Arts

Home Arts Page 4

ESMA Adds 14 Firms to MiCA Register, Ripple Among Newcomers – NFT Plazas

0
ESMA Adds 14 Firms to MiCA Register, Ripple Among Newcomers – NFT Plazas


The European Securities and Markets Authority has expanded its Markets in Crypto-Assets register with 14 additional companies, pushing the total number of licensed crypto-asset service providers in the European Union to 294. Ripple Payments Europe SA, the payments arm of blockchain company Ripple, is among the newest entrants, gaining authorization to offer regulated crypto services across the bloc.

The July 16 update marks ESMA’s latest interim revision to the central MiCA register since the regulation’s 18-month transitional period closed on July 1. With Ripple Payments Europe now listed, the firm can extend regulated crypto asset services to financial institutions and businesses in 29 EU member states, building on the licensing groundwork the company laid earlier this summer.

Ripple’s inclusion follows its full Crypto Asset Service Provider authorization from Luxembourg’s Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier, granted in early July after a preliminary green light in June. That CASP license, paired with an existing Electronic Money Institution authorization Ripple already holds in Luxembourg, gives the company a combined regulatory foundation to support crypto asset and stablecoin payment services throughout the European Economic Area. Ripple has said the setup lets banks, fintechs, and corporate clients rely on a single integration to move funds, exchange assets, and settle payments, spanning products that may draw on XRP, the XRP Ledger, or the RLUSD stablecoin depending on the client and service involved.

Ripple Payments Joins MiCA With 14 Firms

Ripple Payments Joins MiCA With 14 Firms

Banks join the crypto licensing queue

Ripple was not alone in the latest batch. ESMA’s update also added Portugal’s Bison Bank, Croatia’s state-owned Hrvatska poštanska banka, and Liechtenstein’s Kaiser Partner Privatbank to the register. Their appearance reinforces a trend regulators have flagged repeatedly since MiCA’s transition window closed: established banks, not just crypto-native firms, are pursuing authorization to offer digital asset services under the bloc’s harmonized framework.

Payments processor BitPay secured its own MiCA authorization separately, receiving a Crypto Asset Service Provider license from the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets. The license lets BitPay offer crypto and stablecoin payment services across eligible EU markets, using MiCA’s passporting mechanism to operate without seeking approval country by country.

Taken together, the additions bring ESMA’s interim MiCA register to 294 authorized providers, though the pace of new licensing has slowed markedly since the July 1 cutoff. ESMA’s prior large update, published July 3, added 37 firms in a single batch; the July 16 revision added only 14, suggesting the initial post-deadline surge of approvals is giving way to a steadier, slower drip of new authorizations as national regulators work through remaining applications.

Under MiCA, any company offering covered crypto asset services within the EU must secure authorization from a national competent authority. Once a firm receives that approval, it can passport its services into other participating markets without applying separately in each jurisdiction, a structure designed to let compliant providers scale across the bloc efficiently while keeping oversight anchored at the national level.

Ripple’s European footprint now extends beyond MiCA as well. The company holds an Electronic Money Institution license and cryptoasset registration from the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority, secured earlier this year, rounding out a broader push into regulated markets across the region. Ripple has said its total portfolio of regulatory licenses worldwide now exceeds 75.

Ripple has also received regulatory approval from the UK Financial Conduct AuthorityRipple has also received regulatory approval from the UK Financial Conduct Authority

Ripple has also received regulatory approval from the UK Financial Conduct Authority

Compliance pressure mounts as deadline passes

The newest authorizations arrive as European regulators keep a close watch on customer movement triggered by MiCA’s transition deadline. Firms that failed to secure authorization by the applicable cutoff are required to wind down regulated crypto services in EU markets, absent alternative national arrangements, pushing their customers to migrate toward licensed platforms.

That migration has drawn direct attention from the EU’s Authority for Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism. AMLA chair Bruna Szego, briefing the European Parliament’s Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, warned that firms exiting the market could face a sharp rise in withdrawal requests as customers rush to move assets before services shut down. She cautioned that licensed providers absorbing those departing customers may struggle to process a large volume of new accounts while still maintaining rigorous anti-money laundering checks.

Szego urged departing firms to prepare operationally for a spike in customer activity and called on newly authorized providers to hold the line on compliance standards even as onboarding volumes increase. AMLA has said it plans to publish a fuller report on money-laundering risk in the crypto sector before year’s end and is expanding its blockchain analytics capabilities to strengthen supervision of authorized providers going forward.

For Ripple and the other newly listed firms, the AMLA warning underscores that regulatory authorization is only the starting point. ESMA’s register confirms these companies can now legally serve customers across MiCA’s participating markets, but Szego’s comments make clear that regulators expect authorized providers to manage the resulting influx of business without loosening identity verification, transaction monitoring, or the broader anti-money laundering controls that MiCA was designed to enforce.



Source link

Ledger Wants AI Agents to Manage Crypto Without Holding Users’ Keys

0
Ledger Wants AI Agents to Manage Crypto Without Holding Users’ Keys


Ledger is pushing AI agents into crypto workflows, but private keys remain tightly locked on the device. The company announced this direction on June 10, 2026, and continued to heavily roll out developer documentation in the following weeks, just as the “agentic finance” race began to heat up.

This is a notable move because Ledger is not just selling an extra feature; it is attempting to place hardware wallets at the center of how AI agents interact with on-chain assets. In an environment where a single wrong move can touch real money, the biggest question is no longer what AI can do, but who holds the signing authority.

Inside Ledger Agent Stack

The Ledger Agent Stack is a set of four open-source building blocks that Ledger recently announced for workflows involving AI agents. According to Ledger, this stack was tested in a private preview with over 1,000 agents before being expanded to more builders.

The four components include Device Management Kit Skills, Ledger Wallet CLI, Ledger Enterprise CLI, and Ledger Enterprise Multisig CLI. DMK Skills help coding agents integrate Ledger hardware into applications or signing flows. The Wallet CLI allows agents to check balances, history, and prepare on-chain actions. The remaining two CLIs target enterprise and multisig workflows.

Notably, they do not call this an automated AI wallet. Instead, the Agent Stack is designed for the agent to act as a supporting layer on top, while final control still resides on the user’s hardware.

Why Keys Stay on Device

Ledger says AI agents can be useful, but they should not be fully trusted when handling assets. In its roadmap blog, the company highlighted three main risks: prompt injection, autonomous execution, and agents being granted access to real resources.

Therefore, Ledger sets its principle very clearly: agents propose, humans approve, and hardware enforces. The agent can analyze and prepare transactions, but the user must still confirm on the Ledger device before the command is signed. This approach keeps the private key inside the hardware instead of letting it pass through a software middleware layer. For Ledger, this is a safer way to handle AI-driven workflows.

The Docs Behind the Rollout

The company has expanded its developer portal with a “For Agents” section, including an AI tools overview, documentation for the Ledger Wallet CLI, DMK Skills, and guides such as OpenPGP or FIDO2 security keys. In the docs, Ledger also states that the Wallet CLI can run with shell-capable agents, while the signing step must still be confirmed on the device.

This rollout comes with more signs of deployment than just a product announcement. Ledger says the toolkit can be used with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and other shell-capable agents. The company is also driving community activities such as a $5,000 bounty on college.xyz, a $10,000 hackathon prize pool at ETHGlobal NYC, and a build challenge that recorded 50 submissions from 38 universities across 8 countries.

Ledger sets its 2026 roadmap across three milestones: Q2 for Agent Identity, CLIs, and Skills. Q3 for Agent Intents and Policies. Q4 for Proof of Humanity. This shows that the Agent Stack is part of the company’s broader plan for AI security, not a one-off launch.

ZachXBT and the Skeptical View

According to ZachXBT, hardware wallets, especially Ledger, continue to be questioned regarding their actual user experience and suitability for critical tasks. This is a familiar debate in crypto, where high security often comes with a difficult-to-use UX.

ZachXBT slams hardware wallets

ZachXBT slams hardware wallets. Source: Investigations by ZachXBT

For skeptics, the question is not whether hardware wallets are safer than software, but whether that level of safety is enough to compensate for the clunkiness, operational errors, or inconvenience when fast processing is needed. Some users still want fewer steps, less friction, and higher speed.

This reaction shows that the debate surrounding Ledger is not just about what AI agents can do, but also whether users are willing to trade experience for an additional trust boundary layer.

What It Means for Crypto’s Agent Era

For users, this story opens up a new model: allowing AI to assist in working with crypto without handing over custody to the software. This can be useful for portfolio monitoring, treasury ops, swap planning, or repetitive tasks, as long as the user still controls the final step.

For developers, Ledger is sending a message that agentic crypto requires not only good models but also a sufficiently hard trust layer. This stack allows builders to experiment with new workflows without having to build the entire security layer from scratch. For the broader market, the agent wallet race will likely revolve around who can control the signing authority while keeping the experience smooth enough.

Ledger is betting that in the era of AI agents, winning is not about who lets the agent do the most, but who lets the agent do the most while still not touching the keys.





Source link

Crypto.com Raises $400M From Citadel Securities at $20B Valuation

0
Crypto.com Raises 0M From Citadel Securities at B Valuation


Citadel Securities has just invested $400 million in Crypto.com, valuing the cryptocurrency trading platform at $20 billion. The company stated that this is the first institutional funding round in its 10-year history. This deal is notable not only because of the capital scale, but also because it shows that major Wall Street names are continuing to expand their presence in crypto infrastructure.

Citadel Securities Invests $400 Million in Crypto.comnft

According to Crypto.com’s announcement, the investment from Citadel Securities brings the company’s valuation to $20 billion and marks the first institutional funding round in the enterprise’s 10-year history. This is a notable milestone because the platform had previously grown primarily through bootstrapping, rather than relying on large external funding rounds.

This deal also carries symbolic weight. Citadel Securities is not a typical financial investor, but one of the largest market makers in the US. Their capital injection into Crypto.com shows that major institutions continue to view crypto as an increasingly clear part of market infrastructure, rather than just a separate speculative segment.

The company also stated that the new capital will help it expand into new asset classes and markets, thereby demonstrating that this deal is not just an ordinary funding round but also reflects Crypto.com’s ambition to expand its role in financial infrastructure.

Crypto.com to Use Funds for Tokenized Securities and Derivatives

Crypto.com stated that the new funds will be used to expand into tokenized securities and derivatives. These are two strategically significant sectors because they directly connect crypto to traditional asset classes and financial products, while enabling a higher-continuity trading infrastructure.

For the company, tokenized securities are a step toward deeper engagement in the capital markets, while derivatives help increase professional user stickiness and expand revenue beyond spot trading. In other words, this investment not only helps the company scale up but also pushes Crypto.com’s business model to a more complex layer of financial infrastructure.

In CoinGecko’s Q2/2026 report, spot volume on centralized exchanges decreased by 27.9% QoQ to $1.95 trillion, while Crypto.com’s spot volume decreased by 40.9% QoQ during the same period. Against this backdrop, expanding into products with higher stickiness for the institutional market could be a way for this exchange to reduce its reliance on the pure spot segment.

CEX spot market trading volume Q2/2026

CEX spot market trading volume Q2/2026. Source: CoinGecko

Crypto.com’s Position in the Crypto Exchange Market

Although not among the largest global exchanges, Crypto.com still maintains a significant position in the exchange race. In the CoinMarketCap June 2026 Exchange Monthly Report, the company ranked 10th with $64.4 billion in total volume for the month, equivalent to a 1.36% market share among the group of 11 tracked exchanges.

The exchange has also expanded into multiple products and services related to digital assets and trading infrastructure, thereby creating a distinct position for itself compared to exchanges that focus solely on spot trading. In the context of a slowing spot market on centralized exchanges, Crypto.com’s current position shows that the company still has a significant presence but faces pressure to find additional growth drivers.

Crypto.com’s Regulatory Backing

Part of what makes Crypto.com a notable partner for major institutions is its regulatory track record. On February 23, 2026, they stated that they received conditional approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) for a National Trust Bank Charter in the US. Later, on February 27, 2026, the company further announced that it had received a Limited Financial Institutions Licence from the MFSA in Europe to continue providing stablecoin services related to MiCA within the EU.

On its license page, the company lists multiple registrations and licenses in the US and Europe, including Broker-Dealer Registration, DCO, DCM, MSB, money transmitter licenses, along with MiCA, EMI, MiFID, and a Limited Financial Institutions License in the EEA. For institutional investors, this signals that the company is building infrastructure with a compliance-first approach from the outset.

In this context, Crypto.com’s regulatory advantage is also part of the reason why the deal with Citadel Securities carries more weight than an ordinary investment.

What Comes Next

The next point to watch is how this exchange deploys the new capital into reality. If the company soon announces additional products or expands into new segments like tokenized securities and derivatives, this deal will be seen as a strategic move at the right time.

The market will also pay attention to Citadel Securities’ subsequent role after this investment, especially the potential for deeper cooperation in areas related to trading infrastructure and liquidity.

For Crypto.com, this is a deal that both validates the company’s position in the eyes of major institutions and sets higher expectations for its ability to convert capital, licenses, and strategic relationships into real growth.



Source link

Visa Launches Stablecoin Platform for Banks and Fintechs – NFT Plazas

0
Visa Launches Stablecoin Platform for Banks and Fintechs – NFT Plazas


Visa has unveiled a new platform designed to help banks, fintech companies and payment providers issue, store, transfer and redeem stablecoins through its payments network, expanding the card giant’s push into blockchain-based finance. The launch marks a significant step beyond simple stablecoin settlement, giving institutions a full operating layer for onchain money movement without forcing them to build their own blockchain infrastructure from scratch.

The product, called the Visa Stablecoin Platform, or VSP, combines minting, redemption, wallet infrastructure and treasury management into a single Visa-managed enterprise system. Visa said the goal is to make stablecoin operations easier to deploy inside existing payment and settlement workflows, rather than requiring institutions to stitch together separate vendors and technical.

Visa Launches Stablecoin Platform for Banks and Fintechs

Visa Launches Stablecoin Platform for Banks and Fintechs

Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies designed to maintain a steady value, usually by being pegged to the U.S. dollar. They have become one of the fastest-growing parts of the digital asset market because they offer blockchain-based speed and settlement while avoiding the volatility of assets such as bitcoin and ether.corporate.

“Stablecoins are opening up a new layer of programmable money, but for most institutions the hard part isn’t the concept, it’s the operational reality,” Visa Chief Product and Strategy Officer Jack Forestell said. “With the Visa Stablecoin Platform, we’re giving our clients a single place to mint, move, and manage stablecoin operations with the controls, security, and network reach they already expect from Visa.”

At launch, VSP supports Open USD, or OUSD, a new stablecoin introduced by the Open Standard consortium. Visa also says the platform is designed to work alongside its existing support for Circle’s USDC and Paxos’ USDG, widening the range of stablecoin tools available to institutional clients. The platform is initially available only to select beta users.corporate.

Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire quickly responded to the news of Open Standard's OUSD stablecoin launch. (Source: X)Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire quickly responded to the news of Open Standard's OUSD stablecoin launch. (Source: X)

Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire quickly responded to the news of Open Standard’s OUSD stablecoin launch. (Source: X)

Visa’s new service includes Wallet-as-a-Service infrastructure, blockchain connectivity and security controls such as dual-approval workflows, audit logs and transfer allow lists. Those features matter for banks and fintechs because they bring stablecoin operations closer to the controls they already use in traditional finance, including approval gates, compliance checks and recordkeeping.

The company said institutions can either use a Visa-managed wallet stack or connect their own wallet provider to the platform. In either case, clients can access tools for minting, burning, holding and transferring stablecoins, while integrating those functions into treasury, liquidity and settlement operations.

Visa’s move comes as stablecoin adoption continues to deepen among financial institutions that want faster settlement, lower friction in cross-border payments and programmable financial infrastructure. The company has already spent years building out related products, including stablecoin settlement support, crypto-linked card programs and blockchain-based money movement services.investor.

The new platform also reflects the growing competition around who will control stablecoin distribution. Open Standard’s OUSD has drawn attention because of its economic model, which reportedly allows partners to share reserve income rather than concentrating that revenue entirely with a single issuer. That structure could appeal to banks and payment firms that want both infrastructure and economics aligned with adoption.

Visa’s support for Open USD is especially notable because it adds institutional credibility to a project that is still early in its rollout. Open Standard counts a broad list of backers across payments, banking, technology and crypto, and its model has already sparked market anxiety around the long-term economics of incumbent stablecoin issuers.

That pressure has been felt most directly by Circle, the company behind USDC. Reports on Thursday said Circle shares fell after Visa’s announcement, underscoring investor concern that a partner-owned stablecoin model could challenge the business model of established issuers.

Visa has been steadily increasing its stablecoin footprint. In April, the company expanded its stablecoin settlement program across more blockchain networks and said annualized stablecoin settlement volume had reached $7 billion, while support for stablecoin-linked card programs had surpassed 130 across more than 50 countries.

Taken together, the launch of VSP shows Visa moving from experimentation to infrastructure. Rather than treating stablecoins as a niche crypto feature, the company is positioning them as a core part of modern payment rails, treasury tools and settlement systems for banks, fintechs and crypto-native businesses.



Source link

Ostium Pauses Trading After Security Incident Amid $23.75M Exploit – NFT Plazas Ostium Pauses Trading After Security Incident Amid $23.75M Exploit

0
Ostium Pauses Trading After Security Incident Amid .75M Exploit – NFT Plazas Ostium Pauses Trading After Security Incident Amid .75M Exploit


On the morning of July 16, Ostium announced that it had paused trading following a security incident, while on-chain trackers flagged a large flow of funds from wallets associated with the protocol. According to Ostium, users’ positions remain open but cannot be modified, while traders’ margin remains untouched within the frozen smart contracts. The protocol has not yet announced the final technical cause or recovery timeline, but the incident has immediately placed Ostium at the center of the DeFi market’s attention.

What Happened

Ostium stated that a security incident occurred between 14:18 and 14:23 UTC, prompting the protocol to pause trading and lock trading contracts. The team said they detected anomalies within minutes and quickly coordinated with stakeholders to isolate the risk.

Although Ostium has not specified the technical cause of the incident, the protocol had to halt trading, lock the relevant smart contracts, and keep users’ positions frozen in an unmodifiable state. This suggests that the immediate impact lies not in the complete disappearance of the system, but in the suspension of trading activities to isolate the risk.

How the Funds Moved On-Chain

According to Lookonchain, approximately 23.75 million USDC was drained from Ostium. This amount was subsequently swapped into 12,084 ETH, equivalent to an average price of around $1,966 USD/ETH at the time of the transaction. From there, the majority of the ETH was further transferred to Tornado Cash, indicating that the funds were layered very quickly after leaving the protocol.

Arkham also labeled multiple addresses within the cluster associated with the “Ostium Exploiter,” showing that the funds did not just go straight from the exploit wallet to Tornado Cash, but also bounced between intermediary addresses before entering the mixer. Some transactions were split into multiple ETH batches, indicating that the assets were intentionally layered in the early stages after leaving the protocol.

Why the Incident Resonates Across DeFi

Ostium is an on-chain perpetual trading protocol that enables trading of stocks, commodities, and forex under a self-custody model. With such a structure, this incident is not just a technical disruption but also directly impacts a DeFi product that is attempting to bridge closer to real-world trading infrastructure.

For a protocol positioning itself as an alternative layer to the traditional trading experience, any incident immediately brings up questions about the resilience of the model, user protection capabilities, and the level of reliance on intervention mechanisms during a crisis. This is the part that makes the incident resonate beyond the initial damage figures.

Oracle Risk Returns to the Forefront

Ostium has not released the final technical cause, but the incident has brought pricing, oracle, and liquidation logic back into the spotlight. For perpetual protocols, even a brief price deviation or an error in how prices are updated can result in real losses.

What makes the incident more noteworthy is how the market is reading it: not just as a fund drain, but as another sign that DeFi’s valuation layer remains vulnerable. This is especially notable as protocols continue to expand into stocks, commodities, and FX. For perpetual protocols, this type of risk lies not only in the code, but also in how prices are fetched, updated, and used to process positions in real-time.

Recovery Efforts and Next Steps

Ostium stated that they are working continuously to determine the recovery timeline for smart contract operations and asset retrieval, but have not provided a specific timeframe. For now, the protocol’s focus remains on investigating the incident, tracking the drained funds, and preparing a clearer postmortem.

On the users’ side, the most critical questions remain the final extent of the damage, what portion of the funds can be recovered, and when trading can resume. Until Ostium provides further official updates, the situation remains open-ended on both the technical and user-impact fronts.





Source link

ZachXBT Calls Hardware Wallets “Complete Garbage”, Says Ledger Is the Worst – NFT Plazas

0
ZachXBT Calls Hardware Wallets “Complete Garbage”, Says Ledger Is the Worst – NFT Plazas


Onchain investigator ZachXBT has ignited a fresh debate over crypto self-custody after declaring that today’s hardware wallets are “complete garbage” and unsuitable for signing important transactions or storing significant amounts of cryptocurrency. Instead of relying on dedicated hardware devices, he argues that experienced users may be better served by using a separate iPhone reserved exclusively for crypto activities—a recommendation that challenges one of the industry’s longest-standing security practices.

The comments, shared in a recent Telegram post, quickly spread across the crypto community, drawing both support and criticism. While ZachXBT’s remarks reflect his personal opinion rather than evidence of a new vulnerability affecting hardware wallets, they arrive as phishing campaigns, fake wallet applications, and social engineering attacks continue to drain millions of dollars from crypto holders.

ZachXBT Calls Hardware Wallets “Complete Garbage”

ZachXBT Calls Hardware Wallets “Complete Garbage”

ZachXBT Questions the Hardware Wallet Model

Hardware wallets have long been considered the gold standard for self-custody because they keep private keys isolated from internet-connected devices. Companies such as Ledger and Trezor market their products around this core principle, arguing that offline key storage significantly reduces the risk of malware stealing crypto assets.

ZachXBT disagrees with that assessment.

In his Telegram post, he wrote that he does not recommend hardware wallets for “important tasks like signing transactions or storing funds,” calling every current solution inadequate. He instead suggested using a dedicated iPhone configured solely for crypto wallet management and transaction signing. He added a tongue-in-cheek caveat that users should only consider the setup if they are technically competent.

His criticism focuses less on cryptographic security and more on operational reliability. According to ZachXBT, today’s hardware wallet ecosystem has become increasingly complex, introducing unnecessary software updates and companion applications that can create additional friction for users.

Ledger Receives the Sharpest Criticism

Among hardware wallet manufacturers, Ledger received ZachXBT’s strongest criticism.

He described Ledger as “the worst,” arguing that frequent updates to Ledger’s companion software unnecessarily modify the interface and applications while occasionally disrupting basic wallet functions. The criticism appears directed primarily at the software experience rather than the security architecture protecting users’ private keys.

Ledger, meanwhile, continues to position hardware-based signing as one of the safest methods for protecting digital assets. The company recently rebranded Ledger Live as Ledger Wallet and released version 4.8.0 with interface improvements, security enhancements, and bug fixes as part of its ongoing software development. The company maintains that private keys never leave users’ devices during normal operation.

Importantly, ZachXBT did not claim that Ledger had suffered a new compromise or that its Secure Element technology had been broken. His argument instead centers on usability, software complexity, and the broader ecosystem surrounding hardware wallets.

Ledger Wallet Recent UpdateLedger Wallet Recent Update

Ledger Wallet Recent Update

Human Error Remains the Weakest Link

The debate highlights an increasingly important distinction in crypto security.

Modern hardware wallets are generally effective at protecting private keys from malware running on computers. However, they cannot prevent users from voluntarily revealing recovery phrases, approving malicious transactions, or downloading counterfeit software.

That reality has become increasingly apparent throughout 2026.

Earlier this year, ZachXBT reported that a crypto holder lost more than $282 million worth of Bitcoin and Litecoin in one of the largest individual crypto thefts on record. According to his investigation, the theft resulted from a hardware wallet social engineering scam rather than a technical compromise of the device itself. The attacker subsequently laundered the funds through multiple instant exchanges, converted substantial amounts into Monero, and bridged Bitcoin across several blockchain networks using Thorchain.

The incident reinforced a growing consensus among security researchers: attackers increasingly target people rather than cryptography.

Fake Apps Continue to Threaten Wallet Users

Hardware wallet owners have also become frequent targets of fake software designed to impersonate legitimate wallet applications.

In April, a fraudulent Ledger Live application briefly appeared on Apple’s App Store, successfully deceiving users into entering their recovery phrases. The scam ultimately stole at least $9.5 million in cryptocurrency from more than 50 victims before Apple removed the application.

The stolen assets included Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Tron, and XRP, illustrating how social engineering remains effective even when users own legitimate hardware wallets.

The attack did not exploit Ledger’s hardware itself. Instead, victims voluntarily entered their recovery phrases into software they believed was genuine, giving attackers complete control over their wallets.

Cases like these explain why ZachXBT believes device isolation alone is no longer enough if the surrounding software ecosystem remains vulnerable to impersonation and phishing.

A fake Ledger app on the Apple App Store drained $9.5 million in crypto (Source: ZachXBT)A fake Ledger app on the Apple App Store drained $9.5 million in crypto (Source: ZachXBT)

A fake Ledger app on the Apple App Store drained $9.5 million in crypto (Source: ZachXBT)

A Different Approach to Self-Custody

ZachXBT’s proposal of using a dedicated iPhone represents a different philosophy rather than a universally accepted best practice.

A smartphone used exclusively for crypto—with no social media, messaging, web browsing, or unnecessary applications installed—could reduce exposure to certain attack vectors associated with everyday device use. Modern iPhones also incorporate Apple’s Secure Enclave, which provides hardware-backed protection for sensitive cryptographic operations.

However, security professionals note that smartphones remain internet-connected devices and still depend on operating system integrity, application security, backup practices, and user behavior. They are not equivalent to traditional cold storage.

For most investors, hardware wallets purchased directly from manufacturers and used correctly continue to provide meaningful protection compared with leaving assets on centralized exchanges or standard software wallets.

Ultimately, ZachXBT’s comments reflect growing frustration with how hardware wallets are often marketed as complete security solutions when the greatest risks increasingly originate outside the devices themselves. Whether users choose dedicated hardware wallets or alternative self-custody methods, experts continue to emphasize the same fundamentals: never share recovery phrases, verify software authenticity, purchase devices only through official channels, and remain vigilant against phishing and social engineering attacks.



Source link

BlackRock, JPMorgan and Coinbase Among 50+ Firms Joining UK Tokenization Taskforce

0
BlackRock, JPMorgan and Coinbase Among 50+ Firms Joining UK Tokenization Taskforce


The tokenization race in the UK is entering the implementation phase, as Wholesale Digital Markets Champion Chris Woolard released the first report to the Chancellor, revealing that more than 50 organizations, including BlackRock, JPMorgan, and Coinbase, have joined the Taskforce. The report calls for a 12-month roadmap to develop tokenized capital markets infrastructure, with repo, fixed income, and digital gilts identified as priority use cases.

UK ramps up tokenization push

This week, London continues to push a topic that has been widely discussed but rarely implemented: tokenization for wholesale financial markets. The first report of the Wholesale Digital Markets Champion, conducted by Christopher Woolard CBE and submitted to the Chancellor, aims to build a “tokenized wholesale financial markets system” for the UK over the next 12 months, with priority use cases starting with repo, fixed income, and collateral. The report also notes that this sector already processes over £4 trillion in securities on average each day, demonstrating the scale of the infrastructure that the UK seeks to further digitize.

The essence of this plan is to transform tokenization from a technological concept into an actionable market roadmap. If executed on time, the UK will seek to maintain its central role in the next generation of financial infrastructure, rather than letting standards, systems, and liquidity migrate to other hubs.

Industry heavyweights join the Taskforce

The participation list shows that the UK’s tokenization plan is backed by more than 50 firms and a broader network of members, observers, and market infrastructure providers. Notable names include BlackRock, JPMorgan, Coinbase, DTCC, Euroclear UK & International, LSEG, and LCH.

List of 50+ Taskforce members

List of 50+ Taskforce members. Source Wholesale Digital Markets Champion First Report

The report also mentions that Woolard held over 70 meetings with firms, roundtables with standard-setting bodies, and two full-Taskforce meetings. This figure indicates that the report was built on a deep consultation process rather than being just a conceptual proposal.

The economic case is still only forecast-led

The report cites estimates from Barclays and PwC indicating that tokenization could contribute up to £33 billion to the UK’s annual economic output and £14 billion to annual tax revenue by 2035. The report also states that tokenized real-world assets could reach $88 trillion by the same period, up from just 0.01% of investable assets in 2025, which equated to approximately $30 billion globally, after this market grew by 300% in 2025.

These numbers show that the UK is betting on a market with immense upside, but it currently remains within forecasted scenarios. Therefore, the most notable part right now is not the figures that have already been realized, but London’s attempt to capture an early position in a game that is still taking shape.

Repo and digital gilts are the first tests

Repo is the use case that the report considers most critical to proving tokenization can scale, as it is a foundational part of secondary markets and collateral mobility. The Taskforce has been tasked with delivering and validating an end-to-end repo use case, utilizing Digital Gilt Instrument Pilot (DIGIT) or privately issued assets depending on conditions. The report also calls on the Bank of England to prepare to accept DIGIT as collateral within the Sterling Monetary Framework and to consider more broadly how tokenized collateral can be used in the market and at CCPs.

Alongside this is the DIGIT. The report requests the pilot issuance no later than Q1 2027, while paving the way for further issuances in the medium term. If successfully implemented, the UK could become the first G7 country to tokenize sovereign debt. Additionally, Global Balance Transaction Ledger (GBTD) is seen as the foundation to enable different bank tokenized deposits to interoperate, adding another infrastructure layer for programmable commercial bank money.

The roadmap now moves to execution

The report shifts the focus from concept to implementation by dividing the next 12 months into Action Groups covering 9 areas, coordinated by an Orchestrator Group led by the Digital Markets Champion. This group will focus on the end-to-end repo use case, while the appointment of the Action Groups is expected to be finalized by September.

The policy message is clear: for tokenized markets to scale, the UK needs interoperability, legal certainty, and a clearer regulatory coordination framework between HM Treasury, the Bank of England, the FCA, and the private sector. The report warns that without a national roadmap, standards and infrastructure may develop in offshore markets instead of London. Conversely, if executed on time, the UK can leverage its existing strengths in fixed income, FX, equities, derivatives, settlement, custody, and post-trade infrastructure to transition tokenization from pilots into actual infrastructure.



Source link

Hyperliquid OI Reaches 2026 High of $11B as RWA Markets Grow

0
Hyperliquid OI Reaches 2026 High of B as RWA Markets Grow


On July 13, Hyperliquid recorded a rare double milestone: total Open Interest (OI) on the platform climbed to $11 billion, its highest level of 2026, while the open interest for real-world assets (RWA) touched $3.6 billion, a new peak on the platform. This development indicates that on-chain capital is not only heating up but is also beginning to expand from crypto into tokenized real-world assets.

RWA Open Interest Breaks Out

The most notable point in this announcement lies within the RWA segment. Hyperliquid stated that the open interest for this asset class has reached $3.6 billion, the highest ever recorded on the platform. For a market that was previously discussed primarily as a narrative, this figure shows that RWAs have progressed far beyond a mere “story.” It has become a product class where traders are actively taking positions, tracking volatility, and pricing risk.

According to RWA.xyz, as of March 31, 2026, the distributed asset value of the RWA market reached $26.71 billion, the represented asset value reached $345.07 billion, the total number of holders exceeded 698,200, and the total stablecoin value hovered around $299.30 billion. While this is not data exclusive to Hyperliquid, it shows that the on-chain asset class has grown large enough to generate continuous trading demand, particularly in derivative products.

Why the $11B Print Matters

Thus, the $11 billion mark is not just a pretty number on a dashboard. It demonstrates that Hyperliquid is maintaining its role as a major trading venue within the on-chain derivatives ecosystem, right as demand for tokenized assets is beginning to establish deeper liquidity. As capital seeks out platforms offering fast execution, 24/7 trading, and sufficient liquidity, venues like Hyperliquid will hold a distinct advantage. In derivatives markets, open interest typically reflects trader participation and their level of confidence in the next trend.

Hyperliquid’s Open Interest

Hyperliquid’s Open Interest. Source: DefiLlama

Conversely, high open interest is not solely a positive signal. It also implies higher leverage, a greater potential for liquidations, and volatility amplitudes that could be amplified when the market reverses. If the increase in RWA OI is merely a short-term reaction to a hot narrative, this figure could decline just as rapidly as it rose. However, if the $3.6 billion level is sustained and expanded, Hyperliquid will have clearer proof that tokenized exposure is gradually becoming a product class that can be genuinely traded, hedged, and priced.

What Traders Should Watch

In the short term, the market will focus on three key milestones: whether total OI can hold above $11 billion following this announcement, whether RWA OI continues to chart new peaks or merely spikes due to a few large contracts, and whether the contribution of each asset group remains distributed. If the majority of the OI still stems from a few isolated markets, the sustainability of the trend will be lower compared to a more broad-based expansion.

Another aspect to monitor closely is the correlation between OI and actual liquidity. If open interest rises without a corresponding increase in volume, depth, and trader participation, the market could be more vulnerable during corrections. Conversely, if OI increases alongside volume and liquidity, it would signal that Hyperliquid is not just benefiting from a short-term wave of euphoria but is instead cultivating a more sustainable layer of trading demand. For RWAs, this is even more critical, as this asset class can only sustain its appeal if traders can actively enter and exit positions.

The Bigger Picture

While the $11 billion figure does not tell the full story of Hyperliquid, it shows that the platform continues to attract liquidity precisely where the market’s current focus lies: larger on-chain trading, a broader range of asset classes, and deeper levels of participation.

Most importantly, RWAs are demonstrating real liquidity, rather than just being a market narrative. With an open interest of $3.6 billion, this asset class has begun to take the shape of a genuine market, making it a signal worth watching in the coming sessions. Compared to many other derivative platforms, Hyperliquid is emerging as a clear destination for on-chain capital, especially as open interest continues to expand and RWAs begin to play an actual role in trading liquidity.





Source link

Bitcoin Nears Power Law Support Line Fidelity Has Tracked Since 2015 – NFT Plazas

0
Bitcoin Nears Power Law Support Line Fidelity Has Tracked Since 2015 – NFT Plazas


Bitcoin is approaching one of the most closely watched long-term technical levels in institutional crypto analysis, according to Fidelity Investments’ Director of Global Macro, Jurrien Timmer. After months of persistent selling pressure, the world’s largest cryptocurrency is trading near the lower boundary of Fidelity’s long-running Bitcoin Power Law model—a support zone that has coincided with every major market bottom since 2015.

While Timmer cautions that the market may not have reached its ultimate low, he argues that Bitcoin has entered an area historically associated with long-term accumulation rather than speculative excess. The key question, however, is not whether Bitcoin is cheap relative to its historical trend, but whether global liquidity conditions are ready to support the next sustained rally.

Fidelity’s Power Law Model Signals a Familiar Opportunity

Unlike traditional valuation models, the Bitcoin Power Law attempts to explain Bitcoin’s long-term price trajectory using logarithmic growth rather than fixed market cycles. The framework plots Bitcoin’s entire trading history inside three gradually rising curves: an upper resistance band, a central trendline representing fair value, and a lower support boundary where previous bear markets have consistently found their floor.

According to Timmer’s latest chart, that lower support currently sits around $58,000, with Bitcoin trading near $62,700, leaving the asset less than 10% above a level that has historically marked major turning points.

The model has demonstrated notable consistency over the past decade. During the 2015 bear market, Bitcoin bottomed only slightly below the projected support curve. Similar behavior occurred during the capitulation phases of 2018 and 2022, when prices stabilized close to the Power Law floor before beginning multi-year recoveries.

Although no technical model guarantees future performance, the historical alignment has made the Power Law one of the more widely followed long-term valuation frameworks among institutional investors.

Fidelity's Power Law Model Signals a Familiar Opportunity

Fidelity’s Power Law Model Signals a Familiar Opportunity

Accumulation Indicators Are Flashing Again

Beyond the support line itself, Timmer highlights two additional indicators that have reached levels previously associated with Bitcoin cycle lows.

The first measures Bitcoin’s deviation from its long-term Power Law trendline. That reading has fallen to approximately -56%, placing the asset firmly inside what Fidelity labels the “accumulation zone.” Similar readings occurred only during the market bottoms of 2018 and 2022.

A second indicator compares Bitcoin’s performance against gold over a rolling 52-week period. The Bitcoin-to-gold ratio has dropped to roughly -100%, suggesting Bitcoin has significantly underperformed the precious metal over the past year.

Historically, these extreme readings have emerged when investor sentiment toward Bitcoin reached maximum pessimism while long-term buyers quietly accumulated positions.

One important characteristic of the Power Law model is that support rises over time. That means Bitcoin does not necessarily need to fall to $58,000 for the support test to occur. If prices simply consolidate while the support curve gradually climbs, the market could still complete the historical pattern through sideways trading rather than another sharp decline.

Liquidity Remains the Missing Catalyst

Despite the encouraging technical setup, Timmer has deliberately stopped short of declaring that Bitcoin has bottomed.

His primary concern is macroeconomic liquidity.

According to Timmer, the speculative premium that propelled Bitcoin above $120,000 during last year’s rally has largely disappeared. At the same time, global money supply growth has slowed, reducing the amount of excess liquidity that typically fuels risk assets.

Without renewed monetary expansion or improving financial conditions, Bitcoin could remain trapped near its support zone for an extended period before any meaningful recovery begins.

This view aligns with previous Bitcoin bear markets. The bottoms in 2015, 2018, and 2022 were not followed by immediate V-shaped rebounds. Instead, Bitcoin spent several months trading sideways before improving macro conditions allowed a new bull market to emerge.

Bitcoin (BTC) Price Performance on July 14, 2026 (Source: CoinMarketCap)Bitcoin (BTC) Price Performance on July 14, 2026 (Source: CoinMarketCap)

Bitcoin (BTC) Price Performance on July 14, 2026 (Source: CoinMarketCap)

Capital Rotation Has Shifted Away From Bitcoin

Another observation from Timmer’s analysis is that institutional capital has not disappeared entirely—it has simply moved elsewhere.

According to Fidelity, speculative investors first rotated from Bitcoin into gold as macro uncertainty increased. More recently, capital has continued flowing toward semiconductor and artificial intelligence stocks, sectors that currently offer stronger earnings momentum.

That rotation helps explain why Bitcoin has struggled despite continued institutional adoption through spot Bitcoin ETFs and growing corporate interest in digital assets.

While short-term momentum traders have largely exited the market, longer-term investors appear to be accumulating instead. On-chain analytics from firms including Coinglass have also shown continued buying activity among larger Bitcoin holders during recent weakness, even as overall market sentiment remained subdued.

Total Bitcoin Spot ETF Net Inflow (USD) (Source: Coinglass)Total Bitcoin Spot ETF Net Inflow (USD) (Source: Coinglass)

Total Bitcoin Spot ETF Net Inflow (USD) (Source: Coinglass)

Why the Power Law Still Matters

The Power Law has attracted attention not simply because it identifies potential bottoms, but because it has historically highlighted both market extremes.

During previous bull markets, Bitcoin repeatedly approached the model’s upper boundary before major corrections followed. Likewise, the lower boundary has consistently marked periods when downside risk became increasingly limited relative to long-term upside potential.

This symmetry gives the framework more credibility than models that focus exclusively on bullish price projections.

Still, Timmer acknowledges that the Power Law should be viewed as a valuation framework rather than a precise timing tool. Different analysts produce slightly different versions of the model, placing current support anywhere between approximately $51,000 and $58,000 depending on methodology.

For long-term investors, however, those differences may be less significant than the broader conclusion: Bitcoin is trading much closer to historically attractive valuation levels than it was during last year’s euphoric highs.

What Investors Should Watch Next

Whether Bitcoin ultimately finds support around current levels will likely depend less on technical analysis than on broader macroeconomic conditions.

Investors should monitor several key indicators over the coming months, including global money supply growth, Federal Reserve policy expectations, institutional ETF flows, and changes in the Bitcoin-to-gold ratio.

A sustained recovery in liquidity would strengthen the historical case made by Fidelity’s Power Law model. Until then, Bitcoin may continue behaving as Timmer suggests—drifting near long-term support while patient investors quietly accumulate.

For now, the Power Law does not promise that Bitcoin has reached its absolute bottom. Rather, it indicates that the market has once again entered a region where previous cycles shifted from fear toward long-term opportunity, even if confirmation takes months rather than days.



Source link

Zapper, Early DeFi Portfolio Dashboard, Will Shut Down After Seven Years

0
Zapper, Early DeFi Portfolio Dashboard, Will Shut Down After Seven Years


Zapper has just confirmed that it will cease operations after nearly 7 years, according to an announcement posted on the project’s official X channel on July 9. This move closes the journey of one of the early DeFi portfolio-tracking tools that emerged in the market’s initial stages.

What Happened

Zapper stated that the platform will completely shut down on August 3, including zapper.xyz, mobile apps, and API services. At its peak, Zapper reported serving over 2 million monthly active users and processing over $13 billion in transaction volume.

For many crypto users, Zapper was one of the familiar tools to track wallets, positions, and on-chain activities in a single interface. This platform once helped aggregate many pieces of DeFi data, which were scattered across various protocols, into one place, thereby helping users quickly view their portfolios without having to open each individual app.

What Led to the Wind-Down

In its official announcement, the project stated that it had considered many different options before reaching the decision to wind down. The project said some paths had been pursued to the maximum extent, but ultimately were still not enough to keep the product operating in its old direction.

This decision was made after a process of reassessing the platform’s operational capabilities. For consumer-facing products in crypto, especially tools heavily dependent on multi-source on-chain data and a continuously changing user experience, continuing to run a platform for a long time often requires more than just a familiar community or an established brand.

User Impact

Zapper users will need to note the August 3 deadline, when the platform’s services will be completely shut down, including zapper.xyz, mobile apps, and API services. According to the team’s announcement, existing API users will receive a transition support email. Users holding balances in the Zapper Wallet can also export their private keys via Privy.

For users who have long used Zapper as a comprehensive portfolio dashboard, the closure could cause a disruption in their portfolio tracking process if they do not save the necessary data. On-chain assets still remain on the blockchain or in their respective wallets, but the familiar interface layer to quickly check portfolio status will disappear, forcing users to switch to other tools before the service completely shuts off.

Market Context

Zapper started as a portfolio tracker built by the founder for personal use before expanding into a product serving millions of users. Zapper’s exit from the game reflects the familiar competitive pressure in the DeFi tooling sector, where dashboards that help aggregate on-chain data into one place are often easily replaceable as the ecosystem expands. In the early stages, products like Zapper had an advantage because they simplified the user experience and made fragmented data easier to track.

As the number of chains, protocols, and wallets increased, first-mover advantage was no longer enough to guarantee a long-term position. Zapper’s wind-down therefore shows that tools serving DeFi must also continuously prove their demand, operational models, and adaptability if they want to survive across multiple market cycles.

This shows that consumer-facing DeFi tools must also prove their demand and adaptability across multiple market cycles.



Source link

Popular Posts

My Favorites