Web3

Home Web3 Page 23

Launchpad: The Future of Token Distribution

0
Launchpad: The Future of Token Distribution


We’re redefining how entire crypto ecosystems are built, launched, and scaled. Introducing the Layer3 Launchpad for exclusive token launches and ecosystem campaigns. This is tokenized attention at scale. Buckle up.

For explorers, Launchpad means:

Exclusive access to pre-token protocols

Incentives from established ecosystems

High-quality, interactive experiences

For projects, Launchpad is new rocket fuel:

Exposure to a massive, targeted user base

Onchain engagement plus flexible incentives

Token distribution with powerful Sybil filters

Launchpad isn’t just another platform. It’s the future of how crypto projects launch, grow, and align with their communities. We’re bridging the gap between emerging protocols and millions of engaged users, creating a new standard for token distribution and ecosystem expansion.

Launchpad on Layer3

Launching Now: Caldera 🌋🚀

Meet the Metalayer — the unifying layer of Ethereum rollups in our exclusive Launchpad campaign. Easily connect to new protocols via the Caldera Metalayer including Plume, B3, & Manta.

Featuring $100K in exclusive incentives for discovering Caldera’s rollup ecosystem.

Meet the Metalayer

L3 Token Staking

By staking L3, your loyalty unlocks expanded utility:

Boosted rewards on all campaigns

Early and extended access

Tiered benefits that scale with your stake

This is how you align with the future of crypto.



Source link

Bitcoin Layer 2s: Explained & Examples | Chainlink

0
Bitcoin Layer 2s: Explained & Examples | Chainlink


A Bitcoin layer 2 is any offchain network, system, or technology built on top of the Bitcoin blockchain to help extend its capabilities.

Since its inception in 2008, Bitcoin has become the focal point of the verifiable web as the first decentralized cryptocurrency, remaining the largest one by market capitalization. However, Bitcoin’s growth has faced challenges due to the network’s limited scalability, often resulting in high transaction fees and network congestion. 

The recent introduction of ordinals, BRC-20 tokens, and other Bitcoin-native onchain applications has further exacerbated these issues, where—especially during peak times—Bitcoin can become impractical for everyday use. These ongoing scalability challenges highlight the immediate need for Bitcoin scaling solutions such as layer-2 networks.

In this post, we discuss what Bitcoin layer 2s are, how they work, and how they can benefit from industry-standard oracle services.

How Do Bitcoin Layer 2s Work?

The Bitcoin network takes about 10 minutes to finalize a single block of transactions—only seven transactions per second (TPS) on average. Scaling the Bitcoin blockchain directly isn’t an option, as it would require compromising either security or decentralization per the blockchain scalability trilemma.

The blockchain scalability trilemma posits that a tradeoff has to be made when attempting to maximize scalability, security, and decentralization.

It’s worth noting that the limited core functionality (i.e., a global, censorship-resistant decentralized currency) helps make the Bitcoin network so tamper-proof and robust, and a significant technological breakthrough of the 21st century. However, this narrow focus limits the network’s usability in everyday scenarios and limits developers’ ability to launch new applications on Bitcoin. Enter layer 2s.

A Bitcoin layer 2 is any offchain network, system, or technology built on top of the Bitcoin blockchain that helps extend its capabilities. Layer-2 networks can introduce improvements such as greater transaction throughput, reduced fees, and programmability through smart contracts. A key requirement for a network to be considered a layer 2 is that it must inherit the security of the blockchain it is built on—in this case, Bitcoin. In the case of Bitcoin layer 2s, this means that transaction data is verified and confirmed by the Bitcoin blockchain rather than a separate set of nodes.

Layer-2 networks can vary considerably in how they achieve this increased scalability, but a common denominator between layer-2 environments is that when looking to settle on the base chain, they must provide some kind of cryptographic proof to the blockchain on the integrity of the proposed state change, either preemptively or retroactively.

If you’d like a deep dive into how layer 2s work, read What Is Layer 2?.

Types of Bitcoin Layer 2s

There are several types of Bitcoin scalability solutions that can be categorized as layer 2s, though some exist in a gray area regarding their classification as true layer-2 solutions. Note that Bitcoin scalability is an ongoing area of research, and new solutions and technologies may emerge in the future to address some of the limitations of current Bitcoin layer-2 technologies.

State Channels

State channels enable users to bypass high transaction fees by moving transactions offchain, where two parties lock a certain amount of bitcoin into a multisig to send and receive payments. These channels then maintain records of all transactions that occur within them until they are closed. When the parties are done transacting, they sign and broadcast the final state of the channel to the Bitcoin blockchain.

State channels keep all transactions within them offchain, only reporting the opening and closing balance of participants to the Bitcoin network. This allows participants to make transactions without having to pay Bitcoin mainnet fees for each transaction. 

State channels are similar to payment channels in the Bitcoin Lightning Network, but they also support more complex transactions other than micropayments.

Bitcoin Lightning Network payment channels diagram
State and payment channels enable users to move transactions offchain.

Sidechains

A sidechain is an independent blockchain with its own consensus mechanism that connects to Bitcoin via a two-way peg, allowing the transfer of assets or balances between the two chains. While sidechains often use bitcoin as their native currency, they can also issue their own native tokens.

Operating as separate blockchains, sidechains offer faster transactions and additional features like smart contracts. Because sidechains have their own validator set, they are not always considered true layer-2 solutions, as transactions aren’t necessarily ultimately verified by the Bitcoin network. However, some sidechains may tap into Bitcoin’s security or periodically settle on the main chain.

Rollups

Bitcoin layer-2 rollups move transaction execution and data off the main Bitcoin blockchain to a separate rollup chain or layer while still anchoring to Bitcoin for data availability and consensus.

Rollup technology involves executing transactions on the rollup chain, compressing data, and anchoring to the Bitcoin mainnet. Users submit transactions to be executed on the rollup chain rather than directly on the Bitcoin blockchain. The rollup chain then processes these transactions and updates account balances accordingly. 

After processing a batch of transactions offchain, the rollup compresses the transaction data into a compact cryptographic proof or commitment, representing the net effect of all those transactions. This compressed proof is periodically submitted to the Bitcoin blockchain as a single transaction, and some kind of verification mechanism on Bitcoin then validates and applies the changes represented by the rollup proof.

Rollup transaction bundling
Rollups bundle transactions into batches that are executed offchain and verified onchain using some kind of proof.

Benefits of Bitcoin Layer 2s

Bitcoin layer 2s offer several benefits:

Greater scalability—Bitcoin layer 2s effectively increase the transaction throughput and speed of Bitcoin by processing transactions offchain and then settling them on the main chain, depending on the solution.
Reduced fees—Bitcoin layer 2s enable lower transaction costs, unlocking use cases secured by Bitcoin that wouldn’t be feasible on the main Bitcoin network, such as micropayments.
Programmable smart contracts—Although Bitcoin was not initially designed to support smart contracts, layer-2 solutions can introduce this functionality, enabling the creation of complex decentralized applications and novel programmable financial instruments built on Bitcoin.
Deeper liquidity—Bitcoin layer 2s can improve liquidity and access to Bitcoin, unlocking DeFi on Bitcoin with enhanced liquidity, capital efficiency, and increased access.

Bitcoin Layer 2 vs. Ethereum Layer 2

The utility of layer-2 solutions lies in how they tap into the security of the main chain while increasing its scalability. In this way, Bitcoin and Ethereum layer 2s are quite similar—both seek to introduce enhanced scalability without making changes to the base layer. However, Bitcoin and Ethereum layer 2s differ significantly in their technical implementation, as Bitcoin and Ethereum themselves are designed for distinct purposes.

Accelerating Bitcoin Layer 2 Adoption

State channels, sidechains, rollups, and other layer-2 solutions are all methods of approaching the blockchain scalability problem in different ways—supporting both the growing adoption of onchain applications and enhanced use cases and user experiences.

The Chainlink platform has underpinned the DeFi ecosystem since its inception, fulfilling the need for high-quality data, compute, and interoperability services that help developers create fully-fledged decentralized applications. In many cases, integrating Chainlink has helped layer-1 and layer-2 ecosystems bootstrap their growth with battle-tested Chainlink infrastructure, attracting both new developers and users. With the emerging ecosystem of Bitcoin layer-2 scalability solutions, the need for high-quality data and other oracle services will also grow in the Bitcoin ecosystem.

Chainlink Effect
Ecosystems that integrate high-quality Chainlnik services are better equipped to help bootstrap their ecosystem.

A significant advantage of adopting the Chainlink platform is that once an app uses a single Chainlink service, there are little-to-no additional trust assumptions for using other Chainlink services since they are all built upon the same time-tested oracle infrastructure. And every new service built on top of Chainlink adds more value for all existing users. This is why blockchains are increasingly joining the Chainlink Scale program as a way to accelerate the growth of their application ecosystem. An integration with Chainlink can bring multiple services to a single blockchain and subsequently drive a surge in developer activity.

To learn more about Chainlink, visit chain.link, subscribe to the Chainlink newsletter, and follow Chainlink on Twitter, YouTube, and Reddit.



Source link

Uniswap Fees Comparison on Ethereum vs. L2s | Web3 R&D Company

0
Uniswap Fees Comparison on Ethereum vs. L2s | Web3 R&D Company


In the past couple of years, Uniswap DAO has deployed univ3 on many L2s. Liquidity Providers should have more data about which L2s have been the most profitable for specific token pairs. This is our attempt to demystify some of it.

Chains tracked: Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, Base, Celo

BNB and Avalanche were not included in this research due to their being their own L1 chains.

In this research, we first took the top pools from each chain and made the common top pools part of our research. Except for Base and Celo, the top pools on all the other chains were similar.

On Base, blue chip tokens struggled to make it to the top 10. Here is a snapshot of the top pools by 7D volume on Base:

A snapshot of the top pools by 7D volume on Base

Celo has a lot of local pools in the top 10 which were again not made part of this research.

A snapshot of the top pools by 7D volume on Celo

In the case of Arbitrum, Optimism, and Polygon, liquidity and volume were fragmented between USDC and USDC.e (bridged from Ethereum), and both versions of the stablecoin are part of this research to help LPs make a better decision.

How Was This Research Conducted?

~$100 worth of liquidity was provided in each pool on 25 February 2024 until 25 March 2024. Please note that this research does not consider impermanent loss or LVR. The only focus is on fee generation.

Pools And Their Ranges

ETH-Stable Pairs

Lower Tick: 2993.974 USD per ETH

Upper Tick: 4410.486 USD per ETH

ETH-WBTC Pairs

Lower Tick: 0.0499 WBTC per ETH

Upper Tick: 0.0588 WBTC per ETH

ETH-wstETH Pairs

Lower Tick: 0.845 wstETH per ETH

Upper Tick: 0.882 wstETH per ETH

WBTC-Stable Pairs

Lower Tick: 57907.855 USD per WBTC

Upper Tick: 84184.290 USD per WBTC

USDC-USDT Pairs

Lower Tick: 0.990 USDT per USDC

Upper Tick: 1.015 USDT per USDC

You can find all related pool data here:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15e4W9N0bm6zYJ-eY-nogSiADnxqfYvtOrUbkRYgakcI/edit?usp=sharing

ETH-USDC

ETH-USDC

Polygon’s ETH-USDC 0.3% pool produced the highest fee return at $18.9 followed by Polygon’s ETH-USDC 0.05% pool. Base’s pools performed the worst. Ethereum, Arbitrum, and Optmism were on par with each other.

ETH-USDC.e

Arbitrum’s 0.3% pool performed the best with $16.2 in fee generation with Optimism’s 0.05% pool at almost $15 being close second.

ETH-USDbC / ETH-USDCET

ETH-USDbC pool on Base generated $3.57 and $4.3 respectively.

Celo’s ETH-USDCET generated $8.9.

ETH-USDC (Top Pools)

The chart above combines and compares all the top-performing ETH-USDC pools on all six chains. This chart does not distinguish between the different versions of USDC. For more detailed information on the different versions of USDC, see the charts above.

Here Polygon’s 0.3%, Arbitrum’s 0.3% pool, and Optimism’s 0.05% pool are the top 3 performing pools. Ethereum’s fee generation is lacking far behind them.

ETH-DAI

Ethereum’s and Polygon’s ETH-DAI pools are lagging far behind Arbitrum’s ETH-DAI 0.3% pool with $20.7 generated and Optimism’s ETH-DAI pool with $20.5 generated.

ETH-USDT

Arbitrum’s ETH-USDT 0.05% pool takes the cake with the highest fees generated at $9 followed by Polygon’s ETH-USDT 0.3% pool at $6.7

ETH-WBTC

Arbitrum wins here hands-down in ETH-WBTC 0.3% and ETH-WBTC 0.05% with fee generation of $10.3 and $6.87 respectively.

ETH-wstETH

This is the first and only LST pair in our research. We thought this pair was a good proxy for the overall trading volume in the LST space.

Ethereum’s volume here is not a surprise given that most LST assets are still on Ethereum. What’s surprising is that Base has generated the most fees in the given time frame with the 0.05% pool generating $1.32, perhaps this is an outlier and Base won’t be able to keep up with Ethereum in this pair in the next few months.

WBTC-USDC

WBTC-USDC

Optimism’s both pools generated more fees than Ethereum with 0.3% at $10.2 and 0.05% at $11.6.

WBTC-USDC.e

Optimism again takes the win here with the 0.3% pool generating $23.3.

WBTC-USDC (Top Pools)

The chart above combines and compares all the top-performing WBTC-USDC pools. This chart does not distinguish between the different versions of USDC. For more detailed information on the different versions of USDC, see the charts above.

Here Optimism’s 0.3% pool, Optimism’s 0.05% pool, and Ethereum’s 0.3% are the top performing in terms of fee generation.

USDC-USDT

USDC-USDT

This is the first time that Ethereum has generated more fees on any token pairs. Perhaps the bulk of the stablecoin trading is still happening on Ethereum.

Ethereum’s 0.05% pool generated $0.15 and the 0.01% pool generated $0.06.

USDC.e-USDT

Polygon’s 0.05% is the top-performing pool here.

USDC-USDT (Top Pools)

The chart above combines and compares all the top-performing USDC-USDT pools. This chart does not distinguish between the different versions of USDC. For more detailed information on the different versions of USDC, see the charts above.

Ethereum is the clear winner in both fee tiers with the 0.05% pool at $0.15 and the 0.01% pool at $0.06.

Summary

In our research with the limited pools, L2s fee generation has outperformed Ethereum L1. Although TVL and overall volume are still higher on Ethereum, but LPing is more profitable on L2s. LPs should consider the past data before deciding which chain to deploy the liquidity on. Polygon led the ETH-USDC pools, Arbitrum led the ETH-DAI, ETH-USDT, and ETH-WBTC pools, Ethereum ETH-wstETH and USDC-USDT pools and Optimism led the fees generation on WBTC-USDC pools.

Also read: Optimism Bedrock: An Early Guide



Source link

Decode Dynamic Solidity Structs with Hyperledger Web3j

0
Decode Dynamic Solidity Structs with Hyperledger Web3j


In Solidity, dynamic structs are complex data types that can store multiple elements of varying sizes, such as arrays, mappings, or other structs. The system encodes these dynamic structs into binary format using Ethereum’s ABI (Application Binary Interface) encoding rules. The system encodes the structs whenever it stores or passes them in transactions.

Decoding this binary data is crucial for interpreting the state or output of a smart contract. This process involves understanding how Solidity organizes and packs data, particularly in dynamic types, to accurately reconstruct the original struct from its binary representation. This understanding is key to developing robust and interoperable decentralized applications.

Decoding dynamic structs in an external development environment that interacts with a blockchain network is challenging. These structs can include arrays, mappings, and nested structs of different sizes. They require careful handling to keep data accurate during encoding and decoding. In Hyperledger Web3j, we addressed this by creating object classes that match the expected struct format in the blockchain environment.

These object classes are designed to inherit from the org.web3j.abi.datatypes.DynamicStruct class, which is part of the ABI module. The developers designed this class to handle the complexities of encoding and decoding dynamic structs and other Solidity data types. The ABI module leverages Hyperledger Web3j’s type-safe mapping to ensure easy and secure interactions with these complex data structures.

However, when the goal is to extract a specific value from encoded data, creating a dedicated object can add unnecessary complexity. This approach can also use up extra resources. To address this, our contributors, calmacfadden and Antlion12, made significant improvements by extending the org.web3j.abi.TypeReference class.

Their enhancements allow dynamic decoding directly within the class, removing the need to create extra objects. This change simplifies the process of retrieving specific values from encoded data. This advancement reduces overhead and simplifies interactions with blockchain data.

Decoding dynamic struct before enhancement

To clarify, here’s a code example that shows how you could decode dynamic structs using Hyperledger Web3j before the enhancements.

/**
* create the java object representing the solidity dinamyc struct
* struct User{
* uint256 user_id;
* string name;
* }
*/
public static class User extends DynamicStruct {
public BigInteger userId;

public String name;

public Boz(BigInteger userId, String name) {
super(
new org.web3j.abi.datatypes.generated.Uint256(data),
new org.web3j.abi.datatypes.Utf8String(name));
this.userId = userId;
this.name = name;
}

public Boz(Uint256 userId, Utf8String name) {
super(userId, name);
this.userId = userId.getValue();
this.name = name.getValue();
}
}
/**
* create the function which should be able to handle the class above
* as a solidity struct equivalent
*/
public static final org.web3j.abi.datatypes.Function getUserFunction = new org.web3j.abi.datatypes.Function(
FUNC_SETUSER,
Collections.emptyList(),
Arrays.<typereference<?>>asList(new TypeReference() {}));

</typereference<?>

Now as the prerequisite is done, the only thing left is to call do the decode and here is an example:

@Test
public void testDecodeDynamicStruct2() {
String rawInput =
“0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000020”
+ “000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000a”
+ “0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000040”
+ “0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000004”
+ “4a686f6e00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
“;

assertEquals(
FunctionReturnDecoder.decode(
rawInput,
getUserFunction.getOutputParameters()),
Collections.singletonList(new User(BigInteger.TEN, “John”)));
}

In the above test, we decoded and asserted that the rawInput is a User struct having the name John and userId 10.

Decoding dynamic struct with new enhancement

With the new approach, declaring an equivalent struct object class is no longer necessary. When the method receives the encoded data, it can immediately decode it by creating a matching reference type. This simplifies the workflow and reduces the need for additional class definitions. See the following example for how this can be implemented:

public void testDecodeDynamicStruct2() {
String rawInput =
“0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000020”
+ “000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000a”
+ “0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000040”
+ “0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000004”
+ “4a686f6e00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
“;

TypeReference dynamicStruct =
new TypeReference(
false,
Arrays.asList(
TypeReference.makeTypeReference(“uint256”),
TypeReference.makeTypeReference(“string”))) {};

List decodedData =
FunctionReturnDecoder.decode(rawInput,
Utils.convert(Arrays.asList(dynamicStruct)));

List decodedDynamicStruct =
((DynamicStruct) decodedData.get(0)).getValue();

assertEquals(decodedDynamicStruct.get(0).getValue(), BigInteger.TEN);
assertEquals(decodedDynamicStruct.get(1).getValue(), “John”);}

In conclusion, Hyperledger Web3j has made great progress in simplifying the decoding of dynamic Solidity structs. This addresses one of the most challenging parts of blockchain development. By introducing object classes like org.web3j.abi.datatypes.DynamicStruct and enhancing the org.web3j.abi.TypeReference class, the framework now provides a more efficient and streamlined method for handling these complex data types.

Developers no longer need to create dedicated struct classes for every interaction, reducing complexity and resource consumption. These advancements not only boost the efficiency of blockchain applications but also make the development process easier and less prone to errors. This ultimately leads to more reliable and interoperable decentralized systems.

 



Source link

Phantom x Layer3, ARB Hub, plus 500K USDC

0
Phantom x Layer3, ARB Hub, plus 500K USDC


Digital art shines brighter on digital gold. This month, we’re teaming up with Phantom to introduce Bitcoin Ordinals to the world.

What are Ordinals?

Ordinals are a novel approach to creating NFT-like assets called “inscriptions” on Bitcoin’s blockchain. Ordinals are inscribed onto a satoshi (the smallest divisible BTC unit) via a standard Bitcoin transaction. Each inscription can hold unique data, like images or text.

Phantom 🤝 Bitcoin

Phantom wallet is a powerful portal to Bitcoin Ordinals. Phantom enables full Bitcoin support with extensive features:

Inscribed satoshi protection (so you don’t accidentally spend your Ordinals)

Immersive Collectibles gallery to view, search, and pin your Ordinals

Connected marketplaces to browse, buy, and list on Magic Eden or UniSat

Collect your first Bitcoin Ordinals with Phantom x Layer3 today.

Intro to Ordinals

New Quests (and 140K+ ARB incentives) are being added to the Arbitrum Hub on Layer3. Discover Aura Finance, Maverick Protocol, Vertex Protocol, DeFi Saver, Router Protocol, and more!

Incentives are distributed directly, in real-time, for each Quest completed. Over 58K users have already claimed 200K+ ARB, with new Quests and incentives added weekly.

Layer3 is the leading protocol for next-level attention and incentive distribution.

Enter the Arbitrum Hub

Attention: Season 2 participants!

Did you mint the coveted Trident of Worlds? 500K USDC incentives are currently being distributed for the Infinity CUBEs campaign. The distribution fully concludes last season, with millions in incentives upcoming for Season 3.

Claim Infinity CUBE incentives



Source link

One Final Story About FTX for Old Times Sake | Web3 Daily

0
One Final Story About FTX for Old Times Sake | Web3 Daily



TL;DR

On Wednesday this week, a judge formally ordered FTX and it’s sister company, Alameda Research, to pay $12.7 Billion USD to creditors, ending a 20-month-long lawsuit with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

Full Story

For our final ever Web3 Daily news article (we’ll say a proper goodbye on Sunday), it feels fitting to write about FTX.

(The company that both made us and broke us in many ways – because people love reading about crazy news; but FTX also crippled the crypto industry along with the advertising budgets for many web3 companies).

On Wednesday this week, a judge formally ordered FTX and it’s sister company, Alameda Research, to pay $12.7 Billion USD to creditors, ending a 20-month-long lawsuit with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

The order also bans FTX and Alameda from trading digital assets and acting as intermediaries in the market.

(Nipping in the bud even the slightest chance of a comeback for the company).

How in the world can a bankrupt company pay $12.7B to creditors?

Well, when Sam Bankrun-Fraud was sentenced, he was forced to forfeit $11B in assets (and given 25 years in prison for seven counts of fraud, conspiracy, and money laundering).

Plus, Alameda and FTX had significant crypto holdings in tokens other than the FTT token (FTX’s native token which went to zero) like Solana, which, since the crash that they started, has mostly gone up in value.

For now, FTX and Alameda have filed for bankruptcy, with the full restructure being administered by Kroll – who have the fun job of figuring out what assets are still owned, and which creditors should get how much, and in what order.

Alright! Now you know.



Source link

USDe, the 12.3% Yielding Stablecoin, is Coming to Solana | Web3 Daily

0
USDe, the 12.3% Yielding Stablecoin, is Coming to Solana | Web3 Daily



TL;DR

Full Story

Picture this: you go to buy something online from a British retailer…

And even though the site lists its prices in your local currency (USD), the final transaction is quietly made using their local currency (GBP).

You throw your laptop at the wall in anger and go to Twitter to complain.

The narrative doesn’t add up, right? But for some reason in crypto, that kind of currency tribalism is totally accepted.

It’s dumb! Which is why we love to see stuff like this:

Ethena Labs — the makers of the Ethereum-based USDe stablecoin that earns a whopping 12.3% yield per year when it’s staked? Yuh, they’re now integrating with Solana — bringing greater optionality to us as users.

It’s a smart move. Cause if you study some of the more enduring projects of the previous bull run (e.g. WalletConnect, Thirdweb, Magic Eden…)

You’ll notice they all play nice with other technologies.

WalletConnect and Magic Eden integrate with a range of wallets from a range of chains, while Thirdweb makes it easy for web2 companies to adopt web3 payments (see: Shopify).

The takeaway:

Multi-chain integrations don’t leech from other crypto projects, they let users make a choice and pick the technology that will serve them best.

As a result, the cream rises to the top and the overall crypto pie continues to grow.

Making your job as an investor that much easier.

Cause you no longer have to figure out who is forcing their (potentially sub-par) technology on people with back door partnerships and zealous tribalism…

You just pick the best tech and call it a day.



Source link

The SEC’s $125M Settlement w/ XRP Isn’t a Win for Them — It’s a Big Ol’ L | Web3 Daily

0
The SEC’s 5M Settlement w/ XRP Isn’t a Win for Them — It’s a Big Ol’ L | Web3 Daily



TL;DR

The SEC is about to settle w/ Ripple, moving us one step closer to cut-n-dry regulatory acceptance in America, which will have the power to push the market up by trillions over the following decade.

Full Story

The XRP vs. SEC lawsuit is coming to an end!

But most of Crypto Twitter is treating it like their uncle that just finalized his divorce after years of being separated.

“Wait, I thought that you guys were long done already?”

It sure felt like it was over when the judge ruled the public sale of XRP tokens were not a securities violation — meaning the sale of most other crypto tokens would probably get the same treatment.

(A great thing for everyone’s portfolios, cause it keeps Garry Gensler’s war on crypto in a chokehold of legal precedence).

The final piece of the puzzle was settling the private sale of XRP tokens, which was seen as a crime. The BIG question was, what’d be the punishment?

Was XRP going to be…

Put up for adoption (sued out of existence).

Or lose their allowance for a few weeks (fined, but still allowed to exist).

Well, we now know it was the latter — Ripple’s paying a $125M settlement (pocket change for them).

Here’s what that means for you and your portfolio:

Whether or not you hold XRP, this adds further momentum to the shifting approach to crypto regulation in the US.

If any lawsuit was going to be a slam dunk in the SEC’s favor, it was this one.

For a solid four years, the impression was we were about to see a prime Jordan (the SEC) go up against a benched G-League wash out (Ripple).

But it turned out to be one of the famed 9000 shots that Jordan missed in his career.

And once we see cut-n-dry regulatory acceptance in America, it’ll have the power to push the market up by trillions over the following decade.



Source link

PwC Germany on How Chainlink Enables Asset Tokenization

0
PwC Germany on How Chainlink Enables Asset Tokenization


This is a guest post by PwC Germany.

In the rapidly evolving landscape of financial markets, tokenization is emerging as a pivotal innovation. With industry leaders gravitating toward tokenized forms of value, players across the sector are recognizing an array of benefits. These include the potential to unlock market liquidity, streamline post-trade processing, foster automation, and enhance transparency. This surge in interest is underscored by a striking statistic: 97% of institutional investors¹ believe that tokenization is poised to revolutionize asset management.

However, this promising horizon is not without its challenges, such as the fragmentation of regulatory frameworks related to tokenized assets, which vary significantly across different regions. Adding to this complexity is the lack of interoperability between various blockchain networks, which currently host different types of tokenized assets represented in various formats. This requires more upfront investment for new entrants, and limits liquidity in each network. Liability and recourse in cross-chain transfers require greater clarity. In decentralized blockchain networks, which are often open-source technologies, attributing liability becomes challenging. This complexity is amplified in scenarios involving cross-chain token bridge solutions, where the roles and liabilities of smart contract owners remain ambiguous.

Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) presents a novel solution to many challenges associated with tokenization in financial markets. It offers a more transparent and traceable framework for asset transfers, thereby potentially simplifying compliance with regulatory requirements from a diverse set of regulators. If there is a need to investigate a transaction, perhaps for compliance checks or to resolve a dispute, CCIP’s framework could be used to track the transaction’s entire journey across chains. This capability is significant in addressing potential regulatory requirements, as it provides a reliable method to ascertain the history and legitimacy of tokenized assets, which is often a requirement under various regulatory frameworks.

Moreover, CCIP’s ability to connect various blockchains through existing infrastructures allows financial institutions to leverage their current systems to interact with different blockchain networks securely. This aligns with the legal requirement of monitoring and managing tokenized assets effectively.

CCIP’s unique approach also helps meet institutional requirements around maintaining necessary roles and regulatory compliance. Financial institutions need to ensure that the recording and management of assets on the blockchain are in compliance with regulatory standards. 

Institutional Requirements Around Policies and Controls

Monitoring and Integrity of Asset Quantities to ensure that it matches the issued quantity of securities. This is crucial to prevent unauthorized creation or deletion of assets.
Segregation of Assets and Management of Participation of different entities must be managed by the Designated Depository. This includes both institutional and knowledgeable non-institutional investors.
Prevention of Settlement Fails and Finality are to be ensured to guarantee the trading system’s stability and reliability. Finality should be established in near-real-time within the day, or at most by the second business day post-trade. 
Transaction Confirmation should be a clear and accurate confirmation of transaction details. 
Settlement in Central Bank Money or Commercial Bank Money is preferred.
Compliance with Regulatory Standards, including compliance with existing financial regulations, as well as any new regulations specific to DLT-based securities trading and settlement.
Effective Risk Management must be in place, including managing technological risks, cybersecurity threats, and operational risks.
High levels of Transparency and Reporting to regulatory authorities to ensure compliance and facilitate oversight.

Features and Use Cases of Chainlink CCIP for Financial Institutions

Efficient Integration Across Multiple Chains: A significant challenge for capital markets and financial institutions is the integration with a rising number of blockchain networks. Manual integration is not only time-consuming but also costly, often requiring specialized access to blockchain developers. The collaboration between Swift and Chainlink addressed this by enabling efficient integration with various blockchains, reducing the need for manual, individual integrations​​.

Streamlined Transaction Processes and Liquidity Aggregation: CCIP allows financial institutions to connect to the blockchain ecosystem through a single integration point, which speeds up development and market entry significantly. It also facilitates liquidity flows between various trading environments and provides shared access to users for applications and products across different markets. Ultimately, CCIP as a universal cross-chain standard simplifies the transaction process, making it more efficient and cost-effective​​.

Interoperability Between Public and Private Chains: The ability of financial institutions to trigger transactions on both public and private chains, without the need for direct integration with those chains, is a significant advancement. This functionality of CCIP enables users of different blockchain networks to interact seamlessly with each other, enhancing the scope of financial transactions across diverse blockchain environments​​.

Enhanced Functionality with Smart Contracts: CCIP allows Programmable Token Transfers, which are the sending of messages and tokens with instructions attached. These instructions can dictate actions on the destination chain, such as executing specific smart contract functions on arrival. This feature adds a layer of functionality, allowing for more complicated and tailored financial transactions​​.

Robust Risk Management and Security: Policies and parameters can be coded into the CCIP Risk Management Network. This includes access control and multi-signature policies, ensuring high security and compliance standards. Additionally, the system can adapt to changes in security requirements, modifying transferred assets accordingly.

Handling Real-World Asset Tokens: CCIP enables the transfer of real-world asset tokens across different chains, maintaining up-to-date information and ensuring asset integrity, even as they move across various chains. This feature is critical for tokenized assets, ensuring they are accurately represented and enabling the creation of a unified golden record.

Cross-Chain Settlement of Real-World Assets: A case study with the Australia and New Zealand Bank (ANZ) demonstrates the practical application of this technology. It involved a customer buying a green finance asset token denominated in one stablecoin on a blockchain using a different stablecoin from another blockchain. This test ensured that payment and asset transfer occurred simultaneously and securely, highlighting the system’s capability to handle complex, real-world financial transactions, such as a cross-border, cross-chain, cross-currency transaction​​.

Facilitating Multi-Chain Environment for Regulated Financial Institutions: The case study showed how ANZ, a regulated financial institution, can provide institutional clients access to a variety of tokenized assets across multiple blockchains. This creates a smooth customer experience and enables cross-chain interaction via a single interface, addressing challenges like liquidity fragmentation and integration issues in multi-chain environments​​.

Simplification and Standardization in Transferring Tokenized Assets: The ability to transfer tokenized assets with minimal changes to existing systems is crucial for financial service providers. As demonstrated in the collaboration between Swift and Chainlink, by leveraging Swift’s existing infrastructure and message standards (ISO 15022 or ISO 20022), providers can issue instructions for the transfer of tokenized assets in a manner similar to current processes. This use case is particularly relevant as it facilitates a smoother transition to handling digital assets without extensive investment or disruption​​.

Detailed Description of a Possible Use Case: Tokenized Real Estate Asset Transfer Using Chainlink

Background 

Real estate, traditionally an illiquid asset class with high entry barriers, is being revolutionized by blockchain technology. Tokenization of real estate assets transforms physical properties into digital tokens on a blockchain, making them more accessible, divisible, and liquid. In this use case, we describe the process of transferring a tokenized real estate asset using CCIP’s interoperability solution.

Scenario

The hypothetical real estate company, RealEstate Inc., owns a commercial building in downtown New York. To raise capital for new projects and provide liquidity to its assets, RealEstate decides to tokenize this property. Each token represents a share of ownership in the property. The company plans to sell these tokens to a mix of individual and institutional investors worldwide.

Participants

RealEstate Inc.: The real estate company owning the property.
Investors: Individuals and institutions seeking to purchase tokenized real estate.
Custodians: Financial institutions holding and managing digital assets on behalf of investors.
Chainlink CCIP: The platform used for secure, cross-chain transfer of tokenized assets.

Process Flow 

Tokenization of Real Estate Asset: In our theoretical scenario, RealEstate Inc. works with a blockchain service provider to tokenize the commercial building. The property is divided into 10,000 digital tokens, each representing an equal share of the property.

Listing and Offering Tokens: The tokens are listed on a regulated digital asset exchange where investors can purchase them. RealEstate sets the initial price per token based on the property’s valuation.

Investor Purchase: An investor, using a private blockchain network for their transactions, decides to purchase 100 tokens. They initiate the transaction using their blockchain network.

Chainlink Integration for Cross-Chain Transfer in this Scenario:

The investor’s custodian generates a transaction request on their native blockchain.
Chainlink CCIP receives this request.
CCIP translates and routes the request to the appropriate blockchain network where the real estate tokens are held.
The system ensures compliance with regulatory and security protocols during the transfer.

Transaction Execution and Settlement:

The required number of tokens (100) is locked and prepared for transfer.
The investor’s payment in the native currency or stablecoin is processed and confirmed.
Upon successful payment confirmation, the tokenized real estate shares are transferred to the investor’s custody account.
Chainlink CCIP updates both parties and relevant custodians about the transaction status and completion.

Post-Transaction:

The investor now holds 100 tokens, representing partial ownership of the commercial building.
RealEstate receives the investment funds and updates its records to reflect the new ownership distribution.
The transaction is recorded on the respective blockchains, ensuring transparency and immutability.

This use case demonstrates the potential of CCIP to facilitate seamless, secure, and efficient cross-chain transfers of tokenized real-world assets like real estate. It opens up global investment opportunities, reduces barriers to entry, and enhances liquidity in traditionally illiquid asset markets.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the integration of Chainlink CCIP is transforming the financial services industry by addressing key challenges in tokenization, such regulatory fragmentation and cross-chain interoperability. This advancement streamlines transaction processes, enhances asset liquidity, and can help robust security and compliance standards. As the industry continues to evolve, these innovations pave the way for more efficient, transparent, and accessible global financial markets.

Chainlink Labs will provide essential support to businesses engaged with PwC Germany, aiding those who seek to enter the blockchain economy yet lack the necessary skills for smart contract development and node infrastructure management. PwC Germany possesses extensive expertise in regulations, technical design, implementation, and operation of web3 infrastructure. This deep-seated knowledge further enhances the partnership’s ability to offer comprehensive solutions in the blockchain space, ensuring clients not only develop and deploy secure and compliant blockchain applications but also effectively navigate the complex landscape of web3 technology.

With the combined expertise of Chainlink and PwC Germany, companies will receive tailored support in creating custom blockchain solutions, leveraging the capabilities of the Chainlink platform.



Source link

Popular Posts

My Favorites

Star Wars: Outlaws has sold a million copies in its first...

0
Although I actually quite enjoyed it, the rest of the world responded to the release of Star Wars: Outlaws with apathy. The critical...