives early weekly spoilers for May 11th through the 15th reveal EJ DiMera (Dan Feuerriegel) making some very scary threats and...