Home Blog Page 50

X Games takes over skate. Season 4 with new stadium and rewards – VideoGamer

X Games takes over skate. Season 4 with new stadium and rewards – VideoGamer




You can trust VideoGamer. Our team of gaming experts spend hours testing and reviewing the latest games, to ensure you’re reading the most comprehensive guide possible. Rest assured, all imagery and advice is unique and original. Check out how we test and review games here

The X Games is coming to San Vansterdam as part of skate. Season 4, bringing a complete stadium takeover, new competitive challenges and a collection of exclusive rewards to EA and Full Circle’s skating game.

Running from July 21 until August 25, the X Games San Van event will transform the Stadium into an officially themed competition venue inspired by the MoonPay X Games League Championship course in New Orleans.

The redesigned location will feature a new street park, a competition bowl and a huge vert ramp. While the wider X Games event is only available for a limited time, EA says players will continue to have open access to the new Stadium layout after the event ends.

Season 4 also sees San Vansterdam resurrect the San Van Open, a classic competition from the fictional city’s history. The event is intended to take players from local street skaters to competitors performing on one of skating’s biggest stages.

“X Games has always been about giving the world’s best skateboarders a stage to push what’s possible,” said Jeremy Bloom, X Games CEO. “Bringing that experience into skate. lets millions of players compete on an authentic X Games League course, represent their clubs, and experience the intensity, progression and creativity that define our sport. It’s a natural extension of what we’re building.”

X Games progression and challenges arrive in skate.

Alongside the Stadium makeover, the X Games San Van event introduces a dedicated progression system featuring new missions, team activities and challenges inspired by memorable moments from X Games history.

Several tasks have been designed around the signature tricks of real X Games athletes, while skateboarder Dashawn Jordan will provide voiceover for the challenges. This marks the first time that skate. challenges have included commentary from an X Games athlete.

Players will also be able to complete sets of X Games Club Tasks inspired by the skateboarding scenes of Los Angeles, São Paulo, New York and Tokyo. Each location’s challenges have been built around famous tricks and skating styles associated with the region.

Spot Battles are also returning during the event, although they will include a new competitive twist. Party sizes and cooperative challenges have been expanded as part of the update, allowing up to eight players to participate together.

X Games rewards and cosmetics

Completing event challenges will unlock a selection of exclusive rewards, including player backgrounds, icons and team jerseys representing Los Angeles, São Paulo, New York and Tokyo.

Additional X Games League cosmetics will be available through the in-game store, giving players more ways to customise their skaters and crews throughout Season 4.

“Working closely with the X Games team, we set out to capture the energy and intensity of the X Games League Finals course and bring that into San Vansterdam in a way that feels authentic to both worlds,” said Deran Chung, Senior Creative Director at Full Circle. “From the layout to the flow of each line, this was about translating a real-world competition experience into something players can explore and make their own.”

The X Games San Van event begins on July 21 and runs until August 25. It will be available to all skate. players, with Season 4 also scheduled to conclude on August 25.



Source link

The Chase fans brand new spin-off The Chase Around the World a ‘budget’ version of BBC rival

    0
    The Chase fans brand new spin-off The Chase Around the World a ‘budget’ version of BBC rival


    Bradley Walsh fans have not held back after ITV’s brand new spin-off The Chase Around the World made its debut, with some branding it an “excuse for a free holiday”.

    Bradley, 61,  and the Chasers swapped the familiar quiz studio for the streets of Rome on Thursday night.

    However, instead of winning over fans, the new travel themed format sparked some criticism online.

    Bradley Walsh and The Chasers have gone global with The Chase Around the World (Credit: ITV)

    Six teams raced around the Italian capital while answering questions and completing puzzles before the last placed pair faced Anne Hegerty and Mark Labbett.

    The series now heads to Barcelona for its second episode.

    But many viewers felt the new show looked more like a paid trip abroad than a fresh take on the ITV favourite. Others could not ignore the similarities with BBC rival Race Across the World.

    Bradley Walsh’s new Chase spin off: Verdicts are in

    Viewers took to X in their numbers after the first episode, with several questioning whether the spin off offered enough to justify taking The Chase overseas.

    One wrote: “Is this #chasearoundtheworld another excuse for Bradley Walsh to have a free holiday?”

    Another added: “Basically a holiday for the Chasers.”

    A third penned: “Who signed off on this? Didn’t anybody watch it back and think, ‘this is boring?’”

    Others compared it to the popular BBC show, Race Across the World.

    “The Chase meets Race Across the World. It’s a no from me. Stick to the original format,” someone said.

    One viewer even admitted: “This may sound hasty, but I’m not really warming to this new programme tbh. I’ll just stick to watching #TheChase, Race Across The World, and Coach Trip as separate programmes.”

    race across the world logo 2026
    Race Across the World airs on rival channel BBC One (Credit: BBC)

    When is The Chase Around the World on next?

    Despite the criticism, the race is far from over. And some viewers are looking forward to the next leg.

    One happy customer said once the credits rolled: “It was different, fun and still nail biting! Really enjoyed that!!”

    No teams left the competition in the opening episode. Father and daughter duo Ashwin and Nikita crossed the finish line last in Rome before taking on Anne Hegerty and Mark Labbett in the Final Chase.

    Ashwin and Nikita answered 10 questions correctly in 42 seconds. Anne and Mark managed six before their time ran out, allowing the pair to stay in the competition.

    Episode two of The Chase Around the World airs on Thursday July 23, 2026, at 9pm on ITV1 for one hour.

    Will you be watching?

    Read more: Real life Traveller Trewley-Precious lands C4 reality show The Secret Lives of Gypsy Wives and it looks wild

    The Chase Around the World continues at 9pm on ITV1 on Thursday July 23, 2026



    Source link

    Dutch Platform Knaken Bankrupt With €7M User Funds Missing

    Dutch Platform Knaken Bankrupt With €7M User Funds Missing


    A court in Rotterdam has declared Dutch cryptocurrency platform Knaken bankrupt, after prosecutors said roughly €7 million ($8.1 million) in customer funds could not be accounted for.

    The ruling, issued Thursday, followed a bankruptcy petition filed by the Dutch Public Prosecution Service (OM) in late June, acting on warnings from the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) about what it called a “very concerning situation” at the platform.

    Dutch cryptocurrency platform Knaken’s bankruptcy has significant implications for the EU’s crypto licensing regime, highlighting regulatory gaps

    The collapse of Knaken, affecting 30,000 customers, underscores the need for stricter oversight of digital-asset firms under the MiCA framework

    The case marks a notable failure in the Netherlands’ crypto industry, sparking a criminal investigation and raising questions about consumer protection

    According to the NL Times report, the court did not soften its assessment. “Knaken has many customers, and there is a significant deficit in funds at Knaken, of which customers have not been informed,” it said. “Consequently, a large amount of customer money has disappeared without it being clear how this could have happened.” Declaring the company bankrupt, the court found, was in the public interest.

    The ruling also placed Stichting Knaken Payments — the foundation set up to safeguard customer deposits — into bankruptcy alongside the trading company, Knaken Cryptohandel B.V.

    A Failed Safeguard

    The foundation existed specifically to hold and protect customer funds separately from the operating business, a structure meant to ensure users could recover their money if the company failed.

    Its collapse into the same proceedings undercuts the very protection it was designed to provide. With both entities insolvent, the segregation that should have shielded customer deposits appears not to have held.

    30,000 Customers Locked Out

    Prosecutors estimate around 30,000 customers have been affected, according to figures reported by broadcaster NOS, though that number is the OM’s own estimate rather than an audited count. On the platform, users could convert euros into cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, trade them, and store digital assets.

    Access vanished abruptly. Knaken’s website and mobile app went dark in early June, leaving customers unable to view balances or withdraw funds. In the weeks since, users have had no route back to their holdings and no clarity on what remains.

    Knaken proposed distributing whatever funds were still available among its customers and argued that bankruptcy was not the best way to wind down the business, contending that customers’ interests were already protected by criminal-law measures, including assets seized by investigators. The court rejected the proposal, finding that Knaken held too little capital to repay customers in full.

    MiCA Was the Trigger

    The collapse traces back to Europe’s crypto licensing regime. Knaken went offline after failing to secure a MiCAR license from the AFM, the authorization that has been mandatory for firms serving EU crypto customers since the Markets in Crypto-Assets framework’s transition period expired on July 1, 2025.

    Without that license, Knaken could not legally continue operating. Rather than resolving the compliance gap, the platform ceased functioning entirely, freezing customer accounts in the process. The case is among the more significant Dutch crypto failures in recent years, and it arrives as European regulators tighten oversight of digital-asset firms under MiCA.

    The company had operated for close to a decade and, in a 2024 report, had itself acknowledged financial vulnerabilities — an admission that reads differently in hindsight.

    The Criminal Investigation

    Running parallel to the bankruptcy is a criminal investigation led by the Fiscal Information and Investigation Service (FIOD), the Netherlands’ financial-crime unit, opened after the AFM raised concerns and filed a complaint.

    On June 29, the day before prosecutors filed the bankruptcy petition, FIOD investigators raided Knaken’s premises, seizing computers, phones, and a portion of the company’s assets. No arrests have been made. Prosecutors have stressed that the civil bankruptcy and criminal probe are handled by separate teams.

    A court-appointed trustee will now take over Knaken’s remaining assets, review its finances, and determine how much can be returned to customers and other creditors. For the roughly 30,000 users locked out since early June, the central question remains unanswered: whether they will see their money again and how €7 million came to be missing in the first place.

    Also Read: Cardano Contributor Exits After Bankruptcy, Criticizes Governance


    Disclaimer: The information researched and reported by The Crypto Times is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional financial advice. Investing in crypto assets involves significant risk due to market volatility. Always Do Your Own Research (DYOR) and consult with a qualified Financial Advisor before making any investment decisions.




    Source link

    Quote Of The Day By Christopher Nolan: ‘But Really, What The Director Is, Is The Audience’ – SlashFilm

      0
      Quote Of The Day By Christopher Nolan: ‘But Really, What The Director Is, Is The Audience’ – SlashFilm






      Who’d have thought, in an age where IP and nostalgia reign supreme, that the way to become the most popular director on the planet would be to make cerebral, thought-provoking films that actually challenge audiences. That’s exactly the magic trick Christopher Nolan has pulled off, which is partly why when the man has something to say, there’ll never be a shortage of fans eager to listen.

      Of course, the Westminster-born director had to work his way up to the kind of magnificent, complex blockbuster epics for which we know him today. In the late-90s he was just an ambitious filmmaker with a vision, one that he began to realize with his 1998 neo-noir crime movie “Following.” Filmed guerilla style on the streets of London, the project was made for just $6,000 and caused enough of a buzz for Nolan to court the interest of a relatively small studio. Newmarket Films handed the director $4.5 million and “Memento” was the result. Heralding the arrival of one of the most exciting new filmmakers of the era, the mind-bending 2000 thriller remains one of Nolan’s most celebrated movies more than 25 years after its release.

      Since then, he’s continued to deliver challenging, thought-provoking films that interrogate complex philosophical concepts, examine the legacies of towering historical figures, and with “The Odyssey,” reimagine ancient Greek epics for the modern age. The man even managed to make a film about complex quantum physics and produce his emotional masterpiece “Interstellar” as a result. Somehow, this decade-spanning cinematic enterprise has also turned Nolan into one of the highest-grossing directors of all time. How has he done it? Well, he has a unique perspective on directing, which he articulated during a 2026 interview in a statement that has now become our quote of the day.

      Quote of the Day by Christopher Nolan

      “You can say it’s the conductor of an orchestra. But really, what the director is, is the audience. I’m there on set going, ‘Does this move me? What is this shot? OK, now what’s the next thing I need to see?'”

      Christopher Nolan said this during a 2026 interview with Richard Roeper (via WBEZ Chicago), in which he discussed his approach to making his exhausting yet exhilarating epic “The Odyssey.” It seems to go without saying that a filmmaker should use their discretion to decide what works in a movie and what doesn’t. But Nolan’s specific way of putting it — of drawing a parallel between filmmaker and audience member — demystifies the role of a director, which can often seem nebulous and ill-defined to those on the outside.

      Indeed, as he goes on to say, “It’s very difficult to pin down the job of the director, because I don’t photograph the film. I don’t act in the film. I don’t record the sound. I mean, I have done different bits of those jobs on smaller films, but what does a director do?” By giving the almost anti-climactic answer that directors are merely audience members, Nolan encapsulates the spirit of his films which similarly take complex ideas and make them more digestible for mass audiences. Put this way, suddenly, the role of director seems immediately intelligible. Whether he’s speaking directly or via his films, the man has a gift for clarification!

      Deeper Meaning of Christopher Nolan’s quote: Trust Your Instincts

      In his interview with Richard Roeper, Christopher Nolan explains how he prepared for “The Odyssey” by writing “a list of all the things that [he] wanted to see” in a film version of Homer’s poem. That ultimately guided him through the creation of the movie. He took a similar approach to the Dark Knight trilogy. As he told Film Comment, “I got excited about the idea of filling in this interesting gap—no one had ever told the origin story of Batman.” It wasn’t necessarily that he thought such a thing would appeal to others, it was that he wanted to see how Batman became Batman. Likewise, a lifelong fascination with dreams led Nolan to “Inception.” As the director went on to tell Roeper, “You really are making the film for yourself, and then in a paradoxical way you kind of never get to watch it that way because you’re very familiar with it.”

      That said, asking yourself what you want to see and then actually coming up with an answer is, for many, easier said than done. You may have doubts about your own sensibility. You may question your instincts or struggle to decide between alternatives. It’s not enough to be an audience member, you have to trust your own opinion. Nolan possesses that clarity of vision, which isn’t necessarily captured in the director=audience formulation.

      Nevertheless, Nolan effectively demystifies the role of director, and also delivers a powerful affirmation of the idea that artistic merit comes from following your own vision. That’s an important sentiment for the biggest director in the world to express, especially at a time when our nostalgia-mad monoculture has yielded something as craven as a “Harry Potter” reboot.

      More quotes from Christopher Nolan

      “Every film should have its own world, a logic and feel to it that expands beyond the exact image that the audience is seeing.”

      “Breaking rules isn’t interesting. It’s making up new ones that keeps things exciting.”

      “You’re never going to learn something as profoundly as when it’s purely out of curiosity.”

      “The screen is the same size for every story. A shot of a teacup is the same size as an army coming over the hill. It’s all storytelling.”

      “As a filmmaker, you know, no matter how positive things seem, you always notice the bad reviews, you always notice that the things people love are the same things other people hate, so you can’t react to that. To me, it’s all about doing what you believe in.”




      Source link

      Alessandro Gasparini: Refined low-vamp loafers

      Alessandro Gasparini: Refined low-vamp loafers


      Alessandro Gasparini: Refined low-vamp loafers

      Friday, July 17th 2026
      Share

      Subscribe
      4 Comments
      Add to favourites
      ||- Begin Content -||

      Alessandro Gasparini makes high-end loafers that are slim and light: Blake stitched, but with materials on a par with the likes of an Edward Green or John Lobb. 

      That’s probably the most important thing to say first, as the prices can seem high compared to some Blake-stitched loafers or Belgians: leather models are £545 and suede £525. That price is largely because of the quality of the materials and make, rather than being a big designer brand. 

      Interestingly though, Gasparini’s background is in brands, having been a shoe designer at various ones over the years, including Dunhill. Like a few new outfits we’ve covered recently – August Special, Museum Garments – he’s coming to this with experience, and that’s why the product feels so complete, rather than work in progress.

      The Moccaso in black leather

      The other thing to establish early is that I have a pair (the black smooth leather above) and have been wearing them frequently over the past three months. The fit is probably the best I’ve had in a low-vamp loafer like this, and they were comfortable straight away. 

      I took my regular shoe size – 9 UK, 43 EU – and apart from a little biting on the joint of my big toe, which always happens with me, they fit very well. I wore them consistently during Pitti (where they are pictured here – with a cotton suit at top and my Whitcomb cotton jacket below) and they did very well.

      My slim heel means I often get a lot of heel slippage, particularly in something like Alden, but here it was minimal. Of course, this is personal and depends on your foot, but hopefully the experience is helpful to get a sense of what the shape is like. 

      The loafers in a semi-smart outfit

      Gasparini worked designing women’s shoe lines as well as men’s, but as often happens with these start-ups, struggled to find shoes he wanted. 

      “Partly that was because of the size of my feet,” he says. “I’m a size 6 and few people go down that far. But also, I liked 1980s styles in particular, Ralph Lauren ones from back then with a low throat line.”

      A throat line, I learned, is what bespoke shoemakers also call the top line – the top of the shoe around the ankle and the sides of the feet. This is indeed lower on Gasparini’s shoes, though I’d say it’s barely noticeable. The low vamp – how far the front of the shoe extends up your foot – is more noticeable. 

      “It felt fresh to me, showing more of the instep,” he says. “I didn’t want to make them look vintage or old, from a particular era, just fresh and elegant. So I started making them myself in the factories I was working with, and people started asking me where they could buy them.”

      Vintage 1980s alligator loafers with a low vamp

      I’ve been wearing an old pair of 1980s Ralph Lauren loafers quite a lot since I found them on eBay a couple of years ago, which is a coincidence – that’s them pictured above, and they were also in this article on wearing black shoes with jeans.  

      The style is slightly unusual and more feminine, although that’s also subjective – a lot of those 80s suits that were seen as so masculine were worn with slim, low-vamped Italian shoes.

      And I’ve found both my old Ralph ones and these Gasparinis very wearable. In fact, probably more wearable than the Belgian loafers from Baudoin & Lange and others that have been so popular for the last 15 years or so. They feel simpler and more classic. 

      The Gasparini loafer doesn’t have some of the innovations of the B&L Sagan, but I don’t find it any less comfortable. This is partly due to the quality of the materials – the full leather sock and lining is really nice even against bare skin – but there is also a thin layer of padding on the insole.

      The suede loafer with its turned top edge (so no stitching)

      “Initially I made the shoes in Milan, because it was easy – I was flying home to Como from London all the time, so I could stop in and see them,” says Gasparini. “But they mostly made women’s shoes there, and you could feel they were too perfect and too delicate.

      He moved the production to a small workshop in the Marche, which makes more men’s shoes, and preferred that: “The attitude with womenswear is just always to keep things clean and perfect, but the men’s is about craft that makes things look better with age, which I love.” 

      He did keep some of the elements from those first designs. For example, the suede loafers have a turned finish on the top line, so there’s no visible seam. I like that as a detail, particularly because it’s so subtle.

      Gasparini used a Blake-stitched sole to get the slimness he wanted, but he likes a Goodyear welt as well, and there will be future styles in that style. He also insisted on a hidden channel on the sole, so the stitching isn’t visible, which makes it rather more refined.

      Cléa Carlier of @classic_nonchalance in a pair of the loafers

      I got the smooth-leather model in black because I know how much I wore those Ralph ones and my EG Piccadilly loafers in that colour.

      Compared to Edward Green (or another English Goodyear-welted style) the Gasparini loafers are slightly more casual and easier to wear with warm weather pieces, like a linen trouser – but I’d say the difference is really more a style choice. 

      It used to be that loafers like this were referred to generically as Italian loafers, because so many came from Italian makers or brands – whereas English and American shoes were welted and chunkier. The division is less stark these days, but that’s still a good way to think of the style. It’s a question of which you prefer, and you probably don’t need both. Though of course there’s nothing stopping you.

      Alessandro Gasparini shoes are only currently available on his website; the only wholesale is in Japan. The shoes fit true to size and Simon wears his regular size of 9 UK. 

      The cotton suit shown at top is from Luca Museo and will be reviewed separately. The white cotton jacket is from Whitcomb & Shaftesbury and was covered in detail recently on two articles, here and here. 

      <!–

      –>



      Source link

      Cantor and Securitize Partner to Bring IPOs On-chain – NFT Plazas Cantor and Securitize Partner to Bring IPOs On-chain

        0
        Cantor and Securitize Partner to Bring IPOs On-chain – NFT Plazas Cantor and Securitize Partner to Bring IPOs On-chain


        Cantor Fitzgerald and Securitize announced a partnership on July 15 to bring IPOs and follow-on offerings by public companies onto blockchain infrastructure, in an effort to expand tokenization from secondary market trading to the primary capital-raising process of traditional capital markets.

        Cantor Turns to Securitize for On-chain IPOs

        Cantor Fitzgerald is attempting to forge a new path for traditional capital markets by partnering with Securitize to bring IPOs and follow-on offerings of public companies onto blockchain infrastructure. In their July 15 announcement, the two parties stated that this model will still operate within the framework of traditional capital markets, but will use tokenization to issue, distribute, and manage securities in a more digital manner.

        If successfully implemented for IPOs, it will touch the very core of equity capital markets, where the primary capital-raising process still relies heavily on multiple layers of intermediaries and highly manual post-trade verification processes. For Cantor, this is a way to transition its ECM and trading capabilities onto a new infrastructure layer; for Securitize, it is an opportunity to push tokenization technology deeper into public securities issuance.

        How On-chain IPOs Would Work

        According to the announcement, Cantor will be in charge of market structure and distribution, while Securitize will provide the infrastructure for issuing, distributing, and servicing tokenized securities. In this model, the blockchain does not replace the entire IPO process but instead serves as the infrastructure layer for recording, transferring, and managing ownership rights.

        Investors will still participate in an offering following the logic of traditional capital markets, but the securities can be represented as tokens on the blockchain. Securitize emphasized that the implementation remains within an “established capital markets framework,” meaning it must still adhere to existing requirements regarding offerings, custody, settlement, and transaction oversight.

        The inclusion of Securitize Markets, LLC, an SEC-registered broker-dealer, in this structure demonstrates that the model is designed to operate within the existing regulatory system. The novelty lies in how the infrastructure is more digitalized, not in bypassing securities regulations.

        Securitize’s Track Record

        Securitize was founded in 2017 and has built a highly distinct position in the tokenized assets sector. According to Securitize, the company now manages over $5 billion in assets as of July 2026 and stated that it has tokenized over $4 billion in assets. Among its most prominent products is BlackRock’s BUIDL, a tokenized treasury fund that has been closely watched by the market over the past year.

        The company also recently went public under the ticker SECZ following a SPAC merger deal involving Cantor Fitzgerald, with a valuation of approximately $1.25 billion, according to previously reported sources. Securitize shares rose following the partnership news with Cantor, showing that investors are viewing this agreement as part of the company’s expansion story, rather than just a media-focused announcement.

        Why Wall Street Is Moving Toward Tokenization

        The Cantor-Securitize agreement comes at a time when Wall Street is ramping up broad-scale tokenization testing. The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the DTCC is launching a trial to tokenize stocks and Treasury bonds with nearly 40 participating institutions, including JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, BlackRock, Vanguard, and the NYSE. The participation of many major names indicates that tokenization is gradually shifting from an experimental topic to a direction for upgrading financial infrastructure.

        Wall Street is interested in tokenization because traditional issuance and trading processes still pass through many intermediary layers, creating friction in ownership registration, settlement, and distribution. Tokenization is expected to reduce these frictions, increase tracking capabilities, and expand distribution reach while remaining within existing regulatory frameworks.

        What to Watch Next

        This model will only be proven once a first issuer actually uses it. The agreement currently only opens up a path for on-chain IPOs and follow-on offerings, while the actual impact will only become clear once the first transaction occurs.

        Operational details will also determine how far the model can go, from voting rights, dividends, and transfer restrictions to final settlement.

        Another point to watch is whether on-chain offerings will start with follow-on offerings or go straight into primary IPOs. If follow-on offerings prove effective, it could serve as a stepping stone for larger deals later on.





        Source link

        The Ultimate Energy Race: Why Billions Are Pouring Into Nuclear Fusion Right Now | Metaverse Planet

        The Ultimate Energy Race: Why Billions Are Pouring Into Nuclear Fusion Right Now | Metaverse Planet


        I was digging through the latest energy sector reports over my morning coffee, and a specific number practically jumped off the screen: $4.48 billion. That is the staggering amount of fresh capital injected into private nuclear fusion startups just since July 2025.

        If you’ve been following my updates here on Metaverse Planet, you know I’ve been tracking the explosion of artificial intelligence, advanced robotics, and heavy compute data centers. But here is the reality we are slamming into: all of these futuristic technologies are incredibly power-hungry. We are building the brains of the future, but our current electrical grids are running out of juice to feed them.

        That is exactly why the world’s deepest pockets are suddenly racing to build a star on Earth. Let’s break down why fusion energy has officially moved from a sci-fi pipedream into a cutthroat financial arms race, and what it means for our immediate future.

        The AI Catalyst: Why Now?

        For decades, the running joke in the scientific community was that “fusion is always 30 years away.” But the joke isn’t funny anymore, mostly because big tech can’t afford to wait.

        According to the latest data from the Fusion Industry Association (FIA), the sector saw a massive 69% year-over-year increase in investments. We are looking at a cumulative $14.2 billion poured into 56 private fusion companies since 2021.

        Why the sudden urgency? It’s simple: Artificial Intelligence. The sheer scale of data centers required to train next-generation LLMs and render spatial computing environments is pushing our legacy power grids to their absolute limits. Tech giants realize that solar and wind, while crucial, aren’t dense or consistent enough to power gigawatt-scale AI infrastructure 24/7.

        Fusion offers the ultimate holy grail:

        Zero greenhouse gas emissions.Virtually limitless fuel (derived mostly from seawater).No long-lived radioactive waste (unlike traditional nuclear fission, there is no risk of a meltdown or toxic legacy).

        Following the Money: The Big Four

        When you look closely at where this $4.48 billion went over the last year, it’s not evenly distributed. More than half of all recent investments were swallowed up by just four heavyweight contenders. I’ve been keeping a close eye on these specific players because they are the ones setting the pace:

        Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS): Spun out of MIT, they are leveraging groundbreaking high-temperature superconducting (HTS) magnets.Inertia Enterprises: Pushing the boundaries of alternative confinement models.Helion Energy: Backed by serious tech money (including Sam Altman), they have one of the most aggressive and fascinating roadmaps in the industry.Proxima Fusion: A rising European star focusing on stellarator designs.

        The Engineering Bottlenecks (The Reality Check)

        I’m incredibly optimistic, but I want to keep us grounded in reality. The industry target right now is to achieve commercial electricity generation by the early 2030s. That is less than a decade away. But we have some massive engineering hurdles to clear first.

        The most famous problem is the “Net Energy” challenge. For a long time, it took more power to spark the fusion reaction than the reaction actually produced. We’ve seen breakthroughs recently where we crossed that breakeven point, but we need to do it at a commercial, continuous scale.

        Then there is the materials science nightmare. When you smash light atomic nuclei (like hydrogen isotopes) together at extreme temperatures and pressures, you release an intense flux of high-energy neutrons. Right now, there are very few materials on Earth that can withstand being bombarded by these neutrons for years on end without degrading. Upgrading our reactor walls is just as critical as the plasma physics itself.

        The Tech Race: Tokamaks vs. Lasers vs. Direct Conversion

        If you want to understand this space, you have to know how these companies are actually trying to bottle a star. There are a few competing philosophies, and honestly, the engineering behind them is mind-blowing.

        1. Magnetic Confinement (Tokamaks and Stellarators)

        This is the classic approach used by massive international projects like ITER in France. Imagine a giant, donut-shaped vacuum chamber. Inside, plasma is heated to millions of degrees (hotter than the core of our sun). To keep this ultra-hot plasma from touching and instantly melting the walls, engineers use massive magnetic fields to suspend it in mid-air.

        With the recent invention of high-temperature superconducting magnets, companies are now shrinking these massive, building-sized reactors down to the size of a large room. It completely changes the economics.

        2. Inertial Confinement (Laser Fusion)

        Instead of giant magnets, this method uses the world’s most powerful lasers. They take a tiny pellet of fuel—literally the size of a peppercorn—and blast it from all sides simultaneously with perfectly timed laser beams. The outer layer of the pellet explodes, driving a shockwave inward that compresses the core so violently that fusion occurs in a fraction of a second.

        3. Direct Electrical Conversion (The Helion Approach)

        This is my personal favorite because it skips a step that has always felt archaic to me. Traditionally, whether it’s coal, fission, or fusion, the goal is just to create heat, boil water, make steam, and spin a turbine. It’s a 19th-century method attached to 21st-century physics.

        Companies like Helion Energy are trying to bypass the steam turbine entirely. They are working on capturing the electromagnetic energy released by the expanding fusion plasma and converting it directly into electricity. If they can pull this off reliably, commercial power plants will be drastically smaller, vastly more efficient, and incredibly cheap to build.

        The Geopolitical and Financial Shift

        We are also witnessing a major shift in how this tech is funded. In the United States, the fusion race is heavily driven by private venture capital and tech billionaires. Meanwhile, China is taking a different route, with massive, state-backed public funding that currently dwarfs the US government’s official fusion budget.

        But Wall Street is about to get involved. The era of fusion being purely a secretive R&D experiment is ending. Companies are gearing up to go public. General Fusion (based in Canada) has already announced plans for a US IPO, and Google-backed TAE Technologies is mapping out a similar public offering. Soon, retail investors will be able to buy a piece of the fusion dream.

        My Final Thoughts

        I truly believe we are living through the final years of energy scarcity. The sheer volume of capital—$14.2 billion and climbing—combined with the absolute necessity driven by the AI boom, guarantees that we are going to crack this code. The 2030s are shaping up to be the decade where human civilization graduates to a Type I civilization energy model.

        I’m curious to hear your take on this massive shift. If companies like Helion and Commonwealth hit their 2030 targets, how do you think unlimited, nearly free clean energy will change the global economy? Let’s discuss in the comments!

        You Might Also Like;



        Source link

        Ostium Pauses Trading After Security Incident Amid $23.75M Exploit – NFT Plazas Ostium Pauses Trading After Security Incident Amid $23.75M Exploit

        0
        Ostium Pauses Trading After Security Incident Amid .75M Exploit – NFT Plazas Ostium Pauses Trading After Security Incident Amid .75M Exploit


        On the morning of July 16, Ostium announced that it had paused trading following a security incident, while on-chain trackers flagged a large flow of funds from wallets associated with the protocol. According to Ostium, users’ positions remain open but cannot be modified, while traders’ margin remains untouched within the frozen smart contracts. The protocol has not yet announced the final technical cause or recovery timeline, but the incident has immediately placed Ostium at the center of the DeFi market’s attention.

        What Happened

        Ostium stated that a security incident occurred between 14:18 and 14:23 UTC, prompting the protocol to pause trading and lock trading contracts. The team said they detected anomalies within minutes and quickly coordinated with stakeholders to isolate the risk.

        Although Ostium has not specified the technical cause of the incident, the protocol had to halt trading, lock the relevant smart contracts, and keep users’ positions frozen in an unmodifiable state. This suggests that the immediate impact lies not in the complete disappearance of the system, but in the suspension of trading activities to isolate the risk.

        How the Funds Moved On-Chain

        According to Lookonchain, approximately 23.75 million USDC was drained from Ostium. This amount was subsequently swapped into 12,084 ETH, equivalent to an average price of around $1,966 USD/ETH at the time of the transaction. From there, the majority of the ETH was further transferred to Tornado Cash, indicating that the funds were layered very quickly after leaving the protocol.

        Arkham also labeled multiple addresses within the cluster associated with the “Ostium Exploiter,” showing that the funds did not just go straight from the exploit wallet to Tornado Cash, but also bounced between intermediary addresses before entering the mixer. Some transactions were split into multiple ETH batches, indicating that the assets were intentionally layered in the early stages after leaving the protocol.

        Why the Incident Resonates Across DeFi

        Ostium is an on-chain perpetual trading protocol that enables trading of stocks, commodities, and forex under a self-custody model. With such a structure, this incident is not just a technical disruption but also directly impacts a DeFi product that is attempting to bridge closer to real-world trading infrastructure.

        For a protocol positioning itself as an alternative layer to the traditional trading experience, any incident immediately brings up questions about the resilience of the model, user protection capabilities, and the level of reliance on intervention mechanisms during a crisis. This is the part that makes the incident resonate beyond the initial damage figures.

        Oracle Risk Returns to the Forefront

        Ostium has not released the final technical cause, but the incident has brought pricing, oracle, and liquidation logic back into the spotlight. For perpetual protocols, even a brief price deviation or an error in how prices are updated can result in real losses.

        What makes the incident more noteworthy is how the market is reading it: not just as a fund drain, but as another sign that DeFi’s valuation layer remains vulnerable. This is especially notable as protocols continue to expand into stocks, commodities, and FX. For perpetual protocols, this type of risk lies not only in the code, but also in how prices are fetched, updated, and used to process positions in real-time.

        Recovery Efforts and Next Steps

        Ostium stated that they are working continuously to determine the recovery timeline for smart contract operations and asset retrieval, but have not provided a specific timeframe. For now, the protocol’s focus remains on investigating the incident, tracking the drained funds, and preparing a clearer postmortem.

        On the users’ side, the most critical questions remain the final extent of the damage, what portion of the funds can be recovered, and when trading can resume. Until Ostium provides further official updates, the situation remains open-ended on both the technical and user-impact fronts.





        Source link

        Cooper Hoffman Emerges as Rumored Frontrunner for MCU Cyclops

          0
          Cooper Hoffman Emerges as Rumored Frontrunner for MCU Cyclops


          Tom Holland has offered a mysterious new tease about Spider-Man: Brand New Day, revealing that the true meaning behind the film’s title may not become clear until its final shot.

          Speaking in the new Disney+ documentary Generations: The Evolution of Spider-Man, Holland suggested that the “brand new day” referenced in the title is not where Peter Parker’s latest story begins.

          “The ‘Brand New Day’ of this movie, it isn’t the beginning,” Holland said. “It’s the last frame of this movie.”

          The cryptic comment has immediately sparked theories about how the upcoming Marvel Studios and Sony Pictures film could end. While the title initially appeared to reference Peter beginning a new life following the events of Spider-Man: No Way Home, Holland’s statement suggests the movie may instead conclude with a major transformation or new beginning for the character.

          At the end of No Way Home, Doctor Strange’s spell caused the entire world to forget Peter Parker. Peter was left completely alone, separated from MJ and Ned while continuing to protect New York City as Spider-Man.

          Some fans believe the final frame could show Peter finally accepting his new life and moving forward from everything he lost. Others think the ending may reveal that the physical changes and evolving powers teased in the film are permanent, creating a dramatically different version of Spider-Man moving forward.

          A more extreme theory connects Holland’s comments to unconfirmed rumors involving the symbiote and Peter potentially being brought back from the dead. Other fans have suggested the “brand new day” could introduce another Spider-Man, including the long-awaited arrival of Miles Morales in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

          None of those theories have been confirmed, and Holland’s carefully worded tease could ultimately point toward a more emotional conclusion rather than a massive franchise changing twist.

          The comment does make one thing clear. Whatever happens during the final moments of Spider-Man: Brand New Dayappears likely to establish the next chapter of Peter Parker’s journey in the MCU.

          Directed by Destin Daniel Cretton, Spider-Man: Brand New Day stars Tom Holland, Zendaya, Jacob Batalon, Mark Ruffalo, Jon Bernthal and Sadie Sink.

          Spider-Man: Brand New Day arrives in theaters on July 31, 2026.



          Source link

          Leaks Reveal Suno Fed Thousands of Hours of Deezer, YouTube and Pond5 Data Into Its AI – Decrypt

          0
          Leaks Reveal Suno Fed Thousands of Hours of Deezer, YouTube and Pond5 Data Into Its AI – Decrypt



          In brief

          A hacker using the Shai-Hulud worm breached Suno in 2025 and leaked source code showing the platform scraped over 113,000 hours from YouTube Music, 62,000 from stock library Pond5, and 12,000 from Deezer, among other sources.
          The same intrusion reached customer emails, phone numbers, and Stripe payment data for what the hacker describes as hundreds of thousands of users.
          Suno’s own California compliance disclosure had already acknowledged that its training data may include music “subject to intellectual property protection”

          A hacker broke into AI music platform Suno and walked out with source code that documents, in precise detail, exactly where the company’s training data came from.

          The breach was first reported by 404 Media, which reviewed the leaked files. It confirms what the music industry had been saying in courts since 2024.

          The intruder claims to have used a piece of malware called the Shai-Hulud worm—named after the enormous sandworms in Frank Herbert’s Dune. Suno, one of the largest AI music generators online, lets users type a text description and receive a full song in seconds; building that capability required a substantial training dataset—a collection of audio files used to teach the model what different genres and styles sound like.

          

          The leaked material consists of scraping instructions and internal logs from 2023 and 2024, offering a rare look at how those pipelines are actually assembled.

          The dataset breakdown is specific. According to internal file comments reviewed by 404 Media, the training library included 113,879 hours of YouTube Music, 152,162 hours of tagged YouTube tracks, 62,117 hours from stock music library Pond5, 12,287 hours from Deezer, and 17,615 hours in a dataset labeled genius_hq, associated with material collected through Genius. The code also documented plans to download roughly 1 million hours of podcast audio via RSS feeds.

          One internal file tracking YouTube Music ingestion alone logged 2,013,545 music clips. That’s millions of recordings covering decades of audio—and the appetite wasn’t limited to music.

          The hacker claimed to have accessed records associated with hundreds of thousands of customers, including emails, phone numbers, and Stripe-related information. Suno disputes that sensitive personal information was compromised.

          The company says it identified the incident in November 2025 and called it “limited.” Suno determined the exposure primarily involved outdated source code no longer in use and concluded that individual customer notifications weren’t required under applicable privacy laws. Users are only finding that out now, through news coverage.

          Here’s the thing: Suno had already told anyone willing to read its own website that something like this was happening. Under California’s AB 2013 law—which requires AI companies to disclose their training practices—the company publicly acknowledged that its training data may include music “subject to intellectual property protection,” and listed the corpus at tens of millions of publicly available music audio files. What the hack adds is specificity: The legal filing was vague by design, and the leaked code is not.

          The scope of AI music training was already becoming clear before anyone breached anything. In June 2026, The Atlantic published four searchable databases documenting music used to train AI models—one containing 12 million tracks, another with 9 million, and two more with around 100,000 each. You could look up your favorite artist before a hacker handed anyone source code.

          The Recording Industry Association of America had alleged in a 2025 amendment to its original 2024 lawsuit against Suno that the company was ripping songs directly from YouTube—an accusation Suno contested under a fair use defense. The suit sought $150,000 per infringement incident. The hacked source code corroborates the RIAA’s central allegation.

          Udio, which was targeted in a parallel lawsuit filed by the same major-label coalition, settled with Warner Music in November 2025 and is now transitioning to a licensed platform. Suno’s case with Sony and UMG remains active in federal court; the company’s valuation sits at $5.4 billion with around 100 million users on the platform.

          Suno did not immediately respond to a request for comment by Decrypt.

          Daily Debrief Newsletter

          Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.





          Source link

          Popular Posts

          My Favorites

          The Last Bullet – A Cowboy shooter for the ZX Spectrum...

          0
          Bubble in Trouble and Driar wasn't the only games released this week for the speccy, as thanks to the developer letting us know...