Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon told Politico he is “very supportive of moving the Clarity Act forward.”
His stance breaks with much of Wall Street, including JP Morgan’s Jamie Dimon and a coalition of banking trade groups who want stronger language limiting stablecoin yield.
The endorsement lands as Republicans circulate updated bill text preserving the market framework while adding contested ethics provisions, leaving the Clarity Act’s Senate path uncertain ahead of a hoped-for vote before the August recess.
Goldman Sachs Chairman and CEO David Solomon has come out in favor of the Clarity Act, positioning one of Wall Street’s biggest banks apart from much of the industry as the crypto market-structure bill approaches a possible Senate floor vote.
“I’m very supportive of moving the Clarity Act forward, so we can get some market structure in place and start to move the innovation process along,” Solomon said in an interview with Politico.
The Clarity Act, if passed and signed into law, formally legalize most cryptocurrency activity in the United States, classifying most crypto assets as non-securities and outside the purview of the SEC. The bill also carries provisions that would protect decentralized software developers and addresses the practice of offering rewards on stablecoin balances.
Solomon acknowledged the legislation is far from flawless, telling Politico that, “like all legislation,” the bill “is not perfect” and leaves plenty to debate. Its central value, he argued, lies in creating “a level playing field to enhance market stability and allow these markets to develop appropriately.” According to Politico, Solomon also suggested the framework could draw more institutional players into crypto markets—a stated priority for Goldman.
That stance sets him apart from the broader banking sector, which has spent months fighting one provision in particular: language governing yield on stablecoins.
Stablecoins are blockchain-based tokens that are designed to hold a steady value and are typically pegged one-to-one with the U.S. dollar. Traders use them to enter and exit positions without the need to access dollars directly, while market participants use them to make payments or send remittances overseas.
Crypto companies such as Coinbase have for years offered rewards on certain stablecoin balances, like the Circle-issued USDC. Those rewards can range between 3-5% APY, which is significantly greater than what banks typically offer on a traditional savings account. This practice, now commonly referred to as stablecoin yield, was—in a roundabout way—essentially codified into law with the passage of the GENIUS Act last year.
The banks and their lobbyists in Washington have been fighting to change it ever since, pouncing on the Clarity Act as their opportunity to close what they view as a loophole in the law.
JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon has been the loudest critic of stablecoin yield, arguing in a May appearance on Fox Business that letting crypto firms pay rewards on dollar-pegged tokens without bank-equivalent oversight would hand them an unfair edge. “The banks will not accept it that way,” he said at the time.
The industry’s objections run deep. In May, a coalition of the nation’s top banking trade groups warned senators that a proposed compromise on stablecoin yield contained loopholes that would enable “evasion” of the intended limits, cautioning that such rewards could pull deposits away from traditional lenders. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has countered that banks are lobbying to kneecap stablecoin rewards precisely because they threaten deposit-based business models.
Solomon’s endorsement of the Clarity Act lands at a pivotal moment. Republican senators this week circulated updated bill text that preserves the core market framework while adding new ethics provisions restricting officials—language Democrats have already blasted as insufficient to address President Donald Trump’s crypto dealings.
With unresolved fights over stablecoins and ethics still in play, the bill’s path through the Senate remains uncertain ahead of a vote lawmakers hope to hold before the August recess.
Daily Debrief Newsletter
Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.
Odos will permanently shut down on July 30, 2026, with the app entering read-only mode on July 27.
Users with wallets created through social or email login must transfer assets or export private keys before the deadline.
The company confirmed the ODOS token and Odos DAO will continue operating independently on-chain while warning users about shutdown-related scams.
Odos, a cryptocurrencyswapaggregator, announced that it is winding down its operations. The app will switch to read-only mode on July 27, with all services shutting down permanently on July 30, 2026.
In an official announcement on Thursday, the company said Odos is non-custodial, meaning user assets remain under individual control and on-chain. However, users who created wallets through social or email login were advised to transfer assets or export their keys before the final shutdown.
To the Odos community: after much consideration, the operating company behind Odos is winding down its operations. The app moves to read-only on July 27, and all Odos services shut down permanently on July 30, 2026. Odos is non-custodial: your assets remain yours and on-chain. If… pic.twitter.com/9btbBLyhRL
— ODOS (@odosprotocol) July 23, 2026
What happens before Odos goes offline
The company outlined the following timeline:
July 23: Existing users can still perform swaps and close positions, but new signups, wallet creation, and limit orders are disabled.
July 27–30: The application becomes read-only, allowing users to view balances and transaction history.
After July 30: All Odos services will no longer be available.
Odos said there will be no further development, customer support, or maintenance after the shutdown. Users were encouraged to migrate to alternative aggregation services. Regarding the ODOS token, the announcement clarified that it exists independently on-chain. The company does not custody or control the token, and the wind-down does not affect its on-chain functionality.
The Odos DAO operates separately and will communicate its own plans independently. The company warned users to be cautious of potential scams. It explicitly stated there will be no new products, token migrations, claims, or airdrops associated with the operating company.
Any such claims from DMs, fake support accounts, or unauthorized websites should be treated as fraudulent. Users were reminded never to share seed phrases or approve suspicious transactions.
The announcement concluded with appreciation for the community that supported Odos through swaps, integrations, and development.
Crypto platforms continue announcing shutdowns
Odos joins a growing list of crypto platforms that have recently announced plans to cease operations.
Earlier today, BitMEX, a derivatives exchange and creator of the perpetual swap, said it will cease operations on September 23, 2026, after more than a decade in business.
DeFi portfolio tracker Zapper Fi is also shutting down after nearly seven years. Co-founder and CEO Seb Audet shared the news on X, thanking the community for the journey.
Meanwhile, multi-chain wallet Ctrl Wallet is scheduled to permanently close on August 3, 2026, advising users to withdraw assets and back up recovery phrases beforehand.
Why this shutdown matters for DeFi users
The shutdown of Odos highlights the short-lived nature of many DeFi projects.
Although user assets remain under users’ control because the platform is non-custodial, the shutdown requires users to take timely action to maintain uninterrupted access to their wallets and services, particularly those created through social or email logins.
The incident also serves as a reminder that while DeFi protocols and tokens may continue to exist on-chain, the companies operating user-facing applications can discontinue services, making it important for users to understand how to access and manage their assets independently.
Also Read: Robinhood Confirms CEO’s X Hack Behind Fake Memecoin Post
Disclaimer: The information researched and reported by The Crypto Times is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional financial advice. Investing in crypto assets involves significant risk due to market volatility. Always Do Your Own Research (DYOR) and consult with a qualified Financial Advisor before making any investment decisions.
An article criticizing the on-court behavior of WNBA star Caitlin Clark sparked major backlash today.
And the discourse surrounding the controversial USA Today piece has spread well beyond the world of sports.
The article — written by sports columnist Nancy Armour — starts with a simple enough premise:
Armour argues that Clark has engaged in strategic “flopping” and has argued with refs with the goal of receiving undeserved fouls.
Caitlin Clark attends the 2024 A Year In TIME dinner at Current at Chelsea Piers on December 11, 2024 in New York City. (Photo by Jason Mendez/Getty Images)
The article was originally titled, “Caitlin Clark’s reaction to non-calls puts other players at risk,” but the headline now reads, “Caitlin Clark’s flopping isn’t just annoying — it’s becoming dangerous.”
“The irony of the WNBA’s All-Star Game is that it’s happening this weekend in Chicago, the hometown of Emmett Till, who became an icon of the civil rights movement after his tragic murder,” Armour writes in the piece, adding:
“The local art gallery is currently hosting an exhibit imagining his life if he hadn’t been lynched.
“While it’s incumbent on the WNBA to do more to protect its players, there also should be an expectation on Clark to recognize the broader implications of her actions being weaponized.”
The use of Till’s name sparked outrage, but the claim that Clark is being supported by white supremacist groups created an even bigger uproar:
“It seems there is a white nationalist faction to Clark’s fandom that is deeply, deeply problematic, made even more so because the WNBA is made up predominantly of Black women, many of them queer,” Armour writes.
“When Clark claims fouls that don’t exist, when she goes on profanity-laced tirades at referees, those racists see her as a white woman in need of saving and take matters into their own hands.”
That assertion may be entirely true, but Armour should support such a bold claim with substantive evidence and not a mere “it seems.”
In the hours since it was published, the article has received significant criticism.
“I honestly cannot believe this made it past the editor. And I’m a Democrat. This is literally nonsense,” author Amy Siskind wrote of the piece on X (formerly Twitter).
“Even as a fan, I believe CC does complain too much and she can be overly dramatic. But that is not where Nancy Armour took this nonsense,” another commenter wrote.
“Instead, she connected two debatable basketball plays, a disgusting racist message, and the murder of Emmett Till to argue that Clark is somehow putting other players in danger. That is an enormous and irresponsible leap.”
That commenter concluded: “This article is disgusting and so is Nancy for writing it.”
Even as a fan, I believe CC does complain too much and she can be overly dramatic.
But that is not where Nancy Armour took this nonsense.
Instead, she connected two debatable basketball plays, a disgusting racist message, and the murder of Emmett Till to argue that Clark is…
— J.D.C (@starbuck_1973) July 22, 2026
The situation prompted Armour to post an explanation, reading:
“In my recent column, I made an inartful comparison with the murder of Emmett Till. I intended to connect the issues the WNBA is currently facing with its All-Star Game being hosted in Till’s hometown of Chicago.
“I obviously did not provide enough context for that. However, this point stands: There is a history in this country of perceived threats to white women being weaponized against African-Americans, and the danger that poses to Black players in the league.
“Players have been abused online and have reported receiving death threats. That has to be taken more seriously.
“I sincerely regret that my lack of appropriate context is overshadowing that important conversation and the action that needs to be taken by the WNBA to address it directly – for the benefit of ALL players.”
The current version of the article begins with disclaimer explaining that the piece has been “updated to provide further context and clarity.”
Caitlin Clark has not yet publicly responded to the controversy.
Coronation Street tonight (Thursday, July 23) saw Maria Connor warn Gary Windass that their marriage might not survive after discovering the truth about his role in covering up Theo Silverton’s murder.
Now she knows Gary helped Sarah Platt hide what happened, Maria fears his actions could destroy their family’s future. And in Coronation Street spoilers, a tense prison visit to Sarah could determine whether there’s any hope left for her marriage.
Gary begged Maria to stay by his side (Credit: ITV)
Maria and Gary’s marriage reaches breaking point in Coronation Street
In tonight’s Weatherfield scenes, Maria continued to confront Gary over helping Sarah cover up Theo’s murder.
She couldn’t understand why he’d risk prison for his ex when Sarah had been in a relationship with a detective who might have been able to help instead.
Later, Maria spoke to Summer about Sarah allowing her to spend time in prison for a crime she hadn’t committed. Summer pointed out that Sarah had children to think about, and suggested most parents would do whatever they could to protect their family.
The conversation gave Maria plenty to think about. She worried that if she was charged with perverting the course of justice after learning Gary’s secret, her own children could lose both parents.
She eventually told Gary she planned to withdraw her statement so the children would only lose him, not her as well.
As Gary pleaded with Maria to stand by him, she wondered if he was still in love with Sarah, believing it was the only explanation for why he’d risk everything for her.
Gary insisted that wasn’t true and told Maria he loved her and couldn’t imagine life without her. But when Maria admitted she felt their marriage was over, Gary was left devastated.
Maria then revealed she’d only decide whether their relationship had a future after visiting Sarah in prison. Until then, Gary would be sleeping on the sofa.
Maria wants the truth from Sarah (Credit: ITV)
Coronation Street spoilers tease Maria’s showdown with Sarah
The fate of Gary and Maria’s marriage now rests on Maria’s prison visit to Sarah.
In Coronation Street spoilers for the next episode, Maria confronts Sarah and is furious after learning exactly how Gary became caught up in Theo’s death. Sarah is then pushed to decide whether to continue protecting Gary or finally reveal the truth about his involvement.
With emotions running high, Maria struggles with the consequences Gary’s actions could have for their family.
The prison visit appears set to leave Maria with even more questions, but will it be the final blow for her marriage to Gary, or can the couple still find a way through?
Read more: Coronation Street opinion: Soap losing balance as villains dominate
Coronation Street usually airs Monday-Friday at 8.30pm on ITV.
What do you think about this story? Let us know by leaving a comment on our Facebook page @CoronationStreetInsider. We want to hear your thoughts!
Phoenix Cyclops, the first DLC character included in the Year 1 Character & Stage Pass, is coming to MARVEL Tōkon: Fighting Souls!
Inspired by his Phoenix Five incarnation from Avengers vs. X-Men, this iconic X-Men leader harnesses the overwhelming power of the Phoenix Force, bringing a fiery new look and devastating abilities to the battlefield.
Phoenix Cyclops arrives in Fall 2026. Stay tuned for more details on his gameplay and abilities.
MARVEL Tōkon: Fighting Souls is coming to PS5 and PC on August 6th, 2026 PT!
Published: July 23, 2026 at 2:43 pm Updated: July 23, 2026 at 2:43 pm
To improve your local-language experience, sometimes we employ an auto-translation plugin. Please note auto-translation may not be accurate, so read original article for precise information.
Toronto, Canada, July 23rd, 2026, Chainwire
CoinRabbit and GoMining have published a report on Bitcoin mining profitability, showing why managing mined Bitcoin is becoming as important as producing it.
The report highlights how the post-halving environment is redefining success in mining, with operators relying on stronger treasury management, capital discipline, and long-term asset strategies to navigate tighter margins. With the block reward reduced to 3.125 BTC and network difficulty near record levels, operational efficiency alone is no longer enough. The next phase of mining will be shaped by smarter capital allocation and long-term conviction in Bitcoin.
The Four Pillars of the Bitcoin Mining Efficiency Mindset
The report presents a clear framework built around four key pillars:
1) Operational Cost Efficiency
Low-cost power procurement, high uptime, efficient cooling, and disciplined maintenance remain the foundation of any viable mining operation. These factors determine the baseline production cost and are essential for competitiveness.
2) Collateralization Over Liquidation
Instead of selling freshly mined Bitcoin to cover expenses, effective operators are using it as collateral. This approach allows them to meet short-term cash needs while retaining full ownership and long-term exposure to the asset’s value.
3) Operational Liquidity and Tax Optimization
Bitcoin-backed lending provides flexibility to cover recurring operating costs, including power, hosting, and payroll, while avoiding taxable sales. At the same time, it preserves the deductibility of operational expenses.
4) Long-Term Vision and Capital Discipline
Sustainable operators treat mining as a disciplined, capital-intensive business. They maintain the flexibility to hold Bitcoin through market cycles and reinvest in hardware upgrades when opportunities arise, avoiding forced sales during downturns.
The full report can be downloaded here.
Walter Barrett, Chief Strategy & Growth Officer at CoinRabbit, commented: “Long-term success is built on conviction in the assets you hold and the discipline to manage them through different market cycles. At CoinRabbit, we are proud to work with clients who share this long-term vision and recognize the value of staying focused through periods of uncertainty. We appreciate the collaboration with GoMining experts and their contribution to sharing deeper industry insights with the mining community.”
Jeremy Dreier, Chief Business Development Officer at GoMining and Managing Director of GoMining Institutional, added: “In the post-halving environment, discipline is critical. The miners that are winning are those with efficient operations and cash put aside for this exact time. This is the best possible moment to deploy capital into expanding your fleet, because it’s cheap to add hash rate when Bitcoin’s price is down. There’s a lot of opportunity in the market. At GoMining, this is our third bear market, and we’ve seen that the operators who are prepared look at these conditions as an opportunity. Those who aren’t prepared are the ones who panic.”
About CoinRabbit
CoinRabbit is a crypto asset management platform built for long-term capital preservation. It enables users to manage liquidity seamlessly across instant payments, lending, trading products, and the Private Program — all within a single ecosystem. Since 2020, CoinRabbit ensures 100% capital reserve, keeping clients’ funds safe and never reused.
For more information, users can visit coinrabbit.io
About GoMining
GoMining is an all-in-one Bitcoin ecosystem that makes it simple and secure to mine, earn, and use Bitcoin every day. GoMining serves 5 million users and ranks among the top-10 Bitcoin miners by hashrate globally, with data centers in the U.S. and internationally. The company makes Bitcoin accessible through tokenized hashrate, daily BTC rewards, and an expanding suite of payment and earning products.
For more information, users can visit gomining.com
Contact
CMOIrene AfanasevaCoinRabbit[email protected]
Disclaimer
In line with the Trust Project guidelines, please note that the information provided on this page is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as legal, tax, investment, financial, or any other form of advice. It is important to only invest what you can afford to lose and to seek independent financial advice if you have any doubts. For further information, we suggest referring to the terms and conditions as well as the help and support pages provided by the issuer or advertiser. MetaversePost is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice.
About The Author
Chainwire is the top blockchain and cryptocurrency newswire, distributing press releases, and maximizing crypto news coverage.
More articles
Chainwire is the top blockchain and cryptocurrency newswire, distributing press releases, and maximizing crypto news coverage.
Rhian Sugden has revealed she will be addressing her sexting scandal with TV presenter Vernon Kay in her upcoming memoir.
The 39-year-old former Page 3 model made headlines in 2010 after it was revealed she had exchanged a series of flirtatious text messages with the married broadcaster.
At the time, Vernon had been with his then-wife, Tess Daly, for 17 years. The revelations proved deeply upsetting for Tess, with reports also claiming Vernon had been sending flirty messages to “four or five girls” during the same period.
Vernon, now a father of two, has consistently maintained the exchanges were harmless banter and insisted nothing inappropriate ever happened.
Rhian shares a son with Coronation Street actor Oliver Mellor (Credit: Splashnews.com)
Rhian Sugden to address Vernon Kay sexting scandal in upcoming book
Although Rhian has rarely spoken publicly about the episode, she’s now ready to address it in her forthcoming autobiography.
The Bury-born model and television personality’s memoir will chart her rise to fame. It will also include her years as Britain’s longest-serving Page 3 model, and her life today as a wife and mother.
Rhian is married to former Coronation Street actor Oliver Mellor, and the couple share a son, George.
Rhian first crossed paths with Vernon in a nightclub in 2010, where they exchanged phone numbers before messaging each other over the following four months.
After the story became public, Vernon admitted he had made a mistake, describing himself as an “idiot” who had let his family down. He also issued a public apology to Tess during his BBC Radio 1 show.
Now, 16 years later, Rhian is reflecting on the impact the scandal had on her life. She insisted she has faced years of scrutiny over something that never developed into an affair.
Speaking to the Mirror, she said: “Of course there’ll be mention of him [Vernon, in the book] but I think people are expecting some wild revelation about a sordid affair that didn’t happen.
“People get less of a sentence for murder. I’d understand if there’d been a full-blown affair, but there wasn’t. Yet somehow, nearly 20 years later, it’s still something that follows me around. I’ve spent years building a career and businesses that I’m incredibly proud of, and I’d much rather people talked about those than one chapter of my life that refuses to go away.”
‘It’s about finally telling the story that’s never been told’
According to sources close to Rhian, readers shouldn’t expect the memoir to be a personal attack on Vernon or anyone else from her past.
An insider said: “The book isn’t about reopening old wounds or settling scores. It’s about finally telling the story that’s never been told. People think they know Rhian because of a handful of tabloid headlines, but that’s just one tiny chapter of an extraordinary life. Rhian and Vernon both moved on with their lives, but somehow it’s always Rhian whose name gets dragged back into the headlines.”
ED! has contacted Vernon’s reps for comment.
What do you think about this story? Will you be reading Rhian’s book? Leave us a comment on our Facebook page @EntertainmentDailyFix. We want to hear your thoughts!
Published: July 23, 2026 at 10:30 am Updated: July 23, 2026 at 9:44 am
by Victor Dey
Edited and fact-checked:
July 23, 2026 at 10:30 am
To improve your local-language experience, sometimes we employ an auto-translation plugin. Please note auto-translation may not be accurate, so read original article for precise information.
In Brief
Coinbase advances post-quantum cryptography with upgraded key management, Bitcoin developer workshops, and Bitcoin Security Consortium funding.
Cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase revealed its preparations for post-quantum cryptography, asserting that the industry must begin migration efforts immediately despite uncertainty around when a sufficiently powerful quantum computer might emerge.
The company established an Independent Advisory Board on Quantum Computing and Blockchain earlier this year to distinguish between hype and genuine risk. The board concluded with high confidence that a fault-tolerant quantum computer capable of breaking current cryptographic standards will eventually be built, rendering the cryptography securing virtually every major blockchain vulnerable.
While the threat is not imminent, the board stressed that post-quantum cryptographic solutions already exist and are being standardized; the more difficult challenges are operational, including migrating millions of users, coordinating decentralized protocol upgrades, and maintaining current security standards throughout the transition.
Coinbase maintains that debating timelines is largely irrelevant because preparation must begin regardless, and the company is developing detailed playbooks now to enable rapid action when standards mature.
We’re proud to announce the launch of the Bitcoin Security Consortium, in partnership with BlackRock, Fidelity, Block, and more.
Together we’ll support the long-term security of the Bitcoin network.
Quantum computing is coming. Crypto needs to be ready. pic.twitter.com/T792xvP7jj
— Coinbase 🛡️ (@coinbase) July 23, 2026
System Upgrades, Developer Workshops, and Consortium Funding
Coinbase is pursuing three parallel workstreams to advance its quantum readiness. The company is developing PQ-CoreKMS, a post-quantum iteration of its proprietary key management system that currently safeguards approximately 99.9% of custodied assets using state-of-the-art Multi-Party Computation protocols designed to prevent any single party from reconstructing a private key.
Within the next year, Coinbase plans to deliver an automated signing pipeline that integrates secure enclaves, secret-sharing, and threshold cryptography to support post-quantum signature algorithms across distributed environments. Over the subsequent two to three years, a dedicated research effort will build full MPC capabilities for lattice-based and potentially other post-quantum signing schemes.
Beyond key management, Coinbase is conducting a company-wide inventory of all cryptographic systems to rank migration priorities based on criticality, exposure, and complexity, including its Base Layer-2 network as Ethereum advances its own post-quantum roadmap.
Furthermore, Coinbase will co-host its first working session with Stanford University in August, bringing together Bitcoin Core developers, cryptographers, and researchers for focused discussions on Bitcoin’s post-quantum migration. The August workshop aims to assess realistic timelines, evaluate viable migration strategies, and identify what the decentralized developer community requires to move forward. The company intends to convene such sessions regularly to ensure the conversation remains productive and grounded.
Additionally, as a founding member of the Bitcoin Security Consortium alongside BlackRock, Fidelity Digital Assets, Block, Blockstream, Strategy, and others, Coinbase is donating to a fund that supports Bitcoin developers working on quantum-related challenges while dedicating internal engineering resources to open-source contributions, including proposals such as BIP-360.
The consortium will also function as an authoritative source of information on Bitcoin’s security posture and post-quantum preparedness. Coinbase emphasized that no single entity can solve this challenge alone, underscoring the necessity of coordinated efforts among researchers, developers, protocols, and financial institutions.
Disclaimer
In line with the Trust Project guidelines, please note that the information provided on this page is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as legal, tax, investment, financial, or any other form of advice. It is important to only invest what you can afford to lose and to seek independent financial advice if you have any doubts. For further information, we suggest referring to the terms and conditions as well as the help and support pages provided by the issuer or advertiser. MetaversePost is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice.
About The Author
Alisa, a dedicated journalist at the MPost, specializes in crypto, AI, investments, and the expansive realm of Web3. With a keen eye for emerging trends and technologies, she delivers comprehensive coverage to inform and engage readers in the ever-evolving landscape of digital finance.
More articles
Alisa, a dedicated journalist at the MPost, specializes in crypto, AI, investments, and the expansive realm of Web3. With a keen eye for emerging trends and technologies, she delivers comprehensive coverage to inform and engage readers in the ever-evolving landscape of digital finance.
Ryan Clark was fired from ESPN during a broadcast of “NFL Live” on July 20. Now, days later, journalist and former CNN anchor Don Lemon is not only defending Clark, but he’s also likening it to his own firing several years ago. This comes after the former ESPN host broke his silence.
5ZUMAPRESS.com / MEGA
Lemon took to his official TikTok account on July 22 to react to ESPN’s firing of Clark, and it happened as the 46-year-old was on air. He told his 2.4 million followers on the platform, “Okay, I want you to listen here. Imagine getting fired in front of millions of people while you’re in the middle of a broadcast. That’s what ESPN did to Ryan Clark this week.”
After that, Lemon was understanding of the fact that companies sometimes have to lay off employees, saying, “And I know that layoffs happen, networks restructure. I get it. But the way that this one went down? I mean, it shows how these companies treat their staff.”
In criticizing the company, the former CNN host stated, “ESPN didn’t need to cut Ryan Clark at that exact moment, but they were scared that the story would break online before they got to control the narrative. So instead of calling him on the phone or having a private meeting, they let him find out in the middle of a broadcast.”
The Former CNN Host Likened Clark’s Experience To His Own
5Xavier Collin/Image Press Agency/MEGA
Lemon continued his commentary about Clark’s firing from ESPN by alluding to his 2023 firing after 17 years with the network. He said, “Now, just imagine that happening to you. I can imagine it happening to me because something very similar happened to me. He spent over 11 years at that network.”
The 60-year-old journalist went on to highlight the issue with the way Clark was fired, noting that the networks don’t want to treat their employees like people.
According to him, “Here’s my problem with all of this: We keep hearing that these big media corporations want authenticity from their talent, but when it comes down to treating talent like a human being, suddenly, it’s just business.”
Referring to his situation with CNN, Lemon said, “That’s what they said about me: ‘It’s just a business decision.’ That’s what they told my colleagues.”
Don Lemon Also Highlighted Other ESPN On-Air Personalities Who Faced Layoffs
5Lisa OConnor/ AFF-USA.COM / MEGA
Near the end of the video, Lemon highlighted the fact that the issue with ESPN doesn’t start and stop with Clark, although the way he was let go was the most egregious. This is the case, as others were also reportedly laid off, including Cam Newton, Bart Scott, and Charles Davis.
The “Don Lemon Show” host said, “Guys who gave this network everything are being treated like disposable items.”
He continued, “This kind of stuff is why talent is flocking to independent media and starting their own shows. These companies don’t care about the people who make their business possible, and everyone can see it. And you can see it in the ratings. Trust.”
Ryan Clark Has Broken His Silence
5MEGA
The morning after his unceremonious ESPN firing, Clark broke his silence with a post on X. He began by “sending prayers and love” to everyone who had been impacted by the layoffs at the network, noting all they dedicated to their work.
Sending prayers and love to all those laid off today by ESPN. So many of you have poured your life into that company, & I know how you’re feeling right now.
My hope is as this door closes another opens for you all. God bless!
— Ryan Clark (@Realrclark25) July 21, 2026
According to him, “So many of you have poured your life into that company, & I know how you’re feeling right now. My hope is as this door closes another opens for you all. God bless!”
Since then, he’s also reposted comments from Stephen A Smith, who wrote, “Business is business. I understand that. But losing Ryan Clark?” Clark quoted the post, saying, “My dog.” Then, he quoted a report from TMZ Sports that stated he wasn’t forced to leave the broadcast before its end after learning of his firing.
He claimed, “I wasn’t forced? ‘I ask, should I be done now?’ The answer was ‘yes.’”
Pat McAfee Has Addressed The Layoffs
5CraSH/imageSPACE / MEGA
Pat McAfee, one of the top analysts at ESPN, reacted to the news of layoffs at the company on the July 21 broadcast of his show. Per NBC Sports, McAfee, who is reportedly set to have his pay raised to $60 million per year, began, “We hate any time this happens.”
He continued, “Obviously this is terrible. We don’t like that. But we are very honored that we are still partnered with ESPN and Disney for the good of sport and the future.”
McAfee then defended his show, saying, “The first time we licensed the show through ESPN, one of these happened, we got blamed.”
He continued, “OK, OK. Thank you. I feel like you don’t fully understand budgets and where things are coming from, but I do appreciate that. This time, we’re getting blamed as well. Which I guess I can understand, but I mean, there’s billions and billions of dollars in these companies, and hard decisions have to get made. And we don’t like any of them, and we hope we’re an asset to the company going forward.”
Revenge On Gold Diggers tackles China’s gold digger industry, women who entrap men and steal their money. That’s not me saying that, that’s the game/interactive movie saying that, and it even started an online firestorm over it when it originally released in China last year. It starts with a montage setting the scene. Then the interactive movie starts proper. You follow Wu Yulun, a suave, successful man in the fashion industry, who seeks revenge on the titular gold diggers, in this case, a ring of gold diggers.
Taking Revenge on Gold Diggers!
Revenge on Gold Diggers, as I said, is an interactive movie, with nearly 8 hours of footage. At certain points, you have choices, and these choices will raise or lower obsession level of the woman Yulun is interacting with. The obsession level will control what paths you can take. And these paths will drive you to one of thirty-eight endings. There are seven chapters, obviously there’s an optimal path the game wants you to go to see all seven chapters. It can be not entirely clear on what that is. But even if you get stuck(as I did) you can always go back on standard mode and play a different path(as I will do). However, in Master Mode, you cannot go back and change your choices.
Honestly, I’m not going to get in to the online firestorm or the cultural issues involved in Revenge on Gold Diggers. I’m not Chinese and never been to China. As for the interactive movie, its good with great production values. It is centered around a likable main character. The acting can get melodramatic, but its not bad by any means. The game was even made and directed by a real director, Mark Wu, and it shows.
Revenge on Gold Diggers will get a Your Mileage May Vary with an eight score. The interactive movie will you have you rooting for Yulun, but whether or not you want to play it depends on if you care at all about Chinese gold diggers. The choice is yours.
Overall: Revenge on Gold Diggers is a good interactive movie, but whether or not you want to experience it depends on if you care about the topic it addresses.
The day has arrived, Valve have announced a major hardware expansion with multiple devices including the new Steam Frame, Steam Controller and Steam...
