Home Blog Page 1064

CryptoQuant: Binance Short Squeeze Pressure Signals Potential Bitcoin Price Volatility

CryptoQuant: Binance Short Squeeze Pressure Signals Potential Bitcoin Price Volatility


CryptoQuant’s analysis reveals Binance short squeeze pressure driving Bitcoin price movements, with historical patterns suggesting sharp rallies as traders face liquidations.

Understanding Binance Short Squeeze Pressure

On May 26, 2025, CryptoQuant shared an insightful analysis highlighting the impact of Binance’s short squeeze pressure on Bitcoin’s price dynamics. 

The chart illustrates Bitcoin’s price movements from April 20 to May 24, 2025, alongside Binance short and long squeeze pressure. Key periods of short squeeze activity, marked by sharp spikes in pressure, correlate with significant price increases.

Understanding Binance Short Squeeze Pressure

Source: CryptoQuant

For instance, a short squeeze in early May, following a low-volatility phase, propelled Bitcoin’s price from $88,000 to $104,000 within days. Another short squeeze signal around mid-May preceded a rally to $111,000, Bitcoin’s all-time high at the time.

Short squeezes occur when traders holding short positions are forced to close due to rising prices, triggering a cascade of buy orders that amplify the upward momentum. This metric is particularly useful for identifying moments when short sellers are under pressure, often leading to rapid price surges.

Historical data from the chart shows consistent patterns: periods of low volatility followed by short squeeze signals have repeatedly resulted in Bitcoin price breakouts, a trend also observed in early 2024 when Bitcoin hit $70,000 post-ETF approvals.

Short Squeeze and Large Long Positions Indicate a Broader Breakout

The current market environment, as of May 26, 2025, aligns with these historical patterns. Bitcoin BTC recently recovered to $109,000 after a dip to $106,800, driven by President Trump’s decision to delay EU tariffs.

However, Binance data indicates that 62% of traders with open BTC positions are short, increasing the likelihood of another short squeeze if Bitcoin breaks above $110,000. 

Short Squeeze and Large Long Positions Indicate a Broader BreakoutShort Squeeze and Large Long Positions Indicate a Broader Breakout

Source: CoinGlass

CoinGlass reports $108 million in short liquidations over the past 24 hours, underscoring the pressure on bearish traders. This dynamic is further amplified by institutional activity, such as the famous whale James Wynn on Hyperliquid, which saw a $75 million BTC long position opened.

Short Squeeze and Large Long Positions Indicate a Broader BreakoutShort Squeeze and Large Long Positions Indicate a Broader Breakout

Source: Hyperliquid

The broader market context also supports potential volatility. The Crypto Fear and Greed Index remains in the “Greed” zone, reflecting bullish sentiment, while open interest in Bitcoin futures rose 1.96% to $76 billion. 

Coupled with short squeeze pressure and macroeconomic uncertainties like evolving trade policies, Bitcoin’s price could experience significant swings.

Traders should focus on capitalizing on this momentum by prioritizing long positions: look to enter a long trade if BTC consolidates above $110,000 and shows bullish confirmation (e.g., a strong green candle with high volume) on Tuesday or Wednesday, targeting $115,000–$118,000. For shorter-term plays, scalp long positions on pullbacks to $108,000 with tight stop-losses at $106,800 to minimize risk. 

Given the risk of a short squeeze amplifying price surges, avoid opening short positions this week, as bearish bets could face significant losses if the upward momentum persists.



Source link

How Web3, NFTs, and the Metaverse Are Becoming Mainstream | NFT News Today

How Web3, NFTs, and the Metaverse Are Becoming Mainstream | NFT News Today


A few years ago, many people associated blockchain almost exclusively with Bitcoin. Today, it encompasses entire online ecosystems where gamers, artists, entrepreneurs, and casual observers come together to explore new methods of interaction and investment. A classic arcade enthusiast might find the concept of virtual worlds—where digital assets have real-world value—both thrilling and perplexing. This mixture of wonder and curiosity is typical of individuals who encounter Web3 for the first time.

Why Web3 Resonates with Everyday Enthusiasts

Instead of relying on large, centralized platforms, Web3 expands the internet into a decentralized system in which ownership can be shared among participants. One might compare it to a community co-op on a global scale, where shared responsibility and equal footing are the norm. This framework allows for the seamless use and creation of NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), which serve as digital certificates of authenticity for unique items—ranging from art and music to sports memorabilia and in-game assets.

NFTs show us the creative and financial potential of digital spaces. For example an online player can upgrade a rare sword in a fantasy game and then sell that item to another player without a middleman. This level of autonomy encourages experimentation and investment in virtual worlds.

Growth of Blockchain Gaming

Blockchain gaming introduces a new spin on traditional gameplay. Anyone who has participated in a tournament where each playable asset—such as a race car or a character skin—is tokenized will attest to the sense of genuine ownership. Transferring upgraded items or collectibles can be executed directly between individuals, fostering a social and economic dynamic that keeps players engaged.

Many are drawn to the transparency of blockchain. Matches, trades and tournament results are recorded on a public ledger so there is no hidden fees or manipulation. Some skeptics are now acknowledging blockchain’s role in creating fairer digital marketplaces.

The Metaverse as a Shared Digital Space

The Metaverse builds on these ideas by creating immersive, continuous virtual spaces that merge socializing, productivity, and entertainment. It allows users to attend virtual concerts, collaborate in 3D workplaces, and pop into coffee shops—all without leaving a single connected environment. Digital avatars roam freely across interconnected platforms, carrying or wearing blockchain-based items that hold value beyond typical game currencies.

Despite the excitement, many newcomers still wonder how something like “virtual real estate” can hold genuine worth. Yet businesses have already begun investing in this domain, establishing virtual properties, stores, and event venues that capitalize on the growing demand for online experiences.

Opportunities at the Intersection of Business and Innovation

Beyond gaming and virtual concerts, industries are looking into Web3 to solve many challenges. Decentralized finance solutions provide secure, transparent transactions and new marketplaces to monetize digital assets. For companies looking to integrate blockchain infrastructure, the right experts can ensure safety, scalability and compliance.

One such resource involves tapping into the financial software development services offerings by Svitla to secure robust technical backing for new Web3 ventures. Proper guidance can be the difference between managing a successful project and facing unforeseen hurdles in digital asset management or smart contract deployment.

Embracing a New Online Frontier

The Web3 revolution is still in its formative stage. Skeptics and enthusiasts exist side by side, each testing the waters of decentralized marketplaces and immersive virtual realities. While it can be easy to get swept up in the hype, genuine innovation is unfolding every day. Novices and early adopters alike are discovering new passions—be it a first NFT purchase or a deep dive into blockchain gaming—and forging collaborative ventures in online worlds that continue to expand.

One of the greatest advantages of this frontier is the inclusivity it fosters. Individuals from different backgrounds can gather, create, and invest in ways never before imagined. Technology undoubtedly plays a vital role, yet the real driving force remains the collective human desire to connect, explore, and share unique experiences in an ever-evolving digital landscape.



Source link

Supra Unveils Threshold AI Oracles to Power Smarter On-Chain Decisions | NFT News Today

Supra Unveils Threshold AI Oracles to Power Smarter On-Chain Decisions | NFT News Today


Supra is aiming to rewrite the Oracle rulebook with its new AI-driven protocol to enhance decentralized reasoning.

Blockchain infrastructure firm Supra has introduced a new oracle system, “Threshold AI Oracles,” marking a significant leap in on-chain intelligence. Unlike traditional oracles that feed data into smart contracts, Supra’s system brings real-time, context-aware AI reasoning—enabled by domain-specialist agents operating in decentralized committees—directly onto its Layer-1 blockchain.

AI Committees, Not Just Data Pipes

Supra’s use of multi-agent AI committees is at the heart of the innovation. These agents don’t just retrieve data—they deliberate. Each committee comprises specialized agents trained in domain-specific knowledge such as finance, law, or technical infrastructure.

This allows dApps to ask complex, context-rich questions like whether a regulatory change has actually taken effect or if market sentiment supports a liquidation. The agents exchange arguments and build consensus before issuing a judgment—mirroring real-world expert panels in process design, as outlined in their technical whitepaper.

Verifiability Baked In

To establish trust, Supra has embedded threshold BLS cryptographic signatures into every AI decision. A quorum of decentralized AI agents must reach consensus before an output is signed and shared. This creates a verifiable trail and removes the need for centralized trust or opaque AI plugins—decisions are both transparent and tamper-proof.

Smarter, Cheaper, On Demand

The Threshold AI model activates only when summoned by a smart contract or when on-chain triggers occur. This just-in-time architecture significantly reduces gas fees and ensures scalability, providing intelligence only when needed.

Three-Phase Rollout

Supra is deploying the protocol in stages:

Phase 1: Basic outputs like yes/no answers and sentiment scores

Phase 2: JSON-structured commands for automating processes across DeFi and DAOs

Phase 3: Full smart contract code generation, enabling dApps to evolve autonomously

Source: Supra

Real-World Impact

This protocol opens new horizons for applications in:

Dynamic DeFi strategy execution – dApps could respond to evolving market sentiment in real-time, adjusting trading or lending strategies automatically.

Automated DAO governance – Proposals can be evaluated by AI agents for relevance, feasibility, or legal implications before going to a vote, streamlining decision-making.

Prediction market resolution – AI committees can assess nuanced, real-world events (e.g., election outcomes or policy changes) to settle markets accurately and fairly.

Smart contracts triggered by off-chain events – External developments like regulatory shifts, supply chain disruptions, or news headlines can activate on-chain responses without manual input.

Regulatory compliance checks in real-time – Financial applications can verify if a new rule has taken effect or applies to a transaction, helping prevent violations.

Automated insurance claim assessments – AI agents could evaluate conditions and documentation to determine payout eligibility.

Adaptive logic in on-chain gaming – Game mechanics can evolve dynamically based on player behaviour or broader community activity.

Beyond Traditional Oracles

While traditional oracles, like Chainlink, mainly supply raw data like prices or timestamps, Supra’s AI-driven oracles aim to go a step further—analyzing, interpreting, and verifying the information before passing it on. This approach would help dApps make better-informed decisions, without relying on off-chain systems or centralized services.

Fully Integrated Stack

Threshold AI Oracles are tightly integrated with Supra’s broader platform, which includes smart contracts, native price feeds, and cross-chain messaging. The protocol leverages a layered committee structure to ensure both scalability and resistance to manipulation.

Developers can explore features and access demos through the company’s Developer Hub. With Threshold AI Oracles, Supra is positioning itself at the forefront of intelligent blockchain automation—enabling a new era of smart contracts that don’t just act, but think.



Source link

Jordan Banjo reveals relationship ‘pressure’ ahead of milestone with wife Naomi: ‘I’m finished’

    0
    Jordan Banjo reveals relationship ‘pressure’ ahead of milestone with wife Naomi: ‘I’m finished’


    Jordan Banjo has opened up about the “stress” of keeping the spark alive with his wife Naomi as they approach their 10th anniversary.

    The 32-year-old Diversity dancer, Kiss Breakfast host and dad-of-three is juggling a packed schedule while planning to celebrate a decade of love, and he admits the bar has been set high by his other half.

    Jordan Banjo and Naomi share three children: Cassius, seven, Mayowa, five, and Tre, two.

    While Jordan is no stranger to performing under pressure, he admits that when it comes to romance, Naomi has him beat.

    Jordan Banjo on relationship with wife Naomi

    In an exclusive chat with OK!, Jordan opened up about the challenges of balancing it all.

    “Oh man, I’m stressed about it!” he laughed when asked about their upcoming 10-year anniversary in September.

    “The pressure’s on. When we were together for a year, I thought I’d done alright with a bracelet and a nice meal. Then I woke up to balloons in the hallway, Polaroids with handwritten messages on the back saying why she loves me. I was like, ‘I’m finished.’ She smashes it every time. For 10 years, I might need the kids to form a choir or something!”

    Despite his busy schedule, Jordan tries to make family time count, like their spontaneous Easter trip to Disneyland.

    “Though I’m still busy, I’m only busy with things I genuinely care about. I’m lucky to choose projects I’m passionate about. Being a dad has forced me to put things in perspective. Work is important, but it’s about balancing it with being present for the kids and not neglecting your relationship with your partner.”

    Jordan opened up about his relationship with his wife Naomi (Credit: ITV)

    ‘Three is my limit!’

    As for growing the family, Jordan is very clear: he and Naomi are done. He admitted that three is his “limit”.

    Jordan – who had a vasectomy in 2023 – quipped that he’s already “outnumbered”. He also joked that when he sees friends who have four kids, he wants to “hug them and give them an escape plan”.

    Read more: Loose Men star Jordan Banjo reveals ‘secret’ booze battle: ‘It impacted my relationship and my parenting’

    The Diversity Boys Are Back! Ashley, Jordan & Perri Take On The Podcast World | This Morning

    What do you think? Tell us on our Facebook page @EntertainmentDailyFix.





    Source link

    Binance Alpha will list Puffverse (PFVS)

    Binance Alpha will list Puffverse (PFVS)


    Binance Alpha will be the first platform to feature Puffverse (PFVS) on May 27, 2025.

    $PFVS token details

    Token Name: Puffverse (PFVS) 

    Total Supply: 1,000,000,000 PFVS

    Blockchain: Ronin

    Read more: How to participate IDO on Binance Wallet

    $PFVS on Binance Alpha

    Binance Alpha will begin distributing Puffverse (PFVS) to eligible users. This is the first platform to list and open trading for PFVS tokens.

    Airdrop claim window opens: May 27, 2025

    Eligible users must use Alpha Points to claim their rewards. More details will be announced later.

    About Puffverse (PFVS)

    Puffverse is a multiplayer gaming metaverse centered around its core product, PuffGo Pro, a Web3 battle royale game that blends Web2 gaming experiences with a Web3 economy. 

    About Puffverse (PFVS)

    Puffverse employs a dual-token model with $PFVS and $vePUFF, each serving distinct roles within the ecosystem.

    $PFVS Token: This is the primary utility token used for in-game transactions, such as purchases, creating new maps, joining the PuffGo League, and staking to acquire $vePUFF. It’s the operational currency driving user interactions in the Puffverse ecosystem.$vePUFF Token: A governance token obtained by staking $PFVS at a 100:1 ratio (100 $PFVS for 1 $vePUFF). It grants holders voting rights and additional privileges within the ecosystem, incentivizing long-term commitment.





    Source link

    Building Enterprise-Ready Knowledge Graphs with LLMs in minutes

    Building Enterprise-Ready Knowledge Graphs with LLMs in minutes


    Knowledge graphs have evolved from complex, time-consuming projects to accessible tools developers can implement in minutes. This transformation stems largely from the integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into the graph construction process, turning what once required months of manual work into automated workflows.

    Understanding Knowledge Graphs and Their Value

    Knowledge graphs represent information as interconnected nodes and relationships, creating a web of data that mirrors how information connects in the real world. Unlike traditional databases that store data in rigid tables, knowledge graphs capture the nuanced relationships between entities, making them particularly valuable for complex information retrieval tasks.

    Organizations use knowledge graphs across various applications, from recommendation systems that suggest products based on user behavior to fraud detection systems that identify suspicious patterns across multiple data points. However, their most compelling use case lies in enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems.

    Why Knowledge Graphs Transform RAG Performance

    Traditional RAG systems rely heavily on vector databases and semantic similarity searches. While these approaches work well for straightforward queries, they struggle with complex, multi-faceted questions that require reasoning across multiple data sources.

    Consider this scenario: you manage a research database containing scientific publications and patent information. A vector-based system handles straightforward queries like “What research papers did Dr. Sarah Chen publish in 2023?” effectively because the answer appears directly in embedded document chunks. However, when you ask “Which research teams have collaborated across multiple institutions on AI safety projects?” the system struggles.

    Vector similarity searches depend on explicit mentions within the knowledge base. They cannot synthesize information across different document sections or perform complex reasoning tasks. Knowledge graphs solve this limitation by enabling global dataset reasoning, connecting related entities through explicit relationships that support sophisticated queries.

    The Historical Challenge of Building Knowledge Graphs

    Creating knowledge graphs traditionally required extensive manual effort and specialized expertise. The process involved several challenging steps:

    Manual Entity Extraction: Teams had to identify relevant entities (people, organizations, locations) from unstructured documents manually

    Relationship Mapping: Establishing connections between entities required domain expertise and careful analysis

    Schema Design: Creating consistent data models demanded significant upfront planning

    Data Validation: Ensuring accuracy and consistency across the graph required ongoing maintenance

    These challenges made knowledge graph projects expensive and time-intensive, often taking months to complete even modest implementations. Many organizations abandoned knowledge graph initiatives because the effort required outweighed the potential benefits.

    The LLM Revolution in Graph Construction

    Large Language Models have fundamentally changed knowledge graph construction by automating the most labor-intensive aspects of the process. Modern LLMs excel at understanding context, identifying entities, and recognizing relationships within text, making them natural tools for graph extraction.

    LLMs bring several advantages to knowledge graph construction:

    Automated Entity Recognition: They identify people, organizations, locations, and concepts without manual intervention

    Relationship Extraction: They understand implicit and explicit relationships between entities

    Context Understanding: They maintain context across document sections, reducing information loss

    Scalability: They process large volumes of text quickly and consistently

    Building Your First Knowledge Graph with LangChain

    Let’s walk through a practical implementation using LangChain’s experimental LLMGraphTransformer feature and Neo4j as our graph database.

    Setting Up the Environment

    First, install the required packages:

    pip install neo4j langchain-openai langchain-community langchain-experimental

    Basic Implementation

    The core implementation requires surprisingly little code. Let’s build a knowledge graph for a scientific literature database:

    import os
    from langchain_neo4j import Neo4jGraph
    from langchain_openai import ChatOpenAI
    from langchain_community.document_loaders import PyPDFLoader
    from langchain_experimental.graph_transformers import LLMGraphTransformer

    graph = Neo4jGraph(
    url=os.getenv(“NEO4J_URL”),
    username=os.getenv(“NEO4J_USERNAME”, “neo4j”),
    password=os.getenv(“NEO4J_PASSWORD”),
    )

    llm_transformer = LLMGraphTransformer(
    llm=ChatOpenAI(temperature=0, model_name=“gpt-4-turbo”)
    )

    documents = PyPDFLoader(“research_papers/quantum_computing_survey.pdf”).load()
    graph_documents = llm_transformer.convert_to_graph_documents(documents)

    graph.add_graph_documents(graph_documents)

    This simple implementation transforms research documents into a connected knowledge graph automatically. The LLMGraphTransformer analyzes the papers, identifies researchers, institutions, technologies, and their relationships, then creates the appropriate Neo4j objects for storage.

    Making Knowledge Graphs Enterprise-Ready

    While LLMs simplify knowledge graph creation, the basic implementation requires refinement for production use. Two key improvements significantly enhance graph quality and reliability.

    The default extraction process identifies generic entities and relationships, often missing domain-specific information. You can improve extraction accuracy by explicitly defining the entities and relationships you want to capture:

    llm_transformer = LLMGraphTransformer(
    llm=llm,
    allowed_nodes=[“Researcher”, “Institution”, “Technology”, “Publication”, “Patent”],
    allowed_relationships=[
    (“Researcher”, “AUTHORED”, “Publication”),
    (“Researcher”, “AFFILIATED_WITH”, “Institution”),
    (“Researcher”, “INVENTED”, “Patent”),
    (“Publication”, “CITES”, “Publication”),
    (“Technology”, “USED_IN”, “Publication”),
    (“Institution”, “COLLABORATED_WITH”, “Institution”),
    ],
    node_properties=True,
    )

    This approach provides several benefits:

    Targeted Extraction: The LLM focuses on relevant entities rather than extracting everything

    Consistent Schema: You maintain a predictable graph structure across different documents

    Improved Accuracy: Explicit guidance reduces extraction errors and ambiguities

    Complete Information: The node_properties parameter captures additional entity attributes like publication dates, researcher expertise areas, and technology classifications

    2. Implementing Propositioning for Better Context

    Text often contains implicit references and context that becomes lost during document chunking. For example, a research paper might mention “the algorithm” in one section while defining it as “Graph Neural Network (GNN)” in another. Without proper context, the LLM cannot connect these references effectively.

    Propositioning solves this problem by converting complex text into self-contained, explicit statements before graph extraction:

    from langchain import hub
    from langchain_openai import ChatOpenAI
    from pydantic import BaseModel
    from typing import List

    obj = hub.pull(“wfh/proposal-indexing”)
    llm = ChatOpenAI(model=“gpt-4o”)

    class Sentences(BaseModel):
    sentences: List[str]

    extraction_llm = llm.with_structured_output(Sentences)
    extraction_chain = obj | extraction_llm

    sentences = extraction_chain.invoke(“””
    The team at MIT developed a novel quantum error correction algorithm.
    They collaborated with researchers from Stanford University on this project.
    The algorithm showed significant improvements in quantum gate fidelity compared to previous methods.
    “””
    )

    This process transforms ambiguous text into clear, standalone statements:

    “The team at MIT developed a novel quantum error correction algorithm.”

    “MIT researchers collaborated with researchers from Stanford University on the quantum error correction project.”

    “The quantum error correction algorithm showed significant improvements in quantum gate fidelity compared to previous methods.”

    Each statement now contains complete context, eliminating the risk of lost references during graph extraction.

    Implementation Best Practices

    When building production knowledge graphs, consider these additional practices:

    Data Quality Management

    Implement validation rules to ensure consistency across extractions

    Create feedback loops to identify and correct common extraction errors

    Establish data governance processes for ongoing graph maintenance

    Performance Optimization

    Use batch processing for large document collections

    Implement caching strategies for frequently accessed graph patterns

    Consider graph database indexing for improved query performance

    Schema Evolution

    Design flexible schemas that accommodate new entity types and relationships

    Implement versioning strategies for schema changes

    Plan for data migration processes as requirements evolve

    Security and Access Control

    Implement appropriate authentication and authorization mechanisms

    Consider data sensitivity when designing graph structures

    Establish audit trails for graph modifications

    Measuring Success and ROI

    Successful knowledge graph implementations require clear success metrics:

    Query Performance: Measure response times for complex multi-hop queries

    Information Retrieval Accuracy: Track the relevance of retrieved information

    User Adoption: Monitor how stakeholders engage with the graph-powered applications

    Maintenance Overhead: Assess the ongoing effort required to maintain graph quality

    Future Considerations

    Knowledge graph technology continues evolving rapidly. Stay informed about:

    Improved LLM Capabilities: New models offer better entity recognition and relationship extraction

    Graph Database Innovations: Enhanced query capabilities and performance optimizations

    Integration Opportunities: Better connections with existing enterprise systems and workflows

    Standardization Efforts: Industry standards for graph schemas and interchange formats

    Conclusion

    Large Language Models have transformed knowledge graph construction from a complex, months-long endeavor into an accessible tool that developers can implement quickly. However, moving from proof-of-concept to production-ready systems requires careful attention to extraction control and context preservation.

    The combination of targeted entity extraction and propositioning creates knowledge graphs that capture nuanced relationships and support sophisticated reasoning tasks. While current LLM-based graph extraction tools remain experimental, they provide a solid foundation for building enterprise applications.

    Organizations that embrace these techniques today position themselves to leverage the full potential of their data through connected, queryable knowledge representations. The key lies in understanding both the capabilities and limitations of current tools while implementing the refinements necessary for production deployment.

    As LLM capabilities continue advancing, knowledge graph construction will become even more accessible, making this technology an essential component of modern data architectures. The question for organizations is not whether to adopt knowledge graphs, but how quickly they can implement them effectively.



    Source link

    CoinShares: Digital Asset Inflows Reach $3.3B Last Week, Pushing Year-to-Date Total To Record $10.8B

    CoinShares: Digital Asset Inflows Reach .3B Last Week, Pushing Year-to-Date Total To Record .8B


    In Brief

    CoinShares has reported $3.3 billion in digital asset inflows last week, driving year-to-date totals to a record $10.8 billion, with Bitcoin leading gains.

    CoinShares Reports $3.3B In Weekly Inflows To Digital Asset Investment Products

    European digital asset-focused alternative investment firm CoinShares published its most recent report, noting that digital asset investment products tied to digital currencies recorded inflows totaling approximately $3.3 billion over the past week. This marks the sixth consecutive week of inflows, bringing the cumulative figure over that period to $10.5 billion. 

    Year-to-date inflows have now reached a record $10.8 billion. During the same period, assets under management briefly rose to a historic peak of $187.5 billion. These developments appear to coincide with heightened investor interest in diversification, potentially influenced by economic uncertainty in the United States following a Moody’s credit downgrade and an associated rise in treasury yields.

    The United States accounted for the majority of inflows last week, recording approximately $3.2 billion. Other regions that experienced notable inflows included Germany with $41.5 million, Australia with $10.9 million, and Hong Kong with $33.3 million. In contrast, investors in Switzerland opted to capitalize on recent price increases, resulting in outflows totaling $16.6 million. 

    Bitcoin remained the primary contributor, generating $2.9 billion in inflows, representing roughly one-quarter of total inflows for the year. At the same time, some market participants viewed the price movement as a potential for downside exposure, leading to $12.7 million in inflows into short-Bitcoin products—marking the highest weekly figure since December 2024.

    Ethereum also registered positive momentum with $326 million in inflows, the highest in over three months, continuing a five-week trend of gains. Conversely, XRP’s prolonged streak of 80 consecutive weeks of inflows ended, as it recorded $37.2 million in outflows, the largest ever observed for the asset.

    Bitcoin And Ethereum End The Week Strong After Volatile Highs, Posting Over 6% Weekly Gains

    During the past week, Bitcoin reached a record high of approximately $111,980 on May 22nd, before experiencing a modest pullback to $107,330 on May 23rd, and later stabilizing at around $109,050 by the end of the week. At the time of writing, Bitcoin is trading at $109,756, representing a 6.38% increase over the past seven days.

    Ethereum also showed price volatility, peaking at $2,663.77 on May 22nd and declining slightly the following day. For the remainder of the week, its price hovered near the $2,500 range. As of now, Ethereum is priced at $2,570, reflecting a 6.90% weekly gain based on data from CoinMarketCap.

    Disclaimer

    In line with the Trust Project guidelines, please note that the information provided on this page is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as legal, tax, investment, financial, or any other form of advice. It is important to only invest what you can afford to lose and to seek independent financial advice if you have any doubts. For further information, we suggest referring to the terms and conditions as well as the help and support pages provided by the issuer or advertiser. MetaversePost is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice.

    About The Author


    Alisa, a dedicated journalist at the MPost, specializes in cryptocurrency, zero-knowledge proofs, investments, and the expansive realm of Web3. With a keen eye for emerging trends and technologies, she delivers comprehensive coverage to inform and engage readers in the ever-evolving landscape of digital finance.

    More articles


    Alisa Davidson










    Alisa, a dedicated journalist at the MPost, specializes in cryptocurrency, zero-knowledge proofs, investments, and the expansive realm of Web3. With a keen eye for emerging trends and technologies, she delivers comprehensive coverage to inform and engage readers in the ever-evolving landscape of digital finance.








    More articles



    Source link

    How NFT Collectibles Can Support Eco-Friendly Farming Communities | NFT News Today

    How NFT Collectibles Can Support Eco-Friendly Farming Communities | NFT News Today


    The convergence of blockchain technology and environmental sustainability has created unexpected allies in the push toward more regenerative agricultural practices. Non-fungible tokens (NFTs), once dismissed as merely digital art speculation vehicles, are evolving into powerful fundraising and awareness tools for ecological initiatives. Among the most promising applications is their ability to channel resources toward sustainable farming communities around the world, creating direct connections between digital enthusiasts and land stewardship projects. 

    The Evolution of Purpose-Driven NFTs

    The NFT market has undergone a significant maturation process since its explosive mainstream emergence in 2021. Beyond the headline-grabbing art sales, a new category of impact-focused NFT projects has emerged. These purpose-driven collections, aimed at environmental and social missions, allocate substantial percentages of their proceeds toward specific causes..

    Sustainable agriculture has become a focal point for many such projects, with blockchain communities recognizing the critical importance of regenerative farming practices in addressing climate change, biodiversity loss, and food security. Instead of treating environmental concerns as an afterthought, these NFT collections integrate ecological impact into their core value proposition.

    From Digital Ownership to Real-World Impact

    What distinguishes these agricultural NFTs from conventional charitable giving is the establishment of ongoing relationships between token holders and the farming communities they support. Token ownership often confers:

    Regular updates on project developments and impact metrics;

    Voting rights on fund allocation decisions;

    Virtual or in-person access to supported farming operations;

    Educational content about sustainable agricultural practices;

    Community membership with like-minded sustainability advocates.

    This model transforms traditional donation dynamics into participatory support ecosystems, where backers are connected to the outcomes of their contributions through digital asset ownership. The transparency inherent in blockchain technology enables real-time tracking of how funds are deployed, creating unprecedented accountability in philanthropic agricultural support.

    NFT Projects Supporting Sustainable Agriculture

    Several pioneering NFT collections have demonstrated the potential of this funding model for eco-friendly farming initiatives. Their approaches offer valuable case studies for understanding how digital collectibles can translate into meaningful agricultural impact.

    Regenerative Farming NFT Initiatives

    One significant real-world example is Treedom, which connects NFT technology with actual tree planting initiatives. Through projects like “One Million Trees NFT,” digital artwork purchases directly fund tree planting efforts in various regions.. This creates a tangible link between digital assets and physical environmental restoration.

    Similarly, Dimitra has launched a notable agricultural NFT initiative that began with 1,000 avocado trees in Kenya. Their Real-World Asset NFT (RWA-NFT) program tokenizes agricultural assets like crops, trees, and carbon credits, enabling farmers to access new funding avenues while promoting sustainable practices. 

    Blockchain Support for Specialized Cultivation

    The NFT funding model has proven particularly valuable for more specialized agricultural niches that may face challenges securing traditional funding. Several projects have focused on supporting heritage crop preservation, indigenous farming practices, and alternative cultivation approaches that promote biodiversity and sustainability.

    Some collections have emerged around themes of cannabis cultivation, highlighting the plant’s potential as a sustainable crop when grown with ecological methods. These projects emphasize how certain cannabis varieties like those grown from ILGM autoflower seeds represent low-resource cultivation options, requiring less water, energy, and processing than many conventional crops. The autoflowering characteristic, which allows plants to flower based on age rather than light cycles, reduces energy requirements, making it relevant to discussions about agricultural sustainability and resource efficiency.

    Transparent Supply Chain Verification

    Beyond direct funding, NFT technology offers significant potential for agricultural supply chain verification. AgriDex, a Solana-based platform that raised $5 million in funding, implements NFT-based systems to tokenize agricultural commodities. Each transaction on their marketplace is secured by minting an NFT that records all key transaction details, creating immutable proof for supply chain tracking. This approach helps:

    Document production methods through immutable records.

    Verify ecological certification standards compliance.

    Track carbon offsetting associated with agricultural operations.

    Authenticate fair labor practices throughout the supply chain.

    Validate organic and sustainable growing methods.

    These verification systems help conscientious consumers connect directly with farming communities committed to ecological practices, ensuring premium prices reach those implementing sustainable methods rather than intermediaries.

    Community Building Through Digital Collectibles

    One of the most powerful aspects of agricultural NFT projects is their ability to forge communities around specific ecological farming initiatives. 

    Educational Components and Knowledge Transfer

    Many agricultural NFT projects incorporate substantial educational elements, using their platforms to raise awareness about sustainable farming techniques and ecological challenges. Token holders gain access to:

    Virtual farm tours and operation demonstrations;

    Webinars with agricultural experts and farmers;

    Detailed documentation of regenerative farming methods;

    Community forums for discussing implementation strategies;

    Progress tracking dashboards showing ecological impacts.

    This educational component transforms NFT holders from passive donors into informed advocates, creating multiplier effects as community members share knowledge within their networks. 

    Final Word

    The marriage of NFT technology and sustainable agriculture is a promising pathway for channeling resources toward ecological farming practices. By creating direct connections between digital communities and land stewardship projects, these initiatives bypass traditional funding limitations while building engaged supporter bases invested in lasting agricultural sustainability.



    Source link

    SUI on the Rise: Key Drivers Fueling Growth and SUI Price Prediction | NFT News Today

    SUI on the Rise: Key Drivers Fueling Growth and SUI Price Prediction | NFT News Today


    Sui is a next-gen blockchain with advanced features, big partnerships and community driven innovation. This post will look at how upcoming events including the SuiPlay0x1 launch will impact the SUI token price in 2025 and beyond.

    Key Takeaways

    Sui’s upcoming SuiPlay0x1 console aims to merge Web3 gaming with mainstream adoption.

    Advanced AMM development via STEAMM could raise DeFi activity on Sui.

    Key infrastructure upgrades like Mysticeti v2 are boosting transaction throughput.

    Bitcoin liquidity integration may draw significant new capital to Sui’s ecosystem.

    Microsoft has integrated the Sui blockchain, making its full chain history accessible to Microsoft’s developer ecosystem.

    What Is Sui and Why Does It Matter?

    Sui is a cutting-edge Layer 1 blockchain designed for high throughput, low latency, and flexible smart contract execution. Its success is driven by parallel transaction processing, user-friendly wallets, and a growing lineup of decentralized finance (DeFi), gaming, and institutional integrations. While still relatively new, Sui’s focus on performance and usability has placed it among notable blockchains to watch in 2025.

    Upcoming Events Driving the SUI Token Price

    Below are the major catalysts set to influence the SUI token price in the coming months:

    SuiPlay0x1 Handheld Console

    Beta Testing (May 2025): About 250 units will be distributed at the Sui Basecamp event for performance testing.

    Full Launch (July–September 2025): This launch targets wider audiences by blending traditional gaming experiences with blockchain functionality.

    DeFi Expansion: STEAMM and Perpetuals

    STEAMM AMM Launch: This new automated market maker channels idle liquidity into lending pools, offering dual revenue streams.

    Aftermath Perpetual Contracts: With over $5.57 billion in trading volume recorded on Sui’s Perpetual DEX, DeFi traction is expected to grow.

    Technological Upgrades

    Mysticeti v2 (Q3 2025): A powerful new consensus mechanism with dynamic DAG scheduling promises near-instant finality.

    SIP-45 Gas Optimization: Allows users to prioritize transactions during high activity, reducing network bottlenecks.

    Cross-Chain Liquidity Injections

    Bitcoin Integration (Babylon and Lombard): Wrapped BTC can enter Sui-based DeFi, unlocking a large pool of additional capital.

    Ika Network: A sub-second Multi-Party Computation system that enhances cross-chain functionality and security.

    Institutional and Mainstream Adoption

    Microsoft Integration: Sui blockchain is now part of Microsoft’s developer ecosystem with access to full chain history. This kind of enterprise level engagement is a big deal for Sui.

    Wallet Integration (Phantom, Backpack): User-friendly wallet support can replicate the success of other networks by onboarding more participants.

    Real-World Use Cases and Ecosystem Growth

    Sui’s approach to handling parallel transactions and large-scale data is inspiring a broader scope of applications:

    Walrus Decentralized Storage: This initiative caters to enterprise data solutions and AI-driven apps, potentially generating new revenue streams for Sui.

    Gaming Ecosystem: From SuiPlay0x1 to other NFT-based projects, the emphasis on smooth gameplay and rapid finality can attract top-tier studios.

    DeFi and BTCfi: The integration of Bitcoin liquidity fosters deeper markets, while advanced automated market makers like STEAMM offer yield opportunities for retail and institutional traders alike.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    How might the Microsoft integration affect the SUI token price?

    With confirmed integration into Microsoft’s developer tools, Sui gains enterprise-level exposure and developer accessibility. This could lead to increased usage and long-term growth in token demand.

    Will token unlock events create downward price pressure?

    Short-term volatility can occur. However, Sui’s roadmap, active development, and significant staking incentives tend to offset selling pressure, especially as more projects and users join the network.

    What is the role of STEAMM in Sui’s DeFi growth?

    STEAMM allows idle liquidity to earn both lending interest and trading fees. This dual-stream approach may bring more capital into Sui DeFi, making the network more vibrant.

    How does Mysticeti v2 improve Sui’s performance?

    Mysticeti v2 refines Sui’s consensus mechanism by leveraging dynamic DAG scheduling, effectively reducing the complexity of network messaging. This results in faster transaction processing and near-instant finality.

    Is Sui’s cross-chain approach secure?

    The Ika Network uses a decentralized Multi-Party Computation method, distributing control among numerous nodes. This lowers the risk of single-point failures and helps keep cross-chain transfers secure.

    SUI Price Prediction:

    End of 2025 and Beyond Current analyses place conservative estimates of SUI at $6.77 to $6.90 by the end of 2025, assuming steady development and broader market stability. Optimistic scenarios suggest targets up to $8.99 if major catalysts are effectively executed. A highly bullish case sees potential for prices above $30, though this outcome requires favorable market conditions and flawless execution of Sui’s roadmap.

    Projections Over the Next Three Years

    By the End of 2026: Sustained DeFi adoption and collaboration with technology leaders could see SUI hover in the $10–$15 range.

    2027 Targets: If Sui maintains its lead in transaction throughput and cross-chain liquidity, analysts anticipate a potential climb toward $20, fueled by global trading interest.

    2028 and Beyond: Continued success in enterprise use cases, deeper institutional investment, and broader acceptance could push SUI closer to $25–$35, although results depend on external market sentiment and milestone achievement.

    Final Thoughts

    Sui’s roadmap for 2025 and beyond combines gaming innovation, DeFi upgrades, and confirmed high-profile partnerships. Developments like the SuiPlay0x1 handheld release and Microsoft integration promise wider adoption. While the future is uncertain Sui’s tech, liquidity and enterprise engagement makes it a compelling Layer 1 blockchain. If its roadmap executes well, the SUI token could outperform expectations, making 2025 a landmark year for the project.



    Source link

    The Last Of Us Season Two, Episode Seven Recap: Abby Road

    The Last Of Us Season Two, Episode Seven Recap: Abby Road


    We made it, everybody. We’ve reached the end of HBO’s The Last of Us. Wait, sorry, I’m getting word in my earpiece that…we’re only halfway done with it because this show’s going for four seasons. At this point, I’m mostly feeling deflated. Last week’s episode was such a catastrophic bummer that it cemented for me that the show fundamentally misunderstands The Last of Us Part II, the game this season and those that are still yet to come are adapting. But you know how your mother would tell you not to play ball in the house because you might accidentally break the priceless vase on display in the living room? Well, if you’ve already broken the vase, you might as well keep playing ball, so we’ll probably be doing this song and dance into 2029. For now, we’re on the season two finale, which essentially wraps up Ellie’s side of this condensed revenge story and reveals the premise of season three. Most game fans probably assumed this was where the season would end and, if nothing else, it’s still a bold cliffhanger to leave off on.

    Guilty as charged

    After last week’s flashback-heavy episode, we open on Jesse (Young Mazino) tending to wounds the Seraphites have inflicted on Dina (Isabela Merced), which means we get a real heinous scene of him doing some amateur surgeon’s work to remove the arrow she took to the knee. He douses it in alcohol and offers her a sip to dull the pain, but she staunchly refuses without explaining why. They made Jesse an asshole in this show, but he’s still a smart guy. The gears start turning in his head about why she might turn down a swig right now. Nevertheless, he takes that motherfucker out with no anesthetic, booze, or supportive bedside girlfriend to help Dina through it.

    Speaking of the absent girlfriend, Ellie (Bella Ramsey) finally returns to their theater base of operations. Now that she’s back, all her concern is on Dina, but Jesse is still wondering where the hell she’s been this whole time. Dina is resting backstage, and even though we only see these details for a few minutes, I once again want to shout out the set designers who recreated this little safe haven, which is covered in old show posters and graffiti from bands and artists that performed there before the cordyceps took over. I’m sure Joel would have loved to have seen it.

    Dina stirs awake and Ellie checks her wound. Jesse’s effort to wrap the injury leaves a lot to be desired, but it should heal in time. Ellie asks if the baby’s alright, and Dina says it’s okay.

    “How do you know?” Ellie asks.

    “I just do,” Dina replies.

    The one who is not okay in the room is Ellie, who is bleeding through the back of her shirt. Dina helps her undress and starts to clean the scratches on her back. As she does, she asks what happened while they were separated. Ellie says she found Nora (Tati Gabrielle), and she knew where Abby (Kaitlyn Dever) was, but only said two words: “Whale” and “Wheel.” Ellie says she doesn’t know what it meant. It could have been nonsense. She was infected, and it was already starting to affect her cognitive state.

    “I made her talk,” Ellie whispers. “I thought it would be harder to do, but it wasn’t. It was easy. I just kept hurting her.”

    Image: HBO

    Dina asks if Ellie killed her, but she says she just “left her,” meaning that somewhere in this timeline, Nora is wandering the depths of a Seattle hospital with broken legs and an infected mind. I thought the show couldn’t possibly concoct a worse fate for her than what happens in the game, but they found a way. It takes commitment to put down a character like showrunners Craig Mazin and Neil Druckmann have done for Nora across both video games and television. Personally, I think when you already know that people are wary of the way you treat one of the few Black women in your franchise as if she doesn’t deserve the same dignity as everyone else, maybe you should do better by her when given a second chance, rather than worse. But that’s just me. I’m not the one being paid a bunch of money to butcher this story on HBO Max every Sunday at 9 p.m. Eastern. So what do I know?

    Maybe this is just part of the contrived sadism the show has attached to Ellie. She thinks violence is easy and it comes naturally to her, so I guess she would beat a woman nearly to death until the fungal infection made her lose her mind. Meanwhile the game version is so traumatized by what she’s done in this moment, she’s practically speechless by the time she reaches the theater. God, I knew this shit was going to happen. Mazin has repeatedly insisted that Ellie is an inherently violent individual, something he’s communicated both in interviews and by having Catherine O’Hara’s Gail, the therapist who tells you what the story is about, say that she’s always been a sadist, probably. Now, when we get to moments like the post-Nora debrief which used to convey that Ellie is Not Cut Out For This Shit, the framing instead becomes “Ellie likes violence and feels bad about how much she likes violence.”

    Before The Last of Us Part II came out, a lot of Naughty Dog’s promotion for the game was kind of vague and even deceptive in an effort to keep its biggest twists under wraps, and some of the messaging it used to talk about the game’s themes have irrevocably set a precedent for how the game’s story is talked about years later. When the game was first revealed in 2016, the studio said the story would be “about hate,” which paints a much more destructive and myopic picture of Ellie’s journey than the one driven by love and grief she actually experiences through the course of the game.

    One of the most annoying things about being a Last of Us fan is that its creators love to talk about the series in ways that erase its emotional complexity, making it sound more cynical and underhanded when the actual story it’s telling is anything but. I can’t count how many times I’ve heard people reductively parroting notions that The Last of Us Part II is just about “hate” and “guilting the player” for taking part in horrifying actions when they literally have no choice but to do so, rather than cracking the text open and dissecting that nuance. Mazin’s openly-expressed belief that Ellie is an intrinsically bloodthirsty person similarly bleeds into how a lot of the public perceives her as a character, seeing her as a violent ruffian rather than a grieving daughter who was only ever taught to express her pain by inflicting it on those who made her feel it in the first place. Discussing these games as a fan means having to fight against these notions, but they’re born from a game built on subtext, and thus willingly opens itself to those interpretations.

    Its willingness to dwell in ambiguity only makes it a more fascinating text to unpack, or it would, if we lived in a world where discussing video games wasn’t a volatile experience in which you constantly run the risk of being targeted for performative online dunks, or running up against rabid console tribalism. Now, the Last of Us show has decided to lean into the most boring interpretation of what this story is about without an ounce of subtlety, nuance, or even sympathy for Ellie’s plight. She is a sadist who does terrible things not simply because she’s grieving her father figure, but because this is just who she is. Mazin has deemed it so, and here we are, and this vision of her will no doubt weave itself into the fabric of how we talk about Ellie Williams, even in the game.

    This story only has any thematic weight if Ellie’s violent outbursts are rooted in pain, not pleasure. Yeah, what we’re seeing in the show is her acting from a mix of those things but, in the game at least, the most affecting moments of Ellie’s Seattle revenge tour happen when she has to confront how she is not built for acts of violent excess in the same way Joel was. She never has been. Back in Part I, she was sick to her stomach when she committed her first kill to save Joel, and the entire point of Part II was that we see her cut off parts of herself to do what she feels she must, only to find that she’s unable to recognize herself when it’s all over. In the show, she is instead mesmerized by carnage, only to decide she doesn’t like that she feels that way, actually. But all this self-reflection is fleeting, because she’s only killed one person on her list, and there’s a lot more work to do. How many Joels is Nora’s life worth to Ellie? One-fifth?

    While Ellie is wrestling with these feelings, Dina is about to see things with more clarity than ever. At first, she says that Nora may have deserved this fate worse than death, to which Ellie says “Maybe she didn’t,” before telling her girlfriend everything. She tearfully recounts Joel’s massacre of the Fireflies at the base in Salt Lake City, how the group was going to use her immunity to create a cure, and how Joel killed Abby’s father to save her. Dina puts it all together and asks Ellie if she knew who Abby’s group was. She says she didn’t, but she did know what Joel did. Dina sits with that for a moment, then flatly says the group needs to go home.

    So I guess this is how the show gets Dina, who’s been pretty revenge-hungry thus far, back onto the track she’s on in the games. Without spoiling scenes in the late game for the uninitiated, some major points of conflict at the end of Part II require her to be less on-board with Ellie’s vendetta, so the fact that she’s been egging her girlfriend on to track down Abby was an odd choice. I wasn’t sure how the show would handle it down the line, but it seems the way HBO’s show has course-corrected was by having her condemn Joel’s actions. Dina had her own relationship with the old man in the show, so I imagine that in a later season she’ll interrogate how she feels about him in light of this new information, but having her more or less get off the ride when she learns what Joel has done sets up a contrast between her and Ellie that I’m curious to see how the show handles.

    The shame of it, though, is that this is just one more thing that undermines one of the core foundations of the source material, and I have to get at least one more jab in on this topic before we end the season. In The Last of Us Part II, when you look at what is actually expressed in dialogue, you see that characters are often lacking important information about each other. This lack of communication is an important part of its storytelling, but the show is instead having characters tell everyone everything. In Part II, Joel and Ellie don’t know who Abby’s father was. It’s strongly implied that no one other than Joel, Ellie, and Tommy knew about what happened in Salt Lake City, not even Dina. The more the show bridges these gaps of communication, the more senseless this entire tit-for-tat feels. To be clear, it was senseless in the game, but it was in a tragic, “these people are so blinded by their emotions that they can’t fathom another path forward” sort of way. This time around, everyone knows exactly what’s happening and chooses to partake in violence anyway. We don’t have any mystery or lack of communication to fall back on as a we struggle to understand why the characters keep making these self-destructive decisions. Everyone is just knowingly the worst version of themselves this time around, and I guess Mazin thinks that’s the point, which is the kind of boring interpretation that makes the show such an inferior version of this story.

    Family matters

    We now begin our third day in Seattle. Ellie and Jesse are packing up to get going in the theater lobby. The plan is to find Tommy (Gabriel Luna) somewhere in the city and then head back to Jackson. However, Jesse is a lot less talkative this morning. Dina limps into the lobby, and after a brief scolding for being on her feet, she gives Ellie a bracelet for good luck.

    “I’m not sure it’s been working for you,” Ellie jokes.

    “I’m alive,” Dina replies.

    Jesse is clearly uncomfortable watching his ex (or are they technically still together now? I’m not sure) give Ellie a prized possession, and says he can go alone if Dina wants Ellie to stay. Ellie says they’ll be safer together. Jesse relents and says they should be back by sundown. The tension is radiating off him, but the pair leaves Dina in the safety of the theater.

    Jesse has a disgruntled expression looking at Dina and Ellie.

    Image: HBO

    Ellie and Jesse awkwardly walk through the remains of Seattle. She finally breaks the silence by asking how he found Ellie and Dina’s theater base. He recounts his two days of tracking, giving a shoutout to the horse Shimmer who’s still vibing in the record store the girls left her at, but he’s clearly pissed. Ellie assumes it’s because he and Tommy had to cross state lines to come find them, but no, there’s something else on his mind. Why do Ellie and Dina look at each other differently? Why did Dina turn down a free drink for the first time in her life? He’s putting it all together. Dina and Ellie are no longer just gals being pals, and his (now ex?) girlfriend is pregnant.

    “None of this has to change things between us,” Ellie says.

    “Everything changing doesn’t have to change things?” Jesse asks. “Well, how about this for something new: I’m gonna be a father, which means I can’t die. But because of you, we’re stuck in a warzone. So how about we skip the apologies and just go find Tommy so I can get us and my kid the fuck out of Seattle?”

    Wow, okay. Judgey, much? I mean, you’re right, Jesse. This is a no good, very bad situation, and Ellie has put your kid in danger and won’t even tell you she was torturing a woman last night. But god, I miss kindhearted Jesse. I miss Ellie’s golden retriever best friend who, when finding out Dina was pregnant, firmly but gently told Ellie it was time to get the fuck out of Seattle. Now that the show has created a messy cheating love triangle out of these three, I’m once again reflecting on how The Last of Us Part II could have very easily made this storyline a dramatic, angry one, and instead it was one of the brighter spots in a dark tale. Meanwhile, in the show, the whole thing feels like it’s regressed to a rote and predictable earlier draft of the story that’s much less refreshing and compelling than the one we already know. Justice for Jesse. This is character assassination of the goodest boy in all of Jackson. Well, actually, that’s Abby’s job. Sorry, sorry. That’s actually not for another 35 minutes.

    As the two move further into the city, they see more art praising the Seraphite prophet on the buildings, but she looks notably different than in images we’ve seen previously. This art depicts a Black woman, whereas others have typically portrayed the prophet as white. Ellie wonders aloud if there’s “more than one of her.” Jesse says it’s possible, but ushers her forward as rain starts pouring down. I’m curious what the show might be doing here, as this is a divergence from Part II. Could the Seraphites be a kind of polytheistic group in the show that follows multiple prophets? Could they believe the Prophet was reincarnated into a different woman at some point? All we can do is theorize, but we haven’t seen much of the Seraphites this season so we don’t have much to go on. Which is by design, and feels pretty in-line with Part II, which didn’t tell you much about the group during Ellie’s three days in Seattle. We’ll pick this thread back up next season, I’m sure.

    The pair takes shelter but before they can catch their breath, they hear the popping sound of gunfire nearby as a W.L.F. squad corners a lone Seraphite. Ellie and Jesse watch in horror as the wolves strip and drag him away. Just as Ellie nearly gets out from cover to intervene, Jesse pulls her back. Once the coast is clear, Ellie walks away in a huff. As Jesse follows, he points out that they were outnumbered and would have lost that fight.

    “He was a fucking kid!” Ellie shouts.

    “Ellie, these people [are] shooting each other, lynching each other, ripping each other’s guts out,” Jesse says. “Even the kids? I’m not dying out here. Not for any of them. This is not our war.”

    Who the fuck is this man? I touched on it in episode five, but what is with this show putting all of Ellie’s unlikable traits on other characters so she keeps getting to be the hero? Jesse turns from a selfless guardian into a selfish asshole who will watch a kid get tortured to save himself while Ellie is suddenly very concerned about a war that, in the game, she seemed largely indifferent to. It’s as if The Last of Us’ second season is so concerned with us liking Ellie and feeling like we can root for her that it’s lost sight of anything else.

    So Jesse gets to be the belligerent asshole and Dina gets to be the revenge-driven one in the relationship. Ellie? She’s just bee-bopping through spouting cool space facts, and so when she tortures Nora, it feels like tonal whiplash. I don’t recognize Jesse. Most of the time, I don’t recognize Ellie. But really, the more I watch this show, the more I hardly recognize anyone, and I don’t have any faith in the series to figure these characters and their relationships out, even if it’s going to go on for two more seasons.

    Will the circle be unbroken?

    We shift away from the Jackson crew to check in on Isaac (Jeffrey Wright), who we haven’t seen in a few episodes. Sergeant Park (Hettienne Park) updates the W.L.F. boss that the incoming storm will get worse as the day goes on, but even so, the group is still preparing some kind of operation. She also lets him know the rank and file is a little nervous about whatever’s going on, but Isaac’s only concerned about one person: Abby. From the sound of it, she and most of her crew have all disappeared over the past few days. We’ve seen what happened to Nora, Manny is still around, but Owen and Mel are gone without a trace. Again, Isaac isn’t concerned with them. He’s nervous that they’re going into whatever operation they’re planning without Abby. Park is clearly exhausted by this lane of thinking and asks why he cares so much about the girl.

    Isaac looks at a map on his desk.

    Image: HBO

    She starts off asking why one “great” soldier is so important when they have an army, and then gets into a weird aside where she exasperatedly asks Isaac if he’s harboring feelings for the girl when he’s at least 30 years her senior. I don’t know if this line is supposed to be a joke, but it’s not funny, even though Isaac laughs at it. She acknowledges it’s an out-of-pocket question, but says he “wouldn’t be the first old man” to make decisions based on such inappropriate impulses. As much as it’s a stupid thing for Park to say, it’s also a stupid thing for the writers room to nonchalantly whip out in a humorous fashion given The Last of Us’ history of old men preying on young women with the character of David. Why write this non-joke into your script if you don’t want viewers to possibly view his fixation on Abby as potentially untoward? Isaac’s following speech focuses on the preservation of his militia, in a very similar way to how David’s preoccupation with Ellie in season one was born from the cannibal’s warped views on longevity, and if you’re not trying to make this direct connection, why even gesture at it? Yeah, I don’t imagine anyone considered the optics of this obviously flippant, throwaway line, but Christ, if you’re that desperate for a joke or moment to cut the tension, this was the best you could come up with? Amateur shit.

    Isaac sits Park down and tells her why he cares so much about one soldier. He says there’s a very strong chance that the W.L.F. leadership will be dead by tomorrow morning. If that happens, who can lead the militia in their stead? He wanted it to be Abby. It was “supposed” to be her.

    “Well she’s fucked off, Isaac,” Park says as she leaves. “So maybe it wasn’t.”

    We go back to the Jackson crew as Ellie and Jesse reach the rendezvous point in a bookstore, and Tommy isn’t here. The place is in bad shape like most places are in this city, but Ellie gravitates to the children’s books section. She picks up an old Sesame Street book, the Grover classic The Monster at the End of This Book, and picks it up for the bun in the oven as Jesse says she picked a good one. As the quiet creeps in on the two, Ellie tries to break the silence by clarifying what happened, but Jesse says they have enough problems for the moment, so he wants to bury the issue.

    He says he loves Dina, but not in the same way Ellie does. He remembers a group that passed through Jackson, and how there was a girl he fell hard for. She asked him to leave with her to Mexico, but he declined because he’d found purpose and community in Jackson, and he was taught to put others first. People look to him to become the “next Maria” and lead the town, and he couldn’t abandon them for a girl he’d known for two weeks, even if she made him feel things he’d never felt before.

    Ellie immediately sees through this story. It’s not about him pointing out how he’s felt love and knows that he and Dina aren’t the real deal; it’s about how she’s putting her own needs and wants ahead of everyone else’s.

    “Okay, got it,” Ellie says. “So you’re Saint Jesse of Wyoming, and everyone else is a fucking asshole.”

    “You can make fun of me all you want,” Jesse responds. “But let me ask you this, Ellie: If I go with that girl to Mexico, who saves your ass in Seattle?”

    Before she can reply, they hear W.L.F. radio chatter about a sniper taking out a squad and assume it’s gotta be Tommy. The two head out to higher ground to get a better look, and Ellie sees a Ferris wheel in the distance. She finally puts Nora’s final words together: Abby is in the aquarium at the edge of the city. Immediately, her focus shifts away from Tommy as she starts trying to figure out how to reach Abby’s apparent hiding spot. Jesse is confused and says that Tommy’s got the W.L.F. pinned down in the opposite direction. Ellie starts coming up with justifications for her plan. They don’t know if that’s actually Tommy. If it is him, he’s got the group pinned down. Either way, he would want her to go after Abby to avenge Joel. Ellie doesn’t understand why Jesse is so against this. He voted to go after Abby’s crew back in Jackson, right?

    Jesse and Ellie talk in the book store.

    Image: HBO

    No, actually. He didn’t. He believed this vendetta was selfish and “wasn’t in the best interest of the community.” That sets Ellie off.

    “Fuck the community!” she screams. “All you do is talk about the fucking community, you hypocrite. You think you’re good and I’m bad? You let a kid die today, Jesse. Because why? He wasn’t in your community? Let me tell you about my community. My community was beaten to death in front of me while I was forced to fucking watch. So don’t look at me like you’re better than me, or like you’d do anything differently if you were in my shoes, because you’re not, and you wouldn’t.”

    Jesse takes a beat, then tells Ellie he hopes she makes it to the aquarium as he leaves. While this scene does exemplify the show’s typicalal “no subtext allowed” approach to writing that I find so irksome, the storyline of Ellie feeling ostracized by the people of Jackson while constantly being told that she must make compromises for them even as they are incapable of extending the same to her is one of the few embellishments The Last of Us makes that resonates with me. It’s easy to write off Ellie’s revenge tour as a selfish crusade that puts everyone else in harm’s way, but when she’s also one of the few out queer people in a town that mostly coddles bigotry and she’s being constantly belittled and kept from doing things she wants to do like working on the patrol team, why would she feel any kinship to this community? Now, when she’s so close to her goal that she can almost taste it, Jesse wants her to consider the people of Jackson? Why should she do that? They’re hundreds of miles away, and the only people who came to save her and Dina were the ones who already cared about her. Ellie’s disillusionment with her neighbors is one of the few additions to the story that The Last of Us manages to pull off.

    Ellie reaches the harbor from which she can use a boat to reach the aquarium and finds several Wolves meeting up on vessels heading somewhere off the coast. Isaac is here leading the charge, but it’s unclear where they’re going or what they’re doing. Game fans have the advantage of knowing what’s going on, but the W.L.F. storyline feels underbaked in this season, which is one of the real issues with the show dividing the game’s storyline into multiple seasons. During this section of the game, you get a sense that there’s an untold story happening in the background, and you can learn more about it through notes you can find in the environment and ambient dialogue from enemies. The show doesn’t have those same storytelling tools, so I wouldn’t be surprised if newcomers felt a little disoriented every time we hopped over to Isaac.

    Once the W.L.F. forces make their way wherever they’re going, Ellie finds one of the spare boats and starts to make her way to the aquarium. The storm is hitting hard, though, and the tide is not on her side. A giant tidal wave knocks her out of the boat and into the sea. (Good thing you learned how to swim, queen.) As she washes up onto the shore, Ellie hears Seraphites whistling as a group of them descends upon her. She’s too weak to get onto her feet and run, so the cultists grab her and carry her to a noose hanging from a tree in the woods. She screams that she’s not a Wolf and that she’s not from here, but they don’t listen. As they wrap the noose around her neck and start to hoist her upward, a horn sounds off in the distance. The lead Scar says to leave her, their village is in danger, so I guess that’s what the W.L.F. operation is targeting? This concludes our latest little exposition detour, as Ellie gets right back into the boat to the aquarium.

    Ellie crawls on a beach as rain pours down.

    Image: HBO

    She manages to reach the building and finds a broken window through which to enter. Inside, she finds several makeshift beds. Whatever Abby’s doing here, she’s not alone. As Ellie makes her way deeper into the aquarium, she finds a ton of medical supplies, including bloody bandages and surgical equipment. Was Abby injured? Is that why she’s been missing in action as the W.L.F. undergoes a huge, all-hands-on-deck mission? Who’s to say?

    Quick sidenote: When Ellie infiltrates the aquarium in the game, she’s attacked by a guard dog named Alice. The W.L.F. used trained canines in their war against the Seraphites, but that element has been notably absent from the show. Between this and sparing Shimmer from her explosive fate, The Last of Us has been toning down the animal murder.

    Ellie keeps walking through the desolate aquarium and eventually finds fresh footsteps. She follows them and soon finds their source: Abby’s friends Owen (Spencer Lord) and Mel (Ariela Barer). The two are arguing about something, though it’s not clear what. Owen wants to go somewhere behind enemy lines, even in the midst of the battle Isaac has just initiated. He says he doesn’t have a choice because “it’s Abby.” Mel says he does have a choice and so does she, and the Abby of it all is why she’s not going along with whatever the plan is. Owen says he’ll do it on his own, and if Mel’s still here when they get back, she can “keep going with [them].” Either way, Owen’s leaving. Mel let’s out a hearty “fuck you, Owen” before realizing that Ellie is there. Sure seems like there’s a whole other story that’s been going on while we’ve been hanging out with Ellie, huh? I wonder if we’ll ever get any further insight into whatever this is. Perhaps in a season entirely dedicated to the other side of what’s going on in Seattle? Maybe in a couple years it might premiere on HBO Max (or whatever it’s called by then)? That would be something!

    Ellie holds the two at gunpoint and tells them to put their hands up. When she asks where Abby is, Owen realizes who she is and points out that he was the one who kept her alive. Ellie isn’t swayed by this, so he says they don’t know where Abby went. But, of course, they were just talking about her, so Ellie knows that’s not true. She spots a map on the table and decides to pull out an old Joel Miller standard: She tells Mel to bring her the map and point to where Abby is, saying that next she’s going to ask Owen the same question, and the answers had better match. Owen looks at Mel and says that Ellie will kill them either way, so there’s no reason to comply. Ellie says she won’t because she’s “not like” them. When she crosses state lines to torture and kill someone who killed somebody important to her, it’s very different than when they do it, of course.

    Owen stops Mel from grabbing the map by saying he’ll do it. He slowly turns to the table, but instead of picking up the map, he grabs a handgun stowed under it. Ellie is quick with her trigger finger and shoots him right in the throat. The bullet goes straight through him, and hits Mel in the neck as well. She falls onto her back and, instead of cursing Ellie, she asks for her help. Not to save her life, but someone else’s. She opens her jacket to reveal her pregnant belly, and asks if Ellie has a knife to cut the baby out of her before she dies. Ellie is in shock and doesn’t know what to do. Mel tells her she just needs to make one incision. That isn’t enough direction, and Ellie panics. She doesn’t know how deep or which direction to cut. As Mel starts to become delirious, she asks Ellie if the baby is out. But she hasn’t even made one cut. Mel finally drifts off, and Ellie realizes it’s too late. She sits there until, eventually, Tommy and Jesse find her. Tommy attempts to comfort her, but she’s in shock and doesn’t speak. Finally they leave and head back to the theater.

    Why can’t this show stop giving the audience outs to not turn against its leads? The death of Mel, specifically, feels like the show bending over backward to teach Ellie a lesson without laying blame at her feet. Mel’s death here is an accident. She’s an innocent bystander who dies because Owen and Ellie made choices, and she was, quite literally, caught in the crossfire. In Part II, by contrast, Mel “shot first.” Well, she tried to stab Ellie, but that doesn’t have the same ring to it. Ellie reacts in self-defense and stabs her right back, but she did it fully knowing she was about to send Mel to an early grave. The gut punch Ellie feels upon learning that she’s pregnant is a moment of dramatic irony, because the game’s shifting perspectives had already revealed her pregnancy to the player way back in the opening hours. So when you’re slamming the square button to fight back, you know that Mel isn’t the only one about to reach her untimely end. Here, she doesn’t even get that moment of agency to fight to protect herself. She’s just collateral damage. It’s a small but important distinction. At this point in the show, Mel’s only real trait is a clear distaste for Abby’s violence, and now, when she finally shows up again, she’s just an unintended victim of Owen pulling a gun on Ellie. Sure, season three will fill in those gaps, but the end result will be the same. Mel died not because she was fighting back, but because she was an inch too far to the left.

    Then there’s the matter of her pregnancy. Again, in the game players already knew about this by the time Ellie reached the aquarium, while the show kept it secret until the end. It’s hard not to see this last-minute reveal as a knife being twisted for shock value.

    The other side of the coin

    The group makes it back to the theater and Ellie is still in shock, so much so that she doesn’t even look at Dina as she enters the building. Some time passes, and Tommy and Jesse are mapping out their route home on the stage. The storm is still pretty rough, so they’ll stay overnight and hope the sun is out when they wake up. Ellie finally joins the group, and Tommy reassures her that Mel and Owen played their part in Joel’s death, and they made the choices that brought them to that fateful end. Ellie can only fixate on what she didn’t get to do.

    “But Abby gets to live,” she says.

    “Yeah,” Tommy responds. “Are you able to make your peace with that?”

    “I guess I’ll have to,” she says, defeated.

    She looks to Jesse, who won’t even look up at her. Tommy realizes they might have something to talk about and walks to the lobby to pack. After some awkward silence, Ellie thanks Jesse for coming back for her, even though he had no reason to after the way they clashed.

    “Maybe I didn’t want to,” he says. “Maybe Tommy made me.”

    “Did he?” Ellie asks.

    After a second of contemplation, Jesse drops the act and says, “No.”

    “Because you’re a good person,” Ellie responds.

    “Yeah,” Jesse agrees. “But also the thought did occur, that if I were out there somewhere, lost and in trouble, you’d set the world on fire to save me.”

    Ellie says she would, and the two finally see one another, even if just for a moment. Jesse acknowledges that Ellie’s vendetta isn’t entirely selfish, and that when it comes to defending the people she cares about, dead or alive, you won’t find someone more loyal in all of Jackson. It’s good that they finally had this moment of connection after all this drama. But damn, I miss Ellie and Jesse being bros, and I miss her giving him shit for being a sap in these final moments. But most of all, I miss that dopey good ol’ boy with a heart of gold saying his friends “can’t get out of their own damn way.”

    All that understanding is short-lived, as the two hear some ruckus in the lobby, grab their guns, and book it to the entrance. The second Jesse opens the door, bam. A gunshot rings out in the lobby, and he is on the floor. We don’t even see that it was Abby who fired it until after we get a gnarly shot of him with his face blown open. He’s gone. It was instant. The Last of Us Part II tends to draw out death. It’s either long and torturous like it was for Joel or Nora, or it’s short like Owen’s and Mel’s, but in any case, the game typically lingers on the fallout for a bit. Jesse’s death, by contrast, happens so fast that you can’t even process it before you have to deal with the situation at hand. The show follows suit, and it’s recreated practically shot for shot. But that’s hardly the most disorienting (complimentary) thing that happens in these final minutes.

    “Stand up,” Abby growls forcefully from the other side of the desk Ellie has taken cover behind.

    She repeats herself: “Stand. Up. Hands in the air or I shoot this one, too.”

    Ellie can see Tommy on the ground with a pistol aimed right at his head. He tells Ellie to just run, but she tosses her gun where Abby can see it and crawls out from cover. Abby recognizes her immediately. Ellie asks her to let Tommy go, to which Abby replies that he killed her friends. Ellie says no, she did.

    “I was looking for you,” Ellie says. “I didn’t mean to hurt them. I know why you killed Joel. He did what he did to save me, I’m the one that you want. Just let him go.”

    Hm. Okay. We’re almost at the end. I gotta get another little quibble in before the curtains close. I mean, come on, we’ve been through seven episodes of me complaining together. You can’t take one last gripe? This line from Ellie is slightly altered to account for the fact that she knows more about Abby in the show than in the game, and it means we miss one of the most important subtle interactions in all of the story. As I mentioned earlier, Ellie doesn’t know anything about Abby’s father in Part II. She assumes that Abby killed Joel because he took away any chance of the Fireflies developing a cure, so she cites that in this high-stakes moment. The original line is almost identical to the one in the show, but instead, Ellie says “there’s no cure because of me” and suggests that killing her would be the extension of Abby’s presumed vendetta. Then, we get some incredible, subtle acting from Abby actor Laura Bailey, who hears what Ellie’s saying, has a brief moment of angry disbelief on her face, and then scoffs under her breath before picking right back up where she left off. In just a few seconds, you see Abby realize that, after everything, these fuckers have no idea how much pain she’s been through over the past five years. But they’re not worth the breath it would take to explain herself. They don’t deserve to know the man her father was and what he meant to her. All that matters right now is that Ellie pays for what she’s done.

    Abby still views herself as the righteous one here, as she points out that she let Ellie live when she did not have to do that. It turns out that Ellie wasn’t deserving of her mercy, that she squandered it by killing her friends. Part of me has wondered if all the exposition-heavy dialogue in this show, such as Dever’s villain monologue in episode two before she murdered the shit out of Joel, was written to give its actors more words to say in front of a camera. When you’ve got big names like Kaitlyn Dever, Catherine O’Hara, and Pedro Pascal in your cast, you don’t want them to not talk, right? But all these elongated exchanges have also robbed actors like Dever of those subtle moments. Hell, she led an entire film with next to no dialogue in 2023’s No One Will Save You, and was great in it, so she has the chops to pull off that kind of acting. Communicating something through body language and expression is just as powerful as a poetic piece of dialogue (or in this show’s case, the most literal, unpoetic dialogue a person can fathom), but this show rarely, if ever, understands that.

    A Last of Us poster showing Abby walking on top of a large Firefly necklace with the text "Every Path Has A Price" next to her.

    Image: HBO

    Anyway, Abby says that Ellie wasted the chance she was given when the ex-Fireflies spared her, and points her gun right at Ellie. We hear a bullet fire and Ellie shouts before a hard cut to black. But wait. That’s the season finale? You expect us to wait for two years, probably, to find out what happened? Well, about that. You will probably have to wait even longer.

    We do have one more scene this season, however: a flashback. We see Abby lying down on a comfy couch with an unfinished book resting on her stomach. She’s in a deep sleep before Manny (Danny Ramirez) loudly enters the room and wakes her up. He says Isaac wants to see them, and she stirs awake. She gets up and walks out of this cozy living space and into a giant football stadium. The entire field has been repurposed for agriculture, manufacturing, and housing. Abby takes a second to look at the whole operation before heading to Isaac’s, but the camera lingers over the field as bold white text flashes on the screen: Seattle, Day One.

    Alright, TV newbies, welcome to the second divisive twist of The Last of Us Part II. In the game, the player goes through Ellie’s three days in Seattle, killing Abby’s friends and mostly ignoring the war between the W.L.F. and the Seraphites. Meanwhile, Abby has been kind of an enigma the whole time. Every time Ellie finds a new lead, Abby has already come and gone. When Abby finally shows up at the theater for another round of vengeance, it’s clear that a lot of the story happening in this game has happened off-screen. That’s because you’re about to see an entirely different perspective on the last three days, and you’re going to play as Abby when you do it.

    As you can imagine, this shit drove some players nuts at the time, and you’ll still find angry people online complaining about it to this day. For all my problems with this season, I have to commend the show for actually going for it. HBO has taken the coward’s route in adapting this story for so long, it’s almost surprising that it’s ending here and, from the sound of it, season three will be entirely about Abby and what she’s been doing these past three days. It’s very likely we won’t see Ellie again until next season’s finale after we’ve followed Dever’s character for several episodes. Despite some ham-fisted attempts by the show to build sympathy for Abby early on, it seems like swaths of TV newbies still demand blood. Will viewers complain for an entire season as Dever takes on the lead role? I’d like to think they won’t. I hope that new audiences are more open to her than the worst people you’ve ever met were when the game launched.

    Despite all the golf club swings I’ve taken at this show, I’m looking forward to examining it further as HBO rolls out the next two seasons. The Last of Us Part II is one of my favorite games of all time, but I genuinely fucking hated The Last of Us’ second season. I don’t expect my feelings to improve in season three. At this point, the rot of Mazin’s poor creative decisions runs too deep for the show to be salvaged and reach the highs of the games. But if nothing else, it’s been a rewarding ride. Thank you for joining me on this seven-week journey. I think I’m due for a replay of The Last of Us Part II to wash off this stink. This shit was ass, HBO. I’ll see you in the ring again next time.

     



    Source link

    Popular Posts

    My Favorites