Web3

Home Web3 Page 104

Ripple and SBI to Launch RLUSD Stablecoin in Japan by Early 2026 – Decrypt

0
Ripple and SBI to Launch RLUSD Stablecoin in Japan by Early 2026 – Decrypt



In brief

Japan’s Payment Services Act amendments, effective since 2023, created a licensing regime for issuing and distributing fiat-pegged stablecoins.
SBI VC Trade, the first firm licensed as an Electronic Payment Instruments Exchange Service Provider, already handles USDC and will now add RLUSD.
Japan has a structured and bank-friendly crypto regime, while its local players place a premium on compliance, Decrypt was told.

Ripple and SBI Holdings are preparing to launch the RLUSD stablecoin in Japan by early next year, as the country’s freshly crafted stablecoin laws open its market to foreign issuers.

The joint move was signed under a memorandum of understanding that will see Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin distributed in Japan through SBI VC Trade, the group’s licensed crypto exchange, Ripple announced late Thursday evening.

Ripple’s entry would help step up the “reliability and convenience of stablecoins in the Japanese market,” SBI VC Trade CEO Tomohiko Kondo said in a statement.



It comes as Japan’s Payment Services Act amendment took effect in June 2023, establishing a licensing regime for electronic payment instruments. An earlier version of the stablecoin framework was passed by the Japanese parliament in 2022.

The framework has been continuously refined through new amendments set to roll out by 2026, including relaxed reserve requirements and updated licensing tiers, according to a report from Asia Business Law Journal.

Under the new rules set to take effect next year, only licensed entities such as fund transfer service providers or trust banks can issue or distribute fiat-pegged stablecoins, a framework that has opened the door to regulated launches like RLUSD.

SBI VC Trade was the first in Japan to secure an Electronic Payment Instruments Exchange Service Provider license, allowing it to handle foreign-issued stablecoins.

“Japan quietly has a very structured and bank-friendly crypto regime given its continuously revised Payment Services Act,” Rick Maeda, Tokyo-based analyst at Presto Research, told Decrypt.

Ripple “leverages this regulatory moat as well as SBI’s deep retail and institutional reach,” Maeda said.

He pointed to RLUSD’s “institutional branding and reserve transparency,” which could help it against competitors, given how the Japanese market’s regulators, banks, and corporates “place a premium on compliance.”

Earlier in March, NYSE-listed stablecoin issuer Circle received the first approval of a U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoin in Japan for its USDC product. Tether, which issues USDT, a larger competing stablecoin, has not received similar approval.

RLUSD, meanwhile, operates with a smaller market circulation of about $667 million over an average daily trading volume of about $71 million, according to data on CoinGecko.

RLUSD is issued under a New York State trust-company charter, backed fully by cash, short-term Treasuries, and cash equivalents with monthly reserve attestations, according to Ripple.

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



Source link

Crypto Gaming Handheld Shipments Delayed Over ‘Excessive’ Import Duties – Decrypt

0
Crypto Gaming Handheld Shipments Delayed Over ‘Excessive’ Import Duties – Decrypt



In brief

SuiPlay0X1 buyers are facing unexpected import duties on the $599 gaming handheld, some as high as nearly $350.
Mysten Labs said that it will not cover the fees for buyers, in part because it sells the device at nearly cost.
The firm is temporarily suspending shipments while it gains more information on the import fees for buyers.

Eager gamers keen to get their hands on the latest crypto gaming handheld from Mysten Labs are being greeted with unexpected import duties, potentially amounting to hundreds of dollars.

Early buyers of the SuiPlay0X1 are staring down the consequences of President Donald Trump’s “reciprocal tariffs” on global partners as the White House’s trade policy begins to bite.

Mysten Labs has confirmed to Decrypt that it is holding the next shipment of devices as it attempts to triage complaints from buyers and get a better handle on expected fees.

The SuiPlay0X1 is a handheld gaming PC akin to Valve’s popular Steam Deck, albeit with built-in crypto wallet support to play blockchain games on Sui. It can also play popular games from Steam and the Epic Games Store, among other supported storefronts. The device was built in collaboration with gaming startup Playtron and uses its GameOS software.

The company produced 10,000 units of the gaming handheld for early adopters and said that $599—a single price point offered to over 100 countries—is near the cost of manufacturing each device. As such, Mysten told buyers in an email Thursday that it cannot afford to pay the unexpected import duties for everyone.

“At this small scale, it is not possible to absorb tariffs and duties which differ for every country,” the email read. “It’s important to note: Mysten Labs does not receive any portion of duty fees or taxes. These are set by local and international governments and apply to all cross-border purchases. Given the unpredictable macroeconomic climate, we could not forecast how these fees might change during shipping.”

Decrypt was offered a complementary loaner unit of the SuiPlay0X1 for testing and review purposes, and received a message from carrier DHL earlier this week that an import duty of more than $138 was required before the package—shipped from Hong Kong—could be delivered in Illinois.



All products originating from Hong Kong, a special administrative region of China, are currently subject to a 20% tariff when entering the U.S. 

A previous de minimis exemption meant that products priced at under $800 could avoid such duties, but Trump revoked that exemption in April via an executive order.

Some SuiPlay0X1 buyers on social media and in the official Sui Discord server have reported a similar import duty demand. But others have said they’ve been hit up for much larger sums for a single device, with some claiming a demand from DHL to pay about $348.

A Mysten Labs representative confirmed that the import duties have ranged significantly, and has informed buyers who have been hit with “excessive” fees to email its support team for assistance. The email suggested that residents of select U.S. states are seeing higher duties than in others.

“No customer should be charged duties equal to half their purchase price,” Mysten Labs wrote in the email to buyers.

Decrypt asked a Mysten representative how the company planned to assist buyers who face the higher fees, but they did not clarify further.

“While federal duties are harmonized across the U.S., some additional state taxes can apply, as well as courier fees for administering the charge and managing payments,” the rep said about varying fees. “At this time, we are unsure of the differences in duties and shipping fees between different regions of the U.S., though we are actively working to determine what these are.”

Until that is determined, the rep told Decrypt that Mysten is holding off on shipping additional SuiPlay0X1 units to buyers. 

So far, a total of 2,000 units have been sent, with the next batch of 3,000 units currently on hold. Mysten expects to begin shipping those units by the end of August.

While the SuiPlay0X1 fallout has been met with memes and jokes from some (including an X user who said they “love seeing innovation on Sui” with the “new Tariff-Drop model”), many buyers are frustrated and upset about the unexpected fees.

“If the outstanding duties of $138.11 stand, how do I get a refund?” one buyer asked via Discord. “I won’t want this product if the fees are this high—especially since I would feel purposely misled by the SuiPlay team about the total cost.”

GG Newsletter

Get the latest web3 gaming news, hear directly from gaming studios and influencers covering the space, and receive power-ups from our partners.



Source link

XRP Ledger Developers Refute Last-Place Security Ranking Among Blockchains – Decrypt

0
XRP Ledger Developers Refute Last-Place Security Ranking Among Blockchains – Decrypt



In brief

XRP Ledger received a security score of 41 out of 100—the lowest among 15 major blockchains—in Kaiko’s Blockchain Ecosystem report released in August.
A RippleX leader dismissed the low rating, pointing to XRP Ledger’s strong safety record.
XRP Ledger’s software development kit was hit with a supply chain attack in April, but devs say the chain’s codebase was unaffected.

XRP Ledger developers are pushing back against the network’s last-place security rating in a recent ranking of more than a dozen blockchains by research firm Kaiko, reviving a long-standing debate over the cryptocurrency platform’s decentralization and overall trustworthiness.

The Kaiko Blockchain Ecosystem Ranking, released on August 13, assigned XRP Ledger a security score of 41 out of 100, the lowest among the 15 blockchains included in the report. Ethereum topped the ranking with a rating of 83 out of 100, closely trailed by Ethereum layer-2 network Arbitrum and layer-1 network Solana, Kaiko’s findings show.

However, XRP Ledger’s low score is misleading, RippleX Engineering Head Ayo Akinyele claimed in comments to Decrypt, citing the network’s strong safety record.



“XRPL has one of the strongest security track records in blockchain—13 years of continuous operation without a single incident impacting the core network,” Akinyele said.

Kaiko researchers acknowledged that the ranking was influenced in part by an April incident in which the official software development kit for XRP Ledger was hit with a supply chain attack and infected with a potential crypto-swiping “backdoor,” as first discovered by security firm Aikido.

The XRP Ledger Foundation replaced the compromised software downloads and said the network codebase itself was never impacted. When asked about the incident, a Ripple Labs representative again stressed that it did not represent a network vulnerability.

“Some of the perceptions may stem from a lack of understanding about the nature of the incident,” the representative said, adding that it was “not a vulnerability in XRPL itself, but a supply chain issue in an NPM package (a JavaScript library).”

“Ripple, the XRPL Foundation, validators, and independent developers all communicated openly,” they added, “from incident reports to public posts.”

Beyond considering that incident, Kaiko researchers also used publicly available data on operational resilience, validator decentralization, audit frequency, and past incidents to come up with its security scores.

XRP Ledger received low marks on security because it showed signs of more centralization than other leading blockchains, a Kaiko representative told Decrypt, pointing to the protocol’s relatively low node count and Nakamoto coefficient—two key measures of decentralization in the crypto world. Its score also suffered due to the discovery of a crypto-stealing malware in an official XRP Ledger node package manager for developers in April.

Some Web3 experts have cast doubt on the usefulness of third-party security audits, pointing to a rise in pay-to-play certifications and the technical limitations of many services. The disagreement over XRP’s security score underscores a long-running debate over the trustworthiness of the protocol.

For years, some Web3 users have raised concerns over its level of decentralization, a quality that is often regarded as a proxy for security in the crypto community. The network has a relatively low number of validators—it has less than 200 running validator nodes on mainnet, while Solana boasts more than 1,000 validators, according to online data.

The DeFi platform also has a relatively a low Nakamoto coefficient, a measure of decentralization—named after pseudonyous Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto—that counts the minimum number of independent entities required to disrupt or overtake a blockchain.

But XRP Ledger’s security measures go far beyond its decentralization, according to Akinyele.

“XRPL’s consensus design is inherently resilient against attack,” Akinyele said. “Validators have no incentive to collude or censor.”

XRP Ledger uses its unique node lists to secure its network, the executive added. According to that system, each validator keeps a list of network participants that are deemed trustworthy, keeping bad actors at bay.

“If [malicious] behavior were ever attempted, the community could immediately reject the offending validator and adapt the network to prevent it,” he added.

Akinyele also highlighted several security endorsements received by XRP Ledger over the past two years, including a “Triple A” Skynet score from CertiK and audits from Web3 security firms Halborn and FYEO.

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



Source link

Tether, Circle to Meet South Korea’s Top Banking CEOs as Stablecoin Momentum Mounts – Decrypt

0
Tether, Circle to Meet South Korea’s Top Banking CEOs as Stablecoin Momentum Mounts – Decrypt



In brief

Executives from stablecoin issuers Circle and Tether are set to meet with top figures in some of South Korea’s biggest financial groups this week, according to reports in local media.
The discussions will reportedly revolve around the potential distribution and use of dollar-pegged stablecoins in South Korea, as well as the issuance of won-backed stablecoins.
South Korea’s ruling party and the opposition party have expressed differing opinions about how to regulate stablecoins.

Following reports that South Korea is preparing to launch a legal framework for stablecoins in October, top executives from some of the country’s biggest financial groups are set to meet with executives from stablecoin giants Tether and Circle Internet Group this week.

Tether issues USDT, while Circle issues USDC, the world’s two largest stablecoins by market capitalization.



According to Korean news agency Yonhap, the executives will discuss the potential distribution and use of dollar-pegged stablecoins in South Korea. The meetings will also cover the issuance of stablecoins backed by the country’s currency, the won.

The CEO of Shinhan Financial Group, Jin Ok-dong, and Hana Financial Group CEO Ham Young-joo are set to have separate meetings with Circle President Heath Tarbert on Friday. Ham is also reported to be meeting an unnamed official from Tether later on Friday.

Meanwhile, KB Financial Group’s Chief Digital & Information Technology Officer Lee Chang-kwon and Woori Bank President Jeong Jin-wan are also said to be planning a meeting with Circle’s President, though an official date has not yet been set.

Rajiv Sawhney, Head of International Portfolio Management at Wave Digital Assets International, thinks the development is an “interesting” one considering how South Korea’s regulators have treated crypto in the past.

“Regulators there have historically blocked foreign institutions from registering and operating in the region,” he told Decrypt. “It’s a very domestic market, and the exchanges there are only allowed to list spot products, not perpetuals or leverage trading.”

He points out that Upbit, the country’s largest exchange, is entirely Korean owned and operated, and its listings are primarily quoted against Korean won fiat.

South Korea and stablecoins

Despite the East Asian nation’s current President Lee Jae-myung being widely considered crypto-friendly, the appropriate legal frameworks have proved politically controversial in the country. Under his presidency, Bitcoin ETFs have headed toward legalization in the country, while crypto KYC and AML oversight has been ramped up.

The country’s ruling party and the opposition party have both expressed different opinions about how to regulate the area, with the opposition Democratic Party debating the use of interest-generating stablecoins and the enforcement of strict capital limitations.

Meanwhile, executives from Korea’s central bank have mulled linking its deposit tokens to a public blockchain, enabling them to “coexist” with stablecoins issued by the private sector.

But these issues haven’t stopped some Korean companies from already preparing to issue their own stablecoins, with South Korean internet conglomerate Kakao recently registering trademarks for a Korean won stablecoin.

Sawhney argued that a joint venture or partnership between Circle or Tether and one of the banks would allow them to “maintain their market share in the stablecoin space” versus South Korean fintech firms issuing their own won-based stablecoins.

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



Source link

Kanye West Launches Token on Solana in Frenzied Debut – Decrypt

0
Kanye West Launches Token on Solana in Frenzied Debut – Decrypt



In brief

YZY surged to a multibillion-dollar valuation within an hour of launch before tumbling.
The token is framed as part of a broader “YZY Money” payments ecosystem.
On-chain data shows 70% of supply sits in a single wallet, raising centralization concerns.

Hip-hop artist Kanye West has made his first direct move into crypto with YZY, a Solana-based token promoted late Wednesday night on his verified X account.

“A new economy, built on chain,” West’s account posted on the social media platform. A video of West confirming “the official Yeezy token” drop was released an hour later.

West has spoken about Bitcoin before and once sued to shut down the unauthorized “Coinye” token. YZY is the first coin he has formally launched under his own name and brand. Earlier in March, West pivoted to crypto and teased the possibility of dropping a meme coin.



Volatility for Yeezus

His announcement triggered a buying surge that quickly pushed the coin’s market capitalization to more than $3 billion less than an hour after it went live, before drastically dropping to less than $1 billion, according to on-chain data from Birdeye.

The token was quickly listed on platforms including CoinMarketCap and Bitget, with Poloniex announcing support shortly after. 

Trading volumes on Solana decentralized exchanges spiked, cementing YZY as one of the largest and most visible celebrity-linked coins to debut yet, eclipsing that of other launches such as TRUMP, MOTHER, and LIBRA.

While YZY is clocking a 375% rise over the last 24 hours, the token is down more than 34% in the past hour to $0.99, data shows.

“The rapid rise of $YZY to a roughly $3 billion market cap followed by a crash within hours shows how fragile celebrity-driven tokens can be,” Dan Dadybayo, research and strategy lead at Unstoppable Wallet, told Decrypt.

Framed as part of a broader “YZY Money” ecosystem, its website describes the token as part of “a new financial system, built on crypto rails,” with YZY positioned as the native cryptocurrency of a broader ecosystem.

The token’s launch purportedly has an anti-sniping mechanism, deploying 25 contract addresses with one chosen as official, with the aim of “putting power back into the hands of real traders,” its website FAQ section reads.

The website also describes YZY as more than a meme coin and goes on to describe Ye Pay, a proposed payment processor aimed at reducing merchant fees, and the YZY Card, pitched as a global spending tool for YZY and USDC.

The project claims the token would support loyalty programs, retail use, and peer-to-peer transfers, but no timeline or technical details were provided.

While the site disclosed the Solana contract address and liquidity pool, questions remain about governance, compliance, and whether these features will be delivered.West’s representatives under the Yeezy brand did not immediately return Decrypt’s request for comments on those aspects.

Bubblemaps data shows a single wallet controls about 70% of the token’s total one-billion supply, with public allocations reported at just 20% and the remainder vested under Yeezy Investments LLC, spurring concerns over centralization risks.

“While these wallets are spread across different addresses, they are almost certainly insider-affiliated, giving Kanye West and his team effective control of the token’s supply,” Dadybayo said.

Despite the initial surge in market capitalization, Dadybayo warned that the liquidity pool is thin, which could mean “even moderate sells can trigger cascading price drops.”

“Compared to earlier celebrity tokens like $JENNER, $MOTHER or $DADDY, $YZY is riskier due to its even more extreme centralization,” he added. “Those earlier projects saw 50–60% insider control and still ended in retail losses; here, the imbalance is greater.”

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



Source link

Winklevoss Twins Donate $21 Million in Bitcoin to Pro-Trump, Anti-Democrat Crypto PAC – Decrypt

0
Winklevoss Twins Donate  Million in Bitcoin to Pro-Trump, Anti-Democrat Crypto PAC – Decrypt



In brief

Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss donated over $21 million in Bitcoin to help launch the Digital Freedom Fund, a pro-crypto PAC.
Unlike most crypto PACs, which aim to stay nonpartisan, the twins explicitly said their PAC will work to support Republicans, defeat Democrats, and back Trump’s crypto agenda in the 2026 midterms.
The PAC’s goals include pushing for a lightly regulated crypto market structure bill, blocking a U.S. central bank digital currency (CBDC), and protecting software developers.

Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss announced Wednesday that they have donated over $21 million worth of Bitcoin to a new pro-crypto PAC—one they proudly unveiled will be principally focused on defeating Democrats and supporting Republicans in the 2026 midterms.

“We will identify and support champions of President Trump’s crypto agenda in primary races and the midterm elections,” Tyler Winklevoss said. “If the Republicans lose either the House or Senate in the midterms […] then Democrats will have power to slow down and interfere with President Trump’s agenda.”

The PAC, dubbed the Digital Freedom Fund, will be focused first and foremost on supporting President Donald Trump’s crypto agenda, the brothers said. To kick-start the initiative, they have donated 188.4547 BTC—a sum worth about $21.5 million at writing.

The openly partisan move from the Gemini co-founders is perhaps unsurprising in light of their enthusiastic endorsement of the president’s campaign in mid-2024, months before other industry leaders embraced the polarizing leader. 

But most other pro-crypto political spending groups have taken pains to, at the very least, appear nonpartisan. 

In 2024, top donors to Fairshake, the $300 million crypto super PAC behemoth, made what they at the time considered to be a difficult choice to endorse certain pro-crypto Democrats over reliably supportive Republican candidates, in the aim of not making crypto a partisan issue. 



Even now, as leaders of crypto’s most powerful companies lavish the Trump administration with praise and hobknob with the president’s advisors, they continue to publicly frame their lobbying efforts as decidedly politically agnostic.

The Winklevoss twins, however, are taking a different path into the 2026 midterms. 

They do maintain that their new political spending organ will be focused on crypto policy matters, including aiding the passage of a “skinny” crypto market structure bill that imposes few regulations on the sector, banning an American central bank digital currency, or CBDC, and legally enshrining protections for software developers.

But the brothers also explicitly stated Wednesday that they believe they can only achieve said goals by defeating Democrats in the upcoming midterms. 

“We know from their past behavior that they will resort to whatever bad faith tactics and tricks they can think of (e.g., bogus impeachments, lawfare, etc.) to try to derail the president,” Tyler Winklevoss said of the Democratic Party, should it regain control of either chamber of Congress next year. 

“We want the American Golden Age and we are ready to fight for it,” he continued. “And we don’t just want another year of it, we want three more years of it.”

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



Source link

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Concedes GPT-5 Was a Misfire, Bets on GPT-6 – Decrypt

0
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Concedes GPT-5 Was a Misfire, Bets on GPT-6 – Decrypt



In brief

Altman admits that OpenAI “screwed up” the GPT-5 rollout, after backlash over replacing user-favorite GPT-4o.
Users called GPT-5 colder and less supportive than previous models. OpenAI restored access to GPT-4o for paid users.
Altman said that GPT-6 must feel personal without exploiting users, but GPU shortages limit OpenAI’s pace.

After public backlash over GPT-5’s rollout, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman admitted the company “screwed up,” and said the fallout is already shaping the next version of ChatGPT.

At a private dinner with reporters in San Francisco, first reported by The Verge, Altman admitted that GPT-5’s launch upset many of ChatGPT’s hundreds of millions of users.

“I think we totally screwed up some things on the rollout,” he said.

The misstep centered on OpenAI’s decision to replace ChatGPT’s default “4o” model, which was widely praised for its warmth and conversational style, with GPT-5. User backlash on Reddit and X was swift, with some users threatening to cancel their ChatGPT subscriptions. Following the backlash, OpenAI pushed an update that restored 4o as an option for paying subscribers.



“I think we’ve learned a lesson about what it means to upgrade a product for hundreds of millions of people in one day,” Altman said, calling the reversal a wake-up call.

When users fall in love with their AI

One lesson from GPT-5’s launch is that people form emotional ties with AI, he noted. Some users described the new model as colder, more mechanical, and less supportive than its predecessor. After GPT-4o was deprecated, some Reddit users even said the upgrade “killed” their AI companions.

Despite the outcry on subreddits like r/MyBoyfriendisAI, r/AISoulmates, and r/AIRelationships, Altman estimated that fewer than 1% of ChatGPT users have “unhealthy relationships” with the bot but said the company is paying close attention.

“There are the people who actually felt like they had a relationship with ChatGPT,” Altman said. “Then there are hundreds of millions of others who didn’t but still got used to how it responded, validated them, and offered support.”

The challenge for GPT-6, Altman suggested, will be making the system feel personal without exploiting vulnerable users.

Building toward GPT-6

While GPT-5 is still rolling out, Altman said that OpenAI is already looking ahead, noting the timeline between GPT-5 and 6 would be much shorter than GPT-4 and 5. However, Altman said GPU capacity may impact that calculation.

“We have better models, and we just can’t offer them because we don’t have the capacity,” Altman admitted, citing a shortage of GPUs, the powerful chips needed to run large AI systems. To solve that, Altman said OpenAI would need to spend “trillions of dollars on data center construction in the not very distant future.”

Altman also used the dinner to sketch a broader future for OpenAI, including backing a brain-computer interface startup to rival Elon Musk’s Neuralink. He also floated the idea of joining the escalating bidding war for Google Chrome.

OpenAI is also collaborating with Jony Ive, Apple’s former design chief, on a still-secret AI device.

Despite GPT-5’s bumpy start, ChatGPT is bigger than ever. The app now reaches more than 700 million weekly users, quadrupling its audience from a year ago. However, Altman warned of an AI bubble forming in the industry.

“Are we in a phase where investors as a whole are overexcited about AI? My opinion is yes,” he said. “Is AI the most important thing to happen in a very long time? My opinion is also yes.”

Generally Intelligent Newsletter

A weekly AI journey narrated by Gen, a generative AI model.



Source link

Bitcoin ETFs Shed $645M This Week as Wall Street Retreats Ahead of Powell Speech – Decrypt

0
Bitcoin ETFs Shed 5M This Week as Wall Street Retreats Ahead of Powell Speech – Decrypt



In brief

Bitcoin ETFs recorded $645 million in outflows across two days, with Fidelity’s FBTC leading redemptions Tuesday at $246.9 million.
Analysts attributed the outflows to investors de-risking ahead of Fed Chair Powell’s Jackson Hole speech.
The selloff reverses a $4.7 billion inflow streak from mid-July to early August, though analysts characterize the movement as tactical positioning rather than institutional capitulation.

Bitcoin exchange-traded funds bled $645 million over two trading sessions as institutional investors pulled capital from crypto markets, a major reversal since the digital asset’s summer rally began stalling.

Bitcoin ETFs saw $121.7 million in outflows on Monday and $523.3 million on Tuesday according to Farside Investors data, while Ethereum funds mirrored the weakness with $196.6 million and $422.2 million withdrawn on the same days.

Fidelity’s FBTC led the exodus with $246.9 million in redemptions, while Grayscale’s GBTC shed $115.5 million and Bitwise’s BITB lost $86.8 million across the two-day period.

Investors derisking ahead of Powell speech

Illia Otychenko, lead analyst at CEX.IO, told Decrypt that spot Bitcoin ETFs are seeing outflows as investors “scale back risk ahead of the Jackson Hole meeting and Jerome Powell’s speech on Friday.”

The latest withdrawals break momentum from mid-July through early August, when Bitcoin ETFs saw $4.7 billion in inflows at roughly $135 million a day.



Otychenko attributed the selling to weak job growth combined with mixed inflation data that “left the Fed in a difficult spot, leaving the markets more uncertain about the path of future rate cuts.”

Net Taker Volume, which tracks whether buyers or sellers dominate exchange activity, plummeted to its “lowest point since December 2021,” indicating widespread selling pressure, he said.

The analyst noted that Bitcoin’s rallies since March have followed a weakening pattern, with “each breakout weaker, with smaller price moves and lighter trading volume.”

Dean Chen, analyst at Bitunix, shared similar sentiment, telling Decrypt the outflows stem from two main drivers: macro de-risking as “U.S. PPI came in hotter than expected” and issuer-level profit taking ahead of Powell’s Jackson Hole speech.

He noted that BlackRock’s IBIT recorded zero flow, which “tells us this is more tactical de-risking than broad institutional exit.”

Konstantin Anissimov, global CEO of Currency.com, also remarked to Decrypt the outflows represent “a broad de-risking move rather than a problem with any single ETF.”

He pointed out that redemptions shifted from BlackRock and ARK on Monday to Fidelity, Grayscale, and Bitwise the following day, showing “investors across the board are taking some chips off the table.”

Despite the substantial ETF outflows, Bitcoin’s price is down just 1.5% on the day according to CoinGecko data, which Anissimov attributed to buyers using “$32 billion in stablecoin cash sitting on exchanges” to absorb the selling.

He characterized institutional sentiment as “cautious right now, but not panicked,” calling the movement “short-term profit-taking” rather than a fundamental shift.

Markets now enter a critical waiting period as Powell’s address approaches, with institutional flows likely to remain volatile until monetary policy clarity emerges.

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



Source link

Wall Street Trade Groups Call for Rethink of Basel Crypto Standards – Decrypt

0
Wall Street Trade Groups Call for Rethink of Basel Crypto Standards – Decrypt



In brief

Eight trade groups have urged the Basel Committee to “temporarily pause” crypto standards set for January 2026.
The associations warn current capital requirements of up to 1,250% for crypto assets far exceed those for traditional investments like corporate bonds.
An industry expert told Decrypt the 2022 rules reflect outdated risk perceptions from the FTX crisis era rather than today’s more regulated environment.

Major financial industry associations are demanding that global banking regulators pause sweeping crypto rules they warn will effectively bar banks from the $2.8 trillion digital asset market.

Eight prominent trade groups, including the Global Financial Markets Association and the Institute of International Finance, sent a letter on Tuesday to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision demanding it “temporarily pause” implementation of crypto standards set to take effect in January 2026.

The coalition warns the rules’ “punitive capital treatments” will make crypto activities “uneconomical” for banks, forcing the sector to operate outside regulated financial institutions.



The Basel standards, while non-binding, are typically adopted by member countries and would determine whether major international banks can meaningfully compete in crypto markets.

Musheer Ahmed, founder of Hong Kong advisory firm Finstep Asia, told Decrypt that inconsistent global implementation poses challenges, warning “we risk fragmentation of services and two-tier adoption.”

The associations noted that policy approaches are “fundamentally different in 2025” compared to 2022 when policy frameworks were first laid out, warning that inconsistent implementation could “jeopardize the goal of establishing a minimum standard.”

Ahmed said the Basel rules reflect outdated risk perceptions, noting “the capital rules were brought in when a majority of players were not from TradFi/banking,” following major crashes like Luna/Terra and FTX. 

To that point, the groups warn that the rules risk a “bifurcated market structure” that pushes crypto outside the banking system, noting how bank involvement “promotes safety and soundness, client protections, and financial stability.”

Under the Basel framework, crypto faces higher capital requirements than traditional assets, with Bitcoin and Ethereum carrying 100% risk weights while many crypto assets face a punitive 1,250% penalty, far exceeding requirements for corporate bonds or equities. 

The associations also criticize exposure limits that cap banks’ “Group 2” crypto holdings at just 1% of Tier 1 capital.

The trade groups cite data showing BTC and ETH trading volumes of $10.6 billion and $6.4 billion, respectively, which dwarf the $192 million average for S&P 500 companies, yet face harsher regulatory treatment.

While the committee issued technical amendments in July 2024, refining certain aspects, the groups say these changes don’t address fundamental structural problems with the original 2022 framework.

With increased institutional participation, “the risk management would be more in line with traditional finance/banking,” Ahmed added.

Given these changes, he believes “it is prudent for the Basel committee to review and revise the capital rules accordingly.”

“Throughout the history of financial markets, innovation has always charted the way forward to a more robust and efficient financial sector,” the letter reads, saying banks shouldn’t be “unfairly restricted” from adopting distributed ledger technology.

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



Source link

Who Needs 280 Bitcoin Domain Names? Massive BTC Bundle Goes Up for Auction – Decrypt

0
Who Needs 280 Bitcoin Domain Names? Massive BTC Bundle Goes Up for Auction – Decrypt



In brief

Lloyds is hosting an auction for more than 280 Bitcoin-themed domain names, all in a single bundle.
Domains available include BitcoinWallets.com and BitcoinExchanges.com, among others.
The auction follows Lloyds’ $3 million sale of XBT.com.

A collection of more than 280 Bitcoin-themed domain names is up for auction via a single sale at Lloyds, the famed auction house announced on Tuesday. 

The collection includes dozens of geographical themed Bitcoin domains, like JapanBitcoin.com and AustraliaBitcoin.com, as well as more functional domains like BitcoinExchanges.com and BitcoinWallets.com.

Other notable (and/or amusing) names in the bunch include BitcoinforPizza.com, EmailBitcoin.com, BitcoinSpotETF.com, BitcoinSeedPhrase.com, TokenizedBitcoins.com, and BitcoinNetzwerk.com.

“This isn’t just a group of good domains,” Lloyds Auctions Chief Operations Officer Lee Hames said, in a statement. “It’s the architecture of Bitcoin’s internet presence. Whoever wins this auction won’t just own names, they’ll own the language of Bitcoin’s digital economy.”

The Australia-based auction house previously held an auction for XBT.com, an alternative ticker to BTC that is sometimes used for Bitcoin, selling it for more than $3 million on its own.



“After setting the benchmark with XBT.com, we’re now offering the infrastructure behind it, a full suite of digital assets that define the Bitcoin space online,” Hames added. 

Some domains in the lot were registered as early as 2010, shortly after Bitcoin’s emergence in 2009, leading Lloyds to speculate that the anonymous domain registrants may have been tied to the early Bitcoin developer community. 

In order to bid on the lots, users must be pre-approved by Lloyds. The firm began accepting payment in cryptocurrency as early as 2021, accepting Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other popular cryptocurrencies.

Lot estimates are not listed by Lloyds for the sale, though the firm calls the auction a “significant offering.” Other popular crypto domains, like BTC.com and ETH.com, have traded hands for more than $1 million in the past. 

A representative for Lloyds did not immediately respond to Decrypt’s request for comment or questions about lot estimates.

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



Source link

Popular Posts

My Favorites

India FemTech Market to Hit USD 5,518.58 Million (15.70% CAGR) by...

0
According to IMARC Group’s report titled “India FemTech Market Size, Share, Trends and Forecast by Type, Application, End Use, and Region, 2026-2034”,...